AUGUSTA, Maine — Raymond J. Bellavance Jr. was found guilty of two counts of arson Friday in connection with a fire that destroyed a topless coffee shop in Vassalboro more than two years ago.

The jury returned its verdict just before 6 p.m. in Kennebec County Superior Court after deliberating for about 4½ hours.

Of the two counts of arson, one alleged that he deliberately set the blaze on June 3, 2009, at the Grand View Topless Coffee Shop to cause damage. The other alleged he recklessly endangered a person or property located on Route 3.

Bellavance did not react to the verdict. Early in the trial Superior Court Justice Michaela Murphy warned him to stop reacting to testimony and show more respect for jurors.

After the jury forewoman announced the verdict, Murphy asked each juror individually if he or she found Bellavance guilty or not guilty on each count. One by one, each juror replied, “Guilty,” twice.

No explanation was given as to why the jury forewoman informed a court officer that jurors had reached a verdict about 5 p.m., then a few minutes later told him they had not reached a decision.

Donald Crabtree, the owner of the coffee shop who now lives in Greenbush, was not in court Friday. He testified early in the 10-day trial, which stretched over three weeks, that he was not insured and lost everything in the blaze.

Waitress Krista MacIntyre, who testified Tuesday for the defense, sat at the back of the courtroom for a portion of the closing arguments but left before they were completed and did not return.

After the jury was dismissed, Murphy told attorneys they should submit sentencing memorandums to her by Feb. 3. After that, the judge said she would set a sentencing date.

Bellavance faces up to 30 years in prison. His sentence most likely will be long because of his extensive criminal record, most of which was not revealed to the jury, and because there were two infants living in the building — a former motel — that housed the coffee shop. The 19 months he has been at the Kennebec County Jail unable to make bail and awaiting trial would be applied to his sentence.

Outside the courtroom, Alan Kelley, deputy district attorney for Kennebec County, praised investigators from the State Fire Marshal’s Office and his colleague James Mitchell.

Kelley declined to speculate on what the jury might have considered “key evidence,” but said the testimony of Thomas Mulkern was important.

Mulkern, 26, of Augusta came forward last week and changed his story. Originally, he told investigators that he was in Portland when the fire was set. He said that after going through a drug rehabilitation program, he wanted to come forward and deal with his past as part of his recovery.

He told the jury Dec. 23 that he was with Bellavance when the defendant set the blaze. Mulkern received immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony.

“Obviously, we thought we had a strong case before Mr. Mulkern came forward,” Kelley said after the verdict was announced. “We felt that Mr. Mulkern and [his girlfriend] Emma Wood were accomplices who were used by Mr. Bellavance. We wanted to give the jury the opportunity to hear his testimony and strengthen our case.”

Defense attorney Andrews Campbell of Bowdoinham said after the verdict that it was too soon to say whether the verdict would be appealed.

“We will be looking at the rulings in due course,” he said.

On Friday morning two very different portraits of Bellavance were presented to jurors as attorneys made their closing arguments in his trial.

Campbell said sneaking around at night to start a fire was not Bellavance’s style.

“He’s confrontational,” he told the jury. “He might punch you out, but he wouldn’t come to your house and burn it down.”

He said that kind of act was totally inconsistent with the loving father and grandfather Bellavance is.

Campbell strongly criticized the investigation by the State Fire Marshal’s Office. He said the only suspect ever considered by investigators was Bellavance.

“This case has been a flat tire from the beginning,” he said. “They’ve tried to make the evidence fit their theory of the crime [and] not evaluated the evidence objectively.”

Kelley said the evidence overwhelmingly showed that Bellavance started the fire because he did not like the fact that his then-girlfriend, MacIntyre, was a waitress at the coffee shop and had a sexual relationship with the owner, Donald Crabtree.

“Ray Bellavance is a volatile man, quick to anger and, when he’s angry, quick to act,” Kelley told the jury.

He said witnesses had testified that they heard him threaten to set the fire and then confess to setting it before fleeing the state when he learned a warrant had been issued for his arrest. He was arrested in May 2010 in South Carolina.

“There is no way they would have known the details about the fire that they testified to unless Ray Bellavance told them those things,” Kelley said.

As for the purported eyewitness, Campbell said that Mulkern used news reports of the trial and “the rumor mill” to create a story about seeing Bellavance set the fire in exchange for immunity.

“He was offered the deal of the century,” the defense attorney said.

Kelley disagreed.

“[Mulkern] said he was worried about being prosecuted for this,” he said. “What that means is, he’s telling the truth and provided detail[s] others had no way of knowing and details other witnesses support.”

Join the Conversation

30 Comments

  1. Kelley disagreed.
    “[Mulkern] said he was worried about being prosecuted for this,” he said. “What that means is, he’s telling the truth and provided detail[s] others had no way of knowing and details other witnesses support.”    

    Why was Mulkern worried about being prosecuted? Maybe he did do it if he knew info that others had no way of knowing??? Sounds like someone got the shaft on this one, and I’m not talking about Ms. MacIntyre!

  2. Beyond a reasonable doubt  He said she said??? Juries Are just people. A confident liar Will Be more believable than one that Is shy stutters and tells the truth in most cases. Before I could send A man away for 30yrs I would have to be at last 99% sure he did it. We as people who read the paper will not see all the  evidence.  It is not suppose to be more likely than not he did it This is not cival court It Is A mans life. 

    1. You’re logic would almost never allow for a prosecution.  Beyond a reasonable doubt only applies to murder charges and for good reason.

      1. 30 years is a lot longer than most murder sentences in the State of Maine.  No wonder innocent People are in jail.  It is not just logic seems to have been proven over and over. Many times someone is convicted even tho the jury thinks the witness lied about somethings. The System sucks ,but it is the only one we have. 

  3. Guy looks scary….he may want to pick someone a little more “professional” in the future, slinging donuts at the local grease pit and sleeping with three men at the same time.  You can’t change people. His eyes are screaming hate.

  4. I was not on the jury. From what I read in the paper I would not have enough to convict the man .  It might be more likely than not. If I were on a jury it would take some reliable witness real evidence Fingerprint, DNA, pictures . Having been to court and saw the circus that goes on. A jury will most the time believe a confident liar over an unconfident truth teller. We all have are biases.  Seems like most people are followers and a few are leaders just the way people are. Hope they had more facts in court than the paper provides.

    1. “I was not on the jury. From what I read in the paper I would not have enough to convict the man .”

      That is why they make you come to court every day of the trial and sit in the jury box, althought in your case I am not sure it would matter much either way.

    2. jurys are not as cut and dryed as you see in the movies. I think he did it unless someone beat him to it.

  5. He was in prison before and will do just fine, I’m sorry he only got 30 yrs, the world outside of prison will be a better place with him gone!

    1. are u judge, jury and executioner? How do u know for 100% certainty that he did it? Seems like Mulkern knew an awful lot about it and was awful worried about being arrested for it

      1. When you use “U” you do mean “you”? right?….. well back to your question, no, not 100% sure, but I am 100% sure that the whole bunch of Raymond’s friends and Raymond could all do with jail time and some have.  and to have him and his friends in jail is no loss. Not My fault the state did not go after these other smucks and it speaks to Maine and its justice system……or lack there of.

  6. I realize that this man has a long criminal history and likely faces a longer sentence because of it, however i have to wonder, if this is the norm for arson, why in the world the punishment for crimes in this state and this country in many instances is so wacked.  I have seen in this forum articles on people like Anziani only get 20 years for killing a child, another murderer who dismembers a body get 60 years, and this man is going to get 30.  To my recollection, nobody died in the fire.  Property damage was of course, done. The state likely would have found ways to close down this “Topless” shop eventually as it has every other adult oriented business, but why doesnt the punishment fit the crime.  I guess i have to do some more research on what the statute is for crimes in this state but it certainly seems messed up when compared to crimes done against children, which in my opinion, should carry the longest prison terms.

    1. Nobody died, yes.  That was luck.  People, including small children, were asleep in the building when he set that fire.

    2. I sat on a jury in an arson trial.I was not convinced that he did the crime.But being the 13’th jurer, I did’t  get to deliberate that case.But in this arson I am sure and I didn’t hear all the evidence against him. Funny thing about a jury, it can go for or aganist anyone.

  7. Boy this was a surprise….NOT!!! This guy’s lawyer couldn’t even clean him up with a suit and a haircut…Still looks like a crazed loner…Should send him out in the woods and see if another hunter mistakes his as a coyote…

    1. you would be surprised to hear what people admit to on the witness stand. they seem to think the more they say the more everyone will believe them. 

  8. As much sex as these people are having in this area, Im sure he’ll do fine in the penal institution. Buba’s waiting.

  9. This case is what it is. But thomas Mulkern and Tara B, his ex are known drug addicts and liers.As far as their accounts of the case. Well lets just say I wouldnt believe. Their in the same circle as Ray  for a reason. People dont believe Ray why would they believe them?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *