PORTLAND, Maine — Mitt Romney weathered heckling inside and the presence of a crowd of Ron Paul supporters outside the building Friday night as he tried to sell himself to Mainers as the Republican Party’s best shot to knock President Barack Obama out of office in the coming election.

Romney held a town hall-style meeting at the Portland Company Marine Complex the night before many Maine communities hold caucuses and the state GOP announces the results of its presidential preference poll. Saturday provides the former Massachusetts governor an opportunity to put another state in his win column — and bolster his front-runner status — after rival and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum swept the Tuesday caucuses in Minnesota, Missouri and Colorado.

Romney’s strongest competition for Maine’s GOP endorsement, however, is expected to be the Libertarian-leaning Paul, who visited the state a week ago and plans to campaign here again during caucuses Saturday. On Friday night, as the crowd of more than 500 filed out of Romney’s event in Portland, they were faced by Paul supporters handing out leaflets, holding large signs and even projecting pro-Paul sentiments onto the building in green laser lights.

Neither Santorum nor former House Speaker Newt Gingrich have campaigned in Maine.

While many of the questions offered by attendees were supportive, Romney absorbed scattered heckling and confrontational questions during his town hall-style give-and-take inside the rustic red brick structure Friday. The candidate largely kept his composure and defended his stances when faced with more combative audience members.

The overwhelmingly pro-Romney crowd responded to confrontational questions with a retaliatory hail of boos and enthusiastically cheered the candidate’s replies to those questions.

The former Massachusetts governor, who has won the New Hampshire and Florida GOP primaries thus far in the race, was asked by Munjoy Hill News blogger Carol McCracken if he “thinks it’s patriotic to stash your money in the Cayman Islands.”

Romney told McCracken a blind trustee has managed his money for 10 years and he never has used out-of-country accounts as shelters from taxes.

“I have not saved one dollar by investing overseas,” he said. “I have paid all my U.S. taxes and, by the way, not a dollar more.”

That retort garnered an appreciative pop from supporters, who consistently applauded Romney’s calls for lower taxes, reduced government regulations and private sector solutions to the country’s problems. He pointed to his past as a business leader as proof that he can “make the hard decisions” necessary to “cap government spending” and “finally balance the budget.”

“In the private sector, which most of you live in, you have to have a balanced budget or you go broke,” Romney said.

Instead of focusing on his Republican challengers Friday night, he largely took aim at the Democratic incumbent he’d have to face if he gains the GOP nomination, which many pundits still expect to happen despite his recent loss of momentum.

Romney called the Keystone XL oil pipeline from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada — which the Obama administration last month denied amid environmentalists’ concerns of air and water pollution — a “no brainer,” attracting heckling from one corner of the room and cheers from others.

“The president has blocked coal, he’s blocked oil and he’s blocked natural gas,” the candidate said.

Romney also told Friday night’s crowd that if elected president he will grant waivers to Obama’s health care plan to all 50 states, designate China as a “ currency manipulator” and apply tariffs to Chinese goods accordingly, and distribute leases for oil drilling on approved American properties, among other things.

In a state where one of the largest private employers is destroyer builder Bath Iron Works, Romney criticized Obama’s efforts to cut military spending, saying in part he would increase Navy ship procurement from nine per year to 15.

Romney, who received more than 50 percent of the Republican vote during the 2008 Maine caucuses before dropping out of that year’s presidential race, was introduced at the Friday event by Maine Attorney General William Schneider and Peter Cianchette, an executive with Cianbro construction and Romney’s state campaign chairman.

Other recognizable Republicans in the audience included state Senate President Kevin Raye and Senate Majority Leader Jon Courtney, State Treasurer Bruce Poliquin and former New Hampshire governor and White House Chief of Staff John Sununu.

Members of a protest group sarcastically calling themselves “Billionaires for Romney” announced plans to demonstrate at the event, angry about corporate influence on political campaigns. In a protest announcement, group leader Wells Lyons called Romney’s war chest of more than $50 million — by far the most of the Republican candidates, although far less than Obama’s nearly $140 million in campaign funds — emblematic of a “corrupt system.”

Seth has nearly a decade of professional journalism experience and writes about the greater Portland region.

Join the Conversation

144 Comments

  1. Flip Flop Flip Flop Flip Flop Flip Flop Flip Flop…………
    I don’t think even Romney knows what he believes.

    Ron Paul 2012!

    1. You gave five instances of flip flopping, please back it up if you are going to be critical. Ron Paul was rather weak on abortion when I saw him being interviewed on television, and he doesn’t seem to directly answer questions about foreign policy – of any nature.

          1. Paul suggests we spend money back home on our own infrastructure and a defense system that is expansive, protects our borders, and is ready to defend our nation with overwhelming force, should our soil ever be attacked.  Ron Paul voted for the war in Afghanistan and feels as though we should have captured Bin Laden in Tora Bora.  Unfortunatley, this was an abysmal failure of the neoconservative, G.W. Bush.

            And I would argue that the aggressive, extremist foreign interventionist policy you apparantly support will actually get us all killed.  Why do you suggest that it makes sense for us to bomb, invade, and occpy foreign nations with the hope that they will not retaliate and “maybe they’ll just leave us alone” after we have destroyed their infrastructure and disrupted the lives of tens of thousands of civilians with what our military politely qualifies as “collateral damage”?

          2. No a Chamberlain policy would include disregarding agreements with allies. PAul would not make these agreements.

          3. The foreign policy of the past ten years is scary. Paul gives the most logical solutions to our failed foreign policies. 

