Salmon protection extended to three Maine rivers

Salmon protection extended to three Maine rivers


By Kevin Miller
BDN Staff
BANGOR DAILY NEWS GRAPHIC BY ERIC ZELZ

AUGUSTA, Maine — Federal officials announced Monday that they plan to add Atlantic salmon populations in the Penobscot, Kennebec and Androscoggin rivers to the Endangered Species List.

The decision significantly expands the previous “endangered” designation for Gulf of Maine salmon to include much of the watersheds of the state’s three largest and most heavily industrialized rivers. Salmon reared at two federal fish hatcheries also will be protected beginning next month.

Salmon from eight smaller Maine rivers and the lower stretches of the Penobscot and Kennebec have been listed as endangered since 2000.

Additionally, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration plan to designate 12,000 miles of river, stream and estuary habitat and 300 square miles of lake habitat in Maine as critical habitat for salmon. Such a designation means any projects within that area receiving federal permits or federal money must undergo additional oversight.

The designation is not expected to affect recreational fishing for other species within the watersheds, federal officials said.

Although widely expected, the endangered decision was nonetheless denounced by Maine’s congressional delegation, which worried the announcement could diminish the spirit of cooperation among parties. Gov. John Baldacci, who had been pushing for a less-restrictive designation of “threatened,” said the state will explore all options, including legal action.

“This federal action ignores Maine’s strong track record in species management and our need for a flexible approach which will enable us to use all our tools to work with stakeholders to manage Atlantic salmon,” Baldacci said in a statement. “The extreme approach chosen by the federal government hamstrings the state’s ability to use creative conservation efforts that have been successful in the past.”

Federal officials acknowledged Monday that the designation will affect hydropower facilities, development and other industries located throughout the three watersheds. But they pledged to work with the state and businesses to minimize those impacts.

In some cases, dams will need new or improved fish ladders or lifts to allow the salmon to pass upstream unharmed. Some dams will likely have to apply for “incidental take permits” to protect them from legal action if salmon are trapped or harmed.

Current conservation efforts, including an unprecedented $50 million project under way to remove two Penobscot River dams and bypass a third, were taken into consideration. But federal officials believe more protections are needed.

“Our goal and our responsibility under the law is to help the Atlantic salmon recover from the brink of extinction,” Marvin Moriarty, acting deputy director for the USFWS, said during a conference call with reporters. “The state of Maine is a long-term partner of ours, and we will continue to work with them closely.”

Moriarty said recreational fishing for other species in the Penobscot and its tributaries should not be affected unless the agencies start to see those fisheries affecting salmon.

The state can receive a permit to shield recreational anglers — such as those vying for smallmouth bass in the Penobscot — from any penalties should they accidentally hook a salmon.

The days of catch-and-release fishing for sea-run salmon on the Penobscot are likely gone, however. Maine officials abruptly canceled a monthlong spring season near Bangor due to the impending decision.

“I think closing that door is not a wise choice for the federal agencies given the fact that anglers have done so much for conservation on the Penobscot,” said Andy Goode, vice president for U.S. operations at the Atlantic Salmon Federation, which had preferred a “threatened” designation. Labeling the fish as endangered, Goode said, could ostracize the community that has worked hard to protect salmon habitat and raise money for conservation.

Nonetheless, Goode added, “we recognize that the species is in trouble. We think the listing is warranted.”

During public hearings, several conservation and sporting groups testified in support of an endangered designation.

Before industrialization, salmon returned every year by the hundreds of thousands to New England rivers. But dams, pollution, overfishing and, more recently, low at-sea survival have virtually wiped out wild Atlantic salmon stocks in the U.S.

The lone glimmer of hope is the Penobscot. More than 2,000 salmon returned to the Penobscot in 2008, and this year’s run is keeping pace with last year.

Even those promising figures, however, are only about 10 percent of the number biologists say is needed for salmon to survive on their own. And the vast majority of the sea-run salmon that return can be traced to the Green Lake and Craig Brook salmon hatcheries.

“The goal of the Endangered Species Act is to have natural, self-sustaining populations,” said Mary Colligan, director of protected resources with NOAA’s northeast fisheries service.

