Maine has known for years that its academic growth has not kept pace with the nation’s. And while the state has been busy with reorganizing school districts, overhauling statewide tests and waging funding battles, it has fallen further behind even as the United States as a whole has made slow progress compared with other countries.

Maine cannot hope to keep its families here nor compete with other states, much less other countries, for businesses if it continues to make so little academic progress.

Academic growth over the last 19 years has tended to lift students at different achievement levels uniformly, according to the report from Harvard’s Program on Education Policy and Governance and Education Next. The problem is that student achievement did not rise adequately in every state, especially in comparison to other countries. Maine played a role in slowing down the growth. Between 1992 and 2011, Maine’s annual rate of growth in math, reading and science ranked second to last out of the 41 states examined, the report concluded.

Had all students across the country made the same average gains as the most improved states — Maryland, Florida, Delaware and Massachusetts — the U.S. would be at the same improvement rate as Germany and the United Kingdom.

The study should serve as one of several wake-up calls, especially since it followed a survey that found a significant number of Maine students say they are not challenged in school. The federal Department of Education’s National Assessment of Educational Progress found that 39 percent of fourth-graders in Maine say their math work is often or always easy.

Education Commissioner Stephen Bowen and Gov. Paul LePage responded to the Harvard report by saying what they have been reiterating for awhile: The status quo is not working. It’s difficult to argue against Bowen’s assertion that effective teachers are the most important in-school factor in student achievement. That’s why the state must continue efforts to retain and reward its best teachers.

Bowen also is correct that more districts in Maine need to focus on rigor. Standards must be set high to encourage more learning and growth. Researchers outlined a sad statistic in their report: Only 6 percent of students in the U.S. performed at the advanced level in math — a percentage that is exceeded by 30 other countries. Many states, including Maine, must raise the aspirations of their students.

Unfortunately, state and federal governments have failed in their efforts to improve schools through high-stakes testing. Instead of raising scores, the focus on teaching to the test has often discouraged teachers and restricted studies at a time when more students should be expanding their creativity and knowledge base.

Tests are helpful, but they should not take away from the actual education of students. And they should be reviewed in context, so educators know how to adapt their curriculum accordingly and policymakers know where improvements are really needed. Progress is not just measured by standardized tests but high school graduation rates, college-going rates, behavior in the classroom, job preparedness, dropout rates of first-year college students and postsecondary remediation levels.

It also would be helpful for the state to maintain good, consistent policies, so administrators and teachers do not have to give up their focus on students to comply with each new mandate. Maintaining long-term policies requires policymakers to work together with administrators, the teachers’ union and experts to research what is already working at schools in Maine, other states and other countries.

LePage responded to the report by emphasizing that Maine has some of the highest state spending per student and that the report shows more money does not equate to better test results. He also said that giving students more choice about the schools they are able to attend — such as charter schools, more postsecondary options and virtual schools — will help students improve.

While he’s correct that more funding doesn’t necessarily correspond to higher scores, it’s important to examine the context in which the money is spent. Maine has a greater percentage of special needs students than most other states, and children often have to be bused significant distances to school.

LePage also is correct that students need multiple ways to show they can succeed in school. We would add that Maine’s education system needs state and local leaders who encourage effective, challenging instruction — with teacher and community buy-in.

The report is one of many signals for action. Not responding responsibly would mean Maine really isn’t progressing.

Join the Conversation

33 Comments

  1. You get what you Pay for. You pay teachers with 4 year degrees starting 30,000 you are going to lose out on bright young minds. They are going to enter fields that pay a lot more money. You have fewer people becoming teachers that are the cream of the crop. The best and brightest are in other fields. Back in the 50’s it was socially respectable for Women and Blacks to be teachers. Therefore you had more competition for positions and you had the brightest wanting to be teachers. As our society advanced Blacks and Women could enter any fields of there choice. You know had those bright people going into Business, Engineering, Medical schools instead of teaching because the Pay was a lot more. Yes we can fire bad teachers, but its not like there is an amazing pool of great and wonderful teachers that are unemployed. 

    1. They can’t pay the teachers more money because they spend so gosh dang much on new schools.  For some reason the people who make these decisions think that the answer to getting a better education is building a new school for $40-60,000,000.  Isn’t it ironic that something as important as education is being run by people who are so ignorant.

      1. Yes, and when they build these schools they are being designed by architects that obviously have no idea about the weather conditions in Maine. Look at how many school buildings around this state that have either been closed due to mold from leaking flat roofs or retrofitted with peaked roofs. That’s a lot of money wasted.

        1. For once you and I agree on something. Maine has extreme’s in weather that are right up there with the Dakota’s, especially over the recent week’s. When our public building’s, school’s included, are built by architect’s and builder’s who have no idea what 9 inch’s of snow, daily and OVERNIGHT, for what we all know is a 6 month winter, can do to a building, when that snowfall is combined with 30 MPH wind’s and +15 degree’s for day’s on end, is it a wonder why we have so many of these building’s needing retrofitting or repair’s on a semiannual basis, at a minimum. Maine need’s, regardless of all the whining and crying that is surely to come, a serious and formal Building Code that is specific to Maine’s various environment’s, from the Southern shore’s to the woods of St Francis. What was recently passed is, by any responsible means, a minimum of code and is in actuality nothing less than a very bad joke. What’s going to really get it seen for what it is when the Insurance Industry starts having to payoff on claim’s under this new ‘Code’. Once the first claim is paid, the next premium is gonna be a shocker. And when the building owner call’s their Agent and ask’s why, the reality of a minimum Building Code is gonna be seen. Minimum code is nothing less than Maximum excuse for sloppy or negligent building and the Insurance Industry is gonna make that lesson VERY public and expensive to get their point across.

          And, in fairness to them, I can’t fault them. They’re in business to make money by insuring against risk. Building a structure that’s been built with a certainty of failing is not a risk that any responsible Insurer is going to cover unless their is a VERY steep premium, and a Waiver of Liabilty attached to the Policy. If there was ever a time for Mainer’s to quit crying about ‘Big Government’ and ‘Government Interference’ this is it. A serious and reality based Building Code, with both the Construction and Insurance Industry’s input being used, is needed to keep these type building’s from being built in the 1st place. Build for permanance, build for practicality and maintainability and quit building for ‘pretty’ and Maine can finally get it’s long-term public building’s issue under control. It’s also cheaper in the long-run too !

    2.  We spend time on mindless busy work because the test we teach to is mindless busy work. It would be fine if we were getting kids prepared to play Jeopardy.

  2. Get parents to be better parents in many cases, and everything else falls in to place.  Do you believe that schools in higher income areas (think Cape Elizabeth or Hampden) magically have better teachers than everywhere else?  No, those towns (I am just using those towns as examples) have educated parents at home who value education and set those expectations for their children.  Education and society needs to improve from the bottom up, not wait for teachers to try to do it all when a kid has no focus or expectations from the parents.  

    If the state wants to simplify things, ditch “local control” and get a state curriculum that all schools must follow. Start with that in schools, and parents need to understand that when 2/3rds of your middle schoolers are on the honor roll, that is NOT a good thing.

    1. Schools in higher income areas (think Cape Elizabeth or Hampden) attract better teachers because they pay higher salaries than low income areas.  As mero818 states below, you do get what you pay for. With the current funding formula for schools, high income areas are much better equipped than are low income areas to attract talented and dedicated teachers.

      1. You think Hampden pays their teachers well?  They do not pay nearly as well as Bangor/Brewer(both significantly lower household income areas compared to Hampden), but people will keep believing that myth. The last time I looked at Cape Elizabeth’s payscale, it was pretty good.

        Higher income towns have households who put more emphasis on education. The family expectations are higher, hence the children are more likely to be engaged. Deluding yourself into thinking that Hampden (for example) magically has better teachers (when their payscale is not competitive in the area, doesn’t make it so.

    2. Sounds like Lake Wobegon, where all the children are above average (and the women are strong and the men good looking …)

    3.  Perhaps the Augusta insiders should return the nearly $80,000,000 (that’s million) that it stole from the K-12 education budgets over the last decade and gave to the Maine Maritime Academy to provide a sports and spa for jocks from out of state which comprise nearly 1/2 of its student body of 900+.

  3. Public schools in general spend more time on mindless busy work,than on core subjects.We homeschool and my 8th grader is in advanced math studies. We pay close attention to what her public school friends are doing. They don’t even know the math they are supposedly being taught. YouTube,John Taylor Gatto: The Purpose of Public Schooling, to see why our kids are being dumbed down. Then email the Gov. to get back to basics Reading Writing and Arithmetic!

      1. Qualifications be damned! Results are the final measure. If she or any parent educates their children well they deserve a “well done”. On the other hand, when “qualified personnel” working in a “guided system” fail miserably year after year…..
        Most who home school share a common trait: They care deeply about their child’s education and faced with a failing public system, unable to afford private instruction, they attempt to do the job themselves–often with superior results. Public School teachers with “the eye of the tiger” toward their profession are soon brought down by the increasing friction of the very system they seek to serve.  One small example: What can be said of a sytem that reports a 79% graduation rate while acknowledging only a 3.2% drop out rate. I wasn’t the best in math, but I can see many reasons to look dumbfounded at these statistics.

  4. Why doesn’t the BDN just cut to the chase and advocate spending more money on schools? That’s all this latest tsimmis is going to come down to in the end, after all.

  5. I believe that there is also another factor in the decline in Maine. That would be due to the loss of talented parents. Every year there are more and more of our children who flee the state for opportunities in other states. We are losing our best and potentialy brightest to states that have higher standards of living. Which sad to say is leaving us with a higher percentage of children born to lower achieving parents.

      1. Roughly 80% of our HS grads in Washington County that want to raise a family and make a decent living have to leave to do it.
        A couple of years ago a girl I worked with was the only one left in Washington County from her graduating class of 33. She was 20.

        1. Thank you. Something’s wrong. I don’t think it hurts people to get out of their state voluntarily for a while and see the big world, but when people have to leave to survive, in some acceptable way, that’s a failure of something, probably caused by well-meaning but excessive environmentalism, which drove away industry, or, I suppose, outsourcing, but I think Maine’s decline started before that was a major issue oh, and I can’t leave this one out – bankrupting liberal policies.

          1. Nokomis:
            Industry driven away? It never arrived in the first place. And why should it spend resources to locate in a state without a qualified workforce? If you will look around you will find that the few good job employers we have in Maine arrived with a majority workforce accompanying them. As that captured workforce dwindles, the company searches in vain, then moves out.
            Please, if you wish to argue a point try making one instead of mindlessly repeating mantras from either the left or the right, eg. excessive environmentalism, bankrupting liberal policies.
            Do you honestly believe that Maine today is a hornet’s nest of either
            Although I mostly consider myself a progressive, in all honesty I agree with the comments of tjones4. The sad fact remains that when Maine children seek on their own initiative to better themselves through education they quickly find “better” will come only if they move out of state after graduation.

          2. I can’t parry with you right now because I’m busy, But I would disagree with your statement that “industry never arrived” in Maine. There are a number of mill towns in Maine, some where the mills have closed or left, that I think qualify as “industry”. Granted, by our current standards, they would be tough places to work. Sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do. Maine never had the density of industry that other parts of New England had, true, but it had some. Some can sometimes be a building block for more and better. Can you find a Chinese person who would disagree?

  6. All the comments are correct, but when the school budgets account for most of the towns budget, and the town wants to keep spending money they don’t have, property taxes have to be raised.  Back to the circle, valuation has dropped (although the State and Towns won’t lower to correct level) who is going to pay?  You need business, bright minds, low taxes, low expenses (heating?) and a majority of people working or life as we know it will keep going down.

      1.  …and we have another opinion. 

        Things critical to our future (assuming “our” means the human race.)

        Over population.
        Shortage of fresh clean water.
        Shortage of arable land.
        Conflict over scarce resources.
        Inequity between nations.
        Nuclear proliferation.
        Emerging pandemics.
        Ocean pollution.
        Air pollution.
        Exploitation of smaller (poorer) nations by larger (richer) powers.

        In MY opinion, (formal school based) education isn’t in the top ten.

        1. I meant “our” to mean “Maine citizens”. Sorry for my lack of clarity. Some Maine citizens will leave Maine and make benefits to the whole world – some will stay in Maine and benefit the whole world, so in a sense, you are correct. And I recognize that the environment is very important and complex. But so is survival. Maybe we just need a better balance.

  7. I’m afraid there is a problem with the gene pool – and that goes for the teachers, administrators, school boards, municipal governments, and voters, as well. It’s not my intention to offend.

  8. Facts about Maine:
    1) we are a relatively poor and uneducated state (30% of americans over the age of 25 have a bachelor’s degree, only 18% of Mainers do)

    What does that mean?  It has been my experience that  (most) less educated people put less emphasis on education.  They may think they would like their child to go to college but will not talk with them about it, attend financial aid nights at school, help with college applications, they completely remove themselves from this very important part of their child’s life.

    2) With our attitude toward increasing benefits available to people above the national average (think Mainecare) and with how easy it is to get benefits, we have a higher than average population, honestly, teaching their children that you do NOT need an education.

    I believe those two factors account for much of our struggles.  I do not post this to be controversial, just stating my opinion based on what I have seen in my years in Maine schools.  I am not saying all uneducated people do  not care if  their children to get an education, but I see it….a lot.  

    Some may say well education cuts have impacted education. Well, true, to an extent. BUT, I have seen the impact of budget cuts in my school, and it results in higher class sizes. Well, 30 years ago, a class of 25-30 may have been normal. Now, 18-22, 23 might be more in line with what schools can do and what teachers expect. Student behavior is a large part of why smaller classes are needed now. A well behaved class of 25 is much easier to handle than a class of 15 with 3 or 4 trouble makers in it. That behavior is learned where………

    More parenting, more value on education, better behaved students, it all comes into line.

    When parents start valuing education more, their kids value it more.  When that happens, they are more engaged and “ready to learn.”  Don’t let your kids stay home 30, 40 60 days a year.  Attendance in schools is much worse than when I was in school.  I knew NO student who missed 20, 30 days of school, and now, missing 20 days would be considered “ok” attendance.  You build the house from the bottom up, and the bottom up is parents wanting more for their children.  Instill that in them and then honestly, they will do well in virtually any school.

    1.  I have a Masters degree, and I’m here to tell you I would not recommend college for anyone UNLESS they have a qualified plan on how to use it. 

      $100,000.00 (the cost of a cheap education) in the stock market over your working life will yield as much or more than a liberal arts B.A. degree.

      1. Mark,
        I am forced to agree, but only if $ are valued much more than knowledge. I too came here with  Masters Degree and settled for driving a truck for the next 25+years. I was willing to accept what Maine had to offer in the jobs arena in order to enjoy what Maine had to offer in quality of life.

  9. It is impossible to educate all children in a one-size-fits-all education system.  There are “head” children and “hand” children.  I am sure there are others. You can no more change this orientation than you could make Jackie Kennedy a man.

    EVERYONE is NOT going to college no matter what politicians tell you.  This is true even if you include our community college system.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *