Coalition wants repeal of school consolidation
STONINGTON, Maine — Charging that the school district consolidation law is a failed experiment, the Maine Coalition to Save Schools on Friday ratcheted up its effort to convince voters to repeal the law.
The coalition gathered the needed signatures to put repeal before the voters and submitted their petitions in October 2008. The referendum question, reading, “Do you want to repeal the 2007 law on school district consolidation and restore the laws previously in effect?” will appear as Question 3 on the November ballot.
The coalition argues that despite a goal of reducing Maine’s 290 districts to 80 by July 1 of this year, 218 districts still remain. It notes that of the districts listed by the Department of Education as being in compliance with the law, 66 dis-tricts, representing 55 percent of the state’s enrollment, were not forced to consolidate because of size, location or other special dispensations granted by the department or the Legislature.
On the other hand, residents in more than 100 districts that were ordered to consolidate voted against reorganization plans. As a result, they face a total of about $5 million in penalties. Those districts are in some of the state’s poorest counties, the coalition noted.
“The state told people upfront they would be penalized if they didn’t vote for consolidation and that’s just not right in a democracy,” Skip Greenlaw, head of the coaliion, said Friday. “Even with that threat hanging over their heads, 88,916 voters said no to the man-date because they thought it was a bad idea for their communities and their schools.”
The coalition claims that the law from the beginning has been too rigid to be applied to the varied geographic and economic school districts in Maine.
“They couldn’t pass a law to ad-dress all the different situations in the state, and one cookie-cutter law has been a disaster,” Greenlaw said. “We’re seeing that happen.”
One of the problems with the law, he said, is that there is no es-cape clause. There is no way for a town to get out of a regional district after it joins one, he said, and the law does not recognize voluntary cooperation among districts as a legal alternative to forced consolidation.
“If you get into it and find out it’s not working, you couldn’t get out,” Greenlaw said. “That’s not the American way.”
The coalition also argues that consolidation has not achieved the savings the governor’s administration said it would. Greenlaw claimed that so far the state can’t quantify any savings as a result of consolidation and that it has spent more than $4 million to try to en-force it.
Meanwhile, Greenlaw said, consolidation is costing districts money. Some towns in merged districts — such as Pownal — have seen steep increases in property taxes as a re-sult of consolidation and others have seen added expenses as part of the process of consolidation.
“We need to repeal this law and start working on something that makes sense for everybody,” Greenlaw said. “Everyone knows we have to find efficiencies and cut costs, but forced consolidation isn’t working.”
As part of its effort, the coalition has developed a Web site at www.repealconsolidation.com that went online Thursday and will be updated regularly, Greenlaw said.
“We’re very excited about this,” he said. “There’s going to be a lot of information there in the coming weeks.”
Meanwhile, opponents of the re-peal effort last week launched their own campaign, No On 3, to defeat the repeal effort. They argue that consolidation is working and that districts have found savings, in some cases considerable savings, beyond what was anticipated in their consolidation plans.
No On 3 also argues that the repeal will be too costly and that it will result in a rollback of the $37 million in cuts made to the education budget when the consolidation law was enacted.
Newell Augur, campaign manager for No On 3, said last week that school district consolidation is an efficient and effective reform that not only has created savings — savings that will continue to grow as more districts consolidate — but also has allowed merged districts to offer better educational programs and better access to those programs than they did before.
Repealing the law, he said, would be step backward to the old, inefficient system, a move that No On 3 claims will not be good for students.
667-9394
















