BOSTON — Gail Jones says she has forgiven the man who shot and killed her 23-year-old son during a botched robbery at a New Hampshire Army surplus store five years ago.

But she is hoping her son’s death, in which a stolen gun was used, will prompt gun owners to be more careful about locking up their firearms.

Jones is suing the grandfather of the man who killed her son and two other men, alleging that his failure to secure his gun properly enabled his grandson to steal it and use it in the shootings on July 2, 2007.

Michael Woodbury is serving a life sentence in the deaths of Gary Jones, of Halifax, Mass., William Jones, 25, of Walpole, Mass., and James Walker, 34, of Denmark, Maine. He admitted to killing the men.

Walker was the manager of the Army Barracks store, a military surplus and outdoor gear store in Conway, N.H. Gary Jones and William Jones were friends who happened to stop by on their way home from a camping trip in Maine. Woodbury said he killed the men when they tried to tackle him during the robbery.

Jones said she hopes her lawsuit will send a message to gun owners to make sure their guns are stored securely.

“That is where I’ve taken this, not out of retaliation because it’s not that,” she said. Instead, her hope is that “maybe something else can become of it, and in this instance, just maybe trying to stiffen up the gun laws in New Hampshire or putting some responsibility on a homeowner that owns guns.”

Jones faces an uphill battle. A federal judge in New Hampshire dismissed the lawsuit last year after finding that Jones had not proven her claims that Woodbury’s grandfather, Lawrence Secord, was negligent.

Jones appealed to the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston, which heard arguments in the case June 5. The court is expected to rule within the next few months.

Woodbury, 31, of Windham, Maine, had been released from prison two months before the shootings after completing a five-year sentence on robbery charges. In the weeks leading up to the shootings, Woodbury went on a multi-state crime spree that included robbing a bank in Florence, S.C., holding up a clothing store in Chattanooga, Tenn., and breaking into a home in St. Simons Island, Ga., and then setting it on fire.

Authorities said he stole the .22-caliber handgun from his grandfather’s hunting camp in Wentworth Location, N.H., a family camp he had visited while growing up.

Jones claims in her lawsuit that Secord should have taken steps to secure his gun when he learned his grandson had returned to the area after being released from prison. She also says he failed to report the theft of the gun promptly.

But U.S. District Judge Paul Barbadoro found that Secord was not negligent because the door to his camp was locked, and Woodbury broke a window and entered without Secord’s permission. The gun was unloaded and hidden under a hot water heater platform. The judge also found that Secord did not learn about the burglary or gun theft until after the killings.

The judge also noted that the New Hampshire Supreme Court has recognized that people cannot be held liable for the criminal acts of third parties.

Secord’s lawyer, Anthony Campo, said Secord kept the gun in a locked hunting cabin. He said Secord had only seen his grandson once briefly in the 12 years before the shootings.

“It’s obviously a tragic event and nobody is downplaying that, but with regard to the law, it’s a non-starter,” Campo said.

New Hampshire has a law that holds people liable if a child gains access to a gun and uses it in a reckless or threatening manner or during a crime, but does not have a law requiring guns to have trigger locks or to be locked in secure containers.

“The law is what’s reasonable under the circumstances,” Campo said. “It was in a locked hunting cabin and it was secured.”

Jones’ lawyer, Roberto Tepichin, said Woodbury had seen his grandfather briefly about a month before the shootings, and that Secord should have known Woodbury might try to steal the gun.

“His grandson was familiar with the gun, he had used it growing up, he was familiar with the cabin, he knew there was a hidden key and he could have pushed the door open to get in, given his history of breaking and entering, and bank robbery,” Tepichin said. “In that situation, it’s like dangling meat in front of a lion, so to speak.”

Gary Jones was a plumber’s apprentice who loved BMX biking, traveling and hiking. His mother said her lawsuit is not aimed at getting vengeance against Secord.

“What we’re trying to do in New Hampshire is to just get the word out there that if you are a gun owner, you need to be responsible, you need to take precautions.”

Join the Conversation

50 Comments

  1. So if a person steals my car and kills somebody am I responsible for that too? This is a bad precedent. The idea that I need to take more than ordinary precaution to prevent the possible criminal behavior of another is failed logic.

    1. I have used that exact argument w/ people before.  I always get that deer in the headlight look.

      Crazy anti-gunners will try to lash out at everybody to get their agenda across.  Like the North Hollywood Bank shootout; when they sued Winchester because they produced the ammo. 

    2. That is so true.  Lets say for instance you know your long lost brother drinks alot.  He knows you have 3 cars and you keep your keys on a key chain holder by the door because he’s visited your house every year for family get togethers.  You know he’s in town visiting your sister.

      One day he gets hammered drunk and needs a car to go get more booze.  He breaks into your house, takes keys off your key chain holder and takes one of your cars.  But unfortunately he runs the first stop sign down the block and kills someone.

      According to her logic.  You should be held responsible for your long lost brother with problems becasue you didn’t lock up your keys better, knowing he drinks and was in town.  A gun is an instrument, a knife is an instrumnet, a car is an instrument, even a screwdriver is an instrument that can do harm.  Used properly or even just left alone, none of them will hurt a single person!  Put once a person has them, and decides to use them in an inappropriate manner.  Then the items becomes an instrument of destruction.  It’s the person NOT the instrument!

  2. Another waste of time. I feel for the woman who lost her son but… She cant hold the grand father repsonsible. before we know it parents are going to be sued for giving birth to criminals.

  3. The man who pulled the trigger is responsible for the deaths.  Period.  Will we be required to lock the knife drawer in the kitchen?  To lock up baseball bats?  What about rope & scarves which might be used to strangle?  I feel horrible for the victims and their families, but this lawsuit holds no merit and should be thrown out immediately.

  4. So let’s recap; Jones has forgiven Woodbury, but now blames his innocent grandfather! I guess in this new obama society, a 31 year old is not responsible for their own actions.

    Grief has definitely affected her ability to reason!  She should be required to pay all court costs! Bet the suit would be dropped pretty quickly if that was the case!

    1. Because there were never any frivolous lawsuits when a Republican was in office. What does Obama have to do with it?

      1. Obama has absolutely nothing to do with it but some people just can’t help but throw something political into the mix.

  5. This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. This woman does not need to start lashing out blindly to try to take out whoever she can, she should know better.

  6. What a joke the gun was secure locked in a cabin and hidden what more can one do clearly this woman is anti gun everyone needs to practice more gun control hold steady and pull the trigger till its empty

    1. He had everything covered except the one thing no reasonable person would have anticipated:  a vindictive crusader and her lawyer looking for a green poultice.

    2.  The first case was found in his favor, and the second will undoubtedly be the same. Next step, perhaps he  sues her, to recoup all his legal fees and court costs. Sadly, he likely cannot collect for the miserable stress and undeserved hassle of being sued for a completely frivolous reason.

      1. Thats why they Have ” Summary Judgement” !

        A judge gets to determine if it is frivolous! Not some “frivolous”—- Politician

        And Rightfully So!

  7. Perhaps the focus should be on actually punishing criminals and not releasing them after five years so they can ruin more lives. Maybe we shouldn’t cater to the criminal element or allow lawyers to play the judicial system for the benefit of the lawbreakers. Maybe we need more judges who have intestinal fortitude – not sissy’s in black robes who refuse to punish. The death penalty for murder would alleviate a lot of this lawlessness. The perp would have committed the crime possibly – but far fewer criminals would be inclined to murder if they knew they would be executed for it. Human life is precious but there is no respect for it when we simply lock up the animals.

  8. I get the mothers point in this, that guns should be locked and secured but I dont think that she need to seek anything from the killers grandfather. I am quite sure he feels like s*** anyways besides the fact the gun was locked in a cabin! I feel for the mother but I think that there are other ways that she can go about trying to get people to lock up guns then this.

  9. This agood arguement for universal carry laws. If the firearm had been in the owners posession instead of locked in a hidden box in a locked cabin, the firearm could not have been used in a crime.

      1.  You lost your right to trial in Maine if your hurt at work long ago. Tort “reform” only hurts those who are injured.

          1.  Seen it. That was not in Maine though. in Maine if your hurt on the job you do NOT have the right to be heard by a jury of your peers. The insurance companies have all the power. Thank you liberal rulers of Maine.

  10. I feel bad for the Mother ………………….. but, the person responsible is the one that pulled the trigger.

    However there is another person responsible for this unwarranted lawsuit ………………… The ATTORNEY that is pursuing her claim and I’m sure the Attorney isn’t doing this for free.

    1. it s not her money, or she wouldn’t do it, some slimebag lawyer is bankrolling this…

      1. Why would they, knowing the chances of winning are slim to none? I think the lawyer takes her money after giving her false hope she can win. It’s either that or the anti-gun lobby is bankrolling the legal fees? BDN, get on this!

  11. Gail Jones, what an ignorant move. Very tasteless to say the least. People own guns, and people steal guns. Get over it and move on with your life. Pathetic.

  12. Wonder what lawyer talked her into this and what his percentage will be if he can win?

  13. Sorry for the loss but this is a bogus lawsuit. This  gun was stolen and yes, I’m afraid you are doing it out of retaliation.

  14. This lawyer, Tepichin , should be boycotted.  Hope he dosen’t sue me for this comment !

  15. Good grief.  Like others are saying, I think it’s appalling that she is trying to sue the gun owner.  He did nothing wrong.  The person responsible is in prison.

      1. It states the gun was in a locked cabinet inside a hunting cabin…whats not secure about that? This lady is delusional.

          1. And if  the stolen gun would have been stored in a  locked cabinet, then what would be your argument.  Ah let me guess, then the owner should have had it in a locked cabin, in a locked box, and a trigger lock on it.   Where does it end.   

          2. The case law is clear in NH, people cannot be held liable for the criminal acts of third parties.  This case will never make it to a jury. 

          3. My mistake..its still a waste of time and money for the victim to defend himself. Its already been dismissed once…shes whipping a dead horse here.

      2.  It was in in his cabin. Someone had to trespass and break into the cabin to get it. But hey don’t blame the CRIMINAL who stole it..

  16. Ok lets get this straight. This lady wants to sue the guy who got his pistol STOLEN form him by a criminal who used it to kill her son? If he had stolen anything else say a fire pick or a hammer I bet she woudl not be going after the guy who was ROBBED!

  17. Maybe he should have secured his gun. Of course the theif is at fault for stealing the gun and using it, but this isn’t an all or nothing situation. There can be multiple people at fault.

  18. Obviously she needs to seek help emotionally because, if you truly forgave the guy that shot your son, you would’t be suing his grandfather that had absolutely nothing to do with it!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *