World’s dullest persons lose their title Friday night
Pat LaMarche

World’s dullest persons lose their title Friday night


I did a Web search for the world’s dullest person — I wanted to let him or her know that this past Friday they lost their title.

There actually is a Web site that corrected my errant thinking by stating the obvious. See, once the dullest person in the world has been found, the fact that they’ve earned a superlative makes them less dull and the runner-up takes over.

Seems once you’re named the world’s dullest, you instantly become more interesting.

If I could though, I’d nominate two guys for the title. And if that made them more interesting, so be it — they need all the help they can get. I mean, of course, Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama.

Did you watch Friday’s debate?

I found myself pulling the table into the center of the room, lighting a candle, turning out the lights and channeling the soul of the 1992 vice presidential candidate, Admiral James Stockdale.

When it comes to politics, no-life politicos like me are pretty hard to disappoint. Anything — and I mean anything — is interesting. And what a week for a debate: what with securities falling faster than autumn leaves in Maine.

I know, I know, it was a debate on foreign policy. But it sure seems to me that the U.S. being in debt to foreign countries might influence said policy.

Did you miss Stockdale, too? And actually this was a presidential debate so it’s Ross Perot that we should’ve missed.

You know, I interviewed that little guy a few times — Perot I mean — and while I could never claim to read his mind, I’m pretty sure he would have brought up the irony of using taxpayer funds to give the lion’s share of a trillion dollars to folks who can’t handle money.

Heck, Perot was so fond of calling it like it is, he might even have used the word “welfare.” Why don’t our newspapers and politicians say, “Congress struggles to reach corporate welfare agreement” instead of telling us about the “bailout”? If they gave a little family a few hundred bucks a month to help make ends meet or buy groceries they’d call it welf… oh wait, they do call it welfare.

See, I was missing Perot and Stockdale because they were the last political outsiders allowed to debate in the national general election. Coincidentally, they were the last ones to say anything interesting. But some folks think the Perot-Stockdale participation made Bill Clinton president — the so called “spoiler” effect — and these observers decided to take control of the debates. Everyone went along because, just like the “most dull” competition, one would win and the other would be second and the title would just flip back and forth between the two.

The Commission on Presidential Debates emerged and now a group of elites handle all those pesky participation decisions. No longer does the League of Women Voters decide, instead it’s a select few and their sponsors. Yes, sponsors. Friday’s debate was brought to you by Anheuser Busch and the International Bottled Water Association, among others.

Go to the commission’s Web site. The complete list is there — including the Howard G. Buffet Foundation. Howard doesn’t just pay for the debates — he also sits on their board of directors.

You’d know Howard better by his dad: Warren. Warren Buffet was in the news this week. Check out the Wall Street Journal. Its opening paragraph reads, “Fabled investor Warren Buffett took advantage of the turmoil in the markets last week to make a shrewd $5 billion investment in the beleaguered but best-run major Wall Street securities firm, Goldman Sachs.”

Nice to know the “turmoil” is paying off for somebody.

Maybe the fact that Warren made a killing on Wall Street has nothing to do with his son deciding whether legitimate third party candidates get to debate. And maybe keeping Libertarian, Constitution and Green Party candidates out of the debates has nothing to do with whether one of them might have mentioned the “corporate welfare” from which folks like Warren can make so much money.

Maybe none of it’s related at all.

Oh, by the way, Congress called. They want to buy you some swampland in Florida.

Pat LaMarche of Yarmouth is a spokeswoman for The Olympia Group and its campaign for a casino in Oxford County. She may be reached at PatLaMarche@hotmail.com.

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
7 comments on this item

OMG Pat!! I actually found some humor in your article. What's wrong with me?

Dont forget Sat night Kimbo Slice takes on Ken Shamrock on CBS!!!!!! How about that!!!!!!!! Liberals will Whine!!!!!!!!

Hi WR: OMG Maybe something is going right for you when you can laugh at a humorous article.

With Pat LaMarche around writing op ed columns we will have the honor in Maine of having one of the dullest columnist in the history of this newspaper. I guarantee that superlative will never diminish that title so long as she is concerned.

Actually ShawnDaily, she is one of the most humorous and controversial columnists around. You must enjoy her dullness since you keep reading her articles. Ms. LaMarche has one of the keenest wits around. And you know, humor is a wonderful thing because it delineates not only the seriousness of issues such as crippling debt and lack of health care for millions of Americans, but the folly of politicians who are only the front men/women for the ruling elites. The best satirists from Aristophanes, to Erasmus, Swift and Twain--were very serious people who survived because of their ability to see the folly of these strutters who are very danger because their dullness masks the most sinister of evils: killing innocent people in manufactured wars and stacking the deck against working people. The whole thing is getting dull, especially the players. My choice for dullard of the year is the unsinkable and uninformed, cliche-ridden Sarah Pailin whose very speech patterns are so dull, they almost seem cute if you are a hungry psychiatrist.

Pat is parroting Sarah Smiley, folks...but Sarah has nothing to do with casinos. Sarah does not lead a dull life. If you think McCain and Obama are dull...wait until one of these characters are elected to the Presidency. I'am dull. Me, myself and I. I figured it all out and will not vote at all in this election. I just told Randy-The-Guide in his article, although I'am Independent, I'am so frustrated right now, I tossed my glass of Royal Horse (Chivas Regal) into the pool last night...glass, ice, and all...in a frustration attempt to declare I will not be responsible to be part of what will come in the next four years or beyond. My wife is not dull. She is voting. For Obama! God forgive her! And God forgive all those dull website posters who hate me so much. (heh, heh, heh) Oh, what a dull existence we all lead. I wished I had the dull life Pat LaMarche has!

I don't hate you!

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.