I am writing in response to Sherry Huber’s OpEd in the BDN endorsing Barack Obama. Huber is absolutely wrong when she says Obama has the vision to lead our country in the right direction when it comes to the economy and energy. Looking strictly at the facts, it is clear Obama does not have what it takes to make our country less dependent on foreign oil and he won’t generate tax breaks for the middle class. John McCain has what it takes.
Obama is not for change. Under an Obama administration, we can expect tax hikes and more bureaucracy in Washington. His record speaks for itself. In the short time he’s been in the Senate, Obama has voted for tax increases an astounding 94 times. Obama and Joe Biden speak over and over again about how they will help the middle class, but Obama even voted to raise taxes on Americans making as little as $42,000 a year. So Ms. Huber is wrong when she claims we can expect middle-class tax cuts from Obama. With a record like that it is doubtful anyone can expect any tax relief.
John McCain’s economic policies embrace small-business owners, entrepreneurs and every hardworking American. I know John McCain has my best interests in mind when he makes economic policies.
Nicholas Smalley
Orono
···
Nurse backs Collins
Nurses are the single largest group of health care providers in Maine and the nation. There is a severe shortage of registered nurses looming as baby boomer nurses retire. This retiring further magnifies the shortage of teaching faculty, who educate the next generation of nurses. As a nurse educator, I have had several opportunities to enlist Sen. Susan Collins’ assistance for funding to address this impending nursing shortage.
I have had the rewarding experience of visiting Sen. Collins in her Senate office in Washington. She and her staff go out of their way to welcome Maine constituents, listen to their needs and follow through by advocating for bipartisan support from her colleagues.
Sen. Collins has been one of the leading proponents in the Senate for nurse education and work force development funding. In recognition of her extraordinary support for nurses, she has received multiple awards including: American Association Colleges of Nursing Outstanding Leadership in Nursing Award; American Nursing Shortage Relief Public Service Award; and Friend of Maine Nursing Award from The University of Maine-Husson College Omicron Xi Chapter Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.
To ensure safe, quality health care and to maintain an educated nursing work force in Maine and the nation, we need to keep Susan Collins in the senate. For these reasons I remain a supportive Democrat for “my senator,” Susan Collins.
Teresa Willett Steele
Brewer
···
America not alone
While couching his platitudes about reproductive responsibility in an encomium to Mark Steyn, Hayes Gahagan may have lulled readers into thinking he was being a reasonable political moderate. However, buried in his OpEd piece, “Reproduction and responsibility vital to U.S.” (BDN, Sept. 11), is his major point: We need to breed more white Americans to make sure America does not become like Europe where Arab, Muslim, African, and Asian people are threatening the white gene pool.
Steyn’s book, “America Alone,” is on the best-seller list because some think his political incorrectness is funny. He is not a “culturist,” as he claims. He is a racist. He refers to members of the human race as “Japs, Gooks, Wogs, Prophet-monkeys, and Chinks.” Apparently, he and Gahagan are both ignorant of the fact that Arabs invented basic arithmetic, algebra and trigonometry and that Egyptians invented writing long before our European ancestors did.
If Gahagan’s views speak for all Maine Republicans, then we are all the poorer. In Gahagan’s view, a “nanny government” must be one that practices tolerance of people as individuals, supports religious freedom, and prosecutes hate crimes. It sounds like the Bill of Rights to me.
Pro-life in my book is pro-everyone: women, children, and all human beings. “Pro-lifers” cannot be just pro-baby; they must oppose the death penalty, all war, oppression, and intolerance and injustice here and around the world.
Mac Herrling
Orland
···
Islamic threat is real
In a Sept. 18 letter to the editor, William Babson Jr. criticized Hayes Gahagan for his stand on the right-to-life issue. While I am firmly in the anti-abortion camp, my concern with Babson’s letter is that he slides over another extremely significant issue, the threat of “Islamofascists.”
In today’s politically correct society it seems as though the only acceptable targets are Republicans, pro-life advocates and evangelicals. It is apparently impolite to openly discuss or publicize the dangers of radical Islam. Gahagan may be warning us to wake up and stop smelling the roses.
It is possible that Gahagan picked up the term “Islamofascist” from a book by Brigitte Gabriel, “Because They Hate.” Gabriel is a Lebanese native who clearly and frighteningly lays out the threat of these groups to our civilization, and the issue of their use of population growth in order to spread their cancerous campaign. This is a book every American should read. Whether you describe them as “fascists” or “terrorists” is a moot point — whatever you call them, radical Islamists are a real and present danger to all of us.
Robert Merriam
Stockton Springs
···
Our nation’s priorities
I am proudly voting for Barack Obama and Joe Biden. They are correct on our nation’s priorities: we need to spend taxpayer dollars here in the United States to start to rebuild our fragile economy for our unmet industrial, education, health, energy and infrastructure needs; and carefully withdraw from Iraq to rebuild our national security.
The front page of the Sept. 19 Wall Street Journal showed how much money the Bush Administration (with a tiny amount from other central banks) has paid in the last month to bail out our financial sector — $465 billion.
Now our leaders are talking about a new “rescue” institution similar to the one that cost the U.S. taxpayers and financial institutions $185 billion during President H.W. Bush administration to rescue 747 failed savings and loan associations.
We need to leave Iraq. Reports indicate that 4,162 U.S. soldiers have died and more than 50,000 have been physically or mentally impaired. U.S. taxpayers have authorized almost $800 billion on direct military operations of this war — almost all borrowed. Our authority to remain in Iraq ends on Dec. 31, 2008. Iraq is a sovereign nation and the government and most Iraqi citizens do not want us there.
This month, Iraq is negotiating a $3 billion oil contract with China National Petroleum. Iraq has just canceled its technical oil field service agreements with ExxonMobil, Chevron and other companies. Our country’s companies are not even getting Iraq’s oil.
Philip H. Person
Orland
···
Cell phone usage
We must pass a law concerning talking on a cell phone while driving.
When someone has one hand on the wheel and the other on a cell phone, their focus is on the phone call.
I walk a lot and I know to stay way over on the road or sidewalk because surely these drivers’ focus isn’t on their surroundings.
We passed the seat belt law, and now the smoking in the car with children, and now it is time to pass a law against driving while talking or texting on a cell phone.
Joan M. Robertson
Eddington
···
Francis of Assisi
Eight hundred years ago, Francis of Assisi began to live a life in which he embraced poverty and selflessness to take up the cross and proclaim love as the way. He lived in a time of great violence in which his church and society were waging war against the Islamic people.
On Oct. 4, during the Feast of St. Francis, we will celebrate International Keep Space for Peace Week with a vigil at Bath Iron Works. BIW builds the Arleigh Burke class of Aegis Destroyers and has contracted to build the new Zumwalt Destroyers. These destroyers are part of our nation’s theatre missile defense or “star wars” program which places weapons and military satellites in outer space.
With fewer sailors and more weaponry, the Zumwalt destroyers are launching platforms for weapons of mass destruction. They are designed to attack the enemy and to fire missiles at targets hundreds of miles away creating a shock and awe type of terrorism in which human life and environmental degradation are considered collateral damage. These warships are a crime against humanity.
Can we realize and embrace disarmament just as Francis threw off the trappings of militarism and lived in a way that honors all of the creatures of the Earth and beauty of the heavens? Please join us on Saturday, Oct. 4, the Feast of St. Francis, from 11:30 to 12:30 at the BIW Administration Building on Washington Street in Bath, to honor the heavens, to say No! to weapons in Space, and to conspire toward a disarmed world.
George and Maureen Ostensen
Hope
···
End sleepless nights
Though I’d hoped the sleepless nights from worrying about Bush’s trashing of the country were finally over, it does seem kind of fitting that his terrorist administration should end with one final, gargantuan assault (adding further insult to countless prior injuries) against his own people.
Assuming that Bush’s finance team is as incompetent as the rest of his administration has been, it would behoove us all to call our senators and representatives as soon as is humanly possible to protest any attempt to leave future generations of everyday Americans holding the bag, (possibly trillions of dollars in bad loans and debt) so that the rich, greedy, outrageously-leveraged, investment bankers don’t have to.
As Robert Reich (Clinton’s money man) said recently, the remedy for the turmoil on Wall Street should be bankruptcy for the mismanaged companies and more (and more transparent) regulation of the banking sector into the future.
Melodie Greene
Calais
···
Refreshing story
Two things about Seamore. One, where most of the news we read these days is bad or sad, it was refreshing to have a little miniseries on the abduction and recovery of Seamore the gorilla. Cute story. Happy ending.
Two , the photo of the kids riding in the back of the pickup with Seamore… well, that’s a parade of sorts, don’t you think, with a police escort and people along the route waving and all?
With all of today’s crushing news, it was good to have a story to make some of us smile.
Nannette Romanelli
Princeton
···
Don’t be sheep
Many of you will vote for Obama because you want “change,” because he is young and speaks well to a crowd, or because for some reason you see it as a vote against Bush. Don’t be sheep. Actually listen to what the man does and doesn’t say. Pay attention to what we will get if he becomes president.
Thirty eight percent of Americans don’t pay income taxes. Obama plans to raise that number to 50 percent. That goes against my belief that all should pay their fair share. Those who don’t pay any income taxes will also see refunded tax credits for education, mortgage payments, heating costs, and other items.
You can’t pass that burden onto those that Obama classifies as “wealthy” — those who own the businesses that drive our economy. His tax and health care plans will drive us toward economic ruin. Obama will slash military spending to help cover his new welfare programs; this will put us at risk of a terrorist attack as it did immediately after the Clinton years.
Obama wants a windfall tax on “Big Oil.” ExxonMobil’s profits last quarter were reported to be $1,400 per second. It also paid $4,000 per second in taxes. The government already gets more than its fair share. His plan for oil is to drill less, consume less, and tax more.
Don’t be sheep. Look at what this candidate stands for, to what he says, and realize what he will do to our country. Jimmy Carter was a terrible president — Obama will be disastrous.
Alice M. Herrick
Blue Hill
···
Campaign distortions
On Sept. 19, “The News Hour with Jim Lehrer” showed a clip of a speech by John McCain in which he castigated Barack Obama for taking more than $100,000 in campaign contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. After the clip, the TV reporter said that actually McCain had received a much greater contribution from the companies.
Lies and deliberate distortions have been prominent in the speeches of the two Republican candidates. McCain accused Obama of advocating sex education for kindergarten children. This was blatantly false.
Sarah Palin has repeatedly said that she said “thanks but no thanks” to the bridge to nowhere, but she took the money. She rails against pork and lobbyists, but she hired a Washington lobbying firm to secure pork for her state. Alaska has the highest per capita pork allotment of any state.
It is about time we had some honest officials, not attack dogs who do nothing but viciously go after their opponents. It would be nice if we could have an honest discussion of issues.
June Stiller
Sebec
···
Supporting Collins
During this hectic election season, one is faced with a wide range of opinions, half-truths, and wildly erroneous statements that paint a very misleading picture of certain candidates. Although most writers are sincere in their support of a candidate, they often resort to inaccurate characterizations of others. This negative approach may attract some, but to me it reveals a lack of personal integrity and a desperate attempt to win at any cost.
I have had the pleasure of knowing Sen. Susan Collins, and working with her to help Maine residents for many years. Her public service has been recognized nationally, and here in Maine she and her local staff provide support and assistance to everyone regardless of party affiliation or philosophical differences. Working with Maine’s growing elderly population, I am keenly aware of Sen. Collins’ interest and ability to further the aims of such legislation as the Older American’s Act, which provides a broad array of services to seniors here and across America. Her ability to reach across the aisle and seek consensus on matters of importance underscores her strength, and ability to get things done. Susan Collins is a strong, dedicated, and knowledgeable senator serving Maine, and her re-election on Nov. 4 is in the best interest of Maine residents.
Nelson Durgin
Bangor
···
Save the landmarks
The city of Bangor has seen major improvements to many of its architecturally significant buildings in recent years. There is a renewed appreciation for historic buildings, complemented by streetscape projects undertaken by the city. Residents can look with pride at the restored Opera House, the Vestry building now owned by Merrill Bank, and after many years of neglect, the prominent Nichols Mansion at the corner of Union and High Streets is getting a new lease on life. Many still lament the destruction of so many of the city’s architectural gems through the urban renewal program, but fortunately, many still survive.
However, the pressure is always on to protect historic buildings from damage by careless owners attempting to “rehab” without regard to a building’s integrity thus causing irreparable damage to the building, neighborhood, and the community. In hindsight, the boundaries of the historic district should have been expanded to include other unique structures in the immediate area of the Nichols Mansion. Inclusion in this district would afford some level of protection for the buildings and guidance for owners before making repairs that affect the exterior appearance.
Owners of historic buildings should feel compelled to be good stewards of their properties for future generations. Since that is not always realistic, communities need to take an assertive lead to protect them through appropriate ordinances, code enforcement, and incentives. A review and update to Bangor’s historic district boundaries might help save some of these endangered landmarks.
Ron Harriman
Brewer
···
Smiley’s writing
I am responding to the letter written by Andrea Maberry of Deer Isle in which she implies that Sarah Smiley is “grumping” about her move to Maine. Maberry needs to take a more objective look at Smiley’s writing.
Smiley is not making light of Maine’s or an individual’s economic woes, as Maberry suggests. Smiley is writing about her personal experiences, in a humorous manner, about moving from the south to the north. Maberry does not state where she moved from 20 years ago, but moving from different regions of the country is a difficult transition for a family.
I definitely felt Smiley’s same emotions when she brought her children to school and groups of mothers were milling around outside of the school and she and her children knew no one. My family has moved 12 times in the past 31 years, one of those moves to a different country, and two moves from the north to the south. The culture, customs and language are very different in many regions of the United States. Smiley is just making light of her transition to another region and writing about experiences that many other people have had.
Hopefully some kind “Maniac” has taken Smiley under their wing and is helping her with the transition.
With all the negative and “woe is me “ articles that readers are confronted with daily, it is refreshing to read a writer’s column where she writes humorously about her family and personal experiences and can put a smile on another reader’s face.
On 9/30/08 at 7:24 AM,
mallett wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
I dont recall an op ed being refered to as wrong before .
we are all entitled to our opinions, and an op ed is usually a well thought and written piece and deserving of a littkle more respect .
You are obviously a hard core republican , blinded by the failures of your party , not only over the last 8 years , but through its basic philsophy, money over everything , me first and then maybe crums for you ..
John Mccain is a washed up old hawk who views the world throught the eyes of a caged man .His VP pick is an idiot and a religious zealot .
they are both as corrupt as anyone in american politics today and I enjoy the show from where I sit.
realmainer
On 9/30/08 at 8:04 AM,
Coolfusion wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
Francis of Assisi was a nut case. Today he would be locked up in a psycho institution as a favor to him and as a danger to society. Why do people believe this crap.
On 9/30/08 at 9:38 AM,
ckc1996 wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
Phil,
Senators Chuck Schumer, John Kerry, and Claire McCaskill wrote a letter to Secretary of State Rice asking her "to persuade the government of Iraq to refrain from signing contracts with multinational oil companies until a hydrocarbon law is in effect in Iraq." The Bush administration wisely refused to do so, but the resulting media hooraw in Iraq led to the cancellation of the contracts, and helps to explain why Iraq is doing oil deals instead with China.
On 9/30/08 at 10:15 AM,
danwoj wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
Mr Smallely: Could you please list the facts that you based the following on:" Obama does not have what it takes to make our country less dependent on foreign oil and he won’t generate tax breaks for the middle class" Also, could you please lets us know when Obama voted to raise taxes on those making over $41000? What was the bill he voted on? I can't seem to find any reference to such a vote in his voting record. The only results I could find when searching the internet were instances of those making this claim, but none to the actual vote itself. I applaud your plea to make decisions based on facts, but it would help us all if you could reference this facts. Thanks
On 9/30/08 at 1:24 PM,
ronscave wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
This administration has scammed us one time too may. We the people need to understand that. A famous quote goes "The last official act of government, is to loot the nation". We should be watchful and act. Do we really have a choice this November or are we being spoon fed by the media 2 peas in a pod?
On 9/30/08 at 2:06 PM,
Tikitorch wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
Alice M. Herrick---Blue Hill... Alice ma lady, you have put this as plainly and rationally as anyone... I agree with you whole heartedly!! BUT.... I think the liberals are too hard headed and anti-Bush to realize what they are doing..... I just hope you and I have the Majority of the vote in November!!
VOTE SENSIBLY FOLKS!!!
Mallet, tell me what is wrong with religion.... BILL CLINTON and JFK went to church regularly and were proud of it... Both parties have had failures over the past 30 years... spiraling us into what we have landed in presently...... You are obviously a hard core liberal... who likes big words and can't stand that others have different opinions than yours... Remember, differences from the norm are what this country was basically started on..... If I were to say that the Deli-Bama was a controlled puppet muttering the words of others and he is not fit to make any decisions or capable of any cognitive thought... I am sure you would take offense to that...!!!
On 9/30/08 at 7:14 PM,
EtnaJohn wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
I find it interesting that people who believe something to be true can aver that as a fact, without any real basis in reality. FactCheck.org - its non-partisan - please look it up before spouting your thoughts, or what you read that someone said and claim to know as the truth. As for Obama and the economy and "what he will do to this country" - first off, I was not aware that the President was capable of writing and passing legislation on his (or her) own (with the exception being the current president who has blatantly disregarded the spirit of the Constitution more than any President in history with his numerous "signing statements"). Secondly, we've had "your" way of neo-conservatism, trickle down economics for at least 8 years, and look where we are now. I'm not sure how a change in the other direction is going to make things worse...and at least there's a chance it will make things better. Sounds better than the current situation, don't you think?
On 9/30/08 at 9:05 PM,
ronscave wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
It's time to fire them all. Tar and feathers anyone?
On 9/30/08 at 10:42 PM,
dirigodad wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
EtnaJohn, can you cite some of those "signing statements" that President Bush used? What did they address and why did he resort to using that means?
As for FactCheck.org, they're about as non-partisan as "Mind-numbed Robots for Obam-uh." FactCheck's primary funding source is the Annenberg Foundation, which donates to radical leftist causes, including the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which had ties to guess who? Barack Obam-uh and his terrorist friend, William Ayers. So beware when asking people to look up FactCheck.org, they might actually stumble on the truth!
Also, can you define "trickle-down economics?" Do you have any idea what federal revenues have been over the past few years since the Bush tax cuts? Didn't think so. Record revenues! Maybe you could check out the "non-partisan" CBO reports for tax revenues to confirm that.
On 10/1/08 at 7:28 AM,
anne_of_mdi wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
Dirigodad, with a little research you could have answered your own question about signing statements. President Bush has issued more signing statements than any other president in history. Some say it's more than 100, some as many as 750. His prolific use of signing statements undermines the basic rights of democracy – the right to elect legislators who have the primary responsibility for making laws – by signing laws but then announcing that he is free to carry them out or not, as only he sees fit.
You asked for some examples. From the New York Times, May 5, 2006: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/05/opinion/05fri1.html?scp=5&sq=signing%20statement&st=cse
"...Perhaps the most infamous was the one in which he stated that he did not really feel bound by the Congressional ban on the torture of prisoners. In another case, the president said he would not instruct the military to follow a law barring it from storing illegally obtained intelligence about Americans. Now we know, of course, that Mr. Bush had already authorized the National Security Agency, which is run by the Pentagon, to violate the law by eavesdropping on Americans' conversations and reading Americans' e-mail without getting warrants.
...The signing statements are not even all about national security. Mr. Bush is not willing to enforce a law protecting employees of nuclear-related agencies if they report misdeeds to Congress. In another case, he said he would not turn over scientific information "uncensored and without delay" when Congress needed it. (Remember the altered environmental reports?) "
As for Factcheck.org, what is the problem? Too "facty" for you? It is non-partisan, and it is staffed by mostly Wall Street Journal writers, which fyi is a right-wing paper. Too bad there's not a truthy site for guys like you who are from the party of "blurt out made-up stuff." Oh wait, there is: http://www.johnmccain.com !
On 10/1/08 at 10:07 AM,
duckwa wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
I was just reading the back and forth on who checks their facts and who doesn't. Then I got to "some say... some as... ; and the ny times". Real strong finish!! You really sold me..... not!
On 10/1/08 at 12:41 PM,
anne_of_mdi wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
Ah Duckwad, you seem to be channeling the spirit of Stephen Colbert:
"Truthiness is what you want the facts to be, as opposed to what the facts are. What feels like the right answer as opposed to what reality will support...
"Truthiness is the reality that is intuitively known without regard to liberal ideals such as reason and logic. It is the truth that is felt deep down, in the gut. It can't be found in books, which are all facts and no heart (except for the one true book, I Am America (And So Can You!) It is absolute, and can only be infallibly known by the gut of Stephen Colbert. It can only be felt by Americans with huge brass balls."
On 10/1/08 at 2:03 PM,
duckwa wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
Not sure what all that meant ( it went over my quota of big words), but it looks important. Get my screen name correct and maybe sometime we could get together, cozy up on the couch to watch the Colbert Report, and if your lucky maybe find out if I am one of those kinds of Americans. ;-)
On 10/1/08 at 2:06 PM,
kleban wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
To Ms. Steele, the nurse who is a Democrat but supports Sen. Collins: Certainly she has done a lot for Maine, and her staff is also very helpful. But any Senator worth her salt would do that. Tom Allen, who has been Representative in the other district for (I believe) six terms, also does a lot for Maine, and would continue to in the Senate.
