Richard Grenell, whom Mitt Romney chose last month as his presidential campaign’s national security and foreign policy spokesman, stepped down from his post Tuesday, suggesting that the conservative backlash over his sexuality prevented him from being effective in his role.
In a statement provided to The Washington Post, Grenell, who is openly gay, said: “While I welcomed the challenge to confront President Obama’s foreign policy failures and weak leadership on the world stage, my ability to speak clearly and forcefully on the issues has been greatly diminished by the hyper-partisan discussion of personal issues that sometimes comes from a presidential campaign.” He added: “I want to thank Governor Romney for his belief in me and my abilities and his clear message to me that being openly gay was a non-issue for him and his team.”
Widely known in conservative circles, Grenell was named President George W. Bush’s spokesman to the United Nations in 2001 , and served as communications director under four U.S. ambassadors to the United Nations, including John Bolton, who is among his strongest supporters.
Grenell was a volunteer consultant to the Romney team before he was officially brought aboard, but the hiring was controversial from the start.
Shortly after Romney announced that Grenell would join his team, the former spokesman for the U.S. mission to the United Nations was forced to remove entries from his Twitter account that some considered offensive. Grenell came under fire for a series of snarky tweets aimed at women, including Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton; MSNBC talk show host Rachel Maddow; and Callista Gingrich, the wife of GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich.
The tweets included posts about Clinton’s appearance, Gingrich’s hair and Maddow’s lack of jewelry, but Grenell was forced to address complaints that his comments were sexist even before he moved into his new role.
And some longtime reporters openly complained about Grenell’s confrontational style, which sometimes included calls to editors and freezing reporters out of stories. Among Romney’s biggest champions in the twitterverse, Grenell often used his Twitter account to call out reporters and to criticize U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice.
But it was social conservatives who balked most over the choice.
Matthew Franck, director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute, called Grenell a “loose cannon” with a passion for the “gay agenda.”
“My problem is that by his own description he is an ardent activist for same-sex marriage who went to go work for a candidate who wants to defeat same-sex marriage. It doesn’t look good to the people that Romney needs support from to have an advocate for same-sex marriage in such a high-profile position,” Franck said. “The Romney campaign needs to be unequivocally opposed to same-sex marriage and to appear to be. The campaign has remedied a problem that was bound to get worse.”
While discussions of foreign policy have been front and center in the campaign for the White House, Grenell has been largely absent.
The Romney team maintains that it was Grenell’s decision to leave his post.
“We are disappointed that Ric decided to resign from the campaign for his own personal reasons,” campaign manager Matt Rhoades said in a statement. “We wanted him to stay because he had superior qualifications for the position he was hired to fill.”



What a strange litmus test — if you’re gay, apparently the right-wingers say you aren’t credible as a hawk on national security issues. How bizarre! They’ll apparently forgive or ignore all kinds of obnoxious heterosexual behavior (Newt Gingrich, Clarence Thomas, John Ensign, David Vitter, Herman Cain and others). But they don’t trust you if you are fluent in Mandarin, like John
Huntsman, and they barely tolerate you if you are a Mormon, like Romney
and Huntsman. And if you were born gay, you’re apparently not allowed to be a right-winger. Go figure.
Wow! How do conservatives really feel about that …
You are known by the company you keep, as the saying goes, and politicians are undermined by some of the people they hire.
So your saying having gay friends “undermines” a person?
I would think Romney needs to be seen as a Big Tent guy, despite what the Far Right mentors think.
Why don’t they “Pray away his gay !”
Romney just went up a notch in my book.
“But it was social conservatives who balked most over the choice.”
No… Really? Get outta town! Who’d have thought that would happen, and in the Republican party, of all places?
He was a caustic mouth homosexual with a grudge against women. Stick a fork in him, he’s done.
His mouthilitis overrode his desire to remain in his politically-associated position as he is obviously got something against women. Romney said he could care less what sexual preferences or color anyone happens to be, except if they are fit and professional enough to carry the job assigned. But I think we all know this guy was fired!