Election money may be scant

Election money may be scant


Many demands on public funds
By Kevin Miller
BDN Staff

AUGUSTA, Maine — The prospect that Maine’s clean election fund could run dry before the November 2010 elections is causing some concerns among gubernatorial candidates hoping to tap into the program.

The Maine Ethics Commission, which oversees the state’s campaign finance laws, is weighing its options should the combination of budget cuts, legislative races and a full slate of Blaine House hopefuls deplete available funds in the program.

To date, seven gubernatorial candidates have notified the Ethics Commission that they intend to seek public funding in return for refusing contributions from private individuals and interest groups. More than 80 percent of candidates during the 2008 legislative races tapped into clean election funds.

The program now has a cash balance of roughly $3.4 million with an additional $6 million in General Fund money expected to be deposited into the account by September 2010.

Whether that money will cover the demand depends on how many candidates stay in the race as well as whether legislators decide to take back some of that money. Lawmakers have voted to tap into clean election funds five times since 2003.

The possibility of a shortage has the Ethics Commission debating when and how to allow clean election candidates to raise private dollars in order to allow them to compete with privately funded candidates. There are 14 early candidates for governor who have indicated they intend to finance their campaign with private donations.

If there are either three or four clean election candidates in the primary for the governor’s race and only two in the general election, the program should have enough money on hand, according to Ethics Commission staff. The program would fall into the red, however, if more candidates were still in the running come the primaries and the general election.

On Thursday, Ethics Commission staff said they would have to reduce payments to candidates and allow them to raise private matching funds if there is a shortfall.

Jim Mitchell, appearing on behalf of Democratic gubernatorial candidate Senate President Elizabeth “Libby” Mitchell, warned that the commission staff’s worst-case scenario of five primary candidates and three general election candidates may be underestimating the potential problem. He said there are already seven clean election candidates with the possibility for more.

“You may have no money for the general election,” he said.

David Bright, campaign manager for Green Independent Party candidate Lynne Williams, urged the commission to aggressively defend the clean election funding with legislative budget writers. But he also said the commission has an obligation to be flexible with candidates if they know there is going to be a shortfall.

Bright said the commission should offer the money to candidates but also loosen the rules to allow campaigns to begin collecting private donations early on in the race. That private money, which could be held in a separate account, would be used only if there is a shortfall, he said.

But Alison Smith, co-chairwoman of the group Maine Citizens for Clean Elections, cautioned against making major changes to the restrictions on private fundraising. Smith said the state needs to find a viable way to adequately fund the program.

“It seems kind of late to be making statutory changes,” Smith said.

The commission will take up the issue again during its January meeting.

kmiller@bangordailynews.net

623-0024

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
8 comments on this item

Welfare for politicians. Gotta love it.

The clean election fund is supposed to be funded by the check off on the Maine Income Tax Return. If there is not enough money in the Clean Election Fund, then I submit that Maine people did not want to pay for it. It is theft to take the money paid by those taxpayers and put in into the Clean Election Fund to prop it up. Keep your grubby paws off the General Fund.

I agree jakemulligan it's FRAUD!!!!!!

That is a good one, welfare for politicians.... Exactly!! Dole for the legislature. THE STATE SHOULD NOT BE IN THE ELECTION FINANCE BUSINESS!!!

Which one of the professional parasites in Augusta stole this?

It didn't work.. now is a good time to repeal this ugly legislation. New hampshire doesn't have it.. and they also have no income tax and no sales tax. They have a near balanced budget, the lowest unemployment in the nation, always in the top 5 in education testing, and the best hyways. No problem getting swine flu vaccines either.

Not to mention the local morons who keep running for house and senate with no prayer of winning,just wasting out tax money on dumb stuff like bumper stickers and flyers that no one cares about.

To save money will have to hold the primary as early as possible to weed down the 20+ candidates to four or five.

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.