FERC sets timeline for LNG decision

FERC sets timeline for LNG decision


ROBBINSTON, Maine — The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission announced last week its schedule for issuing a final Environmental Impact Statement for Downeast LNG’s proposed import terminal.

The federal agency said that a “Notice of Availability of the Final EIS” will be issued Sept. 18 and the 90-day federal authorization decision deadline would be Dec. 17.

“Our project continues to move forward through the federal approval process,” Dean Girdis, Downeast LNG founder and president, said in a press release. “Receiving the FERC scheduling order is another significant milestone for us.”

Now that the schedule order has been issued, Girdis anticipates that a draft EIS will be issued in the next month or so. The public will have an opportunity to comment on the draft and a public meeting will be held in the area.

But Downeast LNG critics Save Passamaquoddy Bay say the company should not be so confident. The group is an alliance of citizens from the United States, the Passamaquoddy Tribe and Canada opposed to siting an LNG industrial facility in Passamaquoddy Bay, but not elsewhere in Washington County.

Spokesman Robert Godfrey said Monday the company is unlikely to succeed in its quest for several reasons.

“As we’ve seen previously, Quoddy Bay LNG was unable to satisfy that requirement, resulting in FERC throwing Quoddy Bay LNG out of the permitting process,” Godfrey said. “FERC’s latest questions indicate that Downeast LNG still hasn’t satisfied FERC.”

The Oklahoma-based Quoddy Bay LNG was the first LNG company to pursue FERC approval in Washington County. That project has since been placed on hold.

Downeast LNG project manager Rob Wyatt said Monday night, however, that his company was following FERC requirements as the review process unfolded.

“The recent FERC questions simply represent a requirement of evaluation of the facility that continues and will continue for quite a while,” Wyatt said.

Downeast LNG has proposed to locate, construct and operate a new LNG import terminal on about 47 acres in Robbinston, on Mill Cove near the confluence of Passamaquoddy Bay and the St. Croix River.

In January the U.S. Coast Guard issued a favorable Waterway Suitability Report for the Downeast LNG project, which will be included in the draft EIS, according to the company’s press release.

The release points out that the report states “the Passamaquoddy Bay Waterway is suitable for the type and frequency of marine traffic associated with this proposed project ... provided that all of the recommended risk mitigation measures ... are fully implemented by the applicant.’”

But Godfrey said the Coast Guard also “requires Downeast LNG to obtain Canada’s coordination — in essence, Canada’s approval — to transit into and through Passamaquoddy Bay. Prime Minister [Stephen] Harper stated, face-to-face, to [then] President [George W.] Bush that no LNG transits would be allowed into Passamaquoddy Bay. Simply put, Downeast LNG will not be receiving any LNG; therefore, FERC’s permitting decision is moot, and both FERC and Downeast LNG are powerless regarding this issue,” he said.

Wyatt disagreed.

“I am afraid Mr. Godfrey misunderstands the Coast Guard approval, and the Coast Guard approval speaks for itself as to what Downeast will be required to do,” he said.

The issuance of the draft EIS will be an important step in the process because it will offer a review of how the federal government views the engineering, environmental and socioeconomic details for the Downeast LNG project and will identify any issues that need to be addressed before final approval will be given, Girdis said.

“This is a long process, but we now have significant momentum behind us in terms of obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals,” Girdis added in the press release. “Given the state of the economy, the Downeast LNG project is more important than ever because it will provide Maine with an important new source of natural gas and bring good paying, much needed jobs to Washington County.”

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
21 comments on this item

Who exactly wants the new LNG terminal besides Gov. Baldaci and a few rich CEOs. Washington County will accept anything that pays a few bucks. It is being studied as an area with one of the highest cancer rates in the U.S. ...for that reason.

Everyone in Washington County wants LNG - in addition to Baldy and a few rich CEO's. A lot of other people who do not live in Washington County would like to see it go through as well- minus the hard core environmentalists. An LNG facility isn't going to make or break the Washington County plight, but it will help put a band-aid on the dead pulp and paper industry. I don't think that there is anything worthwhile that can be done for Washington County at this point. Many a good idea have failed. With the manufacturing economy a thing of the past, and environuts handcuffing the lobstering industry, I would move my family out as soon as possible. Unfortunately thousands of them are 3rd, 4th, or 5th generation mill workers or lobstermen and have 0 skills for a technology based economy. It will be interesting to see what Calais and Machias look like in 15 years- LNG or not.

Martha - do you suppose it is the vast amounts of granite in Washington County and the radon it produces could be one of the reasons the cancer rate is so high? We have known about this link for years.

Martha, if you are so worried , then all you have to do is move to a safer place, I am sure you will not be missed.

We might just as well let canada have the LNG's the Nuke plants . That what Baldy wants, then we can buy ours power from them. That way canada can control the state. Lot of our pulp mills are own by canada, you can see whats happening their, has anyone heard of mills shutting down in canada? I think Baldy is getting way to friendly with canada and Irving.

MOST OF THE SAVE THE PASSAMAQUODDY BAY PEOPLE ARE RICH AND OF COURSE THEY DO WANT ANYTHING COMING TO ANY WASHINGTON COUNTY TOWNS, THEY ARE ALL SET IN LIFE WHILE THE REST OF US HAVE TO SUFFER WITH NOTHING, HIGH TIME SAVE THE PASSAMAQUODDY BAY PEOPLE MOVE OUT OF TOWN, THESE TOWNS ARE TOO POOR FOR YOU AND YOUR BUSINESSES, LIKE THE BUSINESSES YOU HAVE IN EASTPORT, NOBODY CAN AFFORD TO SHOP IN THOSE STORES, COME ON CLOSE YOUR STORES AND GET THE HECK OUT OF TOWN....AND AS FOR DOWNEAST LNG GO FOR IT I HOPE IT ALL WORKS OUT FOR YOU, TIMES ARE REALLY HARD AND WE NEED ALL THE JOBS WE CAN GET...GOOD LUCK

AS FOR OUR CANANDIAN NEIGHBORS, YOU ALL HAVE MORE LNG FACILITIES THAN I THINK THE US DOES, BUT MAYBE NOT, BUT I KNOW THEY ARE CLOSE TO CALAIS NOW. STOP YOUR OWN LNG TERMINALS AND LEAVE THE US ALONE

Oil is a thing of the past. It is a limited resource. People who care about the future of Washington County need to be planning for the future instead of getting stuck in the past. You need to be thinking about renewable resources.

What we need to do is Tax the SAVE THE PASSAMAQUODDY BAY PEOPLE to the full extent of the law if they think their product is worth what they sell it for then they should be taxed for what they say it is worth

If in my wildest dreams, all three LNG plants are built. It will only provide about 150 full time jobs with benefits. Better than nothing, and might be a lure to some small manufacturing companies that might be lured by the availability of LNG.

We in Washington County are on the fast track to oblivion. The loss of the paper mill is removing 300 high paying jobs at the mill, along with another 85 jobs in Eastport, not to mention all the truckers on both sides of the border that relied on the mill being in operation and the wood lot owners that will have a harder time marketing their wood.

Every year the graduating classes from the local high schools gets smaller. Most of the graduates have to leave Washington County in order to make a living. Of those that remain, an alarming number turn to drugs.

For those people opposed to the building of LNG plants I have a question. What is your plan to save the people of Washington County? Tourism? That would be 2 months of the year, no benefits and minimum wage. How do you propose those that do that live for the other 10 months?

Don't you get it yet most of the people opposed are originally from another State and want us useless 3rd,4th, and 5th Mill workers and Lobstermen to move to hell out so, they can take over land that in some cases have been in families for a couple hundred years, put up a beautiful shore front home and have a unoccupied forest to the north of them all the way to northern tip of Maine.

Maybe they would put up a Heritage Museum in Eastport to show how us stupid Mill workers and Lobster men survived here during that time.

Guess they forgot about the stupid Lumber men and truck drivers, but I guess they don't even qualify for a mention.

Well guess what FLATLANDERS my family on my mothers side was here in the county to tell the British to go to hell in 1776 and my fathers family was here during the occupation of 1812 and my family will be here after you are gone.

If you don't like us here in Washington County move back to where you came from, I for one never asked you to come up here to save us, we see what a great job you have done with your own home Counties and States!

