LEWISTON, Maine — Shots were fired and several men were detained early Friday night after a man with a gun opened fire on Blake Street.

The sound of gunfire was reported by several people at about 6 p.m., police said. Seconds later, at least a dozen officers were in the area as suspects scattered and reports continued to come in.

A police officer detained three men at gunpoint after spotting them running from the scene. The three were ordered to the ground on Bates Street, near the corner of Ash.

Farther up Ash Street, another man was caught by police, allegedly as he fled the same scene.

The shots were fired near the corner of Blake and Pine streets, witnesses said. Reports that a woman had been shot and that the shooter might still be hiding inside 111 Pierce St. added confusion.

At about 6:30 p.m., the woman reported to have been shot came outside to declare that she was fine. She never reported being hit by gunfire, she said, and didn’t call police.

Others not only heard the gunfire but saw the shooter in action.

One woman who lives nearby said she had just come inside from playing with her child when she heard the explosion of gunfire outside.

The shooter, described as a young man, was in the alley between tenements when he fired the first shot, that woman said. The shooter then dropped something and after running back to retrieve it, he jumped into a car that had been parked at the corner of Blake and Pine.

“He got in the car and fired four more times,” she said. “I saw him stick his hand right out the window and start shooting. He shot up in the air. There was no point to it, really. Apparently, he wanted somebody to know he was out there.”

Other witnesses told similar stories.

“Pop and then pop, pop, pop, pop,” said one man who had been walking through the area at the time. “Four shots, at least.”

For a time, police surrounded the three-story tenement at 111 Blake St. with guns drawn. They were hampered by a large and growing crowd of spectators, who stood on sidewalks, watched from porches and leaned from windows.

Groups yelled back and forth across Blake Street. Accusation and rumor spread from one side of the street to the other. The number of onlookers continued to climb.

“There are a lot of irresponsible parents,” another woman said, “bringing their kids out here to watch all of this.”

One witness described the car the shooter fled in as a white sedan, possibly a Mitsubishi. Police were given similar descriptions from other witnesses.

An hour after the shots were first reported, there was still confusion at the scene. A fifth man was taken into custody in front of 111 Blake St. It was unclear how he was connected to the shooting.

The lower end of Blake Street has been lively since last summer, witnesses said. Late-night parties, drug use and assaults are common.

“I’ve lived here six months,” Bowman said. “And I’ve probably seen the cops out here 10 times.”

Later Friday night, Lt. Adam Higgins said police were still interviewing witnesses about the shooting. No arrest had been made and no weapon had been recovered. The investigation was expected to continue overnight.

An hour after police arrived, a bearded man stood on the sidewalk, watching the officers interviewing witnesses.

“Let Jesus sort it out,” he shouted across the street. “That’s what it all comes to, anyway.”

Join the Conversation

64 Comments

    1. So how can you tell the suspects are Somalian? Because they’re black and from Lewiston? I guess I’m confused then…are the cops Somalian too then?? Seriously people, might want to check a few stats on crime in Lew before blaming a whole race, as convenient as it may be. Oh yea, & the only parents I ever see outside walking & playing with their children are the Somalians, I assume the other kids are inside tethered to a TV or video game. 

    1. That would be fine, other then the fact that 30+ thousand people that live in Lewiston aren’t from Somalia. 

    2. Yeah, because we all know that Lewiston was a clean, crime-free, healthy place to raise your children in the 90s, and that there were no drugs or violence in the city before the influx of immigrants.
      Oh, if only we could harken back the glory days! Back then things really *were* different! For one, when the news showed pictures of poor people laying on the ground after a police bust, everyone was white! Now THAT was a city we could all be proud to love!

    1. And what do you do with the vast majority of white folks commiting crimes?  Deport them where?

        1. hahaha!   White collar criminals sank our economy and we punished them by bailing them out.  (‘We’ being a euphemism for G. W. Bush.  Of course, Pres. Obama has been taking the rap for that.)   The top 1% walked with the $$$.  I’m not sure there was anything else we could have done but no heads rolled, no one was arrested.  Most people on these blogs ignore that fact but get all up in arms over some petty theivery, esp’ly if it involves a person of color, as in black or mexican.  “They come here an bring their evil ways with them.” All the while ignoring the fact that the elite 1% walked with the money. Pres. Obama is insisting on enforcing the new rules on investment scams and the republicans bad nouth him for it, call it ‘class warfare.’ I have paid more percentage of my earnings (20%) in taxes that Mitt Romney (15%) does.

          1. “Petty theivery”….. Read this article again. It clearly states he shot once, and then at least four more times!! If one of those bullets struck one of your loved ones would it still be a petty crime?? I think not! I could care less about your silly politics, they are all rich and could care less about the working man.

          2.  I agree wcg!   This has nothing to do with politics of today nor occupy movement.  I am so sick and tired of hearing about the President and what he is/isn’t going to do.  Especially with a story that has nothing to do with him!

    2.  They are already here with the gangsta ghetto  rap and attitude. See new ones daily walking from Concord bus lines to de ‘hood in Capehart…

    3.  12% of the population, 40% of the prison population… And this is from the US Census Bureau before I get deleted or called a racist…

      1. I won’t call you a racist for using those figures; I *will* call the act of cherry-picking those figures in an attempt to draw overly-simplified negative conclusions about a group of people, *extremely* racist. What you fail to mention is that black people also represent grossly disproportionate numbers of Americans living below the poverty line (just under 50%). Or that black poverty is demographically concentrated in segregated urban centers. The poorest neighborhoods in the poorest cities are *obviously* also the most crime-ridden areas. So if black folks make up the overwhelming majority of people living in those areas, then your “facts” about the number of people in prison mean almost nothing. They are numbers out of context, devoid of meaning.

        Also, you might want to look at the number of convictions of black men as compared to those of their white criminal counterparts. For example, African-Americans make up 14% of the drug users in the U.S. (whites make up 70%), but they represent over 45% of those actually convicted of drug possession. How could that possibly make sense if the only fact that matters is how many blacks/whites there are and how many are in prison? (Pssst… the answer is that your oversimplified statistical justification for bigotry is idiotic.) And it’s not just drug crimes. Overall, a black defendant is SIX TIMES more likely to be convicted and sentenced to jail/prison time than a white defendant. And once convicted, black convicts receive sentences which are on average twice as long as the sentences given to white folks.

        But this isn’t meant as a lecture in the proper use of statistics. All I’m saying is that you might want to stop and consider the context of the numbers you throw around. It’s pretty easy to point your finger at someone and hand-pick a couple stats that make them look irredeemably bad. It’s much harder to ask yourself why you had the negative opinion about black people that you felt you needed to justify in the first place.

        1. True, but some of the disparity in the white/black drug ‘possession/use’ argument can be explained by what we here in Boston have long understood. While usage by blacks is lower than for whites, it’s because the white suburbanites come to the inner city to buy and use, but it’s the blacks that do the selling (which is considered a worse crime than mere possession)
          Hence, one of the bigger reasons for the imprisonment differential . It’s also the reason for so much inner city violence: lucrative turf  for dealing to those whites. :-)

          1. Wow, you are a sociopolitical savant!
            “Get a job.” Pure genius!
            Man, I’m in awe by your insight. I just can’t think of a single flaw in your logic.

    1. and I wonder if the libs are wondering if these fine upstanding young men just need more help from the government.

  1. Who is this Bowman character?  I can’t find any mention of them in the article other than a quote inferring they had already been mentioned…

  2. “The shooter, described as a young man,”
    they couldn’t give us any more details? something to watch out for?
    Did he have hair?white? black? tatoos? anything that the residents can use to identify the criminal?
    or are we just going to have to hope that he gets caught before he shoots at someone else?
    Nice reporting, really.

      1. Just like they don’t say “he was of franco american descent.”  , Italian descent etc.    Crimes in Maine are commited by Franco and English descent way more than others ethnicities.  Why don’t you read that in the paper?  Perhaps because anyone who’s educated would realize ethnicity has nothing to do with it?   Or am I just being a socialist commie liberal moon bat whacko?

        1. “Crimes in Maine are commited by Franco and English descent way more than others ”

          Gee, because they way outnumber all the others?  Did you flunk math?

          1. Nice side step.  You still have not answered my question: Why don’t you read that in the paper?, that being that most crime is commited by French and English descendents.  It is never mentioned.  Ethnicity, like I said, has nothing to do with crime at all, no matter how many more of ‘them’ or less of ‘them’ there are.  You have ignored the intent of my post because you are making excuses.

        2. Given the percentages of Franco/English descent in Maine, I would suspect they would commit more crimes.

          Now, as to “socialist commie liberal moonbat whacko,”……..your words, not mine

        3. Of course they are.  We live in whitest State in the union.. Simple Math… how did you figure that whites commit more crimes anyway? the liberal math scale?

  3. Your comment is in poor taste. The one thing responsible firearm owners agree on, whether conservative, liberal, independent or otherwise,  is that
    this kind of behavior deserves swift prosecution, a harsh sentence and loss of the future right to possess firerams (though I suspect the individual is already a prohibited person).     

  4. What?  The reporter idetified it as a white car, and worse yet, a Mitsubishi?   The writer’s prejudices surface!

  5. Looks to me like the police did a good job. They’ll catch the shooter, hopefully without having to shoot anyone.

  6. Angus King should live in their neighborhood for a year or 2.. He loved the welfare $$$$’s that came with them.

  7. Lewiston goes downhill all the time.  Pretty soon it will completely drag down all the surrounding communities.

      1. The facts are that the police aprehended individuals potentially involved in the incident and are looking for another. What I see here is a lot of racist conjecture masquerading as relevant commentary.

  8. and this made news because ???????  lewiston has turned into the arm pit of maine :( i feel bad for the honest familys there

  9. Just a theory here but I would like to know how many involved where  gainfully employed and how many where on the dole if those involved then the same question applied to the household they live in.

    I have a sneaking suspicion what the answer is. 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *