Plum Creek accepts LURC conditions

Plum Creek accepts LURC conditions


Plum Creek Timber Co. has accepted state regulators' conditions for approving what would be Maine's largest-ever development — the Seattle-based company’s plan for nearly 1,000 house lots, two large resorts and hundreds of thousands of acres of land conservation in the Moosehead Lake region — and is moving on to the project's next review phase, officials said Friday.

The Land Use Regulation Commission staff now will craft additional documents outlining the plan’s implementation. The final plan is expected early next year for final approval.

Two opponents of Plum Creek — Maine Audubon and the Natural Resources Council of Maine — said Friday they are exploring ways to legally prevent the project from going forward.

LURC in September gave its approval to Plum Creek’s proposal, including a controversial plan to develop a resort on Lily Bay, an unspoiled area that conservationists wanted left alone.

In accepting LURC’s conditions on the concept plan, Plum Creek’s general counsel wrote that many of the conditions were difficult to accept and would burden the company with additional costs.

At the same time, “we believe the concept plan ... is too important to all of us — the state of Maine, the Moosehead region and our company — to abandon our efforts at this point,” James Kraft wrote.

Luke Muzzy, Plum Creek’s project manager, said the company now would await LURC’s recommendations on how the company should implement its plan.

Catherine Carroll, LURC's executive director, said Friday that the Forest Society of Maine and the Maine Bureau of Parks and Land were the last of the half-dozen or so implementing parties or major players in Plum Creek's plan to approve changes proposed by LURC.

Those approvals came on or about LURC's Tuesday approval deadline, Carroll said.

“Everybody has agreed that they can accept the broad recommendations the commission has made,” Carroll said Friday. “This has forwarded everyone along toward eventual approval, but before we can get that we have to get through the tier-2 issues that are in front of us.”

As Carroll described them, tier-2 issues are the detail work and very particular commission recommendations on everything from developing standards for vegetative clearing on development sites to agreements on the language of conservation easements.

She anticipated that staff approvals for these would happen fairly easily with an eventual final vote by LURC coming in the spring.

“I am pleased to see that this process is moving along,” Carroll said. “Right from the get-go, it has been fair, impartial, thorough and transparent. I am pleased to see the parties coming to a place where they can all make this concept plan be consistent with the commission's rules for allowing concept plans.”

Opponents of Plum Creek’s plan said Friday that LURC blew its chance to protect the Eastern United States’ largest contiguous forestlands and the sensitive, lovely areas within them.

“We recognize that many changes have been made in the proposal over the last three years, but from our position, LURC has failed to address the two big issues,” Jody Jones, a wildlife ecologist for Maine Audubon, said Friday. “The plan proposes too much development, and it’s in places like Lily Bay that are simply inappropriate for development.”

LURC was seduced by the conservation package within Plum Creek’s proposal and that “biased the commissioners into making the plan work,” Jones added.

“Maine people have consistently opposed the amount of development and a number of specific locations that LURC is now set to approve,” said Cathy Johnson, North Woods Project director for the Natural Resources Council of Maine. “This place is too special to let it get sliced and diced into house lots by out-of-state developers like Plum Creek.”

Both organizations said they are pondering various ways to appeal or legally prevent the project.

A final LURC vote on the plan won't mean the start of construction. The developers still would need to receive a litany of additional approvals and permits before breaking ground on any of the Plum Creek projects.

LURC would be approving a rezoning plan for 975 house lots and two large resorts near Moosehead Lake, Maine's largest. LURC staff and commissioners have recommended a long list of changes to the plan.

However, the two most contentious aspects of the plan — the total number of house lots and development on Lily Bay — remain in the proposal.

LURC approval also would trigger the permanent conservation of more than 400,000 acres of forestland in the region, which commissioners have said was critical to their endorsement of Plum Creek's historic development plan.

Plum Creek's proposal has been controversial since the day it was announced in April 2005. While supporters view the planned growth and resorts as a model for economic revival, opponents predict the development will spoil the natural beauty that draws tourists to the region.

Thousands of people have weighed in on the proposal on all sides.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Guidelines for posting on bangordailynews.com

Bangordailynews.com is pleased to offer a forum for readers to react to our stories, discuss them and provide additional information. We are reluctant to delete comments, but do reserve that right for those who abuse our forum. For more on using this site, please see our terms of service.

