Baldacci fiscal plan earns a 'B'
State House

Baldacci fiscal plan earns a 'B'


Think tank ranks nation’s governors
By Mal Leary
Capitol News Service

AUGUSTA, Maine — Gov. John Baldacci got a B on this year’s fiscal report card from the conservative, Washington, D.C.-based Cato Institute, up from the D he got from the group two years ago.

“I was surprised with this report, [considering] the organization that it comes from,” Baldacci said in an interview Monday. “But when you look at what they measure, it makes sense with what we have been trying to do here in Maine.”

The governor got a D from the group two years ago, the same grade Gov. Angus King got in his last year in office. The report looks at taxes, other state revenues and spending in establishing the grades. Only three governors got an A, fourteen got a B, eight got a C, thirteen a D and eight got the lowest grade, an F.

Chris Edwards, director of Tax Policy Studies at Cato, wrote in the report that the states are facing serious economic challenges. He said that many governors — the key policy setters — are failing to hold down spending and too often have resorted to raising revenues instead of cutting to balance budgets.

Explaining that the report uses statistical data to grade the governors on their taxing and spending records, Edwards said the “governors who have cut taxes and spending the most receive the highest grades, while those who have increased taxes and spending the most receive the lowest grades.”

Baldacci ranked high on taxes, with only a doubling of the tax on a pack of cigarettes, which is considered a negative in the taxes ranking of the study. The report also examined sales taxes, individual income taxes and corporate income taxes. The fact that those taxes maintained their rates in Maine was considered a positive for Baldacci.

The governor also scored well when it comes to measuring per capita spending, prompting Baldacci to point out that not many Mainers are aware of how much his administration has cut.

“We are spending $31 million less this year than last year,” he said. “And we will be cutting more spending this year of the budget we are in.”

Baldacci said that with the national economy having an adverse impact on Maine, he believes further cuts in state spending will need to be made over the next two-year budget cycle.

He already ordered all state agencies to submit this month proposed budgets that are 10 percent less than current spending levels.

“We are going to continue to reduce spending, with at least the 10 percent reduction we are working on,” Baldacci said Monday. “Given the economic conditions, we are going to have to find new and novel ways of doing more with less.”

The Cato report said Baldacci’s efforts to cut property taxes for homeowners and to repeal the local property tax on business equipment were part of his ratings. The report said they were “much needed.”

The report also praised the governor for his recent proposal to reduce the personal income tax rate in the next session of the Legislature.

“However, the governor has supported substantial tax increases on health providers and on consumers of tobacco and alcohol,” the report stated. “On spending, Baldacci has a good record, although he supported large spending increases on his Dirigo health care plan, and he opposed a referendum in 2006 to put a legal cap on state budget growth.”

Baldacci said he disagrees with Cato on its criticism of his support for a doubling of the tax on a pack of cigarettes. He said the tax hike was more than a revenue raiser, it was a health measure.

“The damage that cigarettes do to families, to the health of Mainers is in the hundreds of millions of dollars,” he said. “If you want to reduce heath care costs, don’t smoke. If you want to be upset with me for proposing it, be upset with me for supporting it. It’s a health issue. When you raise the tax, people stop smoking.”

He also said that legislation he proposed has set budget spending caps on both state and local governments and that the referendum proposal Cato criticized him for opposing was flawed.

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Comments
10 comments on this item

Wow, I give him a F grade based on his administration's excessive/wasteful spending habits illustrated at http://www.maineopengov.org.

I also would give Baldacci an "F" as a govenor for having REQUIRED all state employees to join the Union and pay union dues which are only spend on Democratic advertising and not Republican or Independant candidates. His crazy idea, Dirigo Healthcare, and his constant raising of our taxes, many of which are hidden. And mostly, he has not brought good jobs to Maine BECAUSE of our high taxes.

I'd give him an A for encouraging businesses and industries that pay just about the minimum wage to open in Maine

WE, THE STATE ARE NOT LIKELY TO PROMOTE SMALL BUSINESS AND FREE ENTERPRISE BY SUPPORTING LARGE LABOR UNIONS.

I say B for BAD.. WE NEED JOBS ... GOOD PAYING ONES, WHICH BALDACCI SEEMS TO THINK WE DO NOT NEED. HE IS MAKING IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR NEW BUSINESS'S TO COME TO MAINE WHEN WE ARE LOSING SO MANY OF OUR OLD STAND BYS!!!! DIRIGO IS A FARCE AND A WASTE OF MONEY!! I know a couple who is on DIrigo.. They pay over $800 a month (which they cannot afford) The state in return refunds them $200 of that figure... Sounds like a scam to me!!! Why even charge them the extra $200 to begin with?

How 'bout a C for Communist.

.

I realized a long time AGO, that BaldArchie, DOES NOT CARE ABOUT MAINE BUSINESS (other than his own), Maine Economy or Maine people. Maine voted him in there (not me) but I can not wait until this fool is out of office. He get's a "F" for everything he stands for...

Baldacci needs to grow a backbone and start getting rid of his overbloated government and administration. Top to bottom. He's afraid of, or in cahoots with, the MSEA. Too many of his cuts come from programs that actually help the people of Maine instead of cutting the people that do nothing in their government job day in and day out, get their healthcare, retirement, vacation pay, blah blah blah. An acquaintance of mine "retired" after 20 years with a police force a few years ago. Nice pension, benefits, etc. Got more good paying work. He was in his 40's. I, however, get to work right into my '70's and pay for my own retirement (if any), healthcare, etc., just so my acquaintance gets his free ride. Another acquaintance of mine retired from HIS State police position, then his local PD position AFTER getting his military retirement AND a little social security for odd jobs in between. Now he's got a million-plus dollar shack on the water (with a nice pool) in a much warmer, no income-tax jurisdiction. Sorry folks, but I'm not big into having to work to support "retirees" in their 40's. But that's the State, Federal, County and Local government's way of doing things.

Oh, I had a question: is it true that Maine Legislators receive lifetime healthcare benefits if they win and serve their second term?

REMEMBER PRESIDENT CARTER! CARTER WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO CARED ABOUT THE PASSAMAQUODDY TRIBE! WHERES CARTER WHEN YOU NEED HIM! BALDACCI OF MAINE < YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED KNOWING THAT NATIVE AMERICANS LIVE IN YOUR STATE AND THEY ARE NOT EVEN AN OPTION TO HELP!! BALDACCI YOU WILL GO DOWN IN HISTORY! TINA SALVO BOSTON , MA

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.
Contact Us | Help/FAQ | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright ©2009 Bangor Publishing Co.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.