Because of a new law passed by the state Legislature, local school districts across Maine are now able to seek competitive bids in providing health insurance for teachers, staff and their families. Industry professionals estimate possible savings of up to 15 percent for the second-most expensive item in school budgets behind salaries: health insurance for school employees. Expected substantial savings could be used to reduce rising local property taxes.

Local property taxes fund 79 percent of the average Maine municipal budget. According to Maine Revenue Services, property taxes have more than doubled in the past 20 years — increasing 123 percent. These surging property taxes are making it more and more difficult for an increasing number of Maine families to hold on to their homes.

The local school budget accounts for 61 percent of the cost to operate the average Maine city or town, according to the Maine Municipal Association. For the most part, the cost of public education drives the level of local property taxes. Health insurance for school workers is estimated to cost up to 15 percent of total education expenses.

Local property taxes can be significantly reduced by addressing the high cost of health insurance for school employees.

For many years, the Maine Education Association, the public school teachers’ union, has maintained a monopoly in providing health insurance to Maine teachers and staff. The Maine Education Association Benefits Trust has hired one insurance company, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, to provide health insurance for teachers, staff and their families in nearly every school unit in Maine.

Through the years, the MEABT has declined to disclose the medical claims data experienced by the individual school districts. (It is, of course, unlawful to identify any individual in the release of such information.) Without having this “loss claims data,” no other insurance company will blindly bid for a school district’s health insurance business. If a competing insurance company does, it might grossly overbid the price to provide coverage for a healthy group of school employees filing few medical claims. Or, the competing insurance company might greatly underbid a policy for an unhealthy population filing many expensive medical claims.

After many years of trying, last year 18 Maine state senators and 83 representatives passed a new law requiring the teachers’ union to share this medical claims data with their school unit clients. Seventy-five legislators voted against LD 1326, sponsored by Rep. Ralph Sarty, R-Denmark.

Shortly after the new law was passed, the union’s Benefits Trust continued to prevent the release of this basic health insurance loss information by filing suit against the Maine Superintendent of Insurance, the Maine School Board Association and four local school districts. The MEABT lost the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Portland. The MEABT then appealed the decision to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston. After losing the appeal last week, the teachers’ union finally gave up trying to conceal the medical claims data experienced by its Maine school district customers.

Now, school boards across the state will be able to seek competitive bids from insurance companies interested in providing health insurance to their school employees.

Industry professionals estimate that local taxpayers pay $400 million per year to buy health insurance for Maine public school teachers, staff and their families. This cost has contributed to escalating property taxes during the past two decades.

Insurance professionals project possible savings of roughly 15 percent for school districts that put their health insurance needs out to bid. For example, the Regional School Unit 18 school budget is $32 million for 2013. Approximately $4.8 million is directed to pay for employee health insurance. Inviting insurance companies to compete for this business might save Belgrade, China, Oakland, Sidney and Rome taxpayers nearly $720,000 per year, according to insurance company workers. That’s real money that could be used to lower smothering property taxes.

During the teachers’ union monopoly in providing health insurance to school employees, Anthem has returned to the union’s Benefits Trust part of the insurance premiums paid by local taxpayers. Those excess premiums sitting at the MEABT have recently reached approximately $86 million. Who “owns” those excess funds collected from local taxpayers?

Soon, more than 50 Maine school districts will receive for the first time their own employee health insurance loss information. Finally, transparency and free market competition will potentially save boatloads of school-budget dollars. It’s sad that it took a new law to help struggling Maine families reduce their property taxes in order to help them stay in their homes.

Bruce Poliquin is treasurer of the state of Maine. His comments are as state treasurer, not as a trustee of the Maine Public Employees Retirement System.

Join the Conversation

17 Comments

  1. More financial snake oil sales from the GOP. They are not to be trusted on the economy or national security. Or much else.

    1.  exactly .  “could” ,  “may” ,  “potential.” etc  MEA gets a great deal now because of bulk purchasing power.

    2. So you suggest that we should place our trust in the teachers’ union?  Why do you suppose that they were so adament in refusing to share claims data that would have enabled competitive bidding by other insurance carriers?  Why do you suppose that they were so focused on protecting a monopoly relationship?  Could it have had anything to do with the MEA wanting to protect a revenue sharing arrangement with Anthem Blue Cross?  Wake up! 

      1. I am wide awake to the fact that the GOP insurance “reform” has led to premium raises throughout the state for small businesses and self-insurers. There’s no good reason to trust these guys on anything to do with saving money for average folks.

        1. Wait until you see what Obamacare does to insurance rates (and the “extra taxes embedded within the bill). People will be screaming, but too bad……..

  2. Insurance rates go down with higher numbers of participants. Lose your insurance due to a job loss and see how much it will cost you to buy the same coverage on your own. To think that a small town in Washington County can get a better rate per school employee vs. a state wide pool of participants is highly doubtful.

    If however all the teachers in Maine were in one pool and the bid went out for all of them, plus you can find a insurance company or companies that are willing to bid for the business. You might get a better rate. Being as I’m fairly cynical, I doubt that there would be any saving in cost unless there was a much reduced coverage package.

    1. well stated and making sense of the obvious.  He’s worried, (Poliquin) about insurance expenses for teacher?…….what about the rest?   And this……is a person who ran for his party’s nomination as Senator?   

    2. Before they bid on the insurance you will see they will  look at all the medical history  an there age of the people  so it could cost more for insurance an the medical history of there families  .

    3. Actually if the district required teachers to pay a larger portion of their insurance it would save a bundle; most citizens would be outraged to see what a teacher pays for health insurance……how do I know – retired teacher here.

    4. One of the following facts is true the other false.  Which is which do you think?

      Insurance companies lobbied the legislature in favor of this law.

      Insurance companies will make less money under this law.

      1. Let me go way out on a limb here ( I’m afraid of hights) and say the insurance companies lobied in favor of this law.

  3. As we all know by now, if it comes out of Poliquin, it is probably a bunch of horse-pucky. He and honesty are not on speaking terms.

  4. The first time a smaller school district “experiences” a prolonged catastrophic healthcare “loss”, it will find out how “competitive” the rates will suddenly become. 

  5. I’d be watching those ‘competitive’ policies closely. Most likely they will be the kind where there are high co-pays and ginormous deductibles. So in essence, no ‘insurance’ at all. So thank you Republicans for once again handing taxpayer money to private for-profit companies for no  benefits to Maine citizens. Very ALEC of you. 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *