State’s migratory fish plan gets mixed reviews
wildlife

State’s migratory fish plan gets mixed reviews


By Diana Bowley
BDN Staff

DOVER-FOXCROFT, Maine — The state’s $24 million operational plan to restore diadromous fish — those that migrate between fresh and salt waters — to the Penobscot River and guide their management received mixed reviews at a public hearing Thursday.

Area residents who spoke said they were opposed to the plan, which they fear will allow free range of invasive species such a pike. Since pike have been confirmed in an outlet stream at Pushaw Pond and the plan calls for a bypass in Howland, the residents said they fear pike will enter the Piscataquis watershed and disturb the region’s delicate cold-water fisheries.

Ray Campbell Jr. of Millinocket, president of the Fin and Feather Club of Maine, asked how the state and federal governments could ignore an executive order signed by former President Clinton that makes it illegal to stock or allow the passage of invasive species such as pike.

“There’s also a state law against it, yet here we see our state and bureaucrats bypassing the law — same thing with the feds, bypassing law — that’s wrong,” Campbell said at the hearing, which was held by the Maine Department of Marine Resources.

Greenville resident Eric Ward said the region could not afford to lose any more resources. “We’re the last bastion for brook trout in the East Coast and every year we lose more and more water, and just the slight chance of any pike getting into this area is a bad deal,” he said.

Other speakers, who came from as far away as Norridgewock and Eddington, praised the plan because it would provide better fishing and economic opportunities. Some spoke of the benefits they’d seen from a similar restoration project in the Kennebec River.

“One reason that I am excited about the prospect of setting some things right with the Penobscot River is because I’ve seen such amazing promise as the Kennebec River restoration progresses,” Kathy Scott of Mercer said. While she was concerned about the presence of invasive species, Scott said she believed those concerns were being addressed through the plan.

The approximately 50 people who attended the hearing were told that the “objective-driven plan,” drafted by the Departments of Marine Resources and Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, involves the restoration of alewives, the American eel, American shad, sea lamprey and blueback herring, among other fish, into the Penobscot River.

The state plan is a companion to the Penobscot River Restoration Trust project, which wants to restore 11 species of sea-run fish to the Penobscot River, according to Patrick Keliher of the DMR. That effort is a collaboration among a hydropower company, the Penobscot Indian Nation, conservation groups and state and federal agencies.

Keliher said if the state plan is approved by the Atlantic Salmon Commission in June, it will be implemented with or without the trust’s project. There are fishways in place within the system now to allow the state to gain access, he said.

Keliher said the blockage at Enfield Dam to deal with pike would remain in place until the risk management on that watershed has been completed. Stocking in ponds in that area would wait until that has been addressed, he said.

As for Cedar, East Branch and Endless Lakes, which flow into the Piscataquis above the Howland dam, Keliher said if the risk assessment is adopted, a bypass would be installed around the Howland dam when funding becomes available and after discussions are held with stakeholders.

That, said Paul Johnson, a retired Moosehead Lake fisheries biologist, would allow fish passage for all species at Howland.

Keliher said that before the state stocks alewives into the plan’s identified waters, additional meetings with stakeholders will be held. That would include fishermen, camp owners and others interested in the project.

“There is a process that we’re going to go through,” Keliher said. “I don’t want anybody here to think we’re just going to show up one afternoon with a truck and start stocking alewives. That’s not how we do it.”

Laura Rose Day, executive director of the Penobscot River Restoration Trust, reminded the audience that the state’s commitment to restore sea-run fisheries has been in place for decades. Many people have told the trust that its plans to remove dams and be involved in the sea-run fisheries don’t go far enough, she said. Day urged the state to make its next round of decisions based on information rather than worst-case scenarios.

Johnson, who said the risk assessment and the state plan — minus the pike provisions — were good, strongly suggested that the Howland barrier be maintained for at least 10 years and that the effort to remove pike from Pushaw Pond and the Penobscot River continue.

“There have been a number of foibles as a result of the best science available at the time,” Johnson said. For example, he cited the introduction of mysis shrimp in Moosehead Lake. It was state-of-the-art in 1975, but the department was sharply criticized for it in 1990. “Any mistake that’s made now is forever,” he said.

dianabdn@myfairpoint.net

876-4579

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
9 comments on this item

24 million for fish and they cut the state employees pay by 5%???? What's wrong with these people? To hell with the fish. Let's help people have a better life.

Mine is an opinion that has changed - but sincere.

I now believe the few people who will be left in Maine working deserve every edge they can get and hydro power is one of them.

We 'all' tried the Atlantic Salmon thing-- Big Brother shut that down.

Okay -so enough RESTORE already: Big Dams--: on the Colorado behind 'THE' dam is world class striper fishing albeit landlocked.

Hydro power / drill offshore / cut trees / enough looking back to what was -it is about what will be --or not.

Take down the dams!!! How can a natural flowing river scare all these big strong men? If we open the river, nature will do the rest. Pike may be wiped out once the anadromous fish return, they would love to eat a few Pike eggs and fry. Once the fishery returns it will bring more jobs than a few dams could ever bring.

No one ever did a study when they built the these dams. I've read stories that dead and dieing fish chooked the river after the dams went up, trying to go up stream to spawn. Let's stop the madness. Take down the dams....

Let the anadromous fish eat the eggs and wipe out the pike, now that's quaint! Exactly what anadromous fish would you think would eat pike eggs?Frankly, if you are as uninformed as your comments indicate, please do a little homework before posting such stupidity.

About homework on salmon, trout, and pike? For millenia these 3 species have lived in the same watersheds all over western Europe. Everybody posting here has a computer, just do your research on-line, it's easy.

Obsolete dams are obsolete dams, and re-building them won't create any where near the number of long-term local jobs that could be had if a robust anadromous fishery re-develops on Maine's major rivers. We've already nearly killed our rivers once, now it's time we took a different approach because the very survival of our species depends on the health of the other species with which we share this watery world. Although too many of us believe differently, we humans are only a small piece of the planet's bio-sphere. Time to wake from our collective dream that we're all-important. That dream is killing us as I write this.......The reason so many of us aren't "working" has too much to do with the idea that we all should be living in McMansions on land that was once farmland, and driving SUVs to work 30 or 50 miles away, all of which is based on shaky credit, not real wealth. The economy is crashing because it's built on greed.....Time for change...."Yes, we can"

And, by-the-way, it's not only "the rich man's salmon" that benefit from dams being removed where appropriate...shad, alewife, eels, Striped bass, sturgeon, smelt, White perch, all of which once provided many humans with good jobs, may all again ascend Maine's rivers, which once were one of the state's best assets......."Yes, we can"....

ROELM62,

Yours are the indocrinated ramblings of a 7th year undergraduate. The reason you're not working is either, a) you can't get out of bed before noon; b) the trust fund makes it possible to live your dream as a full time student/protester/activist or c) you can't pass the drug test.

"Yes, we can" is for dopes.

"We've already nearly killed our rivers once"......what? How and when was this? All rivers in Maine are cleaner now than they have ever been. 100 years ago the rivers had more dams and the water clarity was no match for what it is today. The high seas fisheries claimed our Atlantic Salmon runs in the 1970's when technology allowed fishermen from other countries to dial in exactly where the salmon wintering grounds were and clean them nearly completely out. This gave the feds an opportunity to ignore the fact and blame the problem on Maine river pollution, dams, illegal fishing in Maine, loss of habitat, and forestry operations. To top it off, each river was genetically segregated by genetics for each rivers salmon (crazy.). The feds took what few fish were returning and broke them all down into several parts so they had even fewer to work with. These numbers were then submitted to the National Marine Fisheries Service, The Federal Government, The Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission, and every Environmental Group in the nation that was well funded. This was done to ensure plenty of backing and support that would enable the Atlantic Salmon to be listed on the endangered species list. Why? Money. We have plenty of fish to work with but because of the creation of the distinct population segment regarding salmon the feds created a program out of thin air that would ensure them federal dollars for years with no success. In the meantime, the rivers are being studied to death in every possible form to try and discover why there are no salmon left. Fact.

ROELM62 wrote-"Although too many of us believe differently, we humans are only a small piece of the planet's bio-sphere. Time to wake from our collective dream that we're all-important." Change we can believe in, indeed! mattcarbone hit the nail on the head, although he could have offered another choice, d. All of the above!

Good Morning,

First, name calling never moved any important issue to meaningful resolution. If "Yes we can," is for dopes, perhaps mattcarbone would find more comfort in staying in bed all day because he believes, "No we can't." In either case he'd probably be right. Second, we nearly killed our rivers (and lakes), with which outdoorman agrees, in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Happily, water quality and many other conditions have improved (including many now free-flowing, once dam-impounded river sections)....I see this progress as a major achievement of cooperation between the grass-roots, not-for-profits, and government agencies. On many fronts we have moved forward, on others we maintain the staus quo. I believe that, if we work together, we have a better chance of moving forward, rather than remaining stuck in our own name-calling attack muck.

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.