The primary rule here is pretty simple: Treat others with the same respect you'd want for yourself. What does that mean specifically? Here are some guidelines (see more):

Comments
9 comments on this item

The fact that Plum Creek accepted the LURC recommendations is not really a big surprise, since in the end they got the major pieces of the plan they initially submitted approved. What remains to be seen is, how long will it take for any actual development to occur. The global economy is in the tank, and real estate markets in the U.S. are way off. There's a ton of stuff on and around Moosehead Lake in all price ranges for sale, some at very reasonable prices, and there are no buyers. I know PC has grand marketing plans, but only time will tell how effective they will be.

It's not over yet.

Nuisance lawsuit, jaygee? A last minute intervention by an already-unpopular Governor Baldacci after the election perhaps? Or, even worse, violent Earth First protests?

Not good choices for the radicals as far as I can ascertain.

I love this quote from LURC director Carroll on the review process; “Right from the get-go, it has been fair, impartial, thorough and transparent. I don’t agree with the fair, impartial, and thorough part, but I will agree with her that it was transparent.

I felt right from the get-go that the hearings were corrupt because 3 of the 7 voting members of the board didn’t even bother to show up for the January public hearings in Greenville where over one-hundred local citizens voice their opposition to the location and amount of development in the plan. Now I find out that this is really how a fair review process works, and that it was in the interest of making the process “transparent” that these voting member had no interest or obligation in attending the hearings or incorporating the concerns of local citizens. Everyone in Greenville will agree that the hearing were well attended by the public, but unfortunately our testimony was presented to a “transparent” board. They were so transparent you couldn’t even see half of them.

As for fair, impartial, and thorough how about the fact months after the public’s comment period was over, LURC suddenly began promoting a THIRD resort on the lake at Moose Bay and additional development at Brassua Lake. How did they find this loop hole, and why is this development being approved without going through the regulatory process required by law for development in unorganized territory? To me, it is not fair or impartial for LURC to promote development for applicants that skirt State regulatory laws and public review.

'THERE GOES THE DAMNED NEIGHBORHOOD...THE WOODS...THE PONDS...THE ENVIRONMENT...THE WILDLIFE...THE SCENERY...THE FISHING...THE HUNTING...THE ENTIRE REGION GONE TO WEALTHY OUT-OF-STATERS WHO SIT WITH THEIR BUTTS LOUNGING ON SOFT CHAIRS AND WATCHING THE SUN GO DOWN WITH A TEACHER'S AND SODA IN THEIR CLAMMY PAWS. SOMEONE IN MAINE, PROBABLY "THE SLOOP JOHN B", AMONG OTHERS, AND THE LOCALS WHO SUPPORTED THIS PROGRAM AND RECEIVED BENEFITS FROM IT, WILL SOMEDAY WISH FOR THE NATURALITY OF MAINE BACK...WHICH WILL BE TOO LATE TO RECOVER. SAD DAY FOR MAINE...SAD DAY FOR THE AREA, SAD DAY FOR THIS BEAUTIFUL AREA TO BE ENCROACHED ON, DESTROYED AND SOON TO BE ENLARGED. THERE ARE NO "CONSERVATION AREAS"...AND ONCE THIS PRESENDENCE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED IN MAINE...THERE IS NO STOPPING OTHER DEVELOPERS FROM STRONG-ARMING THEIR WAY IN AND DOING THE SAME THING AS PLUM CREEK IS DOING. THIS IS TOO BAD TO SEE SUCH A BEAUTIFUL PLACE GONE COMPLETELY TO HELL.

You'll be sorry !!!

Johninphilippines said: "...AND THE LOCALS WHO SUPPORTED THIS PROGRAM AND RECEIVED BENEFITS FROM IT..." Got anything to back that up? Didn't think so.

This is the type of extreme hyperbole and outright personal attacks that has typified the radical environmentalists arguments against Plum Creek. Thank goodness there are more mainstream environmental groups that see the plan for what it is...an opportunity.

Not surprised LURC members didn't show up for the public hearing. They are all appointed by Gov. Baldaci. the LURC hearings for the Stetson Mt. wind farm were a joke. All the paid performers hired by First Wind lined up for the first 10 or 15 speakers pro wind farm. When Gov. Baldaci and his LURC gang leave office they will be very very wealthy.

I agree that the Governor has really let us down on an issue very important to the State. Moosehead Lake’s image as a gateway to undeveloped timberland with clean blue water, abundant wildlife, and spectacular scenery is our unique brand, and needs to be protected for us to maintain a sustainable local economy. Part of the reason we are in this mess now is that the State failed to come up with any long term plan of its own. I also feel the Governor should have been much more active in mediating a final plan with about 30 percent less development and one less resort. This would have met much less opposition, and would have resulted in the plan being implemented much sooner.

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.