      1. While Governor of Massachusetts he was in support of safe and legal abortions. He now claims to be staunchly pro-life.
        While campaigning in Massachusetts, he was a steadfast supporter of gun control regulations. Since then, he has joined the NRA and now claims to support essentially no firearm regulation. While in Massachusetts he favored carbon emission regulations. He now opposes them in any form.
        In a 1994 letter to the Log Cabin Republicans, who advocate gay rights, Romney said he was in favor of “gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly” in the military. He now says it would be a mistake to interfere with the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.
        In 1994, he advocated a spending limit on congressional elections and the abolition of political action committees. In 2002, he supported public financing of campaigns from a 10 percent tax on private fundraising. Later, Romney said the McCain-Feingold law limiting campaign contributions is an attack on free speech. In a November 2005 interview with the Boston Globe, he described an immigration overhaul advanced by John McCain as “reasonable.” He has since denounced it as an “amnesty plan.”
        And then there’s health care.
        That’s 6.

    2. Romney knows exactly what he believes…He believes he is so wealthy that none of this matters.

      As far as him being a flip-flopper…all politicians are…Take Ron Paul for instance…He can’t decide if he wrote racist articles in his racist newsletter or not. At first he said he didn’t…then he said he owned the papers, but didn’t write them…finally (and I think this is his best answer yet), he took responsibility for not taking responsibility for them by claiming that while he didn’t write them, since they were in his papers, he would accept responsibility for them being written.

      Simply put…anyone who reaches the realm of national politician (president, representative, or senator to name a few) for ANY party (rep, dem, or other) is a detached scumbag, beholden only to wealthy special interests and corporation, and who doesn’t give a darn about 90% of the people in this nation.

      1. It sounds to me from your comments you could easily become a Ron Paul supporter.   He’s not the typical politician and has been fighting for the people for a long time.  He is at fault for allowing the racists comments to get by him, but he certainly is not racists and didn’t write them.  I think he was simply doing to much while delivering babies.   This racists stuff has been blown way out of proportion.  Lobbyist will not visit Ron Pauls office because they know he has principles and cannot be bought.

      2. Ron Paul condemned the offending words in those old newsletters and he has also taken responsibility for them being in there. We know who the author was and you can watch this news report to educate yourself about the situation. Ron Paul is not racist by any stretch of the imagination!

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-mVe88Nt1s

  2. “and apply tariffs to Chinese goods accordingly…”

    hopefully he does not carry this out.  It will mean higher prices for goods.  and this will hurt the poor the most.

    1. The Chinese are doing a lot to try to hurt us, they are trying to squeeze as much capitol out of us as they can, you can’t start a trade war but you can’t be a wuss and not stand up for yourself! I’m sure Romney will handle it in the correct fashion as to give us the most gain, because right now we are really getting screwed.

      1. It is the united states that is squeezing as much capital out of china as it can.  Last I checked, Apple computer has 100 billion in cash.  And that money is in america.  They are building a new billion dollar HQ in america.  We get all the benefit, none of the pain, from outsourcing.

        American corporations sell products all over the world. To stay competitive, they need low labor costs. Consumers are also greedy – they want low prices.

      1. I agree with you guys… But check this video out  and see what we are up against…  http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/hotel-time-lapse-construction-30-stories-in-15-days/20vddx3p  a prime example that we can not compete with them. I take care of a mans house who has a business in New Jersey … He just moved it to China because the american work force cant do what he can get done over there. He said it is not just the labor costs. Its the labor. People call out sick here he said so much whining . always griping about this or that never going an extra mile so that machine gets back online today.. ahh.. we will get it in the morning meanwhile he says production is down and the money spent to operate that day is lost…… there are sooo many things to pay for a worker and you dont get a quarter of the return out of an american worker. Everything cost so much more here. The same unit of what he is producing costs 50 percent more to make here than in China.I  certainly do NOT agree with what he has done and It actually hurts me as an american laborer to even hear about it . Let alone know someone who has and is doing it. Makes me sick. Id like to hate this guy but I have known him for over ten years. He is very easy to work for has always treated me fairly and paid me well. He is a rich guy but always has more over for drinks or for a get together…A decent , intelligent man. So that tells me that he must know what he is talking about and what he is doing. I think in this day and age with the cell phone ipods etc .. We have got lazy. My own daughter cant function without her Iphone or computer or I pad.. I dont know.. I dont know how to fix it .. I dont know whats gone wrong..  but something HAS to change. 

      2. Expect goods to go up 100% or more in price overnight.   how does that help the poor?  They might have a job, but their salary buys half or less of what it did yesterday.   An easy way to have full employment is to ban automation, but are we better off that way? No.  Because we are less productive.

        1. Good, It will not hurt me because I havent bought anything made in China(except my cell phone) in 14 years. It can be done!!!   If we did away with free Government give aways to people they would work because they would have to. I do not feel bad for people on Government $$$$$$ I could care less about them!    I am not talking about the truley needy.

    2. Funny how “concern for the poor” comes only AFTER the factories which once employed them are safely ensconced in China.  What part of “Communist China” eludes you?

      1. Getting cheap goods from china is no different from getting cheap oil from saudi arabia, or Canada.  Both benefit us greatly, both are examples of outsourcing.  It increases productivity, and the money saved goes towards creating more jobs in America.

        1. I think you’re missing a huge part of the puzzle. Before the outsourcing of US factory jobs to China the people who are unemployed would have been able to find work in US factories.

          What kind of unskilled (or ones you wouldn’t need a degree or retraining for) jobs are there?

          You’re following a broken logic. Money, as you put it, isn’t “saved” by US consumers, they spend it, and companies like WalMart and BestBuy and Sears take that money to pay the paltry sums to Chinese factory workers, and the profits go to stockholders, who then invest in more things to sell us.

          The so-called “market economy” doesn’t work when there isn’t work to be had, because at some point, the money runs out.

          1. if a washing machine made in china is one tenth the cost of one made in the usa, the consumer will buy the one made in china.    The money saved is real.  Companies also benefit from cheap goods made in china, and can use the cost savings to hire more people.

          2. You’re still not getting it.

            First of all the money “saved” is virtual, and a scam. Today’s washing machines don”t cost any less than the equivalent of what they cost when they were made in the US, say 25 years ago.

            Second, you’ve been duped. Like I already said, the money that companies “save” goes to CEO and executive bonuses and to stockholders, who in turn invest in similar moneymaking schemes.

            Don’t believe the trickle down theory, it just doesn’t hold water.

          3. That is simply not true.  Adjusted for inflation, goods are a fraction of what they cost 25 years ago.  People have more stuff than ever. 

            Machines that have replaced humans in many industries, do work for pennies an hour.  Should we ban automation? The answer is no.  We get more stuff, for less money, with machines.   We have much higher productivity.

            To do the daily work of a a single large farm tractor, it would require thousands of people with hoes.  Should we outlaw farm tractors?  Should we outlaw hoes?  Make people farm with spoons or their bare hands?

          4. Or should we continue to support a system that takes American jobs out of the country and pays slave labor wages and highly questionable working conditions so that you can have your badly needed stuff.

            I think if you scratch a little beyond the surface, you’ll see that regular folks’ biggest worries are not whether they can upgrade their widescreens next Xmas, but whether they can keep and/or heat their homes.

            But when it comes to actually thinking about these things instead of putting up truly dated and futile arguments, I don’t think you’ll be doing much scratching of anything besides your head.

          5. My mother’s Hot Point refrigerator cost her $150 1952 dollars. It lasted until 1986, that’s 34 years and never needed a repair.  Since 1986 we have had four refrigerators all costing over $500 and none lasting more than a maximum of 7 years. The same with our “Chambers Gas stove (Made in Shelbyville Indiana,) Amana Stor mor Freezer Made in Iowa), and  her 1976 Maytag Washer and Dryer set (Made in Iowa) which still do a great job washing my clothing.I just don’t see how the new system “saves” anything. 

            Plus your contention that companies hire more people because they are saving money means NOTHING to the average US worker as the company hires Communist Chinese workers which benefits the US not-at-all.

          6. What does that have to do with this?

            We don’t know whether the Stimulus Act kept things from getting worse yet. To say, like Romney did, that it didn’t keep unemployment from absolutely skyrocketing is disingenuous at best.

            Perhaps the Economic Stimulus Act was only ameliorating the symptoms of a much greater disease that has been plaguing the country now for decades; the mass exodus of blue collar jobs and the knock-on effect of that on the very fabric that once made this country the most powerful in the world.

            … to answer your one-sentence straw man.

          7. The Economic Stimulus Act isn’t trickle down?

            As someone above said – if you can afford a tractor you can be more productive than xxx number of folks with hoes.  But when the efficiencies, productivity and other costs exceed what can be produced over-seas – eventually (as in all actions / re-actions – what goes up comes down) companies relocate.  Govt rules, regulations, taxes, unfunded labor promises are also a major factor.  

            The FairTax.org will put us in a much better position to solve many of our problems in a fair and finally transparent way.    

  3. No one minds wealthy individuals who earn their wealth honestly. Some will take exception to those who exploit others in order to enrich themselves. I hope some hard questions were asked about Bain Capital for example, and its “creative demolition” model.

    1. Romney bought a lot of companies, used them to borrow money, and then bankrupted them! For example, Bain made a 370% return on the money they used to buy KB Toys by leveraging them to borrow huge sums of money, pocketing it, and then bankrupting them!
       
      What Romney does is essentially the same thing as an individual taking out loans and running up huge credit card debt with the intention of filing bankruptcy. The difference is that our corrupt lawmakers have made it legal for people like Romney to do what he does and walk away unscathed with the borrowed money!
       
      You better believe that Romney will essentially do the same thing to America! He will borrow more money to give to special interests and he will benefit from investments and kickbacks! America will be his greatest exploit and he will bankrupt us!

      1. That’s his plan for America. Bankrupt it, sell it off into pieces to the rest of the world and he and his class will walk off with huge sums of money. This is what he has done all his life and what he is good at. Why do you think vulture capital groups are investing so much money in his campaign?

  4. “Romney called the Keystone XL oil pipeline from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada — which the Obama administration last month denied amid environmentalists’ concerns of air and water pollution — a “no brainer,” attracting heckling from one corner of the room and cheers from others.”

    Let me tell you – the pipeline from Canada to the US is now a NO go. Canada is going to keep the pipeline in Canada. its going to Bc and to Quebec – definitly not south! We have lost the pipeline – for good – and maybe we should take this as a lesson, when a country such as Canada offers to help us out – we need to jump at the opportunity – and be thankful for Canada and their kindness!

    1. Is that like the old adage about not looking a gift horse in the mouth?  What they don’t tell you is that the free horse usually turns out to be the most expensive horse in the stable.  

      The tar sand has to be pushed through under high pressure and holds the highest risk of pipeline leaks.  Would it have worked?  I don’t know.  If it were me I’d want to know more before approving it, which is all Obama said.

    2. Actually there is already a pipeline there, the Keystone pipeline is the second.  In addition a pipeline over the Canadian Rockies is probably not in the cards.  Canada has environmentalist citizens too.

      1. Well, over the rockies and to Quebec – sorry the plan is alread written up and APPROVED! In Canada they don’t waste time nor money unlike us in the us.

        In addition where do you think the tar sands are located?

        1. There are many Canadian tar sand deposits, but the largest exploited patch is in northeast Alberta (just above Montana) There are currently six pipelines out of Alberta all of which terminate in the USA.  According to ExxonMobil’s “LAMP magazine there are currently no approved routes to Eastern Canada.

          The idea of Keystone is to move highly corrosive material to the Gulf of Mexico where it will be redefined and exported to South America and China.  There are currently 26 refineries in the USA that take tarsands material, with six more planning on taking this material (1 each in Texas and Louisiana.

          Currently Canada has one refinery   using this material, and four proposed refineries (three in B.C.to the west)which may take this material in the future.  It takes an average of 10 years to get a refinary up and running, so my question to you is; If the Canadians approve a pipeline to Quebec for this material, what will they do with it once it gets there?  There are no proposals for a new refinery in that provence, nor is there a current refinery which can or will take this material.

          There are some things worth arguing and some things not. 

          1. I am not going to argue – its futile. But you have numerous facts that are wrong and need to be reverified! Facts are:
            1) Canada is going ahead with the eatern and western route from the Canadian Tar sands (there are not “many” of these tar sands)
            2) Numerous refineries are already in the works and are being built – talk to Irving in Saint John, NB.
            3)Canada will take the material, refine and sell/be self sufficent as far as oil is concerned – Telegraph Journal.
            4) The continuation of the pipeline is planed to go from Que. to NB – re new oil refinery in  SJ.
            5) Talk to Mr JD Irving as far as plans in the works for new oil refineries – I have!
            6) American has wasted Canadas time – and now we loose this advantace of being able to tap into the tarsands – Prime Mister Harper.
            7) Canada has again, offered to help the US and all we ever do is continually try to screw Canada – who has done nothing but trying to help NA be self sufficent! – Typical of the American people when it comes to international relationships
            8)Look at all the information – not just one source – LAMP magaize – a US magazine – not a good source – when dealing with a Canadian issue – it obviously twisted to have the us “sound” good!
            9) Don’t waste my time!

  5. When the Republican party finally pulls behind Mitt Romney, the same things about him that keep some searching for an alternative will make him sufficiently acceptable to the Reagan Democrats and even some more left Democrats – making him our next President.

    And not a moment to soon to end amateur hour of the Commies on Pennsylvania Avenue.

    1. Ron Paul Democrats will make Reagan Democrats look like a drop in the bucket. Ron Paul came in second in the Republican New Hampshire primary but did you know that he ALSO came in second in the Democrat Primary there??? Romney can’t get near the Independent and Democrat votes that Ron Paul can, which is why Romney has ZERO chance against Obama.

      http://www.democratsforronpaul.com/

      1. Reagan Dems a drop in the bucket? By Ron Paul? You have to be kidding. Particularly in that Ron Paul will never get anywhere close to the nomination. Nice guy. Smart. Honest. Some great ideas. But his defense policy of “maybe they’ll just leave us alone” would get us killed.

        1. This is how Ron Paul will win the nomination.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_Iji3xF0e4

          “The Israeli media does a great job of exacerbating the threat — and that’s the picture that most Israelis see,” said Edo Konrad, 24, of Tel Aviv. “We think of Iran as a genocidal, anti-Semitic regime and forget that outside of Israel, the largest Jewish community in the Middle East actually lives in Iran.”
          http://www.rgj.com/usatoday/article/52949682

          If Iran ever used a nuke on another country they know full well that their entire country and all of the people in it would be nuked out of existence! They will NOT do that and anyone who thinks otherwise is easily manipulated by war profiteers and is a damned fool! Furthermore, no country is dumb enough to give a terrorist a nuke because we would immediately be able to identify the nuclear signature from it, which would tell us exactly where it came from and what facility it was produced at. Consequently, that country would then cease to exist as well!

          Let us maintain diplomatic relations, economic relations, an impenetrable defense, and the power to destroy the world for now. Technology and nukes have changed the entire game. Can you name ANY countries with nuclear weapons that have EVER been invaded by another country? Military expansionism is a complete waste of resources and an archaic idea in today’s world!

        2. Paul suggests we spend money back home on our own infrastructure and a defense system that is expansive, protects our borders, and is ready to defend our nation with overwhelming force, should our soil ever be attacked.  Ron Paul voted for the war in Afghanistan and feels as though we should have captured Bin Laden in Tora Bora.  Unfortunatley, this was an abysmal failure of the neoconservative, G.W. Bush.

          And I would argue that the aggressive, extremist foreign interventionist policy you propose and obviously support is what will actually get us all killed.  Why do you suggest that it makes sense for us to bomb, invade, and occpy foreign nations with the hope that they will not retaliate and “maybe they’ll just leave us alone” after we have destroyed their infrastructure and disrupted the lives of tens of thousands of civilians with what our military politely qualifies as “collateral damage”?

          How is your approach any different…other than the fact that your approach results in the needless deaths of thousands of American and foreign civilian lives and the complete devestation to just as many families?

        3. Just because Fox and CNN keep repeating that Ron Paul has no chance for the nomination doesn’t make it true. He has a better chance than Gingrich or Santorum. Slow and steady wins the race.  The other candidates surge and lull but RP is strong in most.  Besides, its all about delegates and delegates are all about who really participates..there are a lot of those for Ron Paul. I went to the caucus in Bangor and it was overwhelming.

      2. Reagan took
        New York
        Massachusetts
        California
        Oregon
        Michigan
        Vermont
        Rhode Island
        Hawaii
        …and every other Democrat leaning liberal State you can think of.  In our new polarized country I doubt that will happen again any time soon.

    2. do you look under your bed for”commies”?  when  you call obama a commie, you just show your ignorance

    3. I wouldn’t bet the farm on it. Ron Paul will not get the Republican nomination and fip flop Romney won’t beat Obama.

    4. Obama the prince of bank and auto companies a commie… I can’t stand the man and that STILL makes me laugh.

    5. I would be interested in hearing the facts that have led you to believe that there are Commies on Pennsylvania Avenue. 

  6. Funny how Obama supporters will attack Romney for his campaign fund but they are mostly silent about Obama’s and are not vocal at all about Obama’s Super PAC.

    1. No, I think most liberals are against Super PACs entirely, but they realize having Obama be a martyr and losing because of this isn’t the right way to bring about change. The right way is to have Obama back in office and pushing transparency legislation regarding elections. 

      1. your comment is a joke .. right ? no American could possible want Obama to do another term.. if that happened this country would never recover and we would soon be at third world country status.. hahahaha.. that’s me laughing at your joke ,….. right ?

        1. After seeing what the Republicans have to offer, it is safe to say that he will be reelected. I’m no fan for sure but the only Repub that I could vote for would be Paul. The other three remind me of Larry, Curly and Moe.

  7. Dear people of Maine,

    I know it’s going to be cold there on Saturday, and there’s a 100% chance of snow, but Ron Paul could really use your support right now –we all want limited government and low taxes. Romney is guaranteed to give us more of the same big government as Obama.

    So please drive carefully and get the vote out for Ron Paul.

    Take care. 

  8. Really Mitt!!    That’s the best you can do?       Let’s go to Portland.      Let me see,   many people catagorize Portland as a suburb of Boston…or at least Manchester NH, ..Now that’s  a campaign!   He is taking Maine for granted,  just like everyone in the party does.

  9. Oh man that was a painful five minutes of watching a manikin doing an Alzheimer’s shuffle in circles while wearing his illegal lawn care worker’s pants. If he wins it all it will be a testimony to what money alone can buy you in America.

    1. “If he wins it all it will be a testimony to what money alone can buy you in America.”

      The Democratic’s have been buying votes for years with foods stamps, public housing assistance, Section 8 housing, SSI and the like for years. Now they have added health care and free cell phones, so what’s your point.

      1. 1% vs. 99% …. needs of the few out weigh the needs of the many. Come down off the mountain and you’ll find 99% of us are getting screwed with our pants on by the 1%, that’s the point

        1. Actually it’s the 53% of us who pay taxes that are getting screwed by the 47% that don’t and who live off the government dole.

  10. Doctor Ron Paul is a much better choice, Romney is a bankers paradise and not for the 99% that’s for sure.  Vote Ron Paul.

    1. No Dlbrt politicians and the K Street influence is the problem, ALONG WITH the unrealistic expectations of most voters.

    2. BOTH Democrats and Republicans are the problem because each puts The Party ahead of The Country.Don’t believeme?Next time you watch ANY debate between a Republican and a Democrat all you will hear is shouting and each trying to talk at the same time and NOTHING gets accomplished.Vote for an Independent canidate,it will give you a warm fuzzy feeling and when the Democrat or Republican wins and screws up the Country even more ,you can sit back and say I didn’t put them in office.I’ve been doing this for 40 years !

  11. Leave it to the progs and liberals to interrupt and try and stifle free speech. Sice the can’t win any arguments on the merits of their beliefs it’s all that they have.

    1. Why would “progs and liberals” show up at a Romney event? 

      The joke I heard on Fox yesterday was good;

      A liberal, conservative, moderate came into a bar

      What did the bartender say?
      ..

      ..

      ..

            (wait for it)

      Hi Mitt.

  12. These republicans have one dangerous thing in common ( Except Ron Paul) . They are tuning this campaign around focusing on religion. They are challenging our  1st amendment seperation of Church and State.  I have been getting  a lot of phone calls about how Santorum how he doesn’t approve of gay’s getting married.  That’s his problem not mine. They are turning this campaign into religion instead of dealing with the real issues in America .  Frightening!
    How is religion going to help this economy?  How is religion going to get the homeless off the street. How is  religion going to help Veterans who have served in Afganistan 3 -4 times  come back over here and get a job?   Veternans should not be homeless.  How is religion going to help feed our children and  keep us warn in the winter?
    What gays do is none of our business.  And who cares.  They pay taxes-they are paying into this economy.  What goes on in there house is no business of ours.  Goverment doesn’t need to know  what goes on in anyones home. 

    1. I totally agree with you except the “except Ron Paul.” I do agree with much of what Paul says except when it comes to his idea of allowing business/corporations to self-regulate. We’ve seen how well they regulate themselves and what it costs to bailing them out.

        1. I guess I’m trying to figure out what makes him a Republican then? Nothing he says conforms to any plank in the Republican platform?  However if his son is the result of his father’s thinking all bets are off and you better think twice before opening that door.

        2. You must have watched the Brail version. Nothing in this video is against corporations except to get them off of taxpayers back, with an end to crony capitialism and earmarked subsidies.  Ron Paul has captured the best elements of the two parties and culled the worst of the two parties. You have a lot of learning to do.
           

      1. Corporations were always self-regulating with no federal bailouts until modern times when those we foolishly put in office decided for you (and their campaign coffers) that it was in your best interest for you to keep those living large from losing their mansions, BMW’s and 5th avenue blond trophies.  This is your rare chance to change that model.. vote for Ron Paul and send a message.  

    2. Note to republican voters.. avoid Karl Rove like the plague.. if that means giving up your Foxnews where he makes his home .. then so be it. New blood is reforming the old tired core planks by adjusting to the new realities. It’s time to demand that Rove take his incompetent heavy hands off the off the parties working mechanics and retire before the party sinks even deeper into the muck. Oh, ya .. and Rove’s drive-by shooting victims: Gary Johnson, Mich Daniels, Ron Paul, Rich Perry, Sarah P, Sharron Angle, Michael Bachmann, Paul Pawlenty, Michael Steele, Howard Phillips, and many others may have been sucker punched out of the ring.. but are training hard for the next round.  Listen to your conscience and Vote for Ron Paul to take the GOP party back from the hijackers.

  13. The Republican Party never ceases to amaze me that it can SOMEHOW gain the support of the poorest Americans. If you earn less than $250,000 per year AND the majority of those earnings isn’t in the form of capital gains and/or stashed in overseas accounts, then all the Republican claims of wanting to reduce taxes doesn’t mean reducing taxes for YOU. 

    Come on folks…The Dems may have their share os sleaze and special interest ideas, but unless you fit the income qualifications I’ve outlined above, then supporting the Republicans is like hitting yourself in the head with a hammer each and every day.

    And you know what the best thing is about hitting yourself in the head with a hammer each and every day? IT FEELS SO GOOD WHEN YOU STOP!!!!!

    1. Oh Pleeeze the old Democratic saw “Democrats care for you but Republicans are mean viscous people who want to strangle poor babies.

      I don’t have to make a case here,  Just look at the results of the Democrats own list of campaign contributors  over the last 20 years, The same people and companies and same people (with just a few exceptions) give to both parties.  Solomon Bros. was Clinton’s largest  contributor. Then they supported Bush. Ditto Morgan Stanley, B.O.A, Chase, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BP, Boeing and a number of other major businesses. 

      The ticket is to give to the winner so you can “get back” later.  Bush instituted the Part D Medicare plan to help Pharmaceuticals. Clinton helped push through NAFTA, and its step children to help his big business interests. 

      Neither Democrats nor Republicans have any interest in working class Americans, and the Democrats only show slight interest in “the poor” because inner-city blacks are their most loyal constituency.

      This mold must be broken if we are to save what’s left of the USA for the next generation.

      Paul in 2012.

      1. You know, you’re right… I hadn’t thought about it before, but Republicans really are viscous people. I know, because I often see drool coming out of their mouths, and it hangs a long time before it drops.

      2. Unfortunately Paul’s supposedly populous message of State’s rights would put many people in this country under the constraints of the bad politics of ideological, intellectually challenged local political machines such as those found in Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana. Abortion would be banned in any number of states, possibly even Maine with the current leadership. Paul’s foreign policy is relatively sane… his domestic policies are backward and dangerous, and that doesn’t even begin to address his well documented racism.

        1. Racism is a red flag, but not everything people say is “racism” is in fact racism.  Al Sharpton on MSNBC continually points to Newt Gingrich and his phrase “Some poor children grow up in neighborhoods where they have no role models for working, because no one works.” as racist.  Leaving aside the fact that most poor people in the USA are white, It is a fact that there are neighborhoods where no one works.
          Also Sharpton takes on Gingrich for saying this, but I never heard him question the Temptations (a 1960’s black singing group) who say (in their song “Cloud Nine”) the EXACT same message.  Would that be considered racist?

          Paul is a constitutionalist and as such he recognizes that some of the “solutions” to US problems have not followed the principles of constitutional law.  

        2. “Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups rather than individuals. Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike: as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called “diversity” actually perpetuate racism. Their obsession with racial group identity is inherently racist.”  – Ron Paul 2002

    2. Average hourly carpenter wage in 1980 = $16.39
      Average hourly carpenter wage in 2011 = $20.98    (28% increase)
      A gallon of regular gas in 1980 = $1.25
      A gallon of regular gas in 2011 = $3.67   (193% increase)
      A first class stamp in 1980 = $0.15
      A first class stamp in 2011 = $0.44   (193% increase)
      Median home price in 1980 = $64,000
      Median home price in 2011 = $170,000   (166% increase)
       
      This is one of the reasons why we MUST adopt a commodity-backed currency and purge ourselves of the terrible “inflation tax” that is suffocating the working class. This is why both parents have to work to support a family today. 90% of American’s wages have not kept up with inflation and will continue to not keep up.
       
      Historically, economies using a commodity-backed currency enjoy stable prices ; governments can’t print the excess money that causes inflation and governments without excess money can’t spend themselves into massive debt!
       
      Our current monetary system ultimately benefits only a small percent of our population. Don’t let them fool you into thinking that we must continue this lunacy! Please vote for Ron Paul and restore America.
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/business/income-inequality/

    3. Will Romney’s plastic smile give you comfort when the monetary system collapses? When Social Security and Welfare disappear because of bankruptcy, will you still admire Obama’s fiscal irresponsibility? Will you worship Santorum’s fanatical warmongering when China won’t even loan us enough money to fly our troops back home after the collapse? Will you have a warm feeling when Gingrich unzips his pants so you can experience more of his trickle-down theory? Ross Perot was right about what NAFTA has done to our manufacturing. Furthermore, Ron Paul was right about the housing collapse and he is right about the impending monetary collapse. Please vote to restore America.

    4. A family of four making $40,000 in 2001 paid federal income tax of $1,924.  In 2010 a family four received a check for $2,523 for a diference or tax cut of $4,447.   Sound like a lot reducing taxes for them to me.

    5. LOL oBAMo
       Wars and Going broke with massive inflation!!! is our future!!!
       WAKE UP !!!!! Sad!the  way both parties got folks thinking their different!!!!
       Central banking sys own us ALL!
       What we going to do about that?
       VOTE PAUL! or be happy being a wage slave! that thinks he’s free.

    6. Reagan, and both Bush’s lowered taxes for everyone. Reagan lowered taxes significantly for all Americans. Clinton raised them, and Obama wants to raise them. The Bush tax cuts applied to everybody as well. Yet, you never hear that, what a majority of people believe is that all of these cuts were ONLY for the rich, which is not true.

      So to address your concerns, in the last thirty years the republican presidents have lowered taxes for all (by a lot), and the democrats have raised them (or tried to in Obamas case) for all Americans.

      Another interesting thing to note that you never really hear about is the effects of poor monetary policies on the middle class and poor. Poor monetary policies lead to a weak dollar which leads to expensive imports, which effects the price of just about everything. Excessive government spending, may have had good intentions, but like almost everything the government does, it had undesired consequences.

      Please note that I am not a Republican, and I did not like Bush. But your statements really are not true, I am simply trying to be fair.

    7. Except Ron Paul whose ultimate goal is to eliminate the income tax and the IRS.  No, it can’t be done all at once, but give the man a chance.  Besides, Obama just failed in his latest budget to meet his own deficit goals. 

    8. Support of the poor? Romneys rally was free. BO’s next visit to three of Maine’s towns requires a minimum payment of $100 for entry to his rallys with special seating for those who pay $5,000 to $10,000. Better pick up that hammer again becuase it is not working so far.

  14. “In the private sector, which most of you live in, you have to have a balanced budget or you go broke,” Romney said.

    I think it was Andrew Jackson that made one of the last major concerted efforts to actually balance the federal budget and that action resulted in a 75 month depression. Government finance does NOT function in the same manner as businesses or as households. This platitude is a disingenuous sop being tossed to a gullible public that doesn’t know any better. Mr. Romney knows that, and feeding such drivel to his adoring supporters is only meant to garner votes not to suggest serious policy.

    The Keystone pipeline, whether KS I or KS II, is meant to carry diluted bitumen, the product of strip mining an area of the boreal forests of Alberta potentially the size of the State of Michigan. The “oil” that flows through tar sands pipelines consists of a high pressure mix of chemicals, heated, highly corrosive, and of which the chemical composition is unknown to the public. When a spill occurs in a tar sands pipeline, such as the large one in Michigan, the public responders are exposed to hazardous chemicals that they may or may not know how to treat. The spill in Michigan has tainted the Kalamazoo River, has defied cleanup 18 months after the spill because of the composition and properties of the toxic, heated fluid, and has largely been unreported outside of the local Michigan press. Likewise, the secret, proprietary substances used in fracking for natural gas and oil extraction is contaminating drinking water aquifers that are close to fracking sites. Mr. Romney is being disingenuous to dismiss the concerns of those whose drinking water has been tainted with dangerous chemicals.

    Romney used the rise in military spending as an example of Big Government, and excessive Big Government spending talking about the huge increase in military procurement officers from WWII to Reagan through to Obama. That is absolutely true, but as an example of the detrimental rise of Big Government when he also said he intends to INCREASE the size of our military, and the number of military hardware and munitions… seems like a cognitive dissonance the crowd entirely missed.

    A woman rose when given the microphone by Mr. Romney to make the comment about her son’s expenses to pay for college, comparing her own experiences when she graduated from college. She said she didn’t want the government in her life, but said the government OUGHT to do something about this problem with the expense of getting an education. Mr. Romney related an anecdote about his time as Gov. of Massachusetts and his cutting education funding… His cuts, he related, were praised by a University administrator because it allowed the administrator to cut things he didn’t want. I guess the lesson here was “less is more,” but it wasn’t clear to me that the tuition rates dropped after those cuts were made.

    I saw Mr. Romney delivering shallow platitude after shallow platitude, and the crowd just loved it. I fear for our republic.

  15. Mitt went to Maine to see how the poor people live. After he found out the hottest chicks in the US live in the Portland area. Coincidence?

    1. That was second hottest, D.C. came in first. Maybe that’s why he and paul are fighting so hard to get there.

  16. You all can say what you want about Romney but I still believe he’s actually Max Headroom, the guy who imitated an animated computer cartoon. One thing for sure Mitt is the poster child for all that is wrong with Wall Street and our tax structure. I guess one must give him credit for being consistent with Republican dogma, it’s all doom and gloom and one liners with no solutions.    

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEIE2q7kvxQ&feature=related

    1.   Just like all politicos, not most, all. rp is in there with them. Look at the locals also, just something alluring about a little” power”.

  17. Misleading headline. I didn’t hear any hecklers. At most, a couple of yawns, and murmurs of discomfort.

  18. So for all Romney knows his money could be funding terrorism… or even worst … ABORTION!!! *queue scary music* 

  19. Romney’s most unforgetable quote   ” we are all envoius of wall street”    Romney has no clue whats going on.  We are not envious  we are mad. 

  20. 2012 Democratic Presidental strategy: vote Paul in the Primary/Caucus:  this gives Obama an easy win in Nov.
    Many exit polls in other states who have already had their primary/caucuses have said they voted for Paul but will switch for Obama in November:  Research voters, research!!

    1. Mebiz- Silly comment but I do hope people take your advice and vote for Paul. I totally disagree that it will help Obama. When it’s all said and done Ron Paul is the only one that will beat Obama.

      Ron Paul 2012

  21. Am I the only one bothered by the fact, that these people running are spending MILLIONS and MILLIONS of Dollars for a job that pays around $450,000 a year plus benefits?

    Maybe if they couldn’t spend more then they would receive over the term, we would get a better variety of people to run………………………..

    1. Ron Paul will take just under $40,000 as his presidential salary.  But, yes, everyone should question the spending of millions to get the job. 

  22. Good grief, he’s wearing blue jeans at a campaign stop.  Now that’s talking down to us – a real lack of respect for his audience.  

      1. That’s silly.  If he wants to be the President, he should wear a coat and tie when he’s campaigning, just like when he’s debating. 

          1. I posted a comment and you didn’t like it and said that I’d call Romney an elitist if he’d worn a coat and tie.  I replied that he should wear a coat and tie, but you didn’t like that either and told me to “get over it.”

            Well henryhoho, I know you don’t like what I say, and that’s ok, but if anyone needs to “get over it”, it’s you.  You just can’t help replying to every little thing I say, long after everyone else has stopped reading this stuff.  You’re one of those guys who just has to have the last word.

            Go ahead.  Flog away at this dead horse and say anything you want.  I’m not going to reply, and if you’re not happy with that, maybe you can figure out some way to answer your own replies and say things like “Wtf” and “get over it” a hundred times.

            So have at it.  It’s all yours.

  23. Despite any of the GOP candidates’ flaws, gaffes, and misdeeds,  any one of them is INFINITELY BETTER than the condescending and corrupt, incompetent clown in chief that currently sits in the oval office.

    1. If you’re willing to vote for anyone with an R after their name, for the country’s sake, make it Ron Paul. 

  24. RINO Romney:
    *Pro abortion
    *Anti 2nd Amendment
    *Worker unfriendly
    *Pro ObamaCare,,, aka RomneyCare
    *Pro Quimby National Park

    Why is Ron Paul afraid to comment on Quimby….?

    Ron Paul has been repeatedly asked about this and refused to directly oppose the park project.

    *RINO Romney supports Quimby Land
    *Ron Paul seems to be afraid of Quimby
    *Newt is considering it
    *Santorum staff says they are working on crafting a press release

    I will not support or vote for “any” candidate that will not oppose Quimby

  25.   In 2008  I had the voting opportunity of an American lifetime.  It was crazy exciting, thousands of people surrounding the Bangor Auditorium, people were in the trees!  We had the chance to vote for a person who’s educational achievements are most excellent and well suited for the presidency.  And for an added bonus we would say no to woefully unqualified vice president, and yes to showing the world
    that a black man can be elected.  Say what you will  but that alone had to help heal some old wounds if not prove a point.  Some of you may be calling me “suckkkeeerr” but i know I did the right thing.  Now it is time to do it again but this time Ron Paul is the obvious choice.  Thanks to Obama, Snowe and Collins we now live under the  Defense Authorization Act.
      I am not an extremist, I am a father of two and a proud American, if you truly care about liberty, I would urge you to cast your vote for Ron Paul.  

  26. Romney has never exceeded 50% of the vote in any primary or caucus in his own party.

    Santorum whupped him in three states last week.

    The GOP ship is sinking 

    Gotta luv it

    yessah

  27. What have the planks of the republican party got y0u recently? Absurd $trillion dollars wars in foreign lands that are unwinable and have no benefit and certainly can’t in any form be claimed as national defense when our borders are wide open, we borrow the money from china,  and we went broke doing it.   If you loved McCain.. you will adore Santorum. If you loved Reagan, Goldwater, Coolidge and other real conseratives .. you are best friends forever with Ron Paul.

  28. I’m almost willing to bet that all this is for not. The Powers-to-be are realizing that those who are running in this Primary/clown circus are un-electable and will chose the candidate they want to run. Don’t put your markers down yet folks because the real joke is yet to be told. You do realize regardless of who you caucus for in the end it is they who will decide. Time to think ….

    Brokered Convention.

  29. ABO Anybody But Obama
    ABR Anybody But Romney

    Anybody that dosent openly oppose (press release needed) the Obama supported Quimby National Park

    And so far,,,, Ron Paul seems to be “afraid” of Quimby

    Man-Up Ron, stop looking like Frank Perdue, put out a press release opposing the Obama-Quimby Park http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5cqIVWJXYs

  30. Of all the republican candidates only Ron Paul comes off as a really likable  human
    being.  I think the others feel like hollow men.

  31. Did anyone else notice the fact that Romney really dressed down for his Maine Town Meetings?  The oldest pair of jeans he owns I bet. The pictures you see of him usually he has on a suit, or a dress shirt and slacks. He wants us to believe he is one of us, and we know he’s not, with all his wealth.

    1. He’s starting to refer to his supporters as “you guys”.  He’s trying to seem like a normal person and not so out of touch with working America.  He’s pure fabrication and doesn’t have a sincere bone in  his body. 

    2. The blue jeans were the first thing I noticed.  I guess some campaign strategist told him to dress that way in Maine, but I think that someone who wants to be President should act and look presidential regardless of what strategists say.  It’s too bad, because I’d like to vote for the guy, but the more he exposes himself, the less I want to give him my vote.  He’s so shifty that he’s unprincipled, no more than a store front mannequin wearing his window dresser’s blue jeans.

  32. We all know that Mitt Romney is an un-American corporate shill with an agenda to force RomneyCare, subvert the 2nd Amendment, hurt the American worker and support the Obama-Quimby National Park, but why is Ron Paul afraid to say he is against Quimby….?

    No Statement- No Vote

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *