Task force misjudged importance of ‘the girls’
Renee Ordway

Task force misjudged importance of ‘the girls’


By Renee Ordway
Special to the NEWS

Behold the power of breasts!

They are a source of power and comfort and sexuality, and this week, a whole lot of political wrangling.

Early Friday morning as I pondered the topic of this week’s column, my own were the source of a little discomfort as they were squeezed, shifted and flattened into a viselike device that positioned them for their annual photo shoot.

As I peered down at them while holding my breath for the technician behind the curtain, I nearly chuckled at their misshapen state.

“You don’t look all that powerful and alluring now, do you?” I actually thought, hoping that the technician behind the curtain did not have a device that could scan my obviously twisted mind.

It was just coincidence that my annual mammogram was scheduled this week amid the fury of controversy generated by the recommendation by the United States Preventive Services Task Force that women delay routine mammograms until the age of 50 and then have them only every other year.

I’m 46. I’ve been showing up as scheduled for my annual mammograms since I was 40, and I had a couple of base-line screenings before that.

I have not been diagnosed with breast cancer, and I don’t have much of a family history, so I would assume that I am among the statistics that helped convince the doctors and scientists on the task force that such routine screening is not necessary among my age group.

I listened this week to the widely publicized debates over the necessity of mammograms for those of my age, and on Friday morning I went to my appointment as usual.

A year or so ago I discovered a lump in my breast during a self-breast exam. My doctor also felt it and so did the technician who performed the subsequent mammogram and the breast specialist who eventually diagnosed it as simply an enlarged vein. But it was a lump nonetheless and I don’t for a moment regret using the resources I drew upon to follow through.

Nor should any woman.

Scientists on the task force were charged with analyzing the data and putting forth their recommendations without emotion or political bias. They should not be chastised for that.

I think the real error was the manner in which the findings were disseminated. Perhaps those in charge of that part of the process truly underestimated the power of breasts and those of us who covet them — and the lives connected to them.

Perhaps the task force needs a new marketing person.

One need look no further than the unprecedented fundraising success of breast cancer awareness groups to understand the scope and the strong emotion behind this issue.

Prevention is the key component of the Pink Ribbon Campaign that has resulted in such things as pink KitchenAid mixers and pink oil delivery trucks. Could anyone behind the release of the task force’s findings truly have been surprised at the level of backlash from its report?

Most of us learn of the immense power of breasts at an early age.

My friend Gayle and I figured it out when we were 12 and saw all of the attention that the more “developed” girls in the class were getting from the boys. Our desire for that power drove us to pitch in to buy a mechanism advertised in a catalog, which promised to “increase our bust size.”

When it arrived we anxiously ripped open the small, unmarked box to find a rubber band with two plastic handles that we were instructed to pull on.

We were ripped off. It was $9.95 wasted.

While our breasts either did or did not serve us well during our teen years, they later would be used to nourish our babies.

A woman in Texas recently pretended to have breast cancer in order to garner enough money to have breast implants she felt she needed to save her marriage. And there are apparently some researchers with the time to investigate whether breast movement among women runners could harness enough energy to charge an iPod.

That’s a lot of power.

That says nothing of the women and men who long since have put away their concerns for the aesthetics of breasts to focus on the breasts’ ability to kill them or their loved ones.

They are undoubtedly the most driven of all breast supporters — as they should be.

There may be something to the science behind the task force’s report, but those looking to make serious changes to screening and prevention routines have learned this week that they better be prepared if they plan to mess with the breast.

“The girls” wield a lot of power.

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
11 comments on this item

Had a small chuckle, reading this. As a typical man, I've been fascinated with breasts, along with the guy who published a magazine I used to, "read," Hugh Hefner....LOL Just think of all the attention we all gave to Anna Nicole Smith, and how much attention would she have gotten, had she been blessed with an A cup?

As an older man, I've had to have a mammogram on two occasionas. I think that one percent of breast cancer occurs in men. It is truly a strange experience to have whatever passes as, what they now call, Man-Txxx, squeezed in to that machine. Need I say anything more? LOL

yes yes double ds

Men are often accused of having some sort of power fixation on their penis. Frankly, I disagree. My penis doesn't make me feel one bit more powerful. Nor do I see my penis as a projection of myself, or a 'gun' or anything else. It's just my penis. I'm glad I have it; but I'm also thankful for two arms, two legs and a functional brain.

WOMEN on the other hand are OBVIOUSLY fixated on their breasts and to many of them the measure of their prowess is the size of their bust. This is evident by the way they display them. For a man to stare at their semi exposed mammary glands is to have dominion over the man. Even amongst themselves women have a social pecking order, largely based on the size, shape and perceived beauty of their bust.

Female breasts are nothing more than oversize, over developed, minimally functional, vestigially obsolete sweat glands....nothing more.

Think about it. How many men do you see with their penis' sticking out for everyone to admire? We'd be arrested. How many women do you see with their teats flapping around like a dairy cow? Now...draw your own conclusions.

I would like to tell you a story about a dear friend in Ohio and an RN. She has healthy breasts; and this is not a tear jerker...

Jerilynn Leckrone, BSN, RN returned to academia to obtain a nursing degree in 1992. She developed the Breastology Bag™ to meet a requirement for a nursing course assignment at Capital University in Columbus, OH.

She created this breast self-exam patient teaching tool. By sewing one soft sculpture breast after another, the entire story of breast self-exam was told and 6 soft sculpture breasts were born! After receiving enthusiastic reviews from her nursing instructor and nurse classmates, she took the sculptures in a tote bag to the OSU nursing units where I tested their credibility. She taught small groups of patients about breast health and breast self-exam for 13 years.

You may learn more about the the Breastology Bag™ at http://www.breastologybag.com/about/...I'm not hustling her product as much as opening doors to a very cool tool for home use.

Calm down Electra....:)

Very appropriate and mature article, Renee. My dear mother passed-on from having cancer in one of her breasts; diagnosed and operated on too late, I must say, as the disease permeated into her bone marrow. That's what you get for smoking, I told her, lovingly. But we lost her at her age of 83. While my wife was pregnant (in Bangor), and we had a normal OB/GYN examination at the doctor (Aloupis) office, just prior to her giving birth, it was discovered she had a lump in her left breast. Well, not knowing anything about mammary glands as a guy, I was totally confused when the doctor at the EMMC informed my wife over the telephone that no exploratory operation was necessary, as the "lump" was an enlarged vein, and due to her not having children or being active at any younger age than she was at that time. She was 42 years old then and delivered a perfectly normal child, albeit through Cesarean due to her cervix was too small. But we were relieved her "lump" in the breast was non-serious.

Through prescribed, adequate and regular personal checking of the breasts and routine professional (yearly) examinations, the woman should be considerate enough to program this type of examination and checkup on the yearly basis. No doubt about it, any physician and surgeon advanced in the medical profession enough in the removal of breast tumors could tell you, a careful, kind lifestyle to oneself should be the first step in taking care of the breasts. Start with a healthful diet, and go on from there. Don't smoke or overdo the alcohol, either.

Very well done story. This is the kind of reporting we need to have more of. Thanks.

Anyone who thinks there is no connection between Obama's professed goal to "reduce health care costs" and the recent announcements about the changes in recommended medical testing timeframes are fools who obviously voted for Obama in the first place.

Renee. You funny! I like boobies.

SantiniS, it is VERY lucky you had the DR you had and not his partner, Hughes.

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.