AUGUSTA, Maine — Revelations that the director of the state turnpike authority stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from the agency left many — including lawmakers — shaking their heads. “Where was the oversight?” was a common refrain.

To tighten management of quasi-governmental agencies such as the Maine Turnpike Authority, lawmakers are considering legislation to make these entities subject to greater oversight of spending practices, contract awards and lobbying activities under a bill written in the wake of last year’s turnpike controversy.

A public hearing was held Monday on LD 1843, a piece of legislation drafted by staff at the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability at the request of the Legislature’s Government Oversight Committee.

Rep. David Burns, R-Whiting, the House chair of that committee and the bill’s sponsor, said lawmakers wanted to create legislation that could tighten accountability not only at the MTA but at other quasi-state agencies.

“[The MTA] was spending money in a way that was unacceptable,” he said, referring to the activities of former executive director Paul Violette, who stepped down in the wake of an investigation and later pleaded guilty to felony theft charges. “The committee felt there were other entities also potentially at risk, so seemed appropriate to apply remedies to more than just the MTA.”

In addition to the MTA, the Legislature’s oversight arm, OPEGA, also found questionable practices at the now-defunct Maine Green Energy Alliance and is investigating charges of financial mismanagement at the Maine State Housing Authority.

The changes that are proposed for nearly 30 identified agencies under LD 1843 include: adopting more stringent policies for the selection of vendors and ensuring that a competitive bid process is used whenever possible; restricting any contributions to entities that directly support an agency’s mission; limiting reimbursements for travel, meals and entertainment and prohibiting an agency from hiring an outside lobbyist.

The agencies also would be asked to submit regular reports on activities to the Legislature beginning in 2014.

Among the agencies listed are: the Finance Authority of Maine, the Maine Community College System, Efficiency Maine Trust, the University of Maine System, the Workers’ Compensation Board and the Maine State Housing Authority.

MaineHousing also is the subject of a separate accountability bill that received initial approval last week from the Legislature’s labor committee.

A number of people, mostly lawmakers, spoke in favor of LD 1843 on Monday. Jonathan Nass, a senior adviser to Gov. Paul LePage, told committee members the administration strongly supports the bill.

Some, mostly the agencies themselves, feared that inclusion on the list of quasi-government agencies that could face more scrutiny is black mark, according to Beth Ashcroft, director of OPEGA. None testified in opposition Monday.

Rep. Anne Graham, D-North Yarmouth, said she supported the bill but had concerns about whether the changes would results in a “witch hunt” on some agencies.

“I need some reassurance that we are going in with a fair and balanced look,” she said.

Sen. Roger Katz, R-Augusta, Senate chair of the oversight committee, said the intent is not to punish agencies that have been operating above board but to create better oversight for the ones that are not.

Of the more than 70 quasi-government agencies that were initially looked at, fewer than 30 were identified for inclusion in LD 1843. However, there is a provision in the bill that allows the next Legislature to add agencies.

LD 1843 is scheduled for a work session and vote of the State and Local Government Committee meeting on Wednesday. It then goes to the House and Senate.

Join the Conversation

41 Comments

  1. the citizens of the state of Maine should seize control of the Maine Turnpike!
    there is no reason to continue paying for “quasi-state” agencies like this which is essentially a private business or group of investors that own a piece of Maine which they use to screw us with ever-increasing tolls.

    and then on top of all that we get to payl Paul Violettes 5,000.00 per month pension.

    1. Lepage should introduce a bill to phase the turnpike out of business once any bonds are paid off and make it so no new bonds can be issued.

      Get rid of the turnpike, turn it over to the feds and then you eliminate a huge tax Maine working families have to pay everyday, essentially double taxation since we already pay gas tax.

      Give it 5 years to be phased out, 1 less state beurocracy and low taxes for everyone!

  2.  The Republicans say they want less goverment interference and less government spending yet once in power they increase the state budget by 1/2 a billion dollars and they go on a regulatory spree writing new laws creating new taxes , adding new departments.

      1. Baldacci’s last two year budget was for 5.8 billion and was balanced. Lepage’s current two year budget is for 6.3 billion.
         Despite the 500 million increase,  Lepage admits his current budget isn’t balanced and he has asked for another $225 million to be paid for by increasing local property taxes and our insurance premiums.

          1.  The Republican’s screamed like a slapped pig when Baldacci asked for 5.8 billion. They said it was way too much money and if they where in power they would cut  state spending..

             Well here we are. The Republicans and the Tea party snobs are in power and the state budget has ballooned to 6.3 billion with no end in sight. 

             Just goes to show you. It’s easier to throw hand grenades then it is to catch them.

          2. You have avoided the question nicely.
            My point being that if the increases in the budget are due to programs put in place or expanded by Baldacci than how can you blame the Republicans?  Especially since Obama and his healthcare mandate will now not allow the cutting of programs that should never have been expanded to begin with.

          3.         Baldacci asked for 5.8 billion and your party leaders said that was too much money to spend.  Now that your in power even 6.3 billion isn’t enough. No amount of excuses and finger pointing will change the facts.

          4. And again you avoid the point.  If the Baldacci administration put it  into place and your boy Obama made it illegal to cut it then I would say no excuses are needed.  Reasonable voters already know where to lay the blame for the medical fiasco you democrats have created.

          5. Agin you avoid reality . Baldacci’s budget was 5.8 billion. You republican’s said that was too much and yet once you got into power you raised the budget by 1/2 a billion and you want another 1/4 of a billion more….  All the while the roads and bridges are worse than they have ever been. Your giving 17 million to a Toronto investment bank for a toxic waste dump you spent 35 million on a bridge to Strawberry town your spending 350000 on a study to see if Cianbro should build a road for Canadian potato farmers You made it illegal to only hire American workers ……….. I could go on but you will just blame you gross mismanagement on the American president.

          6. Everything you mention here has the potential to generate more money to offset our deficits in the future.  All you, Obama and Baldacci have ever promised us is programs that lead to more deficits and then lock them in.

          7.  Lepage makes it illegal to only hire American workers and this is a good thing to you?

          8. Actually I would think that you would be against discrimination as well.  A law that would only allow you to hire American workers would leave all legal immigrants in Maine without jobs and I’m pretty sure that would be illegal at the Federal level.  
            What do you have against legal immigrants? 

          9. Canadian workers are not immigrants they are contract workers who steal American jobs because they have a national health insurance  in Canada.
             When some people tried to even the playing field by requiring companies to hire Americans when the job was being paid for by American tax dollars Canadian citizen Lepage and the cowards in the legislature used the 14th amendment to make it illegal to only hire American’s .
             Meanwhile those same trators are fighting tooth an nail to make sure Americans don’t get a similar low cost health care.
             They prefer all American to be poor so they will have lots of young boys and girls to work in their strip clubs and to die defending their over seas investments.

          10. Workers come from all countries and the law as you wanted it passed wasn’t an “anti-canadian law”.  You’re law was anti-immigrant worker of all types and was at it’s heart racist.  Figures though since you go by the title white man.
            I don’t talk to racist.

          11. You must be one of the Canadian bloggers who hang out here looking out for your fellow countrymen Paul Lepage.

          12.  So you are Canadian. Do they pay you in cash to blog here or did they promise you a free house? ;)

          13. Actually a lot of border Americans like those of us who live in Maine do have relatives on both sides of the border.  As I asked before, do you hate all foreigners or just Canadians? 

          14. I don’t know about the validity of the rest of your post, but a couple of your statements are blatantly wrong.   1. LePage is 100% US citizen and  2. Foreign workers in the US are immigrants.

  3. On the face of it oversight doesn’t seem to be a bad thing but why are specific agencies being named in the legislation?  Why not set criteria for agencies that that should be subject to legislative oversight thus allowing agencies to move on or off the list naturally?  The naming of specific agencies creates an inflexible law that would need to be revised according to the politics  (or news) of the day.

  4. The horse is out of the barn, so tighten up the laws now, right?   This governor is not responsible for the actions of Paul Violette.  He was not under scrutiny for too many years, with the D’s in control.

    1. It was the “D’s” that initiated the investigation, not the R’s.  It was only the results that were announced under a Republican administation.  The investigation itself was concluded before control of the Blaine House or the legislature changed hands.

  5. Far better just to eliminate the agencies.  Fewer places for the criminals and party hacks (to the extent there actually is a difference) to hide.

    1.  Did you read the list, which includes the University of Maine System and the state community college system?  So, you want to eliminate all public higher education in Maine?

  6. Funny but the D’s who were running the place provided no oversight and now are worried there might be a “witchhunt” by putting oversight in place.  Maybe the problem is they didn’t know they were supposed to be watching out for us at all?

    1. The office of XXX Accountability (can’t recall what it’s actually called) was created while the state government was under “D’s” control, said agency then investigated the MTA.  I think the cozy relationship between agencies and party hacks occurs with both parties.  Democrats have no lock on it.

      1. They have for the last 40 years or so.  The whole time the mantra of the left was there is no XXX fraud.  Now that people are looking “oh wait, there it is, but stop looking again because we don’t want a witch hunt.”

  7. If you are in a position of trust and elected or hired to work in a government job you should be expected to be under the microscope and should be at all times when spending or consuming taxes generated from the citizens of said state ! Do your job with honesty and transparency and you have nothing to worry about !

  8. Why wouldn’t anyone want oversight over taxpayer money being spent???
    There shouldn’t be anyone spending taxpayer money that has no oversight or can’t be removed from power…
     

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *