BANGOR, Maine — City officials say the hangover of the home mortgage crisis seems to be easing but they’re still dealing with a headache.
The economic recession and accompanying mortgage meltdown left cities nationwide dealing with a multitude of abandoned properties or houses — and the security, safety and economic problems that go with them.
While Bangor has not been immune to the problem, city officials say it has fared better than most.
“The Bangor area missed the worst of the housing crunch, but it was still bigger and deeper than anything this community has seen since the Great Depression,” said Dan Wellington, who was Bangor’s code enforcement officer for 18 years.
Wellington said that when it came to tracking down the owners of abandoned houses, he sometimes felt more like a detective than a code enforcement officer.
“Unlike other recessions with foreclosures that the banks handled quickly and efficiently, now the paper isn’t all held by traditional brick-and-mortar institutions,” said Wellington, who retired from the post last August after 34 years working for the city. “Some of these [mortgage companies] shop your mortgage out shortly after signing you up. They act more like mortgage brokers than mortgage holders.”
Just before Wellington retired, staffers from his office conducted a “windshield survey,” driving around Bangor and identifying possible abandoned buildings based on visible signs such as unmowed lawns.
“We started getting the sense things were worse than what we had on paper,” he added. “We found 125 vacant buildings in town that weren’t being maintained.”
David Little, Bangor’s tax collector and deputy treasurer, said there are more than 100 homeowners in Bangor who are three or more years behind on property taxes, giving the city legal standing to take over house ownership.
“Legally we could, but technically we haven’t,” said City Manager Cathy Conlow. “We have the legal right to begin the process, but we haven’t had a full-blown discussion on what to do about that.”
While no one — from people in code enforcement, assessing and Bangor’s treasury department — has an exact figure for abandoned properties in Bangor, estimates range from 50 to 100.
Why the uncertainty?
“I think most of them are simply people’s nonmaintenance of their property,” said Jeremy Martin, Bangor’s present code enforcement officer. “Some may appear to be abandoned, but some may not be, or they’re abandoned for a short period of time and in transition. It’s very difficult to determine.”
It’s even more difficult to determine who owns the houses that have in fact been abandoned.
“The biggest problem is we don’t even know who to contact sometimes,” said Conlow.
Many times, tax records, the city registry and even bank records don’t help, forcing people like Wellington — and now Martin — to play Perry Mason and go digging — deep.
“After two days of making calls and doing Internet searches, we tracked down one house where the mortgage was being held by a pension fund in Dallas, Texas,” recalled Wellington. “I talked to someone there and they said they bought a bundle of around 8,000 to 10,000 high-risk mortgages at 9 percent.
“He said they thought they were guaranteed a 9 percent return on investment and that it was a heck of a deal, but now they’re all toxic and they have to unload them.”
Wellington said he heard some sobering tales while researching the issue of abandoned houses.
“We’ve had several landlords of rental properties who got so desperate they just took off and left the tenants to their own fates,” he said. “The tenants hadn’t seen their landlords in three months and we’d have to tell them the end was here and they’d have to find somewhere else to go because the winter was coming and there would be no heat or water in the near future.”
Martin said when his office is notified of an abandoned house, people from the office usually go there along with a police officer to secure the site by boarding up open spaces and making sure people can’t gain easy access.
“We get occasional calls about them,” said Jason McAmbley, the Bangor Police Department’s community relations officer. “It’s more an annoyance than a problem for us.”
McAmbley said Bangor residents have been very vigilant about reporting activity in empty houses in their neighborhoods.
“People going in those houses are not going in to live there,” he said. “They’re going in temporarily to drink or use drugs. I think it’s more stealing things and causing damage. The most we’ve seen is buildings being stripped of copper pipes and fixtures.”
Martin said the frequency of such calls was about once a month last year, but that pace has slackened.
“In the last six months … I think the frequency of abandoned buildings calls has gone down,” he said. “Compared to a lot of places, we’re not feeling it like they are.”
Wellington agrees, saying he chalks that up to old-fashioned Yankee values.
“Mainers are pretty conservative people and a lot of us got our mortgages from Bangor Savings and other local institutions rather than fly-by-night lending places,” Wellington said.
The Bangor City Council held a workshop on abandoned properties last year and is keeping tabs on the issue.
“The concern is the degradation of neighborhoods. We certainly don’t want unmaintained buildings, which can lead to vandalism and safety issues,” Conlow said.
Council Chairman Cary Weston, who acts as Bangor’s mayor, said an empty building isn’t a problem in and of itself.
“There are certainly some ugly abandoned houses and eyesores, but the problem is we have absentee owners,” said Weston. “The problem, from my point of view, is the buildings that aren’t abandoned but still have code violations from absent or unattentive landlords with a slumlord mentality who need to be held more responsible.
“And we’re stepping up to put the rules and tools in place for law enforcement to more effectively deal with them.”



Nice plug for BSB, like thats the only Local bank that does mortgages.
Obviously, BSB is not the only local lender who offers mortgages. But the point in the article was that BSB does not sell their mortgages in packages to other investors like some of the other banks do. If you have a mortgage with BSB, you make your payments to BSB. For the city personnel trying to track ownership of abandoned buildings, that makes their jobs easier.
Actually BSB sells both types of mortgages, the one they keep and the one they sell.
I wasn’t aware that BSB had started selling bundled mortgages…when did they start doing that?
It’s not recently new, my daughter was given the choice 3 years ago. The down payment or credit requirements may be different-you’d have to call on the specifics.
There must be some way to make these properties available as rentals.
Nope, shouldn’t do it.
I’ve noticed you have been against providing these properties as rental properties. I’m curious as to why you feel that way.
////
Sad. We have some wonderful tenants at our properties who are considered “poor” but have been superb tenants. They aren’t all drug addicts or welfare frauds either.
…..
to expensive to run old houses. The government owns enough rentals.
Not to mention fuel costs… those old houses are expensive to heat.
Our waterfront 1792 house in Baltimore is a good example of the proverbial money pit. Brick with nothing but horsehair plaster on all 3 stories proves that ya just can’t heat it! :)
Yup! My grandmothers old house on Essex was that way until she ripped it apart and remodeled it herself. It was just old newspaper and plaster before. And with 3 full floors to heat, i dont even want to know the cost!
1792? Wow. It’s sounds like a historical treasure. Have you found any artifacts?
Yes, we did. We found that the kitchen floor had collapsed years ago, so some rubble had been put in for fill under the charming brick floor, those STEEP curved stairs are impossible (move furniture up by ropes thru windows), one of the 4 fireplaces leaked water on that horsehair plaster, new roof to replace 200 years of patches, the Fells point Hysterical Commission dictating what can be done to the facade (we cheated and got clad windows anyway at a grand apiece), rotted stringers, water that shuts off everywhere when a tap is opened, getting a notice from the mortgage company saying we now need Federal flood insurance…. Those are the artifacts!
Yes, it’s charming, just like the house in the photo, but DON’T DO IT! :)
It would seem to me that not all of these homes are old or in disrepair, but I could be wrong. Nothing in the article made me assume that abandoned meant old. Regardless, I appreciate the explanation.
What, David? You think the gubmint wouldn’t/couldn’t make a good landlord? Look at Augusta for proof before you decide………
hahah government landlord. You’re funny.
Cynicism is the root of most comedy, and most comedians have a sad life. Not me!
If you can’t laugh about the things unchangeable, you get ulcers!
The best way for the town to do that is to take ownership, if they have the legal right to do so, then sell them to investors (landlords) who could then rent them out. The Gov’t itself would not make a good landlord…
Maybe fire department training?
This is what happens when property values plummet because of an increase in sex offenders as well as drug addicts from 3 Methodone clinics in one town. Shame on Bangor’s city council for allowing this to happen.
Oh please…properties are abandoned because most people can’t afford them because there are no JOBS. You can’t pay a mortgage on part time burger flipping pay or 30 hours a week cashiering.
What does that have to do with paying your taxes. NOTHING!!!!!!
Duh. Drug addicts and sex offenders move to town. Law-abiding citizens and business owners leave town. Landlords are forced to rent to drug addicts and sex offenders, who fall behind on their rent or fail to pay altogether because they know it’ll take months to evict them. Landlords then can’t pay their mortgages and taxes, etc., etc., etc. It’s all connected.
—-
The law abiding citizens are packing up and moving because of the increase in crime. If someone leaves and can’t afford to pay their mortgage payment, the house is left vacant and the city doesn’t get their tax payments. It’s a continuous downward spiral.
I did.
Thank you I feel like I took a class at UMO after what you wrote!!!!
ooooooooooooooook and dont forget hollywood and the gambling addicts to
///////
To be honest, it’s quite refreshing to see them blaming someone besides the gays for a change :)
====
Yes, I’m sure they have their share, and I’m sure it deters the more civil members of society from buying/staying there. I just can’t see lumping all the poor into the sex offender/drug addict category. Lots of my “poor” tenants pay their rent, care for the property like it were their own and I never have an issue with them. Sometimes I have had to give them a few extra days to scratch up the rent $$, but they always have, thus far.
Blame our United States Congress for allowing Pizza delivery people to sell mortgages with virtually no regulation. It’s over now and will take a few more years to clear out this inventory of homes. Bangor has always had some rough neighborhoods and abandoned properties as do all cities . The city was home to well over 100 places to get drunk during the logging boom era. Most of these people could not afford these homes in the first place and only bought a home because these unscrupulous lenders gave them the money.
I blame rock n roll and baggy jeans!
It’s those damn video games I tell ya!
No! its hooded sweatshirts!
lol oh yes, with all those horrible sports names on them!
That wouldn’t explain the drop in property values all throughout the country, including the wealthy, shorefront estate neighborhoods.
We’re talking about “Bangor, Maine”, the sex offender capital of the state, which also has 3 Methodone clinics. We are not talking about “shore front estate neighborhoods.” But, nice try on your attempt to covertly change the subject.
You indicated that the property values have gone down in Bangor due to sex offenders and meth clinics. I asked how you explain the property value declines everywhere in the country? Obviously the point went straight over your head about the decline of property values in the wealthy shorefront estate neighborhoods (i.e. do you blame the sex offenders and meth clinics there too?). No changing the subject. You just need to follow :)
Read slowly and try to follow along. Sex offenders + drug addicts = higher crime. Higher crime = law abiding citizens fleeing the city. Fewer law abiding citizens = lower property values.
Follow along (again): HOW do you explain the decreased property values ALL across the country, including in places with low crime, low drugs, etc.???? It’s ok if you have no answer. Just say so for goodness sake.
This article is not about the rest of the nation. It is about BANGOR. Read the headline one more time.
Ok, I’ll try one last time to get you to see the correlation. If you don’t get it, I give up. YOU claim the property valuen Bangor were on the decline because of sex offenders, druggies, etc. Fine, point taken and I’m sure that doesn’t help the property values, but to assume that is the reasoning for property value declines in BANGOR (yes, we’re talking about Bangor here…follow me) is insane since ALL property values across the country were on the decline at the same time. SO, my question, one last time. If you believe the properties values in BANGOR are due to sex offenders, druggies, etc., WHY did the other property values decline at the same time??? (i.e. I’m disagreeing that the druggies and sex offenders are the sole reason for the decline in property values in BANGOR…in case you haven’t grasped that yet)
I never said that was the sole reason but, as you yourself finally admitted, it is part of the problem.
I’m very glad that you see the point. I don’t practice real estate in Bangor. It is possible that the values there have decreased far more than the rest of the country. I’ll have to check the stats on my MREIS tomorrow. Glad you see that we’re not off topic here. I was starting to wonder about you
I have a house on the market in Bangor and I’m pretty upset about the failure of the city council to keep the city safe. Thus, they have contributed to the degradation of the town.
=-=-=
Bangor is the sex offender capital of Bangor, having more sex offenders than even Portland, which has more then twice the population of Bangor. Bangor also have 3 Methodone clinics. Other cities and even other states send their sex offenders and their drug addicts to Bangor for free food and housing. The police chief himself admitted the increased crime rate in Bangor is due in part to the increasing number of sex offenders. Take off your blinders and look around. See: ProtectBangorKids.com
=====
Bangor residents tried that (see ProtectBangorKids.com) but all but one Bangor City Counselor voted to allow sex offenders to live anywhere they want in Bangor, including next to schools or parks. You see, housing and treating sex offenders is profitable business! The city as well as those providing the free housing, food, etc. receives state and federal funds to do so. If they cut the number of sex offenders, their revenues decrease. Clearly, some are far more interested in turning a profit than in keeping convicted child rapists from ogling our children while they are at school or on the local playground.
You are so severely uneducated on what is going in your community… I feel really sorry for you.
You have your head in the clouds. My sympathies.
And I’m scared that there are more voters out there with the same ridiculous ideas! WOW
Shame on the citizens of Bangor keeping the same councilors…
I do agree we have an increase in sex offenders an drug addicts in the methadone clinics, however if anyone really thinks that is the major reason that we have abandoned properties they are really quite ignorant and must pay no attention to the news or the economical situation our country has been in for the past few years. Yes drugs and sexual offenders are a real problem, but you can not blame all the ills of the world on those two things.
so why not claim the properties and let low income families rent at a very low rate if they maintain the property.
won’t happen shouldn’t happen. bad idea
This is the second time you have said this is a bad idea, and I know some one else earlier asked you why… and you didn’t answer. I am not saying it is or not, I honestly do have an opinion either way because I don’t have enough information either way. But, I will ask again… why a bad idea?
//////
Because the City is not set up for nor has any interest in becoming a land lord.
How about Bangor Housing Authority?
They are a private company.
http://www.manta.com/c/mmjhpxt/bangor-housing-authority
Most of these older buildings need to be torn down, then the land can be given to someone who is going to build a new home to live in… Rehabing these old homes is a terrible Idea. They are full of lead paint, radon, cost to much to heat etc,etc.. These old homes have a life span. and most of them have meet them.. as of renting them as subsidized low income homes they are to expensive to maintain and run. Cheaper to build a complex of 50 units then to totaly rehab 15 massive old homes.
I imagine it would be cheaper – but I hate to think of all these old houses being torn down, some of them are so regal looking…. It seems like if some one could put in the time and money to fix them up, they would be perfectly suitable houses and much better than a bunch of boring old complexes on every street corner. But, I suppose that is the “sentimental” part of me, and I am sure many people that are more building construction savvy than me would disagree (including in some instances my own hubby).
I will say even the one in the picture, at first glance, seems to be in decent shape. But, I guess you truly don’t know until you get into the house with a house inspector. There have been numerous older houses in my community that have just recently been torn down – three of them to make room for exactly what you are talking about. We currently having a low-income housing complex being build on the grounds where they were standing not more than a year ago.
The problem usually is that it is an oxymoron to posit that low income people can afford to maintain a house. Homes are very expensive to operate, paint and generally maintain. To propose to rent at very low rates IF they maintain is naive. Traditionally, low income people are horrible tenants.
Maybe the ones that are in good shape should be claimed and sold somehow within the First Time Homebuyer’s program at a good rate. Make the dream of home ownership a little easier for someone and increase the cities taxable properties by a little more.
Or what about selling them at a good rate to people who are interested in gaining rental property, but may not have a ton of money to offer up front to purchase. My hubby and I have talked repeatedly about buying rental property, but right now we don’t have a huge surplus of money to do so. We are doing fine on our own with everything we have to pay for, but don’t think we add anything else at this time….