But Patrick Keliher, director of Maine’s Bureau of Sea-Run Fisheries and Habitat, contends that the decision on Maine’s salmon appears to be driven, in part, by policies adopted in response to lawsuits over salmon on the West Coast. Keliher said that cooperation among all parties, not regulation, is the best option in Maine.

“We look at this as a population that is without a doubt threatened and that could become endangered if we don’t work cooperatively on the conservation of the species,” Keliher said.

Don Foster, a past president of the Penobscot Salmon Club and a member of the Maine Council of the Atlantic Salmon Federation, personally believes that a threatened designation would have kept the angling community enthused while protecting the fish. Now, Foster worries the salmon clubs that have played such a large role in recent conservation efforts could go the same way as the fish.

“I really fear this may be the end as we know it for salmon clubs because there is no more hope for fishing for many of the members in their lifetimes,” Foster said.

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
11 comments on this item

Captains of the Norwegian factory ships off Greenland are Laughing at us!

Need to Protect and regulate More out There in the Ocean !

.

We have no real control over international waters (to protect or regualte) and if the spawning grounds were adequately healthy and what they once were, those factory ships would barely be making a a dent and we could fish for them to nearly no end as well. It only takes a very small percventage of salmon to return to spawn to have a very healthy population of them in the high seas and that depends 95% on well protected spawning grounds, not on high seas regulation.

gregdavid, with the technology that the fishing fleets are implementing today, migratory fish species stand very little chance of making it back to their breeding grounds. Take a look at the west coast. There are rivers there that have never been damed or industrialized that have seen drastic reductions in fish returning. If you kill the whole school of fish, it sort of eliminates that line of re-production.

Like I said, we have little control over foreign ships in international waters. Be nice if we did but we don't. I did not mean to say it was not a problem, but not one we can easily sove right here at home. But we do have control over our rivers and streams and there very clearly are some real problems there as well and they also need to be addressed, not ignored because of some other problem out to sea. One does not negate the other. And maybe if we strengthened our habitat and fishery then we would be building something that would give us nore incentive to attack the international problem as well.

Endangered? Aquaculture raises Atlantic Salmon by the millions. They are the same Atlantic Salmon. Aquaculture was started by getting salmon from the state of Maine. Salmon from Maine rivers. The aquaculture salmon have the same genetics as the salmon in the rivers because that is where they originally came from. The reason the feds will not allow the aquaculture fish to be stocked by the thousands is because they claim they are "to many generations removed from the wild to have the instinct to survive," yet are unwilling to give it a try in fear of success. The result would be repopulating the rivers which would end the endangered species act on all salmon and no more federal money. This is all one big money grab. I believe the position of a fisheries biologist is to assist restoring existing populations, not taking one population (salmon) and breaking it down into 10 different genetic coded river specific distinct populations! Thisis the biggest example of splitting hairs that I have ever seen. I could prove in a court of law with facts that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the State of Maine could not have made it more difficult for themselves to ever restore the Salmon in the Maine rivers. Read my comment in yesterdays comment page about the history and how we got where we are today on this subject. The people living along the Penobscot and the tributaries are going to be shocked with what's to come.

There are ways to "get control", or at least influence, international waters and activities thereon, and we need to pursue them, along with habitat protection.

And how might that be Dave?

Use brute force???????

submarines

'David889327'---There {are) ways to open these rivers to C. and release t

Stop supporting every Eco. river organization and start talking dams.

I had rather fish than -- even that; but enough already! I am so sick and #%&** tired of The Feds----: nice BIG dam -.

Then watch.

Global warming is cooking the salmon tails off and drowning them in water! There's your scientific answer.

Here’s An Idea with Merit,

I don't know if they do this already but perhaps the salmon clubs could raise their own "wild" fish on Each river site then brand, tag and release them to the river?

Legally Register the brand and tag then serve legal notice to All international fisheries and countries that those branded fish are Your Personal Property.

Much the same as branded free ranging steers. Any high seas rustlers (Norwegian factory ships) would be inspected and severely dealt with.

Sounds like a plan to me. What do you think? Who can this idea, or variation of it, be pitched to?

.

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.