Coalition wants repeal of school consolidation
Question 3

Coalition wants repeal of school consolidation


By Rich Hewitt
BDN Staff

STONINGTON, Maine — Charging that the school district consolidation law is a failed experiment, the Maine Coalition to Save Schools on Friday ratcheted up its effort to convince voters to repeal the law.

The coalition gathered the needed signatures to put repeal before the voters and submitted their petitions in October 2008. The referendum question, reading, “Do you want to repeal the 2007 law on school district consolidation and restore the laws previously in effect?” will appear as Question 3 on the November ballot.

The coalition argues that despite a goal of reducing Maine’s 290 districts to 80 by July 1 of this year, 218 districts still remain. It notes that of the districts listed by the Department of Education as being in compliance with the law, 66 dis-tricts, representing 55 percent of the state’s enrollment, were not forced to consolidate because of size, location or other special dispensations granted by the department or the Legislature.

On the other hand, residents in more than 100 districts that were ordered to consolidate voted against reorganization plans. As a result, they face a total of about $5 million in penalties. Those districts are in some of the state’s poorest counties, the coalition noted.

“The state told people upfront they would be penalized if they didn’t vote for consolidation and that’s just not right in a democracy,” Skip Greenlaw, head of the coaliion, said Friday. “Even with that threat hanging over their heads, 88,916 voters said no to the man-date because they thought it was a bad idea for their communities and their schools.”

The coalition claims that the law from the beginning has been too rigid to be applied to the varied geographic and economic school districts in Maine.

“They couldn’t pass a law to ad-dress all the different situations in the state, and one cookie-cutter law has been a disaster,” Greenlaw said. “We’re seeing that happen.”

One of the problems with the law, he said, is that there is no es-cape clause. There is no way for a town to get out of a regional district after it joins one, he said, and the law does not recognize voluntary cooperation among districts as a legal alternative to forced consolidation.

“If you get into it and find out it’s not working, you couldn’t get out,” Greenlaw said. “That’s not the American way.”

The coalition also argues that consolidation has not achieved the savings the governor’s administration said it would. Greenlaw claimed that so far the state can’t quantify any savings as a result of consolidation and that it has spent more than $4 million to try to en-force it.

Meanwhile, Greenlaw said, consolidation is costing districts money. Some towns in merged districts — such as Pownal — have seen steep increases in property taxes as a re-sult of consolidation and others have seen added expenses as part of the process of consolidation.

“We need to repeal this law and start working on something that makes sense for everybody,” Greenlaw said. “Everyone knows we have to find efficiencies and cut costs, but forced consolidation isn’t working.”

As part of its effort, the coalition has developed a Web site at www.repealconsolidation.com that went online Thursday and will be updated regularly, Greenlaw said.

“We’re very excited about this,” he said. “There’s going to be a lot of information there in the coming weeks.”

Meanwhile, opponents of the re-peal effort last week launched their own campaign, No On 3, to defeat the repeal effort. They argue that consolidation is working and that districts have found savings, in some cases considerable savings, beyond what was anticipated in their consolidation plans.

No On 3 also argues that the repeal will be too costly and that it will result in a rollback of the $37 million in cuts made to the education budget when the consolidation law was enacted.

Newell Augur, campaign manager for No On 3, said last week that school district consolidation is an efficient and effective reform that not only has created savings — savings that will continue to grow as more districts consolidate — but also has allowed merged districts to offer better educational programs and better access to those programs than they did before.

Repealing the law, he said, would be step backward to the old, inefficient system, a move that No On 3 claims will not be good for students.

rhewitt@bangordailynews.net

667-9394

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
8 comments on this item

Hey the consolidation plan is great for many schools systems, and it is downright terrible for others. Ours is fines $250,000.00 per year when nobody will form a consolidated school with us. How dumb is that? The state is taking all that money out of our very small system to buy laptops. This is a plan that was tossed together without thought to the varied population centers and state geography. I hope this piece of drivel is overturned. The whole plan really smacks of communism: do as I say or else. We don't need government abusing its power, and this plan is a perfect example of governmental abuse of power - "for our own good".

skip for governor.....why not?

