PASADENA, Calif. — In a show of technological wizardry, the robotic explorer Curiosity blazed through the pink skies of Mars, steering itself to a gentle landing inside a giant crater for the most ambitious dig yet into the red planet’s past.
Cheers and applause echoed through the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory late Sunday after the most high-tech interplanetary rover ever built signaled it had survived a harrowing plunge through the thin Mars atmosphere.
“Touchdown confirmed,” said engineer Allen Chen. “We’re safe on Mars.”
Minutes after the landing signal reached Earth at 10:32 p.m. PDT, Curiosity beamed back the first black-and-white pictures from inside the crater showing its wheel and its shadow, cast by the afternoon sun.
“We landed in a nice flat spot. Beautiful, really beautiful,” said engineer Adam Steltzner, who led the team that devised the tricky landing routine.
It was NASA’s seventh landing on Earth’s neighbor; many other attempts by the U.S. and other countries to zip past, circle or set down on Mars have gone awry.
The arrival was an engineering tour de force, debuting never-before-tried acrobatics packed into “seven minutes of terror” as Curiosity sliced through the Martian atmosphere at 13,000 mph.
In a Hollywood-style finish, cables delicately lowered the rover to the ground at a snail-paced 2 mph. A video camera was set to capture the most dramatic moments — which would give Earthlings their first glimpse of a touchdown on another world.
Celebrations by the mission team were so joyous over the next hour that JPL Director Charles Elachi had to plead for calm in order to hold a post-landing press conference. He compared the team to athletic teams that participate in the Olympics.
“This team came back with the gold,” he said.
The extraterrestrial feat injected a much-needed boost to NASA, which is debating whether it can afford another robotic Mars landing this decade. At a budget-busting $2.5 billion, Curiosity is the priciest gamble yet, which scientists hope will pay off with a bonanza of discoveries and pave the way for astronaut landings.
“The wheels of Curiosity have begun to blaze the trail for human footprints on Mars,” said NASA chief Charles Bolden.
President Barack Obama lauded the landing in a statement, calling it “an unprecedented feat of technology that will stand as a point of national pride far into the future.”
Over the next two years, Curiosity will drive over to a mountain rising from the crater floor, poke into rocks and scoop up rust-tinted soil to see if the region ever had the right environment for microscopic organisms to thrive. It’s the latest chapter in the long-running quest to find out whether primitive life arose early in the planet’s history.
The voyage to Mars took more than eight months and spanned 352 million miles. The trickiest part of the journey? The landing. Because Curiosity weighs nearly a ton, engineers drummed up a new and more controlled way to set the rover down. The last Mars rovers, twins Spirit and Opportunity, were cocooned in air bags and bounced to a stop in 2004.
Curiosity relied on a series of braking tricks, similar to those used by the space shuttle, a heat shield and a supersonic parachute to slow down as it punched through the atmosphere.
And in a new twist, engineers came up with a way to lower the rover by cable from a hovering rocket-powered backpack. At touchdown, the cords cut and the rocket stage crashed a distance away.
The nuclear-powered Curiosity, the size of a small car, is packed with scientific tools, cameras and a weather station. It sports a robotic arm with a power drill, a laser that can zap distant rocks, a chemistry lab to sniff for the chemical building blocks of life and a detector to measure dangerous radiation on the surface.
It also tracked radiation levels during the journey to help NASA better understand the risks astronauts could face on a future manned trip.
Over the next several days, Curiosity was expected to send back the first color pictures. After several weeks of health checkups, the six-wheel rover could take its first short drive and flex its robotic arm.
The landing site near Mars’ equator was picked because there are signs of past water everywhere, meeting one of the requirements for life as we know it. Inside Gale Crater is a 3-mile-high mountain, and images from space show the base appears rich in minerals that formed in the presence of water.
Previous trips to Mars have uncovered ice near the Martian north pole and evidence that water once flowed when the planet was wetter and toastier unlike today’s harsh, frigid desert environment.
Curiosity’s goal: to scour for basic ingredients essential for life including carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, sulfur and oxygen. It’s not equipped to search for living or fossil microorganisms. To get a definitive answer, a future mission needs to fly Martian rocks and soil back to Earth to be examined by powerful laboratories.
The mission comes as NASA retools its Mars exploration strategy. Faced with tough economic times, the space agency pulled out of partnership with the European Space Agency to land a rock-collecting rover in 2018. The Europeans have since teamed with the Russians as NASA decides on a new roadmap.
Despite Mars’ reputation as a spacecraft graveyard, humans continue their love affair with the planet, lobbing spacecraft in search of clues about its early history. Out of more than three dozen attempts — flybys, orbiters and landings — by the U.S., Soviet Union, Europe and Japan since the 1960s, more than half have ended disastrously.
One NASA rover that defied expectations is Opportunity, which is still busy wheeling around the rim of a crater in the Martian southern hemisphere eight years later.



I just love this stuff! Got up at midnite and watched the NASA TV channel for 2 hours learning all sorts of great facts of how this mission was so flawlessly carried out. America still has it!
Congratulations NASA!
What great news!
Another thing I’m happy to see my tax dollars go to! I hope this rover finds evidence of WMD so we can invade and occupy it.
Mars = Utah
Are you saying that people there in Utah actually did come from Mars? You mean Mitt is right?
I’m talking about the landscape….not the politics or the inhabitants.
How do you explain to a American family with hungry children and sick adults; why it is so much more important to spend tax dollars on this type of project ? It seems the egos of these “scientist’s” are in Mecca today….
Why does the space program get singled out for this type of criticism? I’ve heard the same sort of thing since the moon landing. The exploration of the solar system has so far been carried out peacefully and cooperatively and has broadened human knowledge and perspective. You can’t say that about a lot of other uses of tax dollars.
It gets singled out because it’s a conservative talking point. Puppetry…
If we could build light-rail to Mars, that would be swell :)
Because about a trillion a year on Defense is legitimate? Save your lazy criticism for some other aspect of the budget. NASA is doing something amazing. Our space exploration and research leads the world. That’s important.
Not sure if troll?
Clever baiting the racists with the forced “Mecca” reference.
Superb use of the apostrophe, by the way.
while you are at it tell your kids about our military industrial complex. selling our military things they neither want nor need but end up buying anyway
Oops did we just invade another country for no reason?
Studies have shown that $1 invested in NASA yields $8 of economic benefit. That is an insane return.
Do you think tiny radios were invented because people didn’t like the gorgeous furniture pieces they had before? Hydrogen fuel cells weren’t developed to reduce our dependence on oil. The rubber in your sneakers wasn’t invented by Nike. How many jobs are there creating, marketing and selling Tempurpedic beds? Advanced chemical sniffers are saving lives in the workplace but weren’t developed for Earth.
People who are against investing in NASA ignore every bit of data out there. They are no better than evolution and climate change skeptics or gun control advocates. When every bit of available academic research says one thing, it’s probably true.
I’ve got one burning question about Mars. How many jobs await Americans there right now? Maybe at this time and in this economy it would have been wiser to invest two billion into infrastructure and job creation for someone other than NASA scientist?
Last time that I checked the ” Hardware” was Made in America!
When there is a China logo on the Rocket Booster however its time to scrap NASA!
Babys are still being made in America as well. Only one problem though, there ain’t no jobs for none of em.
For those who spend too much time watching American Idol and going to Nascar races instead of studying and excercising, you’re likely right when you say, “there ain’t no jobs for none of them”.
Stop making so many babies!
One great way to have jobs for babies in 18 years is to have a healthy scientific research pipeline created by projects such as this.
Because Curiosity built itself? It flew there itself? It’s going to analyze its research itself? I’d rather have billions spent on this, than the billions we spend on stockpiling weapons and other Defense waste.
I guess you missed my point. 1000 scientist vs. say 100,000 unemployed Americans and a crumbling national infrastructure that continues to put more out of jobs and prevent new jobs from being created. Personally, I’m going with helping the 100,000 and our immediate problems. Space has been waiting for us for a very long time and it’s always going to be there…when we’re ready. Good call on defense waste.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=nasa-scientists-fight-budget-cuts-bake-sale
NASA Scientists Fight Budget Cuts with “Bake Sale”
The sale is a protest of plans in President Obama’s 2013 budget request to cut 21 percent from NASA’s planetary science budget, and 38 percent from its Mars projects.
But you could say that about anything we spend money on. My point is that this is good spending. We should spend money on ourselves and on research. NASA’s budget is something like 0.5% of our budget. Defense is like 1/4 of it.
I don’t think we really have “much” disagreement here. I don’t think it’s “Bad spending.” I just don’t think this is the best time to be doing it. I’m a space freak as well and would love to see settlement of near and distant planets as soon as possible. Sadly, wasteful spending (Of all kinds) and crushing debt have put this country in a position where for the first time since the Great Depression we “might” really want to start thinking about jobs, food and shelter for millions of our citizens rather than making risky investments involving studying dirt on nearby planets. Those depression era supports for the needy can’t and won’t last forever. I’m saying right now, in these times, the “best spending” puts people to work, in homes/under shelter, and with full bellies. Yes hammer the defense budget. I didn’t go there simply because this story isn’t about defense waste or for that matter waste of any kind. We’re in deep-deep do-do and anything that doesn’t serve the immediate need to get us out of it is probably a poorly conceived investment right now (Just like me going out to buy that new car…or can the old one hang on for another year?). Should the Greeks be sending folks to the moon right now? Should we be looking for Kirk and building the “Starship” Enterprise. I’d love to see it happen, but for NOW I’m thinking it would be wisest for us to settle for the next movie or simply wait for the Vulcans to show up and tell us all the things we’re doing wrong.
We could recoup the $2.5 billion spent on this incredible space mission by cutting all corporate welfare and still have billions left over for infrastructure.
Oh come on! What planet do you live on? That’s never gonna happen! It’s a good thought though. ;>)
I guess you missed the picture above showing dozens of PhD level flight engineers, each making a good salary, celebrating their accomplishment. You are right, the space program doesn’t create factory jobs. But it creates plenty of others (for which you are sorely unqualified, I’m sure). Plus, it’s amazing.
You must have missed where I made note that some NASA scientist have been gainfully employed here? Did I say something about factory jobs? Nope. “I’m unqualified for???” Why would feel the need to go so nasty this early in the morning? Habit?
I’m with Bangorian on this one – you turn a wonderful accomplishment into a stupid political diatribe. You should change your username to Stillatool.
because when we stop paying attention to science and stop our quest for knowledge we enter the dark ages of nothing happening, nothing going forward. How do you think we have gotten were we are as a nation, why do you think all this technology just made itself?
Newt Gingrich must be excited. Red planet = Red state!
Maybe this is the promised land?
Curiosity rover see’s its shadow. Great, 6 more weeks of Martian winter.
Isn’t anyone here concerned about radiating the Martians with the nuclear powered machine? Geez and we have to settle for windmills.
Great accomplishment and only a matter of time now (and a lot of money) before we can colonize Mars.
I always tell people who are against Moon and Mars colonization, “Don’t you think that if we can build a sustainable community on a barren rock that it might have major implications for life on Earth? You can’t make an engineer develop green technology just because he should. But you sure as hell can tell a bunch of NASA nerds that they can’t make a moon base and they will do it just to spite you.”