Referendum Overload
Editorial

Referendum Overload


By BDN Staff
BDN Staff

Trying to explain what voters were thinking on any given Election Day is a risky business. The results of this month’s Maine ballot is a case in point.

Voters repealed same-sex marriage and affirmed traditional marriage, but failed to sustain that roll-back impulse on the school consolidation law. And though it might seem that fiscal restraint was the mood of the day, voters soundly defeated two proposals to rein in taxes and agreed to borrow $71 million for roads, bridges, ports and ferries. And they agreed by a wide margin to expand the availability of marijuana for medical treatment.

But the most ironic result of the Nov. 3 vote was the defeat of Question 7. Had it been approved, it would have eased the burden on municipal clerks as they work to certify signatures on petitions that put initiatives and veto questions on the referendum ballot. Instead of having just five days to certify that signatories were registered voters in the community, Question 7 would have given the clerks 10 days to complete the work.

“I don’t think people understood it,” Deputy Secretary of State Julie Flynn said.

That’s a fair assessment.

Currently, petitioners must gather signatures of 10 percent of those voting in the last gubernatorial election to get a question on the Maine referendum ballot; the threshold is just over 54,000. But in the last decade, professional signature gatherers have become part of the landscape, so that threshold is easier to clear.

The dust has barely settled on the debate about taxes triggered by the TABOR II and the excise tax cut. But the debate is revived because a repeal of last session’s tax restructuring law is headed for the June ballot.

In the past, Ms. Flynn observed, those who strongly believed existing laws need to be changed or who believed they had proposals of great merit would approach the Legislature and make their case. A sympathetic lawmaker would introduce a bill, and it would make its way through the process. If it failed after a couple of attempts, the referendum route would be taken. Now, she said, it seems the referendum is the immediate next step when an idea is thwarted.

If the petition threshold were raised to 20 percent of those voting in the last gubernatorial election, nearly 110,000 Maine voters would have to sign to put a question on the ballot. That is not unreasonably high. More than 100,000 signatures put the same-sex marriage repeal on the ballot, and in recent years, three other issues broke or nearly broke that threshold: the bear-baiting ban, the Maine Municipal Association’s initiative to have the state fund 55 percent of K-12 education, and the beverage tax repeal.

Governing by referendum is inefficient, inhibits leadership and unnecessarily divides Maine people. It’s time for a better way.

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
12 comments on this item

Personally, I like the current referendum way of governing.

X2, the current regime has left us no choice, they are out of touch elitists.

No Kidding Ladyslipper>your Black and White

Way of Thinking oh Yeah, a lot of People know that is NOT THINGKING<<

That be JUST You yelling your gosh DARN Feelings<<

Who the HECK CARES what are YOU FEEING<<

WHY don`t Cha Try Thinking<<

Be a Darn Good Feelin For the Rest of the REal Thinkers<<

Only on occasion do I agree with this editorial board...this is one.

The Vote on #7 oh tells oh So Much<<

Before the ink was dry on the Constitution, "powers" were arguing that the writers, the idea-men, had gone too far. Hell, giving people freedon of speech, and the right to own guns would "destabilize" government. How, they asked were people to be "led" if they were allowed to go of on their own seperate path. Funny thing though, from all that worry, emerged a free, strong nation.

Now people are talking about the sunset. They say that the USA will soon be eclipsed by China, India, and perhaps even Indonesia. I don't believe that is the path most US citizens wish to trod,and I believe if we do eventually go down this path, it will be due to the treasonous behavior of our government going back as far as Richard Nixon. The Republicans and the Democrats are one mouth, selling the same wares, much like Target and Walmart. Here in Maine, a Yankee stronghold, we have been gifted with the right to stand up for our beliefs with the backing of our neighbors and the law. Should we choose, we could eliminate the State income tax, unseat the entire legislature, or make it mandatory that schools teach "civics"

I'm happy with that Idea. I don't agree with my neighbors all the time. Only one of the issues this year went the way I wished, and that was issue number 7 contrary to the belief by bureaucrat Flynn, I understood 7 perfectly. Joan Jasper, our retired town clerk counted all the ballots with help from a represenative from the Republican, and Democratic parties. Actually Joan pretty much ran the town by herself for very little money. Now we have six town employees, two computers, and a digitized list of voters. We pay these people for performance, and we pay for their expensive tools... I would hope with all the extras, they should be able to do the job as well as Joan.

Ya Harry I agree with YOU

but the differences in cost

between 7 and 6 a very interesting thing

I find it hard to believe you were against 5

does not sound like YOU

I do not feel that given 3 extra days at really the same price

Since they are there anyways

and with the more and more numbers to count because of more referendums and signatures.

Oh well what can be said

I didn`t get anthing but 5 so at least I got something

ElectraGlide

I am not against people smoking marijuana, I am always opposed to deceit. everyone and their brothers know that this is about getting high, not about medicine. Bring out a referendum question like "The people of Maine should have the right to get wasted on the substance of their choice" and I'll give that a yes vote. It's the same old question as was #1 "In a free country should folks have the right to be truly free?" Franklin said it best. "Your right to punch, ends only where my nose begins." I've got no nose in the marijuana question.

As was apparent in the last election, signature gatherers can "creative", distortorting the intent of the issue (which was amplified in the succeeding ad campaigns). The referendum process is basically good but, as pointed out, it should not be the primary process for governing (I think that's what the majority of No on TABOR were thinking). The referendum process should be well and better regulated and I agree requiring a larger percentage of signatures to getting it on the ballot is reasonable).

Yeah...I see everyplace, sometimes it is the 'language' and terminologies' of these referendums as printed, then in the polling booths we read them; naturally out of some context, and then decide our vote. Very tricky. I also agree that referendums are not a total answer. BUT...unless the voting public is given fact, and facts honestly and clearly presented, how can they vote appropriate to their own feelings? When it comes down to tax money from the voters being spent (wisely or unwisely) by their governments (local, state or federal), people ought to have a total right to expression and understand the voting process; even through their representatives on any level.

The editors at the Bangor Daily news should remember when criticizing "inefficient" government; the most efficient government is an absolute dictatorship. No people to please, no representatives to convince, and no audible decent from the oppressed.

HarryHSnyder111

I voted for Medical Marijuana

I do not know what others did or did not do and Why

But if it was as you say (everyone and his brother)

Then someone also said one small step for mankind

and others on here have also said

Human Rights are often accomplished through small Steps<<

Real Nice Talking to You Again<<

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.