I had rental property for years..lots of headaches involved. No easy money. Tax laws were changed under a capital gains bill years ago. There used to be great tax write offs. No more. If you rent a place for over , I think, 8 years..when you sell it, you pay taxes just like from a payroll check. So all the work in between renters , the headaches are for the federal govt. Oh, when those tax laws were changed, that is when rent went sky high. I knew poor people were going to have a much harder time making it. This tax law has a lot to do with the US enormous homeless population.
I recently saw a blog title, you cannot work a 40 hour minimum wage job and afford a two bedroom apt. in any state in the union.
This is certainly being done. I was surprised there was zero mention of it in this article. Through the Neighborhood Stabilization Program, the Community Development Department of the City is purchasing vacant, foreclosed homes on the open market. Extensive rehabilitation and Code repairs are made and then the homes are placed back on the market for sale to Low to Moderate Income individuals or, preferably, families. The program rules state that the City is not allowed to make one penny in profit, thus the homes are very reasonably priced. To date, six properties have been rehabed with four sold and two still currently on the market; two properties were deemed to be beyond rehab and were demolished (one parcel was given to Parks and Rec since a good portion of the property was already zoned Parks and Open Space and one property is to be divided up and sold to abutting neighbors to create conforming lots); one property was sold to Penquis CAP prior to rehab and then Penquis rehabed the building into 4 units of low income housing. Now with the money received from the sales of properties, the program is looking to repeat the process. All in all it has been a successful program and again I am surprised/disappointed that there was no mention of it in this article.
Your perspective is very interesting and I agree with you that the BDN should have covered this part of the story.
Something else that was not mentioned in ths story is that some tenants have stayed in their homes without PAYING rent for months, even years! I do not know the exact property, but I do know the person who lived for 3 years without paying a dime of rent after the property was forclosed. Just because it appears to still be lived in does not nesessarily mean that the property has not in fact been abandoned .
Should sell the homes at a very reasonable price.
A few years ago my neighbor took advantage of one of those “great” refinancing deals on his house, and borrowed money to boot. He bragged about what a great deal he was getting and kept encouraging my boyfriend and I to do the same. I told him there was absolutely no way I was gonna fall for that trap. Someone I loved would have to be dying before I’d even consider refinancing. He acted like I’d grown a second head or something.
He blew all the money he borrowed. Then his wife lost her good paying job, and lo and behold they were in a financial disaster. They lost their house, and on moving day my neighbor told me that he wished he had listened to me because if he had not re-financed, money would have been tight, but he would have been able to pay his mortgage.
I still have my house, and now, new neighbors. Live and learn I guess.
And just what happened to the car, vacation, xbox that was bought with that ‘to boot’ loot?
People thought their houses were ATMs, and the housing crash ruined that plan, didn’t it?
Nothing wrong with a sensible refinancing; I just did it for 3.1% no points., for 10 years and the payments went down $100. :)
We are thinking about doing the same, need to call our banker though and hash things out before jumping into anything… like you said, as long as it is done sensibly and responsibly, I don’t see any problem with it.
Go for it! Sensibly (operative word) done, it’s the sensible thing to do! The banks aren’t as easy as they used to be, though. :)
Neither do I. I was talking about a few years ago when there were refinancing companies (Like the ones that flooded the TV with ads), that encouraged people to take advantage of their offers with very easy approvals for their loans. A lot of those companies also encouraged people to borrow money on top of the refinancing deal. There were a lot of people that fell for it and then found themselves in big financial trouble down the road. This is what my neighbor did.
Good luck to you in your efforts to refinance. I hope you find a good deal and get a great rate. :)
Actually, he ended up selling a lot of his possessions. I did not mean to imply that every refinancing deal is a bad deal. I was referring to a few years ago when TV was flooded with refinancing ads. There were people who refinanced and also borrowed a bunch of money when they were in no financial shape to do so (like my neighbor).
3.1% and no points? That’s a great deal. I hope you have fun with that extra $100.00 bucks per month. :)
Do a credit union if possible. My udder half works at Mass Gen Hosp,which is part of the (get this) ‘Harvard University Employees Credit Union’. Whoda thunk that was available to us?! We weren’t aware of it. I hope that everyone really digs for, and finds, all options. We were very lucky. :)
That 100 a month is going towards that 1960 Beetle in Illinois I just bought! (Just how much is it to ship it here?!! Oh Oh)
My udder half….lol!
34 years of a good marriage gives us license to say stuff like that to each other (and worse)! Just always say it with a smile.
Lending institutions were crazy to hand out some of their sketchy loans, but I agree that the people signing the documents were EQUALLY to blame. I still have my home as well, after being contacted by several lenders wishing to have me refinance it for at least twice what it was worth. Oh yes, lets not leave out appraisers as well. The appraisers working for these institutions were as crooked as the lenders themselves.
Ditto. Igot many solicitations as well, all of which I refused. I now own my home after paying off a 30 year mortgage in 19 years. Can’t remember much in my life that has felt so good.
I’ll bet it does. That’s a feeling I can’t wait for myself!
Oh yes, so true. I remember my neighbor bragging about the the estimated value the appraiser put on his house. He gave an estimate of something like 2 1/2 times the actual value of the property. My neighbor was SO excited because it meant he could borrow a lot of money. I kept telling him “Don’t do it!”, but he ignored my warnings and went ahead and “borrowed” himself into a financial disaster.
Looking back now, the guy really was a dullard.
Yep. Lots of people were fooled by crooked appraisers. The agency I work for used to do appraisals and the out-of-state lenders would never accept them. They would actually call our office and ask us to adjust the values. Not a chance. A comp is a comp and there is very little rearranging you can do LEGALLY. Why appraisers haven’t had more liability for this mess is beyond me.
You are smart. Clearly, your neighbor was not. People can attempt to blame the banks all they want but the fact is all those “victims” borrowed more than they could afford. It’s their own fault.
====
When a city invites sex offenders into town (by giving them free food and housing) and drug addicts into town (by giving them free Methodone), the quality of living in the city drops due to the increase in crime and, naturally, the property values drop as well.
If someone took out a loan to “keep up with the Jones'”, it was definitely their fault for biting off more than they could chew.
My in-laws fell for the home re-fi trap too…took out every penny they owned in the house to do work on it..it’s not always a bad thing, but, I can only tell you, as hard as I work to pay my own mortgage, I am certainly not interested in having to re-pay more that I’ve already paid once.
When my wife and I were looking for a home, we kept getting notes back that we were “qualified” for a mortgage that was twice what we already knew we could afford (a mortgage of $250,000 when we already knew our range was less than $150,000)…I kept saying, are these people stupid? If -we- know what we can afford, how can they be so far off??? We ended up with a mortgage that was less than half what they “qualified” us for.
Using your home as a piggy-bank is a mistake. It’s more like an investment that requires TLC, maintenance, and, forgive the term, but “interest” in maintaining your investment.
Renting to low income only devalues the neighborhood. Tear them down. There are no legal owners because the Banks shredded the contracts long ago.
Maybe I don’t understand entirely as I’m not a homeowner. Is it the rental prices that bring down the neighborhood’s value? Or the fact that they are rentals and not owned? Or are you just assuming that low income families are all lowlifes that are going to cause others to move and bring down the property values?
In all fairness, rental properties often do bring down the value of neighboring properties because renters may not care for the property as a homeowner would. This is not a generalization against all renters (I am one), but more often than not people treat their own investment better than a temporary housing arrangement in a building owned by someone else.
Some of the boarded up properties appear to have been decorated as of late:
http://www.bangorbytes.com/2012/05/bangors-pigeon-decorates-abandoned.html
Vandalized is the proper term.
It’s plywood…. If it’s on the actual siding of the house I’ll call it vandalism.
It’s someone elses property….It’s vandalism!
give me a few for me to rent out…lol
This is probably a very positive development for area mouse and rat clans. Some raccoon families may be considering these potential homes as well.
I got my mortgage from Bangor Savings Bank and they immediately sold it to a fly by night company. Let’s not get too carried away with endorsing specific banks.
You knew that going in. BSB gives you a choice if you qualify of keeping it in house or selling the paper. They do not do business with fly by night banks-or people with poor credit. They had very few losses diring the morgage debacle.
Hometown banks should always get consideration over out-of-area banks because outfits like BSB have been around since the Civil War, and they put a significant part of their profits back into the communities they serve via grants, donations, and the like. That’s more than the mortgage investors do, and it’s good business.
Wrong.. Bangor Saving Bank has been around for around ten years.
Bangor Savings Trust Was around for a long time and was owned by it’s depositers.
Know the difference and how Bangor Savings Bank took possession of Bangor Savings Trust and were given an exemption from paying off any of it’s depositers.. It’s a little muddy.
Bangor Savings Bank demutualized about 10 years ago, but before that it was still known as BSB. After they demutualized they were no longer owned by their depositors. Demutualization is a legality, but that doesn’t change their management style or track record since their inception following the Civil War.
Private ownship.. without having to pay for the Bank took over 7 years to do.
I don’t care for them so you won’t see nothing nice comming out of me about them.
That’s OK…you have every right to your preferences as does everyone else. Community bank demutualization was a common practice in 1995-2005 to make it more difficult for community banks to be taken over by large nationally-chartered banks.
I’d be interested in hearing more about this, if you have any information? I’m a little bit of a local historian, but didn’t know this…do tell???
Mmmm- I refinanced my (then) home 20 years ago with a local bank (New Bedford savings) and was promised it would stay in house. 3 years later it went belly up and was subsequently sold through 3 more ‘banks’. Tried to refinance again and was told that it was ‘dispersed to the wind’. Too many entities to deal with. Such is modern banking these days…….
BSB held my mortgage for a number of years and when they did sell it, it was to Camden National. No complaints with either of them.
Have a lottery on the houses………
Auction them off
MSHA cost to rehab a one bedroom apartment is anywhere from $250.000 to $325.000.. and some people want to save these buildings. at what cost to the taxpayer. $500.000 each????
If they do not pay taxes for more than three years, sell the properties at auction…
This will return the properties as taxpayers to the city…
The thing about the greed of the banks that CAUSED the mortgage crisis is this… subprime mortgages were actively sought after because the banks could, and still can, take these risky mortgages, bundle them into securities “securitizing” them, and then sell the bundle to investors… such as the pension fund in Dallas… On top of that the banks could then bet against those bundled securities by buying or selling credit default swaps that pushed the risk of defaulting loans off onto someone else… The banking industry made nearly 13 Trillion in these types of PRIVATE, PROPRIETARY trades, dwarfing the normal commercial banking industry which held 10 Trillion in loans at the same time.
These private, proprietary trades were completely opaque within the industry and to the public. Unregulated, secret deals that tied up trillions, and STILL DOES, and is VERY, VERY RISKY when the house of cards implodes.
The REPUBLICANS that prevent reform of this INSANE situation ought to be tarred and feathered and dropped in the Sargasso Sea for their greed and the danger they PUT ALL AMERICANS.
Want proof that this is what has happened:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/money-power-wall-street/
pbs??? LOL!!!
Barney frank and company is to blame.
Bangor will soon become another Lewiston. Plenty of empty homes to pack full of Somalians and their chickens. If you think crime is bad in Bangor now, in 5 years it will be doubled. Count on it.
Detriot
Perry Mason was a lawyer not a detective
I feel more sorry for those who had to abandon their homes.
Wasen’t this very same article , complete with the same photo, in this same paper last week??