PLEASANT POINT, Maine — Years of efforts by the Passamaquoddy tribe and environmental activists to restore the annual migration of alewives up the St. Croix River received a boost Tuesday when the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ruled a Maine law banning native alewife migration up the river violates the federal Clean Water Act.

For 17 years, the annual freshwater migration of millions of saltwater alewives has been blocked by a barrier on the St. Croix River at the Grand Falls Dam fishway that keeps the fish from swimming farther upstream to spawn. The Passamaquoddy nation wants that barrier removed and the issue has spawned years of legal action spearheaded by Friends of Merrymeeting Bay, an environmental advocacy organization based in Richmond.

An EPA letter to Maine’s attorney general says the status quo represents an illegal lowering of water quality that the agency cannot and will not approve. The EPA ruling, in essence, challenges Maine’s efforts to eliminate alewife access to natural spawning habitat above Grand Falls Dam near Princeton.

“This all ties back to a small but very vocal minority of smallmouth bass fishermen who had a bad year of fishing and blamed it on the alewives,” said Ed Friedman, chairman of Friends of Merrymeeting Bay. “I suspect what really happened is that there was a drawdown of the water level, which created a loss of spawning territory for the bass population.”

The Maine Department of Marine Resources was not prepared to comment Wednesday on the EPA action.

“At this point we have no comment,” Marine Resources Commissioner Patrick Keliher said Wednesday. “We’re looking at the legalities and will determine over the next week what this letter means.”

To Passamaquoddy tribal members, whose settlements on both sides of the St. Croix River separating Maine and New Brunswick date back 4,000 years, the prolific fish are seen as an important food source and a critical element in the diverse marine ecology of Passamaquoddy Bay.

In a letter sent May 24, 2012, to the International Joint Commission that works to resolve disputes involving the waters separating the U.S. and Canada, Clayton Cleeves, Passamaquoddy tribal chief of the Pleasant Point Reservation, said his people want to see all alewife barriers removed.

“I urge you to consider the free passage of alewives to their breeding grounds along the St. Croix watershed and into the northern lakes in the state of Maine,” Cleeves’ letter reads in part. “This special request will eliminate all barriers and blockades and will give alewives the freedom to breed at proportions bestowed by the Great Spirit.”

Cleaves said three major barricades shut off 98 percent of alewives’ natural spawning habitat. “They can’t get up to their maternity ward,” he said.

Under current law, the state’s Departments of Marine Resources and Inland Fisheries and Wildlife undertook an effort to prevent alewives and blueback herring from swimming up into the St. Croix River basin, using stop logs to block the dam’s fishway, which was installed some years ago and paid for by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

In its finding, the EPA directs the state to restore migratory passage.

“EPA is not aware of any sound scientific rationale for excluding indigenous river herring (or other migratory species) from the St. Croix River,” the ruling reads in part. “Maine should take appropriate action to authorize passage of river herring to the portions of the St. Croix River.”

Join the Conversation

9 Comments

    1.  You’re right- given the evidence from recent research, it’s probably more like 10,000+ years.

  1. The Crazy Government strikes again.  Luddites.  They are all Luddites.  They call themselves progressives but are fundamentally against progress.

  2. The idea of ‘banning’ a native fish like the alewife from Maine’s fourth largest river is about as sensible as banning brook trout or chickadees or Atlantic salmon, moose or deer. But sometimes dumb ideas become entrenched, and once entrenched, like dandelion roots, they are very hard to remove. I think we just cut this one in half with a shovel.

    1. Doug, I couldn’t have said it better even if I had stayed up all night trying. I cannot imagine how or why the Downeast guides thought that a natural alewive population would be detrimental to their bass and salmon fishery. And I want to publicly thank Lee Sochasky of the St. Croix Waterway Commission for educating me as I initially and blindly supported the Grand Lake Stream Guide’s Association.

  3. Hard to believe they were ever banned to begin with. Nice to see this progress. Now the bass fishermen will likely feel entitled to move the bass into the pristine and natural brook trout habitat to keep going.

  4. The passage of LD 520 in April of 1995 was not a progressive conspiracy, nor a tree-huggers coup. It was a unanimously supported bipartisan legislative boondoggle orchestrated by fishing guides terrified by a perceived threat to Maine streams that would clobber their income streams.

    Problem is, they and the legislature got the reasoning and the science all wrong.

    In 2008, Kelly Hoffman (then attending the Maine School of Law) wrote an excellent paper on the history and histrionics that have surrounded this issue. It can be downloaded as a PDF file here:

    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=alewife%20law%20maine%201995&source=web&cd=16&ved=0CFQQFjAFOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.friendsofmerrymeetingbay.org%2Fcybrary%2Fpages%2Fvol13_oclj_309.pdf&ei=ahL_T6SlK8PZ6wHks8S_Bg&usg=AFQjCNGCEN2DqRna003G4XXOERIgoF480A&cad=rja

    Congratulations, however, may be premature. The “luddites” as one comment below called them aren’t progressives, they are self-invested Maine fishing guides. They are very much alive and many still believe their own mythology.

    It’s high time to repeal the existing legislation.

  5. As one of those fishing guides struggling to make a living on the upper St. Croix, I take offense to being called dumb and having dumb ideas. The Maine IFW and biologist Mike smith did years of research showing the decline of small mouth bass in Spednic was directly related to the presence of sea run alewives.  Funny how the papers omit any of his work in their reports. 
    Furthermore, there is no evidence that sea run alewives were ever able to ascend Grand Falls prior to it being dammed and having a fish ladder.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *