$1.3B in bond proposals to be discussed

$1.3B in bond proposals to be discussed


By Kevin Miller
BDN Staff

AUGUSTA, Maine — Lawmakers will begin hearings this week on more than $1.3 billion worth of bond proposals to fund everything from land conservation and home weatherization to repairs of college buildings and historic meetinghouses.

But with the country in the grips of a major recession and Mainers cutting their own budgets, legislators will have to carefully weigh how much debt voters will be willing to stomach when the bond proposals appear on the ballot.

“These are not normal times and we can’t treat this as just another bond package,” said Sen. Kevin Raye from Perry, who is the Senate Republican leader.

Leading the lengthy list of proposals is a borrowing package by Gov. John Baldacci’s administration that would spend $306 million of voter-approved bonds over the next three years. The largest chunk of that money — $67.5 million — would be earmarked for research and development grants as well as economic development, while $43.4 million would flow into environmental initiatives.

“We know we must make these investments,” Baldacci said in announcing his bond proposals last week. “Our economy depends on investing in our people, and giving them the tools they need to be successful.”

The Legislature’s Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee will kick off public hearings Tuesday morning on the governor’s and several other environment related bond proposals that include funding for the well-known Land for Maine’s Future program. Other bond proposals on the agenda Tuesday would put money into state parks, wastewater treatment and protection of “traditional hunting grounds.”

Baldacci’s proposal would replenish LMF’s now-empty coffers with $18 million for land conservation and $3 million for working waterfront preservation. The LMF program, which requires at least a dollar-for-dollar match by applicants, has helped protect nearly 500,000 acres during the past two decades.

Another bill, sponsored by Appropriations Committee co-chairman Sen. Bill Diamond, D-Cumberland, would allocate $87.5 million in bonds to LMF over the next four years. Two other bond measures propose $30 million and $40 million for LMF, each over two years.

Tom Abello, senior policy adviser with The Nature Conservancy, said LMF funding helps protect the working forests, farmlands and coastal areas that are key to Maine’s natural resource-based industries and tourism.

“If you look at the past four times the people of Maine have voted on LMF, it has been approved by more than 60 percent every time,” Abello said. “So I think people in Maine recognize that these are investments in our natural resources and even when the economy is down these are smart investments.”

In November 2007, voters approved $17 million in bonds for LMF; however, that money covered less than half of the applications received by the program’s board last year.

After last summer’s oil crisis, it’s no surprise that energy is a hot topic in the Legislature this session, and lawmakers are seeking tens of millions of dollars in bonds to attempt to address the issue in various ways.

Sen. Philip Bartlett, D-Gorham, wants to provide $50 million in low-interest loans for homeowners’ energy conservation projects. Rep. Jon Hinck, D-Portland, has proposed $15 million in bonds for low-interest loans for household or business weatherization projects, as well as $10 million to increase training opportunities for high-demand “green” jobs.

House Speaker Hannah Pingree, D-North Haven, is the sponsor of a separate $25 million bond proposal to encourage “sustainable, environmentally friendly housing.”

Other sizable or unusual bond proposals not part of Baldacci’s package include:

ä $200 million over four years for competitive grants for research, development and commercialization to stimulate economic growth and job creation. The bill — sponsored by Rep. Emily Cain, an Orono Democrat and co-chair of the Appropriations Committee — was a recommendation of a special legislative committee.

ä $25 million in competitive grants for cancer research and development.

ä $93.5 million for renovations at the state’s public colleges and universities.

ä $2.5 million to repair traditional meetinghouses.

If enacted, Baldacci’s investment package will go to voters in two rounds: $265.8 million on this November’s ballot and $40.4 million on the June 2010 ballot.

Raye said he supports bonds that will help stimulate the economy, such as for transportation, water and sewer infrastructure and higher education projects. But Raye said lawmakers need to be aware that Mainers are “very, very sensitive” to debt right now.

At the end of 2008, Maine’s actual and authorized tax-supported debt totaled nearly $920.7 million, according to the state treasurer’s office. Almost half of that amount — $453.3 million — stemmed from general obligation bonds.

Maine’s tax-supported debt was at $618 per capita at the end of 2008, compared to a national median of $889. Its tax-supported debt as a percentage of personal income was 1.9 percent compared to a national median of 2.6 percent.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

kmiller@bangordailynews.net

990-8250

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
14 comments on this item

Please join me in voting NO on every single one of these bonds...

RussHermon you have my vote. i guess they want to see if they can reach the 1,000,000,000.00 dollar mark on debt you ever wonder they dont put numbers up. i guess doesnt look quite so bad they do it. and i guess they want to get us above the average on borrowing that we can be more like the left coast

hermon

R&D in Maine has received a lot of promotion from Augusta; does anyone know if there have been any benefits to the residents of the state? Are we keeping our young people here because of our proactive R&D stance? It seems as though "not for profits" would benefit largely from R&D funding....

No more bonds,

More tax and spend Maine democrat proposals!!! There is no end to more Maine and federal taxes. What ever happened to proper "pay as you go", tax and interest free proposals? We don't see any reductions in those Maine senate and house member increases, either. They should be more than wiling to cancel them in this poor economy.

They need to do a better job explaing why the state needs this money. For example, wastewater treatment seems to be on every bond issue. Is there no end to this need? And what about R & D? I've heard about wood products, what else fits in with Maine's economy? Are there any proposals to cut spending on useless projects? Is there even an effort to identify where money could be conserved?

“Our economy depends on investing in our people, and giving them the tools they need to be successful.”

Perhaps the emphasis might be on offering "our people" the chance the EARN "the tools they need to be successful" There have been more than enough gifts to "the people" in this state. Some of us believe that it is still true that "our people" place far more value on something that they have earned than on something that big daddy has given them.

Zonc

russhermon you have my vote also. i don't think it's a democratic issue but it is legislators who are persuaded by the lobbyists who work for larger companies. i'd like to see a three year moratorium on any bonds and then re-assess

go to http://mainerdsurvey.org/resources.asp or google "evaluating Maine R&D. Check out the Maine Development Foundation or the Economic Growth Council. R&D bond money has a huge ROI in Maine. The legislature has mandated that R&D bonds' impact on Maine be rigorously documented.

Second, lobbyists who work for big companies are not supporters of these bond issues. If you know of any please name them. Big companies do not profit from LMF.

Zonc156, just shows that we can't be right about everything.

No bonds should ever be needed. Maine doesn't have a revenue issue, it has a spending issue. It's time "we the people" quit funding this insanity, and limit those who are "working for us".

To the legislators in Disgusta........STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING, What part of "STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING,STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING,STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING", do you not understand? Would it help you say that you are sucking us dry, the well is really low, we can't take it anymore, or your killing us? How many laws are you conjuring up this session? How much is it going to cost me? Why? Have you ever heard of fiscal restraint?..... I know, I know..... it's a stupid question..... OF COURSE YOU DON'T!

I hope that everyone votes "NO" on these bond issues, but the sad reality is once the scare tactics start the people always seem to vote for them.

If you think there is any common sense in Augusta then your sensless yourself. Remember, 37 million dollars spent to fix 12 miles of road on I 295. More than 1.3 million per mile. It was and is a disgusting display of abuse of power. No one can justify it and they don't even try. Wrote to the governor and got no response. Makes me sick.

If infrastructure construction was done right the first time and properly maintained, we would not see nearly as many bond issues. However, too many times the projects are not properly funded in the first place meaning a lot of short cuts were used to complete the project; then the annual maintenance needs were part of "budget cuts".

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.