Lawmakers want to amend wine tasting law

Lawmakers want to amend wine tasting law


By Kevin Miller
BDN Staff

AUGUSTA, Maine — State lawmakers are hoping to fix a 2-month-old law that was supposed to help Maine’s boutique beer and liquor stores but which instead has left some shops complaining of a regulatory hangover.

Earlier this year, legislators passed a bill authorizing stores that stocked a large variety of beer or liquor to stage up to a dozen taste testings a year. The idea was to give purveyors of specialty brews and spirits the same marketing tool that has helped Maine wine shops draw additional customers who like to try before they buy.

But a last-minute amendment that aimed to prevent children from having to watch adults sipping beer or bourbon in the middle of the supermarket — or in the aisle of some other large retailer — has inadvertently caused problems for the smaller specialty shops.

The amendment stated that all taste testings “must be conducted in a manner that precludes the possibility of observation by children.” The new law, which took effect Sept. 12, presents a challenge to shops with windows that could allow children to catch a glimpse of the activities inside.

Leslie Thistle of Bangor Wine and Cheese Co. said she has to cover her front and back door windows with black and drape a sheet across the large storefront windows, giving her shop the feel of a “speak-easy” during her monthly tastings.

The law also means that she could be found in violation if a parent with children in tow comes into her shop to purchase a bottle of wine during a tasting event. She also pointed out that there are no laws shielding children from the sight of people drinking alcohol while seated on a restaurant’s outdoor patio.

“It is a ludicrous, ludicrous law,” she said.

Other wine and beer shops have taken similar steps to cover their windows or discourage minors from seeing inside during an event. The law’s unintended consequences have drawn national attention from Web sites and blogs catering to wine lovers.

Rep. Stacey Fitts, R-Pittsfield, has introduced legislation aimed at addressing the inadvertent problems. The Legislative Council, which reviews all bills proposed for the legislative session that begins in January, unanimously approved Fitts’ bill for consideration.

“Many stores that traditionally never had a problem conducting wine tastings are being hurt by this onerous requirement,” Fitts said in a statement. “My bill would instead mandate that a sign be placed at the entrance to an establishment when an event is being held, so all patrons are aware of the taste-testing.”

Thistle and other shop owners also hope the Legislature will loosen the restrictions that limit stores to a dozen taste testings in a year. The bill approved last year, LD 498, expanded the taste testings to beer and liquor establishments but kept the limit at a dozen events a year.

“Unless we were seasonal, that really doesn’t benefit us at all,” Thistle said.

In addition to regulating how taste testings are held, the law also restricts how much alcohol may be served to participants. Patrons may not be served a total of more than 5 ounces of wine, 12 ounces of beer or 1.5 ounces of hard liquor throughout the event.

The law also prohibits serving anyone who is visibly intoxicated.

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
29 comments on this item

The Maine legislature should pull their heads out of wherever they have them and breath some fresh air!

I can't wait for the doobage tasting at a new medical cannabis dispensary!

Yet another example of the fine work by our inept state gov't.

This is just another example of the STUPIDITY WE KEEP ELECTING - We need to GET RID OF ------ JOE PERRY -----

Stop complaining.......The government knows best!!!!! How can we trust healthcare to government when they can't get a wine tasting law right.....

Totally Ludicrous !!

If the fools in Disgusta hadn't broken it they wouldn't need to fix it now. The whole bunch should refuse payment of their per diems for any time spent fixing what they broke. Maybe if the associated costs were on their shoulders instead of ours they might be more cautious when considering or passing legislation. Or maybe take the time to read and understand what they're about to sign into law?

Can anyone say TABOR III

If we make wine tasting taboo then all the kids are going to want to do it. We should treat it as no big deal and then it wouldn't be a big deal.

just think we voted these fools into office! and they are sending people out to make sure this f--ked up law is up held.we the people have to stop this bull crap

LEAVE IT TO OUR LEGISLATURE TO SCREW UP SOMETHING AS SIMPLE AS THIS.

WHEN WILL IT ALL END?

OMG .. Children seeing wine consumption. We're all going to die.

Stop electing fools! Bigger government=Augusta=oversight=regulation=bigger government. Anybody not understand the math? It is perpetual and pervasive.

I guess we need to feed the kids then lock them in the bedroom before we have a glass of wine with dinner or a coctail while watching the news about the idiots in Augusta.

Or maybe take them out back and tie them to a tree while we have friends over for a bbq and a few beers.

So, who are the bright ones that came up with these rules. A). First of all, don't bring your kids to a wine tasting. B). I bet you that parents don't put up a drape at home when they have a beer or glass of wine. Dark ages? Unbelievable!!

I wish the story told us who came up with the lame amendment. Then we'd know what maybe the motivation is. Is it anti-business dems or overbearing moral watchdog repubs.

What is wrong with wine testing. Nothing. Do people actually think that people do not have any wine or beer at home with there kids in the house come on.

The closet drinkers came up with this.....

braindead amendment...doesn't matter which idiot came up with it...just look at the lunitics that voted for it...and signed it into law

Is there a sign at the State Capital that says "only the brain dead need apply?"

Our representatives never cease to amaze me.......

sheesh

is this AMERICA?

This would make a great headline for "The Onion" -- that it's a serious matter for those to whom we entrust our public duties puts a damper on the hilarity... HELLO....????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What's the difference between a "Wine Tasting" and parents chugging down beers with their kids at a restaurant. ...there's a LOT more wine/beer consumed at dinner/lunch than a wine tasting!! Who are the bloody idiots that came up with this law??

Every comment above, all 27 of them, is negative, and we keep electing these idiots. We pay for this government and they even receive a per diem rate while they are in session? As far as the Maine taxpayers are concerned, "A fool and his money will soon part"

The "FUN POLICE" are at it again! No more stupid laws!!!

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.