What once seemed like a sure thing for Maine slipped from the state’s grasp this week with the news that Kestrel Aircraft Corp. had decided to base most of its manufacturing in Superior, Wis., instead of here.
Maine had once envisioned someday up to 600 workers producing Kestrel’s aircraft at the former Brunswick Naval Air Station, now called Brunswick Landing. Instead, the state now hopes for up to 100 Kestrel jobs at Brunswick Landing, working on the final stages of finish manufacturing.
Maine officials scrambled for months to close the multimillion-dollar gap in financing the start-up needed to operate in the state, ultimately to no avail.
So in the wake of Kestrel’s migration back to its home state (company founder Alan Klapmeier is a native of Wisconsin and co-founded Cirrus Design there), are there lessons Maine can take away going forward?
“There are always lessons we can learn, both when we’re successful and when we’re not successful,” said Michael Aube, president of Eastern Maine Development Corp. in Bangor. He is a past commissioner of Maine’s Department of Economic and Community Development and former state director of Maine USDA Rural Development.
Aube didn’t work specifically on the Kestrel deal but said it was obvious that state officials made significant efforts to both attract and retain the company.
“First and foremost, the odds are better for us to build what we have, grow what we have, than try to attract what we don’t’ have,” said Aube, who writes a biweekly column for the Bangor Daily News. “Though we want to be open for business, finding those businesses that want to locate here can be very challenging; we have not had the resources to make those incentives available.”
Any business growth or attraction plan has to be based on the assets of a region, said Aube. And, he added, the state needs to develop networks and partnerships to collaborate among different levels of government, as well as with private groups, so that all resources can be brought to bear on an effort.
Peter DelGreco, president and CEO of Maine & Co., a private, nonprofit business attraction group, agreed. DelGreco didn’t work on the Kestrel deal, but noted that media reports related an alignment of financing and economic development efforts in Wisconsin among state, county and municipal officials.
That happens in other successful states, such as Texas, said DelGreco. Maine has strong local communities but county governments are not as strong, said DelGreco. He said he wasn’t aware of projects here in which state, county and local officials have been involved in providing financial incentives.
DelGreco saw a few takeaways from the Kestrel deal.
“I think we have to do a better job of targeting what makes sense for us,” said DelGreco. “I look at Kestrel and see a high-risk, very high-reward project.”
Companies can be broadly grouped in three areas, he said: incubation, growth and mature.
Companies in the three areas have different needs. Start-ups tend to require capital, for example, while growth companies are looking for infrastructure needs — such as buildings and a work force.
“This is something for the policymakers — would it make sense to have those resources focus on start-up companies, or companies that have a track record and are looking to expand?” said DelGreco. “There’s still risk there … Or do we focus only on mature, Fortune 100 companies?”
DelGreco said he looks at Maine’s past success stories in terms of business attraction and sees companies such as AthenaHealth, Carbonite and NotifyMD. Those companies were getting ready to grow and add headcount and did so in Maine, he said.
“They’ve reached milestones, and those milestones indicate a certain staying power, though they don’t guarantee anything,” said DelGreco.
DelGreco noted that Maine’s incentive programs are written in statute, which doesn’t leave a lot of discretion or flexibility in what can be offered to companies. Nationally, a number of states have developed more discretionary sources of incentives. Arizona has a public/private department that has access to a $25 million closing fund, controlled by the governor, that can be used to put together incentive deals for companies seeking to locate there. Ohio also has a group that has access to similar funds through taxes on alcohol. Texas has a $300 million fund.
There’s a debate nationally as to whether economic development should be done by the government, by private groups or by some combination. These are issues Maine can consider.
Another lesson from Kestrel, said DelGreco, is that it should be crystal clear that Maine’s companies are targets for other states. It is key for Maine officials to keep in communication with companies, to be aware of needs and problems, he said.
“Having a meaningful feedback loop is important — I believe all administrations try to figure out their best way to do that,” said DelGreco.
Commissioner George Gervais of the Department of Economic and Community Development could not be reached for comment. On Monday, he told the Bangor Daily News that he felt the state needed to have control over some entity that can allocate federal New Market Tax Credits. The credits, used as an incentive, now are allocated in Maine only by Coastal Enterprises Inc. CEI, a private, nonprofit group, had given Kestrel $20 million in New Market Tax Credits, though the aircraft company had hoped for about $80 million.
In Wisconsin, Gervais noted, a quasi-state agency whose head is directly appointed by the governor allocates those credits, so the financing work they do is more aligned with the state’s goals. In this case, Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority will work with Kestrel to obtain a $30 million allocation of federal New Markets Tax Credits.
If an organization that Maine state government had more control over could allocate some of the New Market Tax Credits, it might be easier to put together details in areas that are critical, said Gervais. That’s something the administration is discussing, he said.
State Rep. Kerri Prescott, R-Topsham, agreed with that goal. Prescott is co-chairman of the Legislature’s Labor, Commerce, Research and Economic Development Committee.
Maine is competing with other states for jobs, she said, and the state needs some control over those allocations. Prescott said that overall, the state needs to continue to work on macro issues to make Maine more attractive to business.
“Maine obviously needs to get its taxes in line, and streamline regulations, overall, to make us more competitive,” said Prescott. “I think the new administration has made some progress there, but we’re not out of the woods.”
Another lesson from Kestrel, she said, is that officials may want to get the financial details of any company they’re working with upfront. A problem with Kestrel came up when the company would not provide those details when officials were trying to line up financing, Gervais has said.
Sen. Seth Goodall, D-Richmond, a member of the Maine Economic Growth Council, said now is a time for lawmakers to look at what could have been done better to secure those potential jobs.
“As policymakers we must make sure we analyze all our economic development programs as well as our partners in the community to make sure we have the tools available to take action immediately,” said Goodall, “but those tools must be in the best interest of the taxpayer.”
Maine is a relatively small state, so it doesn’t have all the resources available for incentives that other states may, he said. But because of that small size, lawmakers and community members can move together quickly to work and even implement legislation and policy changes needed to act on a potential business deal.
He also suggested that Maine has assets that Gov. Paul LePage needs to stress to help promote the state and attract businesses here. For example, said Goodall, a recent Ernst & Young study ranked Maine first in the nation in terms of levying the smallest tax burden on new investments. It’s that sort of news that should be touted, he suggested.
“Mainers are demanding we all work together to create jobs and strengthen our economy — that includes the governor being a salesperson-in-chief and promoting the strengths of Maine,” said Goodall.



What can Maine learn from Kestrel’s migration?
That corporate socialism is not good business ?
i know, that makes me so grrrrrrr…mad!
Before we go jumping at copying other states, let’s look at how those states are doing in keeping and creating jobs compared to us.
Three states were given as examples:
Wisconsin with an unemployment rate of 7.3%. Worse than Maine’s.
Arizona with an unemployment rate of 8.7%. Much worse than Maine’s
Texas with an unemployment rate of 8.1%. Much worse than Maine’s.
Maine’s unemployment rate is 7.0% and getting better.
http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm
Perhaps these states should be copying Maine, instead of us copying them???
Obama doing a great job bringing jobs to Maine. LePage–not so much
What objective methodology and metrics are you using to ascribe credit to one policy maker versus the other? I would like to see the data to support your comment and the specific policies identified to which you attribute the results.
ATLANTA,GA UNEMPLOYMENT IS 12.6%
The only reason Maine is getting better by the nembers is because people are dropping off the unemployment rolls. Not by finding jobs. DUH!
Maine will never learn anything. The state is extremely backward, with an uneducated Governor LePage who crawled out of the Dark Ages. With mostly old people, Hippies and Redneck” not in my backyard crowd.” The educated young Mainers have long left the state for Careers in high tech and large corporate white collar positions which Maine does not have and will never have. Most Maine industry left, is obsolete. The few railroads left are in collapse. Maine’s infrastructure is in collapse. Maine has very, very expensive energy, whether heating oil, gasoline, natural gas and electricity mostly imported from Canada. Maine has nothing to learn here, but to accept, it has become a low wage, uneducated, welfare state, loaded with Drugs and Junkies. It is a Third World Country, maybe even worse.
I agree with much of what you said but LePage did NOT create this mess, he inherited it from the liberal Dems that governed before him.
Too simple. You are an example of knightcross,s commentary. Take NAFTA into consideration and get out of your small minded Maine/Ignorant thought process. Do you live on an island.
don’t blame NAFTA. the economy was going global with our without NAFTA.
more appropriately, we should blame our reaction to NAFTA; our failure to reeducate, our failure to adapt.
it’s incorrect to think that jobs all went over seas. the fact is, automation is/was going to gobble those rote positions anyway.
NAFTA is not the problem. We could live with a trade agreement with Mexico and Canada. The WTO is the problem. We won WWII by out producing our enemies. We couldn’t out produce Haiti these days thanks to the treasonous dirt bags who packed up their factories and fled to China with all the jobs. We are currently running a trade DEFICIT with 88 nations around the world to the tune of $550 billion this year, $350 billion of it with China alone. Our “public servants” have managed to get us upside down in just about every trade agreement they have “negotiated” on our behalf. They wouldn’t be allowed to sweep the floors in the private sector with a job performance like that. The Republicans and the Democrats are at fault and we should not be foolish enough to keep sending these two parties back to Washington and expect a different result, that is the definition of insanity.
i agree with everything you said. but i honestly blame the consumers (me and you).
buy local whenever possible.
I spend 95% of my disposable income within a 5 mile radius of my home and with locally owned businesses only. You are absolutely right. A lack of patriotism at the cash register is a lot of our problem. The treasonous dirt bags that moved their factories to China for fun and profit could not have done it without our help.
The low and middle class do try to purchase locally. What about the rich, they bank out of the country, invest out of the country and purchase there needs out of the country. Really shows who cares, doesn’t it?
Yes, wealthy people have a tendency to be self absorbed. They would not care about the survival of small local businesses. Some people of wealth would. But most would not. I have an Aunt who is worth about $20 million. She ALWAYS checks ChinaMart first. She can’t help herself! Lol.
——————————
Can the liberal vs conservative BS. If you were in a life boat and needed to get away from a sinking ship fast what good would it do if the people on the left side were rowing in one direction and the people on the right were rowing in an opposite direction. The attitude about pointing fingers at one another has done nothing except to get us rowing in a very tight circle. The ONLY way that WE, not politicians, will solve any of our problems is by working together. We have complex problems and simplistic solutions will not solve them . Here is an idea about attracting business to our State. How about the man currently residing in the Blaine House starts telling the world about positive things about our State and her people rather then constantly putting down Maine and her citizens.
Well said 4mermainer. The trouble is that we have been brainwashed into thinking in political extremes. “You’re for us or against us” This works well for the politicians as it allows them to run the country for the benefit of themselves and their buddies who fund the campaigns. It does no good at all for most Americans. In fact, it is obviously harmful to Americans as our current economic malaise proves.
What can we learn? That Maine isn’t rich enough to win a bidding war.
what we learned is LePage is not committed to bringing jobs to Maine. His only commitment is acting on the MHPC agenda
That there is a cost, in terms of business climate, for hosting a pristine environment, which I appreciate nearly as much as anyone else, is hard to dispute. It seems to be a “deal with the devil” – have pristine environment with a minimal business sector and starve, or relax the environmental restrictions and grow an economy which might generate enough taxes to fund a Kestrel effort. I’m not real big on taxpayer funded Kestrel-type deals, but I guess that’s a game that sometimes has to be played.
C’Mon man–this had nothing to do with a “pristine environment”. this loss was caused by Lepage spending all of his time working for MHPC and not for bringing jobs to Maine.
there were no environmental concerns re: Kestrel. if there were, please list them.
I can’t list any specifically in regards to Kestrell. What I was referring to was a bigger picture. For example, the pulp & paper industry. I believe they left because of the political/environmental uncertainty in continuing to invest in their mills. That is what created the “business climate” problems many refer to. That perception has spread to other industries, also. You sound like someone who might say “good riddance” to the paper industry, and industry in general, but that’s my explanation. That is the business climate, and it effects almost all businesses and industry in Maine.
i understand your point. i am not saying good riddance. but i do believe in adaptability. change is inevitable.
i don’t believe we have to sacrifice the air we breathe for jobs. i have a small business. i don’t dump chemicals. i pick up after myself. i don’t get ‘incentives’ from the State.
what I did was develop a business plan and then sacrifice. why do bigger businesses get to litter and pollute when you and i can’t?
I appreciate your analysis. Have you ever considered being a suicide advocate?!
C’Mon man. This had nothing to do with “pristine environments” and everything to do with LePage sucking up to MHPC and not bringing jobs to Maine
I think Maine should start an Open For Buisness Sign manufaturing buisness,
It seems that they are so popular that people have been stealing them!
I don’t think we should give away the farm in the name of jobs. It’s corporate welfare plain and simple. Why can’t we take that same money and make it available to existing small business owners in Maine allowing them to scale, creating jobs and profits here in Maine.
And by small business…I don’t mean a company with 600 jobs. Real small business, those with a handful of employees.
Maine did the right thing by loosing the deal. Kestrel did not provide its financial information to determine if it was a financially viable concern. For all intents and purposes, the company’s recent financial woes indicate that it was using the game of playing one state off the other to get the best deal in order to try to sell it to potential investors. The company was not being forthcoming with information and that is the classic scheme of a swindle.
SingleTrackGirl – Do you suppose it might be because the small business people cannot offer payback under the table. If you can somehow make a buck from the big boys, wouldn’t you also go where the big bucks are?
I wonder how much money was in the briefcase.
That they the elected officials only focus on paper,potatoes,timber and running maine as if it were mardens.
I challenge anyone? If you wanted to open a multi-million dollar business, would you consider doing so in Maine? My god, look at what we have running the state. No wonder anyone with common sense gets the heck out of Dodge.
Maine, OPEN FOR BUSINESS, Ya right. the sign is on the wrong side of the interstate.
Business will never move here with the taxes and regulations!!!!! !!!!!!!!
“First and foremost, the odds are better for us to build what we have, grow what we have, than try to attract what we don’t’ have.”
Well said, Mike. Let’s support our existing businesses (like C&L Aviation) who have proven themselves with a successful record of jobs creation, before we offer the world to a risky start-up venture.
Lepage’s request to see Kestrel’s finances was certainly reasonable; it is one which any smart businesman should make before committing any funds. He is simply being prudent with our State’s limited resources.
Companies love playing states against each other because the know they will act like high school boys slobbering over the prom queen.
And they also love government investment because they usually don’t have to give up any ownership of the company in exchange for the investment by taxpayers. And furthermore that they are dealing with economic development people who have no expertise in their industry and are therefore an easy sell because they are only interested in the next photo-op for the closing handshake of the deal.
A particular red flag was that Kestrel would not provide financial details. Perhaps the lesson to be learned is that if an idea is really good, professionals such as venture capital will be invested instead of using taxpayers money.
If history repeats itself, Maine, not Wisconsin was the winner. The prior company for Kestrel founder Alan Klapmeier, was Cirrus Aircraft (he was a cofounder with his brother). In the Wikipedia entry for Cirrus Aircraft is the following:
“In March 2010 Cirrus went to court in an attempt to get an order to prevent former supplier L-3 Communications from telling other Cirrus suppliers that Cirrus was heading into bankruptcy and from discouraging companies from doing business with Cirrus. On 1 April 2010 Cirrus applied for a “voluntary dismissal” of the case against L3, before L3 had filed a response. L3 has been engaged in a lawsuit against Cirrus for non-payment of US$18.7M in development costs for flat panel electronics, with Cirrus countering that L3 did not abide by the contract terms.
In June 2010 the company began paying back-rent owed to the city of Grand Forks. Cirrus had stopped paying its rent 16 months earlier. It also owed the City of Duluth back rent, which the city has indicated they would forgive in exchange for job creation.
In February 2011, Cirrus was sold for US$210M to China Aviation Industry General (CAIGA), a subsidiary of Aviation Industry Corporation, which is wholly owned by the Government of the People’s Republic of China.”
I’m not surprised that Kestrel is so secretive and acts as if they have something to hide. I think that privately they know that the future of their company isn’t so assured as they’d have others believe.
The small airplane manufacturing business is an extremely difficult one. Even in the best of years, the existing manufacturers have had difficulties.
I see nothing so special about Kestrel’s proposed products that was going to give them an upper hand in the market.
As world oil production continues to stagnate and as the likes of Chindia demand more of their fair share, oil will continue to get ever more pricey. Jet fuel and avgas are destined to get so expensive that the aviation industry is destined to shrink despite the plans of Virgin Atlantic, Boeing, and so on, to run the world’s plane fleet on tropical oils such as jathropha.
People laugh at the idea that Maine is stubbornly hanging onto timber, potatoes, and so on, as economic drivers, but I think it’s dangerous to assume that we’re all going to sail into the future, energy-starved for fossil fuels as it’s going to be, all being paid big bucks to code in Perl, from our computer workstations at home, then hopping into our private, Kestrel aircraft, to go snowboarding in the Rockies.