DENVER — Rick Santorum had a breakthrough night on Tuesday, winning presidential contests in Missouri and Minnesota and making a strong showing in Colorado, all of which is expected to breathe life into his struggling campaign and slow Mitt Romney’s march to the Republican presidential nomination.
Early returns had Santorum running well ahead of Romney in Minnesota and Missouri, and the Associated Press projected he would win both contests. The victories provide fresh momentum to the former Pennsylvania senator’s campaign and boost his fundraising going into the next big big contests a month away.
Santorum was leading in Colorado as well, but it was unclear whether he could maintain his position as more precincts reported vote totals.
Romney had hoped to extend his winning streak as he tries to strengthen his claim to the mantle of the presumptive nominee. But he was prepared for a loss in one or more states as Santorum made an aggressive run in all three contests Tuesday. In Minnesota, where Romney enjoyed strong establishment backing, early returns showed him trailing not just Santorum but also Rep. Ron Paul of Texas.
“Conservatism is alive and well,” Santorum told supporters at his election-night party in Missouri. “I don’t stand here and claim to be the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney. I stand here to be the conservative alternative to Barack Obama.”
Paul, who has yet to secure a win in the 2012 sweepstakes, mobilized his loyal support networks in the three states and was banking on low turnout in the nonbinding contests to give him a win. But he finished a distant third in Missouri and was trailing in the other states as well.
Newt Gingrich did not compete in Missouri and spent limited time in Colorado and Minnesota. The former House speaker looked past Tuesday’s contests and instead campaigned in Ohio, one of several delegate-rich states voting March 6 on “Super Tuesday,” when he hopes to jump-start his struggling candidacy.
Together, the three states voting Tuesday will eventually award 128 delegates. But Missouri was a “beauty contest” with no delegates at stake, while Minnesota and Colorado were nonbinding events with delegates to be chosen this spring.
At stake Tuesday night was the prestige of winning. And Santorum, whose campaign has struggled since he narrowly won the Iowa caucuses, nailed down at least one upset to restore an air of viability to his candidacy.
By defeating Romney, Santorum believes, he could reset the race and help create the perception that he, and not Gingrich, is the conservative alternative to the establishment front-runner.
“I feel great that Minnesota is going to change the direction of this race tonight,” Santorum told supporters at a Tuesday afternoon rally in Blaine, Minn. “Governor Romney’s been able to bully his way through this primary . . . but he’s not inspiring. He’s not painting the vision.”
Recognizing the Santorum threat, Romney and his supporters attacked the former senator the past few days over his support for congressional earmarks.
Romney shifted his efforts in recent days to Colorado, where he has a deeper ground organization and won the 2008 caucuses with 60 percent of the vote.
Campaigning Tuesday morning at a huge RV showroom in Loveland, Colo., Romney said, “Colorado’s got something to say about who our nominee’s gonna be, and I think I’m gonna be that nominee.”
The Minnesota and Missouri contests were early barometers of Romney’s support in some of the key Midwestern states he would need to win in a general election against President Barack Obama. And Colorado, considered a critical battleground in the fall general election, will test Romney’s strength in a swing state that Obama’s re-election advisers consider a must-win.
The candidates spent considerably less money and time in these three states than in the contests that preceded them in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Florida and Nevada; now the race enters a February lull. After the Maine caucuses, which will end on Saturday, there are no primaries or caucuses until the Arizona and Michigan primaries on Feb. 28, two states that will generate intense engagement from all the candidates. Romney, in particular, is planning to compete aggressively in both.
Public polling in Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri had been inconsistent, and Romney’s campaign advisers predicted that Tuesday’s turnout, particularly in Minnesota, would be small and overwhelmingly conservative, favoring Santorum.
Romney officials labored to preserve an aura of inevitability around his campaign, releasing a strategy memorandum Tuesday promoting the former Massachusetts governor’s financial and organizational advantage over the long haul.
“Mitt Romney is the only candidate with the organizational strength and broad-based appeal to secure delegates in all remaining primaries and caucuses,” national political director Rich Beeson wrote. “Of course, there is no way for any nominee to win first place in every single contest — John McCain lost 19 states in 2008, and we expect our opponents to notch a few wins too.”
Beeson dismissed Gingrich’s calculation of a rebound in Southern states holding March contests as “a flight of fancy and not grounded in reality.”
Gingrich, who has pledged to take his fight to the party’s convention in August, kept up his assault on Romney in a string of campaign stops Tuesday.
In Cincinnati, he linked Romney to Obama, saying a “Massachusetts moderate” could not debate the Democratic incumbent on a range of policies, including health care.
“I don’t think that a moderate can defeat Obama, because they don’t have enough space to debate,” Gingrich said at Price Hill Chili in Cincinnati. “I think if you look at Romneycare and Obamacare, they are too similar. If you look at his record as governor, they are too similar.”
After losing badly to Romney in the Florida primary and the Nevada caucuses, Gingrich and his aides turned their attention to the March contests, which include several Southern states where Gingrich could do well.



The good news: “Conservatism is alive and well in Missouri and Minnesota,”
The bad news: “Conservatism is alive and well in Missouri and Minnesota,”
Let us not forget: The debt crisis and the income inequality has been growing for decades under
lively Conservatism and lively Liberalism.
Rick Santorum stands for politics as usual just like Barack Obama and all other candidates:
Watch: German preacher’s thoughts on 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpLYq525SpM
I’ll agree to the first paragraph.
Too funny.
Note to republican voters.. avoid Rove like the plague.. if that means giving up your Foxnews where he makes his home .. then so be it. It’s time to demand that Rove take his incompetent heavy hands off the off the parties working mechanics and retire before the party sinks even deeper into the muck. Oh, ya .. and Rove’s drive-by shooting victims: Gary Johnson, Mich Daniels, Ron Paul, Rich Perry, Sharron Angle, Michael Bachmann, Paul Pawlenty, Michael Steele, Howard Phillips, and many others may have been sucker punched out of the ring.. but are training hard for the next round.
The race is on and it looks like heartache and the winner loses all.
apologies to George Jones.
This food fight in the clown car of the Republican Party is a blast to watch! Will it be Richie Rich, the Lizard, or the Frothy Mix? When a racist like Ron Paul has the most integrity of those on the debate stage, you know the GOP is in trouble.
The case for Ron Paul; Please watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGHJERqsu2c&feature=youtu.be
Average hourly carpenter wage in 1980 = $16.39
Average hourly carpenter wage in 2011 = $20.98 (28% increase)
A gallon of regular gas in 1980 = $1.25
A gallon of regular gas in 2011 = $3.67 (193% increase)
A first class stamp in 1980 = $0.15
A first class stamp in 2011 = $0.44 (193% increase)
Median home price in 1980 = $64,000
Median home price in 2011 = $170,000 (166% increase)
This is one of the reasons why we MUST adopt a commodity-backed currency and purge ourselves of the terrible “inflation tax” that is suffocating the working class. This is why both parents have to work to support a family today. 90% of American’s wages have not kept up with inflation and will continue to not keep up.
Historically, economies using a commodity-backed currency enjoy stable prices ; governments can’t print the excess money that causes inflation and governments without excess money can’t spend themselves into massive debt!
Our current monetary system ultimately benefits only a small percent of our population. Don’t let them fool you into thinking that we must continue this lunacy! Please vote for Ron Paul and restore America.
Romney has the looks and the charm. He is good at presenting himself as being a very diplomatic person. The problem is when you start to peel back those superficial layers and observe that very little substance is being offered. Pay attention to topics that make him uncomfortable and you can tell where his true loyalties are. He does not really care about the working class other than their potential to work for minimum wage and make profits for investors. He has no intention of fixing our monetary system because he and his cronies are part of the small percentage of people who benefit so much from the current one. He panders to the clueless and fearful by offering to increase our already stupidly oversized military juggernaut. He will also continue to support unconstitutional legislation that takes away our rights and freedoms. He is too scared to offer a list of the spending cuts it would take to actually balance the budget because it would negatively impact the majority of voters; consequently, it won’t happen. He offers no tangible plan to avoid monetary collapse and the resulting social chaos; he will just let all of the suffering play out. Regardless, he will keep smiling and the lemmings will vote for him.
On the other hand, Ron Paul doesn’t have a whole lot going on in the looks department. He’s not going to pander for your vote; he’s not going to tell you everything you’d like to hear in order to become President. However, he will veto every unnecessary spending bill, thereby reducing kickbacks and corruption. He will also put an end to military expansionism and tell the war profiteers to take a hike. Ron Paul will remove the incentives that keep immigrants coming here illegally and promote legal immigration. He will also save Social Security by avoiding bankruptcy and he will even try to fix our broken monetary system. Ron Paul will do away with the Patriot act, the President’s ability to indefinitely detain American citizens without a trial, and bills like the Enemy Expatriation Act, which would give the government the power to strip you of your citizenship. Ron Paul will also keep the government from regulating the internet. Meanwhile, the other candidates support all of this nonsense and will continue to spit on the Constitution.
Our national debt is currently $15.3 Trillion; the chances of getting to $20 Trillion without a monetary collapse are very slim. The budget deficit for this year alone is already projected to be $1.1 Trillion. Santorum’s overall plan will result in adding $900 Billion to that deficit in his first year. Gingrich’s overall plan will result in adding $850 Billion in his first year. Romney’s overall plan will add $180 Billion to the deficit in his first year. These candidates have the sheer nerve to call themselves conservatives. Obama will not cut spending either and we will likely suffer collapse by the end of his next term; where will that leave everyone who depends on entitlements and assistance?
http://news.yahoo.com/study-santorum-tax-plan-swells-deficit-900b-080423488.html
Additionally, if we go to war with Iran, the added debt and money printing will cause the monetary collapse much sooner. There is ZERO chance that we will be the first human civilization with fiat currency to continue printing money and not suffer a collapse. Ron Paul is the only candidate that would actually reduce overall spending and try to fix our monetary system. Nevertheless, you need to be prepared. Please make sure that you have enough supplies stocked up so that you and your family can survive the collapse; recovery could take up to several years!
Sounds like Mormon family policy.
As commentators pointed out this morning, these results illustrate that hard core consrevatives are the primary partcipants at this stage. Do they have any staying power? Can a purely (allegedly) conservative candidate win in Nov. ?
I’m really disappointed with thypical coverage of these caucuses (circuses). How many delegates (if any) are at stake? Is the action winner take all? Are there subsequent actions including picking delegates? Is a “winner” really a winner?