AUGUSTA, Maine — The LePage administration’s plan to reorganize the sprawling Department of Health and Human Services got a thumbs-up Tuesday from a legislative committee.

The Health and Human Services committee voted 9-3 in favor of the restructuring bill, which consolidates four DHHS offices into two and reorganizes another.

Meanwhile, partisan tensions hit a fever pitch over computer problems in the state’s Medicaid program, which is overseen by DHHS. Democrats reiterated accusations of a cover-up by the LePage administration, while Republicans came to the commissioner’s defense.

DHHS officials say the restructuring will make the department’s web of services easier to navigate.

DHHS administers a range of health and social services including mental health programs, foster care and oversight of public drinking water. It has offices from Sanford to Fort Kent and employs roughly 3,600 people.

Lawmakers on the committee green-lighted the restructuring bill after tweaking a controversial plan to privatize some services for the state’s most mentally ill residents.

Rep. Beth O’Connor, R-Berwick, said she was confident that DHHS staff would pave the way to a more efficient social safety net for Maine residents.

“You want to take this department, you want to make it run better, you want to get to the bottom of those thousand people that sit on waitlists waiting for services, our most vulnerable who have fallen through the holes in the net,” she said.

The restructuring bill, LD 1887, called for eliminating 33 “intensive case managers” who work with severely mentally ill and potentially dangerous residents and shifting those services to the private sector. The proposal elicited criticism at a public hearing last week from opponents who said it would put Maine’s needy at risk.

The committee sought to keep intensive case management services in-house for prison and county jail inmates while contracting out the rest.

The bill’s broader plan is to merge the Offices of Substance Abuse and Adult Mental Health Services and combine the offices of Elder Services and Cognitive and Physical Disabilities Services. The Office of Child and Family Services would reorganize and link together its four major service areas, including child welfare and behavioral health.

The proposal cuts 91 positions and creates 55 jobs for a net loss of 36 positions. Several of the jobs under the ax are vacant.

The reorganization is expected to save $750,000, though DHHS officials have said its aim is to eliminate duplicative work and integrate care across residents’ lifetimes, not to cut costs.

The bill also would outsource advocacy services for people with intellectual disabilities and autism.

Rep. Mark Eves of North Berwick was one of three Democrats present who voted against the restructuring bill. He said he worried about the measure’s last-minute introduction and the administration’s competency in implementing the plan.

“I think the department does have a great opportunity to do good and I hope that I can reflect back on this vote here and the vote that we’ll be taking over at the House and be proven wrong,” he said.

The reorganization bill now goes to House and Senate.

The committee’s vote came on the heels of a heated State House press conference in which Democrats again accused the LePage administration of covering up a computer error in the state’s Medicaid program.

A computing problem led the program, known as MaineCare, to continue paying medical bills for up to 19,000 beneficiaries after they became ineligible. DHHS is still trying to attach a dollar figure to the bad payments, which went to health care providers over the last year and a half.

About two dozen Democrats accused administration officials of lying about the problem while the Legislature was considering painful budget cuts earlier this year.

“It’s time for the administration to first take responsibility for their mismanagement and second, and most importantly, take responsibility for willfully misleading lawmakers,” said Democratic Sen. Joseph Brannigan of Portland.

Brannigan has called for an independent investigation of the department. The Legislature’s Government Oversight Committee is expected to take up the matter on Friday.

Republicans shot back with a news conference of their own, defending DHHS Commissioner Mary Mayhew and saying the computer problems date back years.

“It is well documented that these problems consistently plagued the Baldacci administration and were passed along to the LePage administration,” Senate President Kevin Raye said in a statement.

“Let’s get to the bottom of it, but to toss around words like ‘cover up’ and ‘lying’ are not only inappropriate, but they really don’t help us,” said Republican Sen. Roger Katz of Augusta.

I'm the health editor for the Bangor Daily News, a Bangor native, a UMaine grad, and a weekend crossword warrior. I never get sick of writing about Maine people, geeking out over health care data, and...

Join the Conversation

81 Comments

  1. Yep this time LePage and crew have all their numbers correct.  They ran em all through the Jethro Bodine School of Mathmatics.  “Ye doggie, you’s can counts on them numbers!”

  2. State Goverment is so screwed up….give Governor LePage a chance, he is trying to get through all the layers of crap that others in the Legislature have done before him. We need to stop paying for everyone else and I believe he is trying, but you have no idea how tough of a job that it is. Streamlining and reorganizing is what is needed but it won’t happen overnight!

        1. Would you rather we blame Cheney who was really running the country?  This is bush’s fault every last bit of it, I’d love to run into that POS just once.

    1. The Republican senator from Augusta,  Sen. Katz has it right;  “lets get to the bottom of it”    …..while press secretary Bennett’s crying politics leads one to believe that,  they don’t want to talk about it;   they don’t want an audit,   they don’t want to legitimize their numbers or actions,  but they do want to restructure the department nonetheless. And you my friend have it right…..”it won’t happen overnight!”. But a restructuring of this Department should NOT happen overnight as well, it should not happen without an audit with recommendations and criticisms.

    2. Brilliant,  

          Privatise Welfare and give our Tax Money to –for profit corporations –instead of the people in need!

      1. “for profit corporations”, please…. I own a “for profit corp” and everyone I know that works for a “nonprofit” makes much more money then any of us do.

    3. We have the head of the first authority to come under the microscope of this administration in jail.  We have the head of the second to be investigated handing in a resignation (which hopefully will not prevent possibly going to jail).  

      We are struggling through the quagmire of DHHS trying to uncover and fix decades-long problems.  So many departments and authorities to go.

      I am proud of the administration!  Proud of the Republican legislature, proud of the Governor, proud of the Constitutional Officers, each of whom is doing incredible work.

    4. Welfare has been STATE run since 1996, that is what makes this a beggar state, 51% receive it.  Shows what the job market is here not to mention the people that don’t pay their taxes.  This is nothing new, he could look to other states but he has his own agenda.

  3. I have sat in dismay this late winter and early spring and watched the special session of the legislature. What was originally designed to be a short session to deal with emergency measures has become a gaming plan to deal with administrative matters with little or no time for either party to adequately research the issues. Nor has there been much time for public comment.

    Two recent bills, the revision of mining regulations put forth by John Martin and this reorganization of DHHS put forth by Mr LePage, are prime examples. Both issues are administrative in nature and both are probably worthy of consideration. However neither are make or break issues justifying emergency action. Both issues are complex and may have far reaching affects we the public may find to be undesirable.

    If both issues are so important as both gentlemen proclaim then they are both deserving of open debate. To short change the debate is deny we the public of adequate representation. Let’s table both issue until the full session next fall.

    And legislators of both parties please get the special session back to what it was intended for and stop the use of it to serve as an end run manuver for political and special interest gain. Our government is supposed to of the people, by the people and for the people — this sort of special session meets none of these parameters.

  4. Gov. LePage is doing such a great job at getting that “welfare state” label off the state of Maine. The state needed a strong, insightful, conservative leader and we have finally found one in Paul LePage. Keep up the good work guv, we are getting back on track slowly but surely.

    1. How strange you should make this particular claim. I’m willing to bet that Mr. LePage is the ONLY leader of this State to have ever actually pronounced in speeches and to the press that Maine is a “Welfare State.” Is that going to bring businesses and jobs rushing northward past the “Open For Business” sign to improve our State economy? Or, as we have actually seen will it continue to make things worse by driving more business and jobs away? Yep, you’ve got quite the salesmen there. Yikes!

      1. I totally agree… Calling Maine a “welfare” state, calling Maine’s people “idiots”, boasting that he’s going to tell the President of the United States where to go – I don’t care if no one likes him – IT’S DISRESPECTFUL particularly coming from a Governor, constantly cussing in public,  always making excuses for everything/anything that goes wrong during his administration, always claiming it’s someone else’s fault, doing nothing to correct a known problem until he’s forced by public knowledge (and even now all he’s doing is whining that it’s not his fault), etc… The list of things not beneficial to Maine’s economy goes on and on.  

        Yes, LePage himself has made national tv – but not for anything positive. All he’s done is show the world that Maine Governor is a joke. Yes, he’s made national news for his many preposterous antics and indiscretions. To those who worship him, what’s so great about being the nation’s joke?  How is that going to bring businesses to Maine to improve Maine’s economy and correct Maine’s welfare situation? I don’t see any businesses rushing to get here or jobs opening up for the unemployed.  All I see is a guy who is blaming the past administration, the people of Maine and the unemployed for his failure to make any economic progress.

        Paul LePage, in my opinion, is not a leader. He is a common complainer who got lucky when he was elected. Since that time he hasn’t done anything of value. He has spent his term complaining about what’s wrong with Maine, calling every man, woman, child and organization names, continued boasting about how he’s going to make changes but without actually doing it, he has discarded scientific data, he has mocked women, insulted everyone from the people of Maine to the President of the USA, he has shown much disrespect for different cultures, he cusses like a trucker whenever he feels like it, he has behaved inappropriately so many times that he’s become a political joke. All of these behaviors that would drive businesses owners out of Maine or keep new ones away.  His “Maine is open for business sign” is his best effort at bringing business to Maine and no business owner actually believes it. After all LePage himself has announced to the business world that Maine has too many economic problems for any business venture to survive here – according to him everyone’s on welfare. So even the “Open for Business” sign is a mockery of Maine and a bad joke.

        Jobs were lost several years back, businesses went under or packed up and left. While that’s not LePage’s fault, making no progress is. All he’s really done since taking office is complain about the same things you do. The difference between him and you is that he is in a position to do something about it and he’s opted to do nothing except blame every man, woman and child in Maine, every organization, every business, past administrations, etc… it’s all about a term full of blaming others and doing nothing. He acts like he expects Baldacci to come back and fix Maine’s welfare problems. He acts like he wants YOU to fix Maine’s employment and economic problems.  He acts like he expects YOU to make Maine a more businesses friendly place.  Apparently he can’t do it… so the next best thing to him is pointing the finger of blame so that you will expect the change to come from someone other than LePage and his administration. Today’s target is people on welfare and Baldacci. In the past it’s been scientists who don’t know as much as he does about chemicals, and women who don’t know as much as he does about women… LePage boasts a lot, a whole lot but he’s all hot air. And when it comes to anyone’s attention that no economic problems have been improved since he took office he quick draws the finger of blame. I don’t see what’s so great about accomplishing nothing and blaming others for his failures. If Maine is open for business we don’t need a governor announcing that businesses can’t survive here because everyone is on welfare… that’s just not intelligent at all. We need business, we need economic improvement and with those things will come reduced welfare need. It’s common sense.

      2. I think she’s wink, winking…..nudge, nudging throughout that whole post,  which by the way is remarkably proximate to all of her post.

    2.  Oh yeah.  Penguin is doing an amazing job, making State employees order new business cards and move cubicles, at the same time that he’s writing checks to people who shouldn’t be getting them and can’t tell us within a $10 million range how far above or below budget the State is on DHHS expenditures.   This guy is out of his league.  Time to head back to Mardens’

  5. Here’s a quick estimate of the cost in the DHHS budget for the computer mismanagement error:
    19,000 ineligible people x $5,000 (average estimated cost per person per year to DHHS for medical care) = $95,000,000 per year or $142,500,000 for 18 months

    And the Republicans propose slashing currently eligible people (elderly, disable, etc.) to make up about that much in “savings”. You bet they want to cover this up. It pulls the rug out from under their whole ideological agenda. Their financial rationale for slashing DHHS goes right out the window.

    You can plug in whatever average per year cost you want, it still blows their argument out of the water, except on ideological grounds.

    1. Democrats have been aware of and still using “computer mismanagement figures” in the DHHS budgets since 2006.  I wonder why?

      1. Nice try.

        The system causing this problem went online just a couple of months before this administration took over and they immediately saw the problem, put in an urgent change order and informed the incoming staff.

        1.  That is not true.  You need to educate yourself on the facts.  There were problems as far back as 2005.  “http://www.cio.com/article/20133/Maine_s_Medicaid_Mistakes”.

          Democrats are lying when they say they didn’t know.  They knew long before Mayhew or LePage were even on the scene. 

          1. Don’t try use truth, facts, common sense, etc., with some of these Democrats.

            They have had control of this state for what, 30-40 years(?) but everything that is wrong with the state financially is Le Page’s fault. Anyone but them.

            I live in a town full of these homes that care for these folks. The waste of having 1 or 2 people per house, with one on one, and sometimes two on one, 24/7 is astounding. There has to be a way to create a group type atomsphere and utilize the workforce more efficiently. But when you consider the homes are owned by a, let’s just say, a less than honest politician, that happened to sit on the commitees that paid these homes, then the waste makes perfect sense. Money in someones pocket, taken from those who need it.

            This was from Foxnews. Similar articles at Huffington.

            5. Maine
            > Overall grade: F (56%)
            > Public access to information: F
            > Legislative accountability: F
            > Political financing: D+
            > Ethics enforcement agencies: F

            Maine received F grades in nine of the 14 measured categories, including legislative accountability, lobbying disclosure and public access to information. The State Integrity Investigation identifies the existence of possible conflicts of interest and corruption. According to the report, there is no law in place, for example, to force Democratic State Senator Jim Brannigan to disclose that the organization that he was a director of received $98 million in Maine government contracts. On February 1, Republican State Representative David Burns was arrested for violating campaign finance laws such as falsifying records and misusing funds.

          2. The current problem is with a system that first came online a couple of months before Mayhew took charge.

            That is what SHE testified.

            Why do you believe she is lying about that?

            There are other problems that happened earlier. They were nasty and costly but bringing them up in regards to THIS issue is just trying to change the subject.

      2. apparently,   the democrats didn’t “use” the computer problems……but,   isn’t that funny…..I know someone who did!   I don’t seem to recall 19,000 people collecting benefits due to a  computer problem 2 years ago,    nor do I recall a 220 million dollar shortfall.

        1.  You need to educate yourself. Please read the link above. 

          Not only was there a computer problem 2 years ago, but there was one 7 years ago.  Furthermore, I would call a $450 million dollar debt to hospitals dating as far as 2006 a very serious shortfall indeed. 

          We haven’t even discussed the $235 million taken from DHHS by Brannigan, et al. 

          1. “the democrats didn’t “use” the computer problems”

             They used the problems.  They knew, and didn’t say anything.  I wonder why.

    1. I hope so but it seems whenever we turn around it is always a problem cover-up. Remember there was no business that was to big to fail…but yet there were. There were problems in the state of Maine before LePage and there are still many problems…Computer problems were conveyed as to why the medical providers were not being paid due to computer problems they said in the past administration…Now again there are computer problems again with the loss of monies paid to those who were not to be given coverage. Well I think we are missing the real problem is not a computers fault as computers are just a mechanical device. All these so called computer problems come from the people who download into them the software as a computer really does not run itself. A computer is only as good as the person downloading it’s software. But it is so much easier to say it is a computers fault means that the people who are being paid a wage to run these machines is a problem for us taxpayers as we continue to sign the checks. If you are not capable of doing the best job you can to earn your wage maybe we should keep the computers and hire new replacements who are aware of what information goes in and are accountable.  

      1. Have you seen the diagram of the DHHS computer system?  It was designed to cover-up all kinds of things.  And that design was not done since the LePage administration took office.  Things are hidden.  After a while (2005-2012) one has to begin suspicioning that they are not errors, but rather deliberate.

        And, they are deep.  Mary Mayhew is doing a good job of uncovering the slime.

  6. It has been common knowledge for years that there have been computer problems at DHHS. What has not been common knowledge was that over the last 1 1/2 years there have been more computer problems at DHHS. Now knowing that the DHHS computers have been prone to problems in the past one would think that Mr LePage would have insisted the Ms Mayhew keep an eye on them so the same thing did not happen on his watch. Surprise !!  Surprise !! And it took them over a year to find the problem and they still can not tell us the magnitude.

    Can we blame the Baldacci aministration for past problems yep. But the problems under Mr LePage belong to him and only him.

    Was there a cover up? According to Ms Mayhew she found about the problem in late January and if you believe her she did not tell anyone about and no one asked her about the problem until mid March. If this is true there is no cover up. However if this is true she failed in the performance of her job to notify Mr LePage, the legislature and more importantly the citizens of Maine. If that is the case she should be dismissed. This situation is a true catch 22 there is no way out. The time line from January to March has built a box from which there is no escape. Someone needs to take responsiblity for this and it can only be taken by those presently involved.

  7. If they knew that the computer problems existed,  then why weren’t they closely monitored? which would have allowed for a correction before the problem got to that point?      Why weren’t these problems told to the Legislature’s Appropriation’s committee?      Why didn’t they (the majority of the legislative council) defend the legislature’s integrity and not LePage’s  by supporting an audit,    an audit of a Department that MUST be done after all of this,  prior to any re-structuring.

    There are certainly viable reasons why all of these issues were thrust upon the legislature;   the governor doesn’t want proper investigation and consideration of this and other proposals.   He wants to slam it through before the next election.   He knows,  that he is going to take a beating come November,  and knows that things will be much different.    He thinks he is a master of chaos,   but actually he is the creator of much of it.

    Table the re-structuring bill,   until an audit can be completed and all issues addressed, hold it over if they must, but if the legislative republicans can’t seem to support it’s own legislature, then a new legislature should give the proposal it’s due diligence and study.

    It’s quite simple: if you don’t know where the problems are now, then how in hell are you going to know if the changes made : were necessary; were useful; or are even helpful and possibly harmful?

    1. I would like to know why when someone called DHHS and told them the hospital still had them in the computor as receiving Mainecare when they had told them that it had ended, why they didnt go into the system and manually change it instead of paying it. And why it took 2 more calls before something like that happened.

  8. I think these cuts are going to impact the mental health but the problem with this is that they should never have closed the institutions.  They are spending more money by letting these people try to live independently and 9 out of 10 times it doesn’t work but there are exceptions.  Then you have people that take full advantage of the system and many that don’t.  The one thing that bothers me is if they cut the elderly.  This makes me sick, there are so many ill elderly people that are barely getting by and I don’t believe it is right to cut their benefits, as for TANF these people need to have a limit.  My wife didn’t get a chance to stay at home and be a stay at wife mom, she went straight back to work and we paid for daycare on our own and have never taken any handouts.  The people in this generation feel they are entitled and that is what is wrong with the world today.

  9. This isn’t a republican or a democrat problem, it’s  a problem with the computer program.  People who work in DHHS are likely not involved with the computer programming, so how would DHHS employees know there is a problem if they were following procedures that they were given related to the program they were told to use?  I’m disappointed that DHHS will be cut.  Somewhere, someone with schizophrenia will not be able to see their doctor, maybe not be able to afford their meds, and not have a mental health advocate who could speak on their behalf.  What if that person is your neighbor?

  10. The bill also would outsource
    advocacy services for “the mentally
    ill.”

    The form you employ, “the” mentally
    ill, has seen considerable use as “the” Jews, and “the” Blacks. Diminishing
    people to a generic has had very negative effect. Its continuance in the above
    example has those negative results.

    The bill would outsource
    mental health advocacy.

    Surveying history, that has been
    the reality. States, unable to monitor their own agencies, were monitored by
    individuals and agencies from outside. Among those many “agencies” journalism
    has a very long history of monitoring.
    Harold A. Maio, retired mental health editor

    Harold A. Maio, retired mental health editor

  11. Augusta must be compelled to STOP the partisan bickering, compromise where necessary and get it done so maybe, just maybe they can work on more important issues, in particular, drug abuse, unemployment, ridiculous fuel prices and climbing grocery bills. Many people continue to lose their homes to foreclosure. I can’t think of any legislators that are living below the poverty level like so many of us and live paycheck to paycheck and frankly I don’t think they care.

    Stop the bickering and mudslinging. The only thing partisanship affects is our legislators careers and isn’t helping the people that elected them in the first place. ( I’m writing this as I look at my fuel bill for $912 for 1 tank of oil and gritting my teeth for having paid $2.68 for 1 LB of butter at Walmart. )

    Cut the crap Augusta, and get it done!!!!!

  12. “It’s time for the administration to first take responsibility for their mismanagement and second, and most importantly, take responsibility for willfully misleading lawmakers,”

    And under whose watch did this agency turn into an out of control monster?

    A little common sense will tell you that the waste, and the scamming of this system needs to stop so those who truely are in need, have this available to them.

    1.  That goes all the way back to King….this missing money has been missing for a very long time. Maine has done the same thing with DHHS as the feds have done with social security. Rob Peter to pay Paul…..you can only run that scam for so long and then it bites you.

  13. It is time to stop the lazy stupid women that think the world owes them a living by pretending or even getting pregant.  Get a life!

    1.  Actually, it is the stupid lazy men, to use your owns words, getting them pregnant that’s an even larger story.  They are the pilot fish along for the shelter, food, and other “benefits”. 

      Many have children with several different young women. 

  14. I for one saw the waste of DHHS first hand a week or so ago through my own mail from them. I have been invovled with them due to collections of child support for a dead bead dad and have been for some years now as my child is 16 years old. They thought for some strange reason that they needed to send me a letter stating certain things that I have known for years..I mean years I have know these things…….why would this department waste time sending out information like this???? It’s the right hand not knowing what the other is doing, sounds like a problem to me from the very foundation of this department..  I work for a place like this also… the smart ones who are suppose to be the ones with an education and smarter than the workers on the floor..Guess what, the people on the floor see all of the waste and bad decisions that those in charge make..so can the people of the state…..I saw it first hand

  15. Streamlining DHHS sounds like a “fool’s goal.” From what I’ve read on the BDN this kluge of a computer system and those running it needs to be addressed before restructuring. Until systems and data are normalized it will continue to produce erroneous results, streamlining or not. Fix the problem first, don’t just give it a face lift in the hopes that pretty will equate to valid results.

      1. Well, that leaves LePage out of it. Maybe he’s right. Maybe nobody in Maine knows anything or has any skills. Maybe he’ll bring an expert back from Jamaica with him.

  16. People get offended by the welfare state label but the bottom line is there are about as many people in Maine working as there are not. Many of us are just poor but many more make Welfare a long term career option because they are fat and lazy. If people don’t like the stigma of us being a welfare state, they should start be trying to instill a work ethic in their children and their neighbors. Nothing is more disgusting then generations of people who simply do not WANT to work. I’ve seen MANY people quit jobs because the thought of sweat and sore muscles just kills them. Take away their video games, their fast food (too lazy to sit down/walk/or make a meal), and their EBT cards.  I have a lot of respect for the elderly and moms with kids. But if you are an able bodied man or woman with no dependents – you really need to grow up and work. Welfare is a safety net – not a lifestyle.

    1. The most important thing that a parent can demonstrate to his child is simply getting up and going to work every day.  Even when it is hard and boring and he would so much rather be doing something else.  

      The second important thing is enforcing the idea that the child has to go to work every day he is on the schedule.  It doesn’t matter if all his friends are going somewhere or if he was out too late the night before.  The only time you call in sick is when you are too sick to do anything.  

      That is the foundation of the work ethic.  And, there is no way to teach/learn that when you are sitting home and collecting a ‘pay check’ for not working.

      1. Parents who are afraid to put their foot down usually have children who tread on their toes. – Chinese Proverb 

  17. You did the same thing with the MediCaid system you bought, junk and that cost us too.  Why would you run checks when one of your computers is down?  They should be fired.  Why not let an outside auditor look at the books, what are you afraid of?  You’re moving to FL anyway what do you care what happens to ME as long as you passeed a law protecting your retirement.  You are an embarrassment to the state, country, and humanity.

  18. As someone who has worked with mental health workers in the past, I’m concerned with this proposal to eliminate those 33 ICM positions.  Have the clients they work with been declared “cured” of their mental illness?  These positions are in place to work with the most difficult and dangerous of the mentally ill–those that no private agency will take on.

    I wonder how they’re going to find an agency now to take on these clients for less cost than having those 33 people on the state payroll.

  19. “It is well documented that these problems consistently plagued the Baldacci administration and were passed along to the LePage administration,” Senate President Kevin Raye said in a statement.
    There you go Kevin, part of the problem not the solution….This will really help your run for Congress!

  20. This sounds an awful lot like creating RSU school districts to save money and consolidate services and 2 years later they are putting in to get out of them because there was no savings there was no cuts only bigger payrolls the kids were the ones to suffer It would seem that the big rush to push this DHHS bill forward on such short notice would do the same thing ,create 55 bigger paying jobs for friends and then in 2 more years a WOW that didnt work so we will spend more money to put it back the way it was.I wonder when the lawmakers and gov. will learn that you just cant throw money at something and fix it.It takes a little effort on their part.   

    1. RSU’s were about something different then education.. John Baldacci wanted total control of everything,  Thus the black hole (general fund) 

  21. Slowly the state is beginning to show signs of reality again. Keep on them Governor, one department at a time and return Maine to a place we can be proud of.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *