Cuts would devastate UMaine academics
Guest Column

Cuts would devastate UMaine academics


By Judy Kuhns-Hastings and Stephanie Welcomer

As evidenced by recent articles, the University of Maine System has serious financial shortfalls. The system projects a $42.8 million annual shortfall by fiscal year 2013.

To help balance the flagship campus’ budget, the University of Maine plan is to cut our campus’ costs by about $40 million dollars in the next four years, by fiscal year 2014. A portion of this approximately $40 million dollars is to come from academic affairs in the form of cuts to faculty, staff and programs. According to University of Maine President Robert Kennedy’s charge to the Academic Program Prioritization Working Group, “On April 2, 2010, the Provost will present to me a plan to reduce Academic Affairs’ base budget by $24.5-$28 million over the next four years.” This means academic affairs will take between 61 percent to 70 percent of the campus-wide reductions.

A cut of $24.5 million to $28 million would be devastating to University of Maine academics. One indicator of the cut’s impact on academic programs is the likely reduction of faculty, who numbered 564 in 2008-09. Given the size of the reductions, 200 to 230 faculty positions will potentially be cut.

These cutbacks will lead to loss of programs and majors, larger class sizes for students and fewer opportunities for students to work with faculty. Students and families of Maine will inevitably have less access to programs that prepare them for professional careers and encourage the critical thinking and analytical skills necessary for the 21st century work force and for a democratic society.

The University of Maine’s ability to attract top scholars and scientists will decline, impacting the innovative research and teaching that has been a hallmark of the university, as well as its ability to offer cutting-edge programs that address the needs of a changing society. Central aspects of the flagship’s land- and sea-grant mission are at risk as resources funding services and outreach to Maine’s farms, fisheries and families are cut.

We believe it is not an overstatement to say that cuts of this magnitude would have damaging effects lasting for decades. These impacts are most hard hitting for the many families and communities of Maine that rely on the flagship university to provide an affordable and world-class education.

The University of Maine has faced budget reductions in the past, but these cuts are truly unprecedented. The Faculty Senate executive committee recognizes that the state is facing an economic crisis of extended duration. Yet we have questions about priorities and assumptions intrinsic to the proposed cuts in academics.

For instance, why is the academic mission being assigned disproportionately greater cuts (or at best, pro-rated equal cuts) compared to other areas? Given the university’s central mission to teach and train students, the level of academic affairs cuts does not represent this strategic imperative, and we think it fair to ask, what are this campus’ high priorities?

Another University of Maine System proposal of concern is the Strategic Investment Fund. This fund essentially diverts campus monies (3 percent, or $5.3 million) from the UMS campuses to the chancellor’s office to support one-time projects chosen through a process and criteria yet to be announced. For the University of Maine campus, this means that we would lose approximately $2.49 million dollars (about 47 percent of $5.3 million). We feel that removing this crucial base-level funding will result in a dilution of University of Maine’s educational mission and believe that this additional reduction in funds further debilitates the campus at the worst possible time.

In light of the just-announced state budget deficit of $400 million and the mid-term budget recision in the higher education budget appropriation, the Strategic Investment Fund seems to be a particularly bad idea. The mid-term budget recision will begin to affect us all in the coming semester. The larger long-term cuts will affect each of us as well as the quality and diversity of educational possibilities for our students beginning next fall.

We hope that by opening a conversation involving all our stakeholders — students, staff, faculty and administration, as well as communities, families, alumni and business leaders — we may all find ways to work together to sustain our flagship university.

Judy Kuhns-Hastings is an associate professor of nursing and president of Faculty Senate at the University of Maine. Stephanie Welcomer is an associate professor of management and secretary of the Faculty Senate. This column was written on behalf of the University of Maine Faculty Senate Executive Committee.

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
10 comments on this item

You know since most young UMaine grads can only find a decent paying job by leaving the state , maybe we should just close all the UMaine campuses south of Portland and at least prepare our grads for the realty and save some money in the state budgets as well? Compare what a 1st year nursing student from UMaine is offered at EMMC her in Bangor and say at a Duke Medical? Case closed!

Now here I sit

Trying to decide

What to get for my Wife

For a Xmas Present

oh, I just remembered

It depends what I can find at the Goodwill Store

For Cutting back is the only smart thing to Do

And even though I can afford a lot more at any Store

It sure IS fun to watch the Maine University System

Whine and Complain WHaaa We cannot do W / Less>WHaaa OMG To Funny

As far as I`m concerned I am leaning towards

A middle Gound with ((( fredrogers ))) ABove

The issue is much larger than cuts and losing faculty positions. The goal of the prioritization committee is to produce a list of programs that the university should focus on and eliminate the ones of lessor priority. Thus, on January 8th thousands of students are going to be told that their programs are not a top priority at umaine. How many of these students will decide to jump ship next fall and go where they are valued? The university seems to think that it can eliminate programs and still maintain a commitment to the students in those affected programs and allow them to complete their majors. Who will teach the courses? The faculty in those programs identified for elimination will begin looking for jobs elsewhere by the end of January. Who would want to wait and live with that kind of uncertainty. For those students that decide to stay their courses most likely will be taught by graduate students. And that is if the university can find graduate students willing to stick around.

The other question that really needs to be asked and pursued is "why are academics taking the largest hit?" The reason a university exists is for academics! The current administration is leans more toward protecting sports programs. Sports at UMaine are protected from any cuts! They will not be touched is what the prez said last August.

I note from the previous posts that some think it dandy and fun to watch these cuts. Well, what you are ultimately enjoying is watching the children of your friends and colleagues leave the state and pay 35% more in tuition because they can't get an education at home.

Perhaps if the State did not have to support seven (redundant and expensive) campuses the level of cuts would not be so great?

I agree Mainecommentater. There are redundant programs throughout the system. Were it not for the local politics in the hometowns of some of these small university campuses many would have died a quiet death long ago and perhaps the current (and future) crisis could have been averted. Maybe the state can appeal to the federal government to borrow more "Stimulus" money to defer the problem into the future. That seems to be general policy now.

Dr. Kuhns-Hastings and the Senate executive committee are quite right in their assessment of the damage cuts of this magnitude will do to the University. The University, as it currently exists, will essentially be destroyed. In its place will be a much lesser institution, one that in all likelihood will neither be the research university it currently is nor that can meet the educational needs of Maine citizens. Instead, it will become a very weak regional state school, weaker even than USM currently is (although probably not as weak as it will be, once cuts wreak havoc there, too).

There does seem to be an element of glee in some of the comments -- those overpaid professors will be getting what's coming to them, by golly! While professors at UMaine may make more, in some (but certainly not all!) cases, than the average salary for Mainers, they are hardly overpaid when compared to UMaine's peer institutions. In a market economy, if you pay less, you get less -- Mainers are paying good salaries to UMaine's professors to get good professors for their children, and to get the kind of research that can power the future economy of Maine. People who chortle about professors getting fired are really laughing at their children and their state being deprived of a community resource that can help ensure their future. Besides, the professors will find jobs elsewhere, often with better pay than what they are currently making. The only people truly losing here are Mainers in general.

And yes, the "seven unique universities" in the System's motto is a perversion of the meaning of "university". UMaine, and possibly USM, are the only universities in the state. The Five Other Things aren't. One may be a decent four-year college, and another may be a good community college, but that's about it. With the exception of Augusta, which is bloated from the Bangor campus, all of the Five Other Things are smaller than one of UMaine's colleges, which are ably administered by deans. Why, then, have the added expense of presidents and all the other administrative layers at the Other Things? Why not admit the reality of the situation, do away with the System entirely, and have all the other campuses (except USM) be just that: other campuses of UMaine, administered by a dean each? That would go a long way toward closing the budget gap in higher education, I think.

http://saveumaine.blogspot.com

Well said, SaveUMaine. Universities are only as good as their faculty. To prioritize administration and fiefdoms over academics and research is absolutely crazy. Maine has got to change.

It's all about the overhead. I wonder how much they could save if they closed the Alfond and cancelled the hockey program?

Are all the U Maine programs equally necessary? I teach Vet Tech, which is necessary for students to get real jobs in the community. But is Philosophy really necessary?

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.