Bill slows penalties for school districts rejected by partners
state house

Bill slows penalties for school districts rejected by partners


By Rich Hewitt
BDN Staff

AUGUSTA, Maine — A bill that would postpone penalties on schools that were “orphaned” when their towns voted for a school reorganization plan rejected by partner towns is making its way through the Legislature.

The bill, An Act to Provide Additional Time to Certain School Administrative Units to Comply with School Administration Union Reorganization Laws, would delay for one year the penalties assessed under the school consolidation law.

The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Stacey Fitts, R-Pittsfield, said Tuesday in a press release that he expects the Legislature will pass the bill.

“The bill essentially buys more time for school districts that tried to consolidate with other districts, but were rejected,” Fitts said.

Fitts noted that SAD 53, which serves Burnham, Detroit and Pittsfield and is in his House district, could lose $180,000 in state aid through the penalty, even though the district towns voted to consolidate with SAD 59. Although SAD 53 towns approved the proposed reorganization plan, voters in the four member towns of SAD 59 — Madison, Starks, Athens and Brighton Plantation — rejected the plan.

“But the way the law is written, SAD 53 now faces a big fine,” Fitts said. “It is profoundly wrong to penalize schools and taxpayers who tried to do the right thing. The law is flawed, and this bill will provide a remedy.”

Under the bill, “orphan districts” would receive an extension until July 1, 2010, to try again to consolidate with the same districts that rejected the plan or with different school districts. To qualify for the extension, the school district must have approved a reorganization plan at a referendum before Jan. 30.

The proposal is one of several bills before the Legislature that propose changes to the reorganization law, including some that have specifically targeted the penalties authorized in the law. For example, Rep. James Schatz, D-Blue Hill, has sponsored legislation that would delay penalties on all noncompliant schools for two years. Rep. Peter Edgecomb, R-Caribou, has sponsored a bill that would eliminate penalties for all nonconforming school districts.

Both of those bills, along with Fitts’ proposal, have been referred to the Legislature’s Joint Committee on Education and Cultural Affairs. Legislators also will consider the legislation based on a citizen’s petition that would repeal the consolidation law altogether.

Fitts’ press release cited the Maine Department of Education which identified communities in 16 other school districts around the state that are in the same position as SAD 53 and are facing fines for nonconformance even though their member towns approved a reorganization plan.

Fitts said he has plenty of support for his bill, which was drafted with the support of Education Commissioner Susan Gendron. Even before the Legislature convened in January, Gendron indicated she would support legislation that gave these “orphaned” schools a one-year break on penalties.

Fitts’ bill also has 45 co-sponsors, including Speaker of the House Hannah Pingree and Senate President Elizabeth Mitchell.

“There is a multitude of bipartisan support,” he said. “It’s hard to imagine a scenario under which this bill would fail.”

According to the DOE Web site, there are 146 school districts not in compliance with the law. The penalties those districts face under the law total $7,176,957. Also, http://forum.mdischools.net/, a Mount Desert Island Web site which regularly tracks consolidation developments and other education issues, calculates that there are 21 state senators and 45 state representatives who have schools in their legislative districts that are not in compliance and will face penalties.

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
8 comments on this item

at this point i think Agusta should put this whole issur to bed. Geographicly we are to large a state and north of augusta to sparcely populated for this to do anything but cripple towns and the taxpayers. the only way any of this would have saved money would have been a 4 day wk. and i've never seen anything come out o agusta yet that has saved the taxpayers a dime. should have kept the liqure business baldy, and i'm not looking forward to what you will have brainstormed with the stimulous money. STOP HOLDING THE TAXPAYERS HOSTAGE PLEASE!!!

I'm for not charging the towns who didn't play ball, took their ball and went home to tell their mommy, that the other kids are being fair, IF the state will now reimburse all the towns that made good faith efforts to work on consolidation.

Bit see, it doesn't make sense and it doesn't make sense to change the rules again because little Johnny knew what the law was and has now thrown a temper tantrum because he can't get his way again!

Stop using the poor, small town excuse being beat up by the big bad state.

These towns are spoiled brats playing when it suits them and running home when they can't get along with the rest of the kids.

I agree with fredrogers and the fact that we need to consolidate our schools. There are fewer students but more faculty and especially administration than years ago. There is an assistant to an assistant in administration. Positions that are created through grant money are kept in place when the grant money expires. You have superintendants presenting this to the community. Do you think they will paint a pretty picture to help eliminate their job?? Some of these superindendants' salaries are four to five times the salaries of the teachers they are in charge of. They ask for $7,000. raises and get them, but tell their staff that times are hard and they all need to make sacrifices. True story in a very small district in the St. John Valley.

Partynut maybe you learn how to spell "Augusta." Then people might take your comments seriously!

I think that is is beyond ridiculous to fine schools that cannot consolidate. Many of these schools are doing it out of choice, but some don't have other towns to consolidate with or the other districts rejected their plans. I think that asking such rural schools to band together with towns that have their schools 30 minutes away from each other is a far stretched cry. Of course there are some towns that it is easier for, those in the more densely populates parts of our state. But to take away money from the schools because they cannot or will not consolidate is ludicrous. That is going to have the opposite effect on our schools who are trying to educate children with ever decreasing budgets. “It is profoundly wrong to penalize schools and taxpayers who tried to do the right thing. The law is flawed, and this bill will provide a remedy.” Consolidation in my opinion, was a bad idea from the start. At least not make in mandatory, but those schools that have a realistic advantage to consolidate can, and those that don't, should not be fined for not doing so.

I know an orphaned school system because the neighboring districts have performing schools. Personally, I don’t blame them, because who would want to team up with a failing school system. Unfortunately, that leaves a failing school system alone to figure things out and there is much needed help, in my opinion. So does that mean they will be helped by this too?

I still wonder how consolidating really saves anyone any money, especially when salaries now have to be altered, and transportation becomes a bigger cost, as schools are closed etc.

I do know how to spell it just choose not to . not only does it lack a u it lacks the fore the people also down there, am so tired of everyone doing their own ajenda down there and in washington also. and i'm sorry u feel that small towns are quote spoiled brats, RSU'S could have been better served by just condolitating the administrative offices , and there are other areas of pork barrel in the system also.

consolidation should have happened years ago...why fund all these small towns with a handful of kids...it only makes sense that it has to save money...and they should fine them right away not delay it....this process has been going on for a couple years now...where have these idiots been...they knew the consequences...I come from a small town that lost its school a few years ago...best thing that could have happened....were still reaping the benefits...

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.