The empirical research has proven universal failure of either district or school consolidation to realize the promise of either taxpayer savings or enhanced instructional opportunity. Case studies further demonstrate the siphoning of precious education dollars away from where they will have the greatest impact (teacher:student ratios) into areas that yield a negative return (bussing -- directly proportional to achievement declines), construction (as larger communities vote to close and liquidate smaller neighbors, they require larger, more expensive facilities)and, yes, administration. (Maine consolidation law has even necessitated the expense of a spokesman to sell citizens a steaming pile of false promises.) This Commissioner's dogged pursuit of this ham-handed, thoroughly discredited policy in light of available, research-based alternatives speaks to her condescension to taxpayers and rural aspirations. The lessons of consolidation have come at such a dear cost. We owe it to our own children, to our citizens to heed them.

As I have no children and so I didn`t pay much attention to the build up to consolidation, could see that this consolidation was going to be tried no matter I thought., so I said what the heck give it a shot even though being from Northern Maine I couldn`t figure out how this would work the same for high populated areas vs. low p. arears. I can see now I was right the low populated areas got shafted as usual. Stopping funding for a school that could not find someone to consolitate with is truely outrageious if true. You know every school that I attended thru high school was an old building. Just my luck when I went to high school they built a new junior high, then when I left high school they built a new high school. What an overall waste of money all these new schools are so teachers can have the newest and better then their neighbors school. Yes it cost alot in the ineffient heating system ya ya, but you sure as heck can buy alot of oil for a Million dollors or more. I feel bad for the school systems in western and northern Maine that have this jammed down there throats. As far as better educated kids goes, just look around, all we got is a bunch of spoiled brats running around saying, ME, I , ME, I, oh that would be the parents of these kids saying that also. Thats how these spoiled kids got spoiled. There will alosnot be an overall great big new piggy bank stuffed with money in 10 yrs

You can count on my wives vote, my vote, and as many citizens I can talk into Repealing this mess! The way this consolidation was done and is still being done to us, is More Shame for Maine!

Hope I can count on you for decreasing the Excise Tax and voting Tabor in. Wow can you just imagine the shooked looks in all of goverment. It would be a wonderful going away present for Baldy. I know that is a little bit callous, but you don`t really want me say what I think about what is going on in this state form top to the bottom. Get out and Vote dang it. Drag your neighbors if you have to.

School consolidation needs to be repealed. It is true some districts will see an increase in costs if they consolidate and it was cheaper for them to vote against it and take the penalty. This is a lose lose situation for them. For those that made consolidating work with proven savings can continue their efforts even if the law is repealed.

Certainly any consolidation "savings" cited by the Commissioner will be highly localized, and more than paid for by children and taxpayers elsewhere. Central mega-facilities with long bus routes radiating outward in a hub-and-spoke fashion was once believed to be the future of education in Maine -- grueling bus rides would be worth the enhanced learning opportunities. ...an idea thoroughly discredited by states in which this has been tried. (District consolidation is touted with a wink and a nod, as the research says district consolidation inevitably leads to school consolidation.) Transportation costs, however, consistently underestimated by other wrong-headed policymakers in states such as West Virginia, consumed promised savings BEFORE fuel prices rose dramatically. Distance costs both in terms of money and student achievement, and poverty amplifies this effect. (Say nothing of the crippling construction and, indeed, higher administrative costs...). Institutionalized polarization between the administration's anointed winners and subsequent losers reflects an offensive value judgement of rural citizens and poor governance in general.

School consolidation is another poorly thought out and executed baldy idea.

I can't wait to have a vote on this. I also can't wait till the year 2012 when Baldacci is out of Office forever. This is another one of his clueless ideas and this state will be much better off without him. Then all we in this state is replace most of the other clueless Rep. in Augusta and take our lives back from them. VOTE YES ON 4 also that will be a big start in taking control of this state back BY THE PEOPLE OF THIS STATE!

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.