Move boosts broadband Down East
Broadband

Move boosts broadband Down East


$527,000 project to reach 29 Washington County towns
By Bill Trotter
BDN Staff

AUGUSTA, Maine — A state entity charged with helping to provide funds for rural broadband development projects on Thursday upheld its earlier decision to commit more than half a million dollars to a project in Washington County.

Axiom Technologies will get $527,000 from the ConnectME Authority to expand its wireless broadband network to 29 towns in Washington County.

The authority rescinded a grant of $284,000 it had awarded to Cornerstone Communications for a broadband network in the Greenville area, however, and tabled its reconsideration of a $346,000 grant it had awarded to RedZone Wireless for a project involving towns on and around Mount Desert Island.

The three projects were among six that were awarded a total of more than $1.5 million by the state agency last September. The three grants the authority revisited Thursday were contested by other communications firms that claimed the awards amounted to unfair competition because the expanded networks would overlap too much with their existing broadband service areas.

ConnectMe Authority rules prohibit the agency from helping to fund any project if 20 percent or more of the area that would be served by the expansion is expected to overlap with a competitor’s broadband service territory.

Approximately two dozen people attended the afternoon hearing, which was held at the state Public Utilities Commission offices in Augusta.

Susan Corbett, CEO of Axiom, said after the hearing that she was “ecstatic” that the authority upheld Axiom’s grant. The grant had been challenged by Pioneer Wireless of Houlton, but no representatives from the Houlton firm were at Thursday’s hearing, Corbett said.

“We are absolutely thrilled,” Corbett said. “This is a huge, huge boost for economic development in Washington County.”

The Axiom grant originally also had been challenged by cable giant Time Warner and by Union River Telephone, but those companies dropped their challenges after Axiom met with them and agreed not to offer service in their service areas.

Corbett pledged to the four-person authority that she would not use any of the state funds to offer broadband service to anyone who currently can get such service from Pioneer Wireless. She said she might have to locate some network infrastructure in Pioneer’s service area, but that such equipment would be used to relay Ax-iom’s signal through Pioneer’s territory, not to offer competition inside of it.

Corbett said though Axiom already offers wireless broadband in some Washington County towns, she has a database of 1,200 people in the county who cannot get any broadband service. She said she did not yet know in which towns the expanded network would be available, but that she expects to begin offering the service within the next few months.

Andy Hinkley, manager of Cornerstone Communications, said after the hearing that he thought the authority’s decision to rescind his company’s grant was “inconsistent” with its decisions on the other challenges. The grant that had been awarded to Cornerstone, which has offices in Bangor and Dover-Foxcroft, was challenged by Bangor-based Premium Choice Broadband, which is spending private funds to install a broadband network in the same area around Greenville and Moosehead Lake.

“There was room for us to have worked this out with the challenger,” Hinkley said. “I think we should have had the same opportunity.”

Members of the authority were concerned about state money being used to offer broadband service in approximately the same area where another firm was using private funds for the same thing. Andrew Vamvakias, CEO of Premium Choice, told the board that his company already has spent “hundreds of thousands of dollars” on expanding broadband service in the Moosehead Lake area.

“It does seem like you’re competing for the same area,” authority member Mitch Davis told Hinkley.

The authority voted 4-0 to rescind the $284,000 grant to Cornerstone, but suggested that it would be willing to consider a cooperative grant application from the two companies if they were willing to work together.

Hinkley said that, without the grant, he does not see Cornerstone trying to offer any service in the Greenville area. In 2007 Cornerstone received another grant from ConnectMe to expand broadband service in southern Piscataquis and western Penobscot counties, he said, and has plenty to do.

When considering Time Warner’s challenge to RedZone’s $346,000 grant, the authority heard conflicting testimony about how much overlap there could be between the competing services. Tom Federle of Time Warner said that, based on the very general information he had received from RedZone CEO Jim McKenna, there would be at least 50 percent overlap and in some areas could be as much as 70 percent to 80 percent.

McKenna, however, said that Time Warner’s coverage claims on and around MDI were inaccurate. He said that he anticipated zero percent overlap with where Time Warner now offers its broadband service. He presented letters from five towns — Bar Harbor, Lamoine, Tremont, Trenton and Winter Harbor — that expressed support for his grant application

Members of the authority, however, wanted to see a detailed map of where McKenna was hoping to offer his wireless service, but McKenna told them a detailed map was impossible without spending a considerable amount of money on testing individual properties for signal strength.

“My intent is not to serve Time Warner subscribers,” he told the board.

Clearly, one complicating factor was a certain degree of tension between Federle and McKenna. Each accused the other of refusing to meet to talk about their proposed coverage areas.

“You guys have to get together and figure out how to get along,” Davis told Federle and McKenna.

The two men indicated that, despite their previous comments, they would be willing to meet to discuss how RedZone can avoid using the grant so that 20 percent of the project area does not overlap with Time Warner territory.

According to Phil Lindley, the authority’s executive director, the board plans to meet in approximately two weeks to see whether the two firms have made any progress.

Not registered? Click here
E-mail this
Print this
Comments
7 comments on this item

I knew it! When Jim McKenna was in school many years ago with Tom Federle he used to cram him in a locker for fun! How many days has tommy boy spent in the field doing installs? Oh Yea-NONE! When is the last time TW showed up at 1am in the middle of the week to swap out equipment at a sub-station to avoid service interruption? Oh Yea-NEVER! Thanks for all your efforts and hard work Redzone!

I don't understand why they all can't sell thier services in any area they would lke, regardless of the funding. Let the customers decide who provides the best service at the most reasonable prices. Isn't that how most other businesses have to operate? The quality services will survive, and the others will fail, just like in any other industry. Limiting my choices for services seems unfair to me the customer, and is just creating another monopoly industry, that can intimadate the consumer with thier fees and services. I'm in downeast Maine, and I only have the choice of dial-up, but Axiom will not be an option if they come to my area, so I am stuck with slow dial-up because nobody else can step on each others toes. HURRY UP FAIRPOINT!!! PLEASE!!!

What we need Downeast is reliable and AFFORDABLE high speed internet. The only decent broadband in this county is the DSL that FairPoint purchased from Verizon and that only covers Eastport, Quoddy Village, and a portion of Pleasant Point. That's where all this grant money should have gone. It is ridiculous that there is a clause in this grant that they cannot compete with one another because we need the competition. Pioneer originally offered their service (Wab Wirelss) for $34.95/mo and in the past year have increased it to 44.95. In the meantime, when it rains, nobody has internet, when you are connected your connection times out and speeds are ridiculously low. I could have reliable service that is never ever down, at 10X the upload and download speeds for 24.95 per month if the FairPoint Fiber Optics Network was expanded to include Route 1. All of the schools would also save money. This is yet another complete waste of money that everyone wants to say is going to "help" downeast. Offering a service that nobody can afford, or if they can, realize the service is not worth the price is not growth. I think some of the people writing up these grants and sending out the cash need to actually live in the rural population for about 6 months. Just another example of executives running things when they have no actual knowledge of the circumstances or working knowledge of their proposed fixes. Let's pay them another $100,000/year.

WAY to GO AXIOM FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY! WE WILL now have a more level playing field for competition with the rest of Maine, and a more improved business climate. NOW connect ME. I have been waiting for this. Maybe also NOW the tribes will have a better chance and a fair shot.

"Lois" and "opinionated" hit the nail on the head. I am dying to get FairPoint into my area. Overall, DSL is the most consistent and reliable form of internet technology.

fairpoint for dsl is in the calais area.

Where, pray tell, does the idea that competition is a bad thing come from???! It sometimes looks like these companies are more interested in "protecting" areas they MIGHT want to serve than the are actually providing a service. I'm in an area a bit west of Dover Foxcroft and we've been hearing the golden promise -- especially from Cornerstone -- and seeing little to nothing in terms of concrete progress. Due to some changes in access numbers my dial up speed is now down to 24 kps (old phone lines I'm told)... and I'm literally about a half mile off a major highway. No cable, no DSL... cell phone service sucks so that's not even close to an option. So while it seems like all these guys are fighting over protecting their future territories from competitors, I'm left sitting here with my hand raised yelling, "Hey, would anybody like a customer?" (Actually, there's a bunch of us.)

Oh, sure we can go with Satelitte I guess... although the local distributor for Hughes has figured out when you're the only game in town you can be pretty arrogant about customer service. (Another benefit of "no competition.") I'm tempted to back Premium Choice at this point simply because they are using private funds... not waiting around for government handouts that come with strings attached. I understand the need to make money, but these companies accepting "grants" seem to be more interested in using the money to go into markets that already have broadband choices. The people who are supposed to benefit from the grants get ignored.

You must be logged in to post a comment. click here to log in.
Contact Us | Help/FAQ | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright ©2009 Bangor Publishing Co.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.