HAMDPEN, Maine — For the employees at the U.S. Postal Service’s Eastern Maine Processing and Distribution Facility, things have slowed a little in recent weeks.
“We’ve got guys standing around not doing anything; that’s a bad sign,” said Richard J. Reed, president of the Bangor Area Local 536 of the American Postal Workers Union, which represents 21 of those workers.
Work has leveled off since the USPS decision last month to shift some of its processing from the plant in Hampden to a newer, more technologically impressive facility in southern Maine, Reed said. Aside from that decreased workload, the union president said he thinks the shift has resulted in poorer standards of quality.
“Any changes made by the [USPS] are supposed to maintain a level of service and that’s just not happening,” Reed said, adding that customers and mail recipients are seeing longer-than-anticipated delays. Instead of a three- to five-day wait, it’s more like five to seven days, he said.
Tom Rizzo, a USPS spokesman for Maine, explained that the processing changes, which went into effect in early August, were an inevitable response to a declining national economy and a sharp decrease in mail volume.
“Considering the current challenges, it would be irresponsible not to improve the efficiency and economy of our operations,” Rizzo said, adding that the recent changes in Maine “parallel the changes in processing across the country.”
Rizzo disputed any decrease in service standards or an increase in unreasonable delays, insisting the facts don’t bear that out.
“Local mailers will continue to drop mail at Eastern Maine, and we have no reason to anticipate a negative impact in service levels,” he said. “We have a high level of service. In fact, our scores are at the highest levels in history, partly because of these changes.”
The two sides will discuss the changes later this week when Reed and other union representatives sit down with Sue Rogers, lead plant manager for the USPS in Maine.
Reed said he’s hopeful that the meeting will be productive. He worried, however, that the decrease in processing volume in Hampden will result in a number of relocations to the plant in Scarborough, which is more than two hours away.
“People are not going to lose their jobs, but if all of our mail processing moves south, that’s a big concern,” he said.
Rizzo acknowledged that there’s no glossing over the fact that mail volume in Maine is down 5 percent this year from last year. He also pointed out that the USPS is not taxpayer-supported, but a private entity funded solely with the profits it generates.
“We’ll continue to review all of our operations,” he said. “It’s an ongoing process and we do this in good times and less-than-good times. And if business conditions continue to flounder nationally, it may be necessary to re-examine those changes, although we’ll work diligently to balance the needs of our customers and our commitment to employees.”
Asked about whether the shift will result in relocation of employees from Hampden to Scarborough, Rizzo declined to answer specifically.
“The changes will impact some of our workers’ current hours, but all of our [personnel] decisions will be made in accordance with our collective bargaining agreement [with the union],” he said.
Reed said local legislators have responded to the situation with support, particularly U.S. Sen. Susan Collins, who drafted a letter recently to the USPS postmaster general.
The union president also urged customers to let the USPS know if they are unhappy with the current service.
On 9/3/08 at 2:34 AM,
Johninphilippines wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
Jeeze...here we go with "unions" once again! Complain, complain, and complain, and then campaign...but nothing can be done about what will happen in the finalization of the decision to relocate the mail facility. "Poorer standards in quality" of mail service remains to be seen, Mr. Reed. We wonder at the sharp decrease in mail volume. Could it be that it simply is due to the independence and democratic utilization of computerization. The internet is an example of second-to-second timing from sender to receivers. Why use the mail if another means is more effective and faster? If the mailing facility at Scarborough was preplanned by the USPS, and there are updated, streamlined machinery and operationsl aspects to advance the mail system in a more expeditious way, then, please allow the United States Postal Service to prove and show what they can do as promised. The increase in the postage stamps are, once again, folks, due to those darned unions demanding this, that, and the other thing, as a matter of "necessity" to their membership, and passed-on to the general public in the increased cost for postage stamps. Same thing with automobiles...etc. This has been on international and national news in the US for some time...if anyone was paying attention. Again, look what has happened...another relocation of services that the unions cannot do one darned thing about but have a meeting with the State of Maine's USPS representative as a matter of due course and communication respect. Plus...a relocation to a plant only TWO HOURS away from Bangor being significant...stop, look, and listen, Mr. Reed...the plant is not being relocated to Kansas City, Missouri! In addition, if any US Senator knows anything about what is happening in the United States...especially something that affects the state in which that Senator resides and is representating that state's population, don't you think that that Senator would have moved to action before writing a letter to the US Postmaster General in Washington, DC...or even have had a personal meeting with him? Senator Collins' response with a letter at this late time and date, is simply an effort in futility!
On 9/3/08 at 5:29 AM,
Taxpayer wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
If at all possible to avoid, why would anyone use the USPS. The expense is high and the service is poor. Thankfully, e-mail and FAX machines generally do a much better and faster job. Ever since I moved to Maine and discovered that my local post office took an over 1 hour lunch break in the middle of the day, which was the only time I could get to the post office I have worked diligently to not have to avail myself of their services, or more to the point, their lack of service.
On 9/3/08 at 8:36 AM,
LincolnMOM wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
The postal service is losing our business...for the biggest reason is ONLINE BILL PAY...We pay ALL of our bills online with debit card. Save on expensive ever rising stamps...checks and envelopes. The chance of it getting lost is no longer there for us, we had a auto & home insurance payment end up having gone through three post offices(marked on back) and was late. If it werent for the markings on back of envelope for proof we would of never had our insurance reinstated by company. Furthermore... I dispise writing checks so paying electronically makes life easier and I don't buy any stamps anymore. (only Christmas)
On 9/3/08 at 10:39 AM,
David889327 wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
What? A unionized workforce slows down?
Post a comment about this story
You must be logged in to post a comment.
click here to log in.