UMaine System panel gives early advice
task force

UMaine System panel gives early advice


Recommendations include moving chancellor’s office from Bangor to Augusta
By Jessica Bloch
BDN Staff

BANGOR, Maine — The work of a task force looking into the future structure of the University of Maine System ratcheted up last week when three of the group’s subcommittees presented preliminary recommendations and heard tough talk from consultants.

The “New Challenges, New Directions” task force report presented preliminary recommendations in a May 20 meeting, a sign the group is beginning the process of putting together their final report, which is expected to be released in early July.

Task force members were reminded of their critical role Wednesday when a consultant told them their findings and recommendations — the acceptance or rejection of which will be decided by the UMS board of trustees — could shape public perception of the system.

Aims McGuinness, a senior associate for the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, which is based in Boulder, Colo., said the task force is facing a challenge.

“I think the credibility of the University of Maine System is on the line here with the public,” said McGuinness, who was an executive assistant to the UMS chancellor in the early 1970s. “There should be no doubt that this system needs a public agenda, and [the system] has to have a capacity to align that agenda with your finance policy and your accountability policy, and to sustain it over a period of time.”

McGuinness and Dennis Jones, president of the national center, both met with the task force, which grew out of Chancellor Richard L. Pattenaude’s “New Challenges, New Direction: Achieving Long-Term Financial Sustainability” proposal.

The proposal seeks to deal with an estimated $42.8 million systemwide shortfall in the next four years.

Chancellor’s office changes

Pattenaude charged the “New Challenges, New Directions” task force with examining one of the proposal’s three arenas, “Structure and Governance,” which has to do with the system’s organizational and financial operation.

The other two arenas are “Administrative, Student and Financial Services,” and “Academic Programs and Services.” The “New Challenges, New Directions” task force, chaired by former Central Maine Power Co. president and UMS board of trustees chairman David Flanagan, is charged with addressing Arena Three.

A former president of the University of Southern Maine, Pattenaude knows the outcome of the task force could change his job description or even do away with his position, depending on what the task force recommends and what the trustees adopt. Pattenaude has been chancellor since July 2007.

“Personally, if that would be the best thing for the state of Maine, I’m OK with that,” Pattenaude said in an interview early last week. “This is not about job protection. This is about trying to create the best higher education system for Maine. I understood that was a risk when we began this process. But if you believe in higher education and want to build the system, you have to look at all options.”

A weak or eliminated chancellor’s office doesn’t seem to be the direction in which the task force is moving, however, based on preliminary recommendations.

Among those recommendations, according to a report presented by one of the task force’s three subcommittees, is a “strong, independent Chancellor with the authority to manage the direction and resources of the system and its seven universities.”

That subcommittee also recommended the chancellor’s office be based in Augusta, rather than its location on Central Street in Bangor, so the chancellor can focus on the system’s relationship with the Legislature and governor and implementing a public policy agenda for higher education.

McGuinness endorsed that idea.

“The leadership of this system needs to be seen in a balanced way dealing with all regions and parts of the state,” he said. “Being housed in downtown Bangor is just about as deadly as being housed in downtown Portland. … You need to be in Augusta essentially because it is a place responsible for looking at all parts of Maine.”

Staffing for the chancellor’s office, the committee recommended, should be reviewed and reconfigured to align with the office’s role, and funding should be based on state appropriations, not funds from the system’s seven campuses.

Another subcommittee also endorsed a move for the chancellor’s office to Augusta.

Academic changes

That subcommittee also recommended a common academic calendar and a unified general education curriculum across the campuses.

That would remedy comments the task force heard during public forums about the difficulties of students transferring between campuses and of different academic calendars that make it difficult to coordinate some activities.

Other recommendations included the re-establishment of associate degree programs, a study of state educational needs to both develop a public agenda and also examine low-enrollment classes and programs on all academic levels, the strengthening of summer programs and a faculty exchange between campuses.

The third subcommittee looking into finances presented a report but did not offer preliminary recommendations.

Layoffs?

While the Arena Three task force is seeking to address strategic planning for what Pattenaude hopes will be years to come, the looming fiscal year 2010, which begins July 1, is of immediate concern.

Around the system, officials are expecting layoffs as the campuses seek to balance their budgets. The flagship UMaine campus in Orono announced recently it will make cuts that will affect 140 positions, including 32 layoffs.

Layoff numbers could grow or shrink depending on the status of the economy and the system’s investments, the state appropriation in the upcoming year, fall enrollment numbers, and how the task force’s recommendations are implemented.

“Layoffs are always the last thing you do, …” Pattenaude said. “We’ll just have to wait to see how the budget plays out. [There are] lots of variables.”

In the past 18 months, Pattenaude said, the system office budget has been cut by $1 million through layoffs and cuts in outlays for memberships, travel, equipment, program money and consultants. The system office will not take stimulus funds, he added.

Four positions were eliminated in the central office, including a receptionist’s position and the department of external affairs and the position of director of external affairs, held by longtime UMS employee John Diamond, a former House majority leader and the chairman of the Bangor Region Chamber of Commerce board of directors.

“We have been doing your basic shrinking, turning over every stone, looking at saving dollars, making some very difficult decisions such as external affairs,” Pattenaude said.

Pattenaude said central office staffers are chipping in to fill the holes, with a rotating schedule of staffers who sit at the reception desk, doing their own work while answering the phones.