So one needs to look at Collins' record overall. Unfortunately, she has supported Bush and Cheney almost all the way, on the war, the economy, and in shredding our Constitutional rights. Tom Allen has been on the other side of all these issues. Further, if you are voting for Obama (as I assume you will), remember that he will need a strong Democratic majority in the Senate to get much done.
On 10/1/08 at 4:56 PM,
BlueCollarBob wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
I can't take it anymore! I've tried to stay out of this but enough is enough. Evidently facts are bad things nowadays and, once again, we really need another administration that we can all sit down and have a beer with. After the last eight years I'm afraid beer isn't going to cut it. The Bush administration ignored the facts when it came to protecting us against terrorism. Remember the NSA warning "Bin Laden intent on attacking inside the US" prior to 9/11? Then, the administration ignored the fact that the people who attacked us were in Afghanistan, not Iraq. They ignored the facts regarding the situation on the ground in Iraq and went in without enough troops, then proceeded to alienate the only Iraqis who might have been able to help us.
4,000-plus dead American soldiers later, we now have a policy of bribing Iraqis not to kill us. At home this administration ignored the facts when it came to the Bill of Rights, caring for wounded veterans, managing a "free market economy," infrastructure maintenance, hurricane relief, global warming, food safety, education and pretty much anything else they focused on.
There actually are a bunch of regular guys, good guys for the most part, down at my local bar right now who've had quite a few beers. I'd be willing to bet that in their current condition they'd do at least as "good" a job as Bush. Don't get me wrong, I love drinking beer with them, but I don't think they're capable of running the country. When I need a lawyer or a doctor, I want someone who is smart and successful, not someone I want to have a beer with! Crazy as it sounds, if I get lost I'll consult a map, (chock full of facts) rather than walk into a bar to ask for directions. I have nothing against the guys in the bar, in fact I'm rather fond of them, but I think it's time we elect people who actually have bothered to learn the what the facts are before they make a decision because, in case you haven't noticed, time is running out.
On 10/19/08 at 1:37 PM,
swann2001 wrote:
Repeated separate thumbs down will cause comment to be hidden
Liberals like to point to the hate speech of John McCain and Sarah Palin because they dare to question a man who sat for "Twenty Years" in a Church that taught racial hatred and division and called this country the root of all evil in the world. I am guessing the people who believe Obama when he said he heard nothing out of the ordinary during all of those twenty years and called the man who preached racial hatred "My Mentor" are the same ones who believed Bill Clinton, when on national television he claimed he did not have sex with that woman. I am not saying Obama is a terrorist but when all your friends like Bill Ayers, Pastor Wright, Tony Resko, Louis Farrahkan are all people who have either proclaimed a strong racial hatred of this country or have bombed it then I just think it would be prudent if we knew much more about what this man really thinks. I understand that many Democrats and Liberals hate Bush but for those who haven't completely made up their minds yet, I would encourage and ask you to find out as much as you can about the people Obama has surrounded himself with. On the economy Obama has had a close relationship with Franklin Raines the man who gave himself bonuses and raises worth 90 million dollars over six years at Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac. The taxpayers have every right to get that money back because Mr. Raines tenure at Freddie Mae & Fannie Mac was a disaster. Who gave him the right to steal from those institutions like that? We need to have everyone including Barack Obama explain their relationship with Mr. Raines. Another issue that has come to light concerns Obama's roommates who were two Pakastani's and during his time at school he took time to travel to Indonesia, Pakastan and Africa. Who did he meet with other than he said he went to see his father in Kenya. He let slip just the other day when the subject came around to religion he said "My Muslin Religion" and then quickly corrected himself and said that was a mistake. Do you think after twenty years in a supposedly Christian Church he would refer to his Muslim Religion? I personally would like to know just who it is he intends to distribute all this wealth he intends to take from Americans to? Who is it that he is referring to when he says this? It goes against everything America and Democracy has stood for, in America we do not penalize hard work and persoanl wealth gained from that hard work. Are there rich people who maybe made their wealth by being in public office that needs to have their ill gotten booty taken from them? Then I would suggest to Obama that he start with the 90 million stolen from the taxpayers by his friend Franklin Raines.Then check out Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, Chris Dodd and oh yes maybe Obama himself might like to donate all his money to someone (Who did not Bomb the Pentagon) who needs it more than he does. Charity begins at home doesn't it?
Post a comment about this story
You must be logged in to post a comment.
click here to log in.