Island hit hard by Bill
weather

Island hit hard by Bill


Many buildings heavily damaged
By Bill Trotter
BDN Staff

BAR HARBOR, Maine — The death of a young girl from New York and injuries caused to more than a dozen other visitors to Acadia National Park were not the only destructive legacy Hurricane Bill left behind in Maine.

The storm that created huge waves Down East the weekend of Aug. 22 also decimated several buildings on Mount Desert Rock, a small, treeless rock outcropping about 20 miles south of Mount Desert Island in the Gulf of Maine.

College of the Atlantic in Bar Harbor uses Mount Desert Rock for field studies in the summer, when college students and faculty members stay in a former lighthouse keeper’s house on the tiny island for days at a time while conducting marine research. Besides the house, the island also has a boathouse, a generator shed, and a lighthouse tower that is owned and maintained by the Coast Guard.

Officials at COA said Saturday that because of the high surf generated by Hurricane Bill, the boathouse is now mostly gone and the generator shed is missing two of its ground-level walls. The storm blew through a door and windows at the house, causing water damage to the interior. The lighthouse tower, built out of granite several feet thick, is unscathed.

Sean Todd, a COA professor who oversees research at the remote facility, said Saturday that the college made sure no one was on the island, which is only 3 acres of exposed rock at low tide, when the storm hit. He said the college made sure the buildings were secure, which included boarding up windows, when people left days ahead of the storm.

“The boathouse is pretty much gone,” he said. “The door to the [house] was ripped open. The storm ripped the boards off.”

Todd said that research based from Mount Desert Rock, which includes studies on whales and seals, will be suspended for the year, though it is late in the summer research season. Other marine research based from the college’s Bar Harbor campus, or that uses submersible buoys to study underwater sounds made by marine mammals, is expected to continue, he said. The submersible buoys are placed several hundred feet below the ocean’s surface, he said, and are believed to have survived the storm.

“We found out about this on Thursday [Aug. 20],” Todd said. “We’re just taking it step by step. I have every reason to believe we’re going to continue those programs [based on Mount Desert Rock].”

Todd said he did not have a monetary estimate for the damage done by Bill to the buildings on the island.

According to Andrew Peterson, marine facilities superintendent for the college, the boathouse was built to withstand severe weather. The walls of the boathouse were built with 10-inch-square posts spaced every two feet. But an 8-inch I-beam and chain hoist that were inside the boathouse and a large contractor’s air compressor now are nowhere to be seen. He guessed the I-beam weighed about 1,000 pounds and the compressor between a ton and 3,000 pounds.

“There’s no evidence of them anywhere on the island,” Peterson said. “All that is gone.”

Peterson said the buildings on Mount Desert Rock, some of which date back to the mid-1800s, have been damaged by storms before. In 1962, Hurricane Daisy destroyed the two-story lighthouse keeper’s house, which was rebuilt, and a single-story structure. The second story was rebuilt again in 2001, he said.

Much of the contents of the house were swept out of the house and are strewn around the island, according to the COA staffer. The foundation of the building also may have had some damage, he said.

COA places a high value on the facilities on the remote island because they enable the college to offer programs that are rare for undergraduates, according to Peterson.

“It’s definitely been a step back because it’s been an invaluable educational opportunity for our students,” he said. “Our undergraduates can participate in hands-on field research. Normally, you wouldn’t get that opportunity until you’re in a graduate school setting.”

Peterson said that, in his 12 years at the college, he has experienced higher winds and torrential rain, but has never seen such damage at Mount Desert Rock. He said the devastation is a result of a combination of the large waves amplified by Bill’s slow forward speed and an unusually high tide.

“It’s a pretty unique spot,” Peterson said. “It’s the most remote light station on the East Coast. When it comes down to it, the ocean always wins.”

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
9 comments on this item

But yet, the bought-off politicians will but greenie funded wind turbines offshore only to have then brought down by storms............

Good point Sledman, besides being expensive and not providing much power and being an eyesore and danger to navigation, I wonder what a partial coating of ice combined with 100mph winds will do to those beautiful, long blades we've all seen getting trucked through town. Job security for the company that gets the replacement blade contract?

According to liberal pols, whose routine talking point is to sigh heavily and say that we can't build a nuke plant because of "problems" disposing of the small amount of waste they generate, (encase it in reinforced concrete and store it onsite) but they're all for these windmill toys that generate lots of feel-good publicity for them and their campaigns, but not much electricity. The important thing is that they get reelected...guess I really can't blame them for being willing to say/do anything though, for not wanting to be out there applying for a real job in THIS economic climate, created by their past bad choices.

Such a shame COA has to pollute our ocean with debris from shoddy construction projects. We need another law.

Good point? That wasn't even a sentence!

Typical righties, turning a factual story about a scientific research facility into a political argument for the status quo.

You don't trust engineers and scientists to construct a wind turbine, but you do trust them to store and safeguard deadly, toxic nuclear waste for an amount of time which is many, many times longer than the entire existence of human technology so far. How does that make sense?

So your worried about being here in 10,000 years and the nuclear waste killinmg you???? I just worried about surviving the next 20-30 yeears. I think I got a better chance of being taken out by a nuclear device detonated by extremists than dying from nuclear waste. I'm very confident our engineers can boith bulid wind turbines and nuclear faciilities. and deal with the enginering issues that occur at the sites.

we can all agree we need change. we all deserve a say in what happens in our country, on our homeland. we don't have time for politics or politicians to grow a heart.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5SBX6IUjwk

Encasing something in reinforced concrete so it will sit there and not crack open, even in an earthquake, is a relatively simple engineering problem.

The difficult thing about designing a windmill that can survive offshore in Maine is that it will be subjected to such a large range of conditions and dynamic loads. As long as everything stays in perfect balance, all goes smoothly, but if it becomes even slightly unbalanced (think an uneven coating of ice on the blades) combined with high winds, I wouldn't want to be anywhere close by because the failure would be sudden and spectacular. With modern materials and computer aided design, I'm sure that the blades can be heated and/or feathered and stopped from spinning during extremely high winds, but this adds complication and expense, and since these things don't put out that much electricity to start with, what's the point in putting them there, except to make some supposed greenies feel good? Modern nuke plants are safe and the problems that libs like to cite have been ironed out and extensively tested in Europe, where they are everywhere. Wind turbines, especially offshore in our climate, are merely a distraction from any serious discussion about how to supply our energy needs.

Airplanes crash from ice buildup, pretty pretty windmills won't be any different.

Question: How many Liberals does it take to change a light bulb?

Answer: It takes ten, nine to deny that darkness exists and one to hire a Republican to change it.

If the wind turbines aren't effective for the purpose they were meant for then another altrenative would be to use them for breast operations since the doctors are giving people cancer from their harmful MAMMOGRAM machines. By the year 2015 I predict that most women will be boobless when the doctors are done with us. Windmills= free boob cutters.

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.