Sorry forgot generation after "5th" but what do you expect from a non-technical Mill Worker. Good thing it doesn't take technology to operate the mill or Navigate on the ocean.

So Bob GODfrey has all the answers on LNG? I wish Bob would move to Canada where he belongs. We need these jobs and taxbase in Calais and Robinston now. Heck Bob GODfrey probabley likes the idea of the mill closing as well. Baldacci should , instead of supporting the importation of energy from Canada, be telling Canada that we will be recieving LNG through head harbor passage and thats that. Just think of all the jobs LNG power plants could bring to the area. I cant believe Baldacci is supporting Canada's energy corridor, he allready screwed washington county on the cassino idea. Did Canada care about our safety when they built the nuke plant ? Its about time our elected officials start looking out for thier constituants. We need LNG now people. Maybe we should close the valve on the LNG pipeline in Baileyville, until Canada comes around to our way of thinking. I did'nt hear Canada whining about the pipeline when they built it, ohh thats right they sell thier LNG to the US through it. One other option to get LNG to the US would be to remove the bridge from Lubec to Campobello Island and dredge that area now theres an idea I really like, problem solved !!!!

Good ol' Bob....can't seem to keep his mouth shut. I would like to ask him what grandiose ideas he has for this area. Well Bob? He seems adamantly opposed to the LNG and will go down fighting tooth and nail until the LNG facilities are built or are not built here. Then what will dear ol' Bob do? Perhaps him and his wife Linda will leave because they certaintly wouldn't want to live in Easport is there was an LNG facility in Robbinston. Do they ever wonder about the plant in St John, NB - what if there is a explosion there...I think that dear ol' Bob might be nervous about that one. Or Point Lepreau - across the bay from Eastport. We need industry in the are and from that whether it be LNG, Wind Turbine projects - jobs will come. Tourism isn't the end all cure all for WA CO.

Ever notice that those who just love anything that will harm the environment and make money for a few try to threaten and minimize. Losers.

Ever notice that those who can't stand the sight people making a decent living will kill any chance of those people getting ahead? Who will pickup your trash for you when there are no poor people left to dengrate in Washington county? You can't ecpect those on welfare to do it for you, or those clients from the Methadone clinic. Wake up and look at each graduating class from the high schools. See how many have to leave in order to make a living. Or is that your plan for a healthy environment. Enjoy your rides to Bangor to do your shopping.

Trash collectors make pretty good money. That's why they do it.

Why isn''t it clear to most by now that fossil fuels are not the answer for jobs or for energy; never have been and never will be. The use of fossil fuels to industrialize the world is one of humanities biggest boondogles. All it has created is supreme wealth for a few; past, current, and future wars; poison and death for the innocent; and the near if not irreversible destruction of the earths atmosphere. Washington County is a pristine, treasured, and natural resource. We must harness through wind, water, and sun the wealth and health that these natural resources can provide and that we happen to possess in abundance. LNG's are being rejected all over the world for more than just the couple of obvious reasons I have stated here. It has become clear planet wide that natural, clean, sustainable, and safe sources of energy are the only alternative. Of course the big oil barons and their ilk don't like that answer. They would prefer to continue to build their empires however and whereever they can. Let us not consider allowing them to do so here at the detriment of our most precious gifts: our people, our water, and our land. Let us implement solar, tidal, and wind resources to fuel our consumption of energy and at the same time our economy.

Seems fossil fuels have run this country of over 100 years.Maybe if we had trilliions of Kites with keys hanging off them we might have had plenty of electricity do you think tomthompson_1.

If it was not for subsudies, wind power actually never recovers the actual cost of construction, etc... And the only areas in Maine that can provide addiquate wind is offshore, and even then there is question as to the ability of the grid to take on this power. Tidal is consistant, but you will get as much pushback on that as the LNG folks are, as setting up tidal dams restricts both fish and boaters from having access to areas they have had, and thus you are opening up a whole other can of worms. That being said, I think tidal would be the best situation, but don't see it happening. And solar.. Have you looked out your window today... or yesterday... or the day before! We don't have sufficient sun. LNG is only a bandaid to get us from now until the point we do have the alternatives. So for the next 15 years or so, we still are using an abundence of fossil fuels, like it or not.

Oil is a thing of the past. Plan your future with renewable energy.

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.