Pattenaude has not had a raise on his $220,000 salary since 2007 and other senior salaries also have held steady. Some senior staffers, including Pattenaude, also worked days without pay this year to try to ease the immediate budget crunch.

These issues are nothing new for any institution, Pattenaude said, and they’re happening nationwide, with some public systems in much worse condition. The volatility of the current situation is, however, unprecedented in Pattenaude’s experience.

“Compared to any time since I’ve been here, month to month [the changes] are more volatile,” Pattenaude said. “Whether it’s investment income, state revenues, people deciding to go to college, people choosing to go part-time instead of full-time, these are all impacted by the economy. It has a ripple effect.”

jbloch@bangordailynews.net

990-8287

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
11 comments on this item

Until the University of Maine System seriously considers closing some campuses.......this is all a waste of time and money.

What a weak direction for an analysis to take. Instead of offering real choices for change, that push the status quo, the group of consultants from Boulder, CO isn't recommending any real change at all. That must have been one of the requirements for landing the consulting job: do NOT recommend any REAL change. Or you don't get paid because we're broke. This is just another example of what little use "experts" are when you recognize your own problems: none.

We will be able to judge the sincerity of the Department of Education in making rational and prudent budget cut decisions when we are able to view their proposals and see that the Maine Maritime Academy has been fully scrutinized and appropriate and sizable cuts have been initiated to their lavish state subsidizations. Acquiring $1,600,000 mansions for their president from the 2007 enacted bond fund and to maintain a $multi-million dollar alumni center for a student body of 800 is beyond comprehension. Aggressively recruiting out-of-state students which currently make up 1/2 of the student body that leave immediately after graduation is not in the interest of Maine taxpayers nor Maine youth which are seeing tuition increases and facility budget cuts. A small college the size of a junior high school doesn't need their own Augusta lobbyist on their payroll.

220,000? This is your salary and your complaining about the budget??? Maybe you ought to sell some of the cars the university system owns and that I see siiting idle in the parking garage in downtown Bangor! Give me a break!

Boy - doesn't sound like this group came up with much, other than some tiny agenda titles. The only concrete recommendations I just read about involve moving people to Augusta and either buying or renting more office space.. Doesn't sound like much of a cost saver. Also, I don't think UMaine should worry about offering more Associates degree programs - there are already a million ways to get one, and they don't do much to help someone get a job.

Don't most of us know, deep down, that there is something inherently wrong with higher education being controlled by the government? Well, the University of Maine System is. It served an important role 100 years ago by providing higher education in areas where none existed. Times and needs have changed. The smaller campuses (Augusta, Fort Kent, Machias) should be privatized (sold). There is too much temptation for government to try to control the agenda through control of the purse strings.

more than a few people would argue that:

1. we are a too poor state to support the luxury of a System's Office

2. many of the functions of that office could reasonably be reallocated and reassigned to the two largest campuses of UMS - Orono and USM

3. we do not have the student population numbers to support a System's Office

and on a related note:

more than a few would argue that we are a too poor state to support the number of campuses that we have...when two semesters now in a row UMFK has seen double digit declines in its enrollment and has only 42 faculty, one has to wonder the rationale of financially maintaining that campus on the heels of budget cuts after budget cuts throughout the System including big ones at UMaine.

David889327 Why not privatize UMO or USM? There's lots more money to be earned from them than from the smaller institutions. Obviously your grasp of economics is as good as that of history (UMS didn't exist 100 years ago).

BrianMurphy: Re: #2: So, add non-revenue generating positions to already top-heavy institutions? #3: You need to demonstrate the validity of your statement with some reliable data. Also, why not work to attract Mainers back to our system rather than going elsewhere?

As for your comment about UMFK: obviously you seem to have little knowledge of that campus. It is the most efficiently run campus in UMS which is supported by numerous the facts and figures. While the past year has been less than stellar, UMFK has been one of the only campuses to experience consistent growth -- even when some of the others expereienced decline. UMFK has made the Princeton Review for several years running -- no other campus in the system has done so, and it has also been listed in US News & World Reports as a good school to attend. "That campus" has one of the best Nursing programs in the state and provides more bargain on a four-year degree than any other institition in the system. Indeed, if you want to solve UMS budgetary issues -- look to UMFK as a model. If all institutions ran with the finesse that it does, then we wouldn't be having these conversations.

Moving the chancellor’s office away further away from the UMaine campus to Augusta in the hopes of lobbying the state house for an ever expanding subsidy is a devious move that will continually hurt tax payers. The 2 biggest problems with their budget are the unending borrowing through bonding and the extremely high wages of some of their employees. Pattenaude makes 220,000/year!

DamonGraf: The Chancellor's primary job, aside from managing the System, is to lobby for higher education. Therefore, doesn't it make sense to have the Chancellor located where the politicians are? As for borrowing through bonds, in many cases, with seriously ageing infrastructure on many campuses, the bonds barely cover the cost of repair. As for the wages of the employees: do you mean administrative, professional, or professorial? Each of these areas costs differently, based on each group's primary functions.

Additionally, readers should remember that Maine is amongst the lowest paying states in New England, and one of the lowest wage states in the country as a whole (43rd per US Department of Labor (see http://www.bls.gov/ro1/meqcew.htm). While higher education is a frequent and popular target of politicians and pundits, the future of the nation will be based on educating thoughtful, conscientious, and competent employees in a wide variety of fields. Both Maine and the nation should consider higher education's value in improving people's lives when considering fiscal priorities, even in the worst of times.

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.