Bill targets sulfur in Maine heating fuels
environment

Bill targets sulfur in Maine heating fuels


By Bill Trotter
BDN Staff
BANGOR DAILY NEWS PHOTO BY BILL TROTTER
Acadia National Park Superintendent Sheridan Steele stands in front of state legislators Wednesday while commenting on a legislative proposal to reduce sulfur in home heating fuel in the next decade. Behind Steele (from left to right) are Rep. Brian Langley, Rep. Rob Eaton, Sen. Seth Goodall, and (partially obscured), Rep. Jim Schatz. Buy Photo

ACADIA NATIONAL PARK, Maine — A group of state legislators hopes to clear the air — literally.

Led by state Sen. Seth Goodall, D-Richmond, the lawmakers met with park officials and others Tuesday afternoon to announce that they intend to clear the air over Acadia and the rest of the state by reducing the amount of sulfur that can be contained in residential and industrial heating fuel by 2018.

The bill, submitted by Goodall, is part of an effort involving 14 states in the Northeast and the mid-Atlantic aimed at reducing sulfur in heating fuel used in residential and commercial buildings.

The effort is in response to a mandate from the federal government to reduce pollution that affects visibility in national parks and wilderness areas, he said. In or near Maine, those areas include Acadia, Moosehorn National Wildlife Refuge near Calais, and Roosevelt Campobello International Park on Campobello Island in New Brunswick.

Most heating fuels used in Maine homes and businesses have sulfur content of 2,000 to 3,000 parts per million, Goodall said. The bill, if enacted, would start sulfur reductions in 2014 and, by 2018, set a cap for sulfur of only 15 parts per million, he said. By comparison, the sulfur content of diesel fuel is now 15 parts per million.

By reducing the amount of sulfur allowed in heating fuel, the state will take action to help protect Maine’s tourist economy, which in areas like Acadia is dependent on clean air and pristine views. It also should help improve the general health of Mainers, he said.

“This is an important day for Acadia’s environment,” Goodall said, standing under an open pagoda that leads to the park's visitor center. “This bill will have significant impacts on the local economy. I would argue that it would save consumers money over time.”

Jamie Py, president of Maine Energy Marketers Association, said Tuesday that the association supports reducing sulfur in heating oil. Contacted by phone after the announcement, Py said reductions in sulfur levels would benefit consumers and would have only a minor effect on suppliers.

Py said MEMA supports an earlier deadline for reducing sulfur in heating fuel. The group has endorsed setting new limits by 2011, several years earlier than Goodall’s proposal, he said.

In previous years, there was a concern about the supply of low-sulfur fuel, Py said, but since the federal government established low limits for sulfur in diesel fuel, the supply of low-sulfur fuel has increased greatly. The consumption of diesel fuel is much greater than the consumption of heating fuel, he said.

In addition, the expected cost increase of producing low-sulfur heating fuel is minimal, according to Py. The cost may increase by 1 cent, but the benefit to consumers of being able to use more efficient equipment and having to do less maintenance of that equipment will outweigh any fuel price impact, he said.

“We think customers deserve a better fuel,” Py said. “It actually will save people money in the long run.”

Acadia's superintendent, Sheridan Steele, said the proposal is important to the park's future. Steele was on hand at the visitor center as Goodall's bill was announced.

“Air quality means a lot to our visitors,” he said, noting that the summit of Cadillac Mountain is one of the top draws for the millions of people who visit the park each year. “There are some days where those views are not so good.”

The advocacy group Friends of Acadia also praised the move to help reduce sulfur emissions.

“People come to Maine for its clean, natural environment,” Stephanie Clement, the group's conservation director, said at the event. “We want to make sure that continues for future generations.”

Also at the announcement were state Reps. Robert Eaton, D-Sullivan; Brian Langley, R-Ellsworth; and James Schatz, D-Blue Hill.

btrotter@bangordailynews.net

460-6318

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
9 comments on this item

If this low sulphur fuel is so great and hardly costs any more, why don't the suppliers sell it already. Why would a legislative deadline be needed?

I'm not sure how much impact this will have on air quality since the main problem with sulphur comes when the hot summer sun strikes it in the air. Not much summer sun around when most fuel oil is being burned.

This is going to cost us more ,make no mistake about it . People are struggling to pay heating bill now . Even a small increase would hurt.

FYI wasted dollars to get some free cash from DC and then Maine will

have to pay it back after DC determines it's like many other smoke and

mirror trick s to get free cash for more programs that do not nothing

but maybe make some feel good in the summer while visiting Acadia

National Park

Now wait a minute here. Acadia National Park has an air quality problem in the summer. There is very little "heating fuel" being burned in the summer. This is not a problem. We don't need reformulated heating fuels. The reformulated gasoline and diesel is quite enough.

This is just typical big government environmental wacko bullsh!t. Drive another inferior expensive "reformulated" fuel down our throats.

scottcom36, do you have your furnace cleaned every year? ever see the black crap that builds up on your filter? That is sulfur! If they sold a low sulphur fuel, you wuld not need to have your furnace cleaned as often as you do. It would cost the oil companies in service calls. that is probably why they do not want to sell the lower sulphur fuel.

Bio-fuel made with vegetable oils has no sulphur and beans much cleaner. That is one of the reasons it is so energy efficient compared to fossil fuel!

well the epa says air is dangerous to our health now, so this is no suprise. Environmenal restrictions = job killers and higher taxes people. WAKE UP! These idiots do not care if you lose your job and your livelihood.

Stupid, but could be worse. Federal EPA doesn't even want us to exhale anymore.

HOORAY! MORE GOVERNMENT! WE'RE SAVED! WE'RE SAVED!!

Calm down misguided zealots. Granted, more people visit Acadia in the summer, but the rest of us should get clearner air too. That's a heck of a lot of sulfur oxides (which can yield sulfuric acid when reacted with water). Sulfates/sulfites/sulfur oxides have been shown to have adverse effects for anyone with many kinds of heart disease. Do you want to be breathing more of that than you have to? Note that becasue of increased availability, the cost should not be that much.

Militaryman, good post except that the soot in your furnace is carbon black, admitedly produced more with a higher sulfur fuel.

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.