KENNEBUNK, Maine — Another list of names of men charged with paying for sex in Kennebunk was released Friday afternoon by the town police department.

The latest list of 18 names came 10 days after the first 21 men implicated as johns in the high-profile scandal were posted online by the Kennebunk Police Department. Among those announced Friday as having been charged as an alleged client in the prostitution case was Portland lawyer and former Portland Planning Board chairman Joe Lewis.

Lewis has perhaps the highest profile of the men charged yet. Lewis served on the planning board for four years, according to the biography posted on the website for his law firm, Port City Legal. He departed from the board last week, according to a secretary at the planning office. He also served on the city’s zoning board of appeals for five years.

The home address of Lewis released by the police matches the address used by Lewis on business filings with the state for Port City Legal until February of this year.

“Thanks for asking … but I have no comment,” Lewis said in an email Friday evening.

The case, in which police accuse Thomaston businessman Mark Strong and fitness instructor Alexis Wright of running a prostitution business out of Wright’s Kennebunk Zumba studio, has attracted national media attention.

The following is the list of the men released Friday who were charged with engaging a prostitute since Oct. 12:

Jason Rickett, 29, of Gorham; Dennis Sillon, 54, of Shapleigh; Michael Dente, 33, of Saco; Matthew Scott, 48, of Auburn; Matthew Dichard, 44, of Glenburn; Patrick Heelan, 56, of Scarborough; Nathaniel Thompson, 53, of Scarborough; Albert Tremblay, 46, of Hudson, N.H.; Kris Kamys, 65, of Hiram; Robert Chabot, 66, of Saco; Neil McDonald, 58, of Scarborough; Steven Houghton, 43, of South Berwick; Frank Parker, 61, of Freeport; Michael Wears, 52, of Sanford; Jason Nadeau, 38, of Scarborough; Joseph Lewis, 49, of Portland; Donald Fortin, 59, of Turner; Lawrence Ritchie, 48, of Deerfield, N.H.

With the addition of 18 men to the running list Friday, 39 individuals have now been charged as clients of the alleged prostitution business.

Among the previous batch of 21 names of men charged with engaging a prostitute were former South Portland Mayor James Soule, Kennebunk High School hockey coach Donald Hill and local lawyer Jens Bergens. Hill was the first to publicly lose his job in connection with the allegation, resigning from his coaching position two days after the first list was released on Oct. 15.

According to prosecutors, Wright kept meticulous records, including a list of approximately 150 clients from throughout the state, including some well-known public figures in southern Maine. Wright also allegedly videotaped her encounters with the johns, prosecutors have said.

Both Wright and Strong have pleaded not guilty to a slate of charges stemming from the alleged operation.

Kennebunk police Lt. Anthony Bean Burpee has said investigators are combing through Wright’s documents and, as they compile evidence to do so, incrementally charging clients with engaging a prostitute.

The names released Friday by police represent the men charged during the past two weeks. The department has indicated it would release biweekly lists of individuals arrested or issued summonses, regardless of the charges, and police plan to maintain that schedule through the prostitution case investigation.

The previous list of men charged with engaging a prostitute was delayed, issued on the Monday following the scheduled Friday, Oct. 12, release day, because of a motion filed in court by attorney Stephen Schwartz, representing two people on the alleged johns list, to keep the names from public dissemination.

Schwartz argued that, because of the alleged videotaping activity, the accused johns were also victims of the crime of invasion of privacy, and as victims, they should not be named publicly.

Cumberland County Superior Court Justice Thomas Warren initially ruled that the names of the charged johns should be released, but without home addresses, in an effort to provide the men with a layer of confidentiality. That ruling caused police to release just the first and last names of the men charged as clients — initially without middle initials, ages or addresses — creating some public confusion around men who were not charged, but have the same first and last names as the men who were.

Warren reversed his decision the following day, on Oct. 16, and allowed all identifiable information to be released, and Kennebunk police updated their published list to include middle initials, ages and addresses.

The list released Friday did not include middle initials. Lt. Bean Burpee said the department does not typically include middle initials in its biweekly arrest blotters and only did last time around to help give the media a little more information in lieu of ages and addresses.

This time, because they included ages and addresses for use in identifying the men, the department didn’t feel the middle initials were necessary.

Seth has nearly a decade of professional journalism experience and writes about the greater Portland region.

Join the Conversation

183 Comments

    1. Not so sure that fits here, how about he poor families that now get to deal with the storm these “poor guys” created.

        1. I’d vote ‘no’ on that one.  Figure any guy who’s still all that charmed up about his wife wouldn’t be sitting in the Zumba Zumba Shack.  LOL

  1. By the time every thing is done how much will this cost the state of  Maine    ??  How much money will the state make on this  ??

      1. I don’t know about sales tax, but there will likely be income tax collected plus penalties, interest and late fees, in addition to the fines – oh, and she’ll probably have to pay back Human Services for the welfare card.

        1. Yet Violette at the MTA didn’t face back taxes for what he stole. Must be his Dem insider connections.

    1.  loss A LOT and gain nothing. its a $200 fine for these guys 200 times 150= $30,000. you don’t think they are going to blow thru that with 3 detectives, a DA or ADA, several paralegals and several other people its gonna take to prosecute these cases? what a waste of time money and effort.

      1. They had to write a ticket to each guy…that’s it. The rest is part of the investigation against Wright and Strong for fraud against the state…tax evasion and welfare fraud and if any more time had passedthey probably would have gotten them on extortion too!  Should criminals  go free because of the cost to the state?

  2. Let’s make this easier. If you DIDN’T engage in an illegal act with this woman, raise your hand.

    1. I highly doubt those that did pay this woman for sex are going to leave a comment so it is safe to say those that do comment, did not engage in any sort of illegal acts with her.

    2.  Yuck – with this many ‘Johns’, these guys should consider themselves lucky that they haven’t come down with some nasty STD

      1. Thanks, laksluster. I was just waiting for that…some comments just leave the door wide open for the “always in seach of a laugh” types, such as you and me.

    3. So, if I got a “freebie”, it wasn’t a crime, I guess………..Not that I did…………….. I’m just sayin’ “IF”

      1. your funny, thats wishful thinking, unless your related there would be no freebees, this is their “jobs” would you give a days work of your earnings to a complete stranger so he could satisfy his sexual cravings? thats what it would boil down to, and the if you were family that would be incest : Double Yuck! just saying….

        1. Dang, Lilly, incest?  Whatever made you go there?  This isn’t about anything like that.  Got some peculiar imaginings in the back of your mind or what?  LOL  Seriously, that angle is completely off-the-wall.

      2. No freebees, but if you took her out to dinner, a movie, then drinks run up over a $100 tab on drinks, then go have sex then its ok. Why not just skip all the BS and the middle man, you pay hte same dam price in the end anyway.

  3. When I have sex, it isn’t a ciminal act. Sorry Ricko, but this is a crime, regardless of your rant.

    1. If you committed sodomy prior to 1976 in Maine you broke the law, if you commit sodomy in a number of states currently you are committing a crime.
      The prostitution law needs to be repealed just like the sodomy laws.

        1. Well, if you look up the definition of sodomy, you’ll see it includes both oral and anal intercourse. That makes it a bit more inclusive to the general population.

      1. Well now, that’s something, I guess.  What brought that up anyhow — did one of the secret tapes get released?  

    2.  pffffffft, the only time sex should be a crime is if it is forced.   screw all you puritanical freaks.

      1. Agreed! Sex of any type free ( lol like there is free ) or paid for between any two consenting adults is between those two ( or more if the also consent ) and nobody else’s busniess.  How  do so many have so much time to worry about what someone else is doing in there bed! If this is all you have time to worry about then you have issues you need to address. I will NEVER understand why the government has any say or part in these matters!

      2. We must abide by the laws in place, nothing puritan about it.. I always believed if no one was harmed then there is no crime, yet we have laws to live by and it’s exciting outing people who act like they are puritians.

    1. Already been done. There was a movie (made for tv) in 2010 called “The Client List”. Jennifer Love Hewitt and Cybil Shepard (sp?)

  4. There is an illegal sex trade in this country that enslaves girls.  If there were no Johns then there would be no business in the sex industry… Time to out all the johns or janes who pay for sex and end this once and for all.

    1. This young women was certainly not a slave, nor were the craigslist girls in Brewer. I find it hard to believe that we have a “slave underground” in Maine. But if you really think that is a threat than legalizing prostitution would be a more viable solution.

    2.  Give up this “illegal sex trade” line.  Most of the girls involved in the “illegal sex trade” choose to do so to satiate their need for drugs.  It is the activists who consider them “victims” because they choose to have sex to get money for drugs.

      1. ??? So somehow it is their fault they want to be sex slaves because they want to be addicted to drugs and if they are underage Well that’s ok because sex is worth more the younger they are. And the only reason this works is because the pathetic John has a cash. And you consider this a consenting situation?

      2. Actually, the girls are lured in through various means, and often held captive and drugged.  They become addicts initially at the hands of their pimps.  This is part of the process to keep them ‘performing’.   They are victims in that the majority of prostitutes have a history of sexual abuse and are often disenfranchised.  This is a dark, disturbing world. 

      3. And who’s fault is that?  Many times homeless girls are taken in with the promise of being taken care of and are turned on to drugs by their pimp.  You really need to do some research of the whole industry.

    3.  Most people pay for sex, one way or another. So what if someone decides to exchange money for sex? Is it really any worse than someone who has frequent one night stands? Oh, and for anyone who doesn’t know this already, PROHIBITION DOESN’T WORK! What ever happened to “keep your laws off my body”?

      1. A lot of the time, these women’s bodies no longer belong to them.  Again, do some research.  The whole sex slave/prostitution/porn industry is sick, and fueled by those who watch and take part in it.  

        1. If a woman’s body, “no longer belongs to her”, that’s called sex slavery, which is not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about consenting adults.

  5. Legalize prostitution; case closed. The only problem I see with this prostitute is the video taping due to the fact it could be used for blackmailing the clients. Let’s face it, prostitution is the oldest profession and it won’t go away any time too soon. Does the name E. Spitzer ring a bell????

    1. Let us put you out to sea on a ship full of horny sailors, gambler16. You can service their sexual needs for 18 months then come back and tell us what a harmless occupation legalized prostitution is.  If you wouldn’t want your wife, daughter, mother and sister to do it, then don’t recommend it as a career choice for any other woman.

      1. No one is required to be a prostitute anymore than one is required to be a coach or football player. Get real. I am not speaking of sex slaves, women kidnapped and forced into prostitution. I was speaking of those who choose to sell sex. Is that any different than the virgin who just sold herself for 700,000 plus?  Stop putting words into my posts and stop reading your thoughts into my posts. I wouldn’t want to see women who do not choose this profession in the trade anymore than some women choose not to work construction or drive 18-wheelers, but those who do—can and will.

        1. 26 October, 2012

          http://www.mediablackberry.com/index.php?oid=13096 

          “The pitfalls of legalizing prostitution in Amsterdam”

          From the article: While prostitution is considered the world’s oldest profession; in most nations it is shunned and not permitted. In Holland, it is a different matter; prostitution is considered liberal having been legalized in 2000. With every pursuit of freedom and liberalism however come bondage, crime and the issue of human trafficking. Prostitution has a queer face in Amsterdam. There are the prostitutes
          of the Red-Light District, the ones who are licensed to do what they do; the ones who are visible as they stand under red neon lights, in skimpy lingerie behind windows like live mannequins on display. What is not known is exactly how many of them are there by their own “free” choice and volition.

          1. “What is not known is exactly how many of them are there by their own “free” choice and volition.”
             That seems as though the number of slaves could be anywhere between zero and all of them.  That would be an important bit of information,  wouldn’t it?  Even an estimated number?

      2.  Boxmaker, your comment is idiotic. By your same logic,  let us presume you are on a ship full of hungry sailors for 18 months.  For 18 months, you must cook their meals 3 times a day, every day.

        Oh Lord, what a horror you have undergone!  You had to do the job you chose! Crimminy, it is horrific!

      3. That’s way too extreme, buddy rough.  Why does your mind even wander into this ‘ship full of horny sailors’ scenario?  That ain’t the common train of thought…

    2. “the only problem” I think the fact that she is so attractive might have you thinking with the wrong head.  If this was your mother, daughter, wife etc it would not seem so. Despite how much she seems to enjoy what she is doing somewhere in her past was a point when she decided the only way for her to make a good living and get attention was with her body and that is the sad reason why many woman fall into this.

      1. Isn’t that what advertising today does? Look into why women buy what they buy, dress how they dress, etc—looking for attention. Even all the tats and piercings are for a reason—attention. 

        1.  Ok so maybe not the best use of the word but yes the face of the matter is that she is an attractive woman, take all this out of it.  I guess what I was saying is that I think to some people her lifestyle make her more “attractive”.   If I were to have seen her in passing I might have thought, she is attractive.  Of course not so much now but to some people the word “nasty” is a good thing.

  6. If Maine continues to aggressively pursue law enforcement action against prostitution type activity, as is happening in these cases, will our social policy concerning prostitution end up way, way out of whack with the policy of our Canadian neighbors?  Do people care if this should happen?

  7. “The new Zumba list is here! The new Zumba list is here!”
    (“Boy, I wish I could get that excited about nothing.”)
    ”Nothing? Are you kidding? Page 3  – JOHNson, Navin R.! I’m somebody now! Millions of people look at this list everyday! This is the kind of spontaneous publicity – your name in print – that makes people. I’m in print! Things are going to start happening to me now.”

    1. They could get a reciept, and maybe even  frequent flier miles. Pay with a credit card and get reward points. Prostitutes could sell gift cards. Just in time for the holiday season.

  8. The way your commenting on the topic you care a lot I would say.  The pol…pol should not be selective in which crimes they enforce, you want it legal speak to your representive and quit your bletching!

  9. Lewis has been screwing people for years what makes Alex Wright so special. I commend her for getting money out of him.

  10. This was a consensual act. This will  cost how much money? And ruin many lives for what? I glad to see that there is nothing more important in our state to be concerned with. Why not use that money for education or drug enforcement? Get over yourselves and tax these activities and save the legal money.

    1. No matter what crime was being targeted or enforced there is always someone that thinks they should be doing something else.  Why bother enforce speeding, why mess with the poor kids having a few drinks and just having fun etc etc it doesn’t matter what it is, unless of course it affects your life, the car is speeding by your house, its your kid that was hurt riding with his drunk friend etc.  Sure it was consensual among the parties physically involved yes but so is drug dealing the buyer consents to purchase from the dealer.  Lot of acts and crimes are consensual to some of the people but the outlying victims or consequences were not consented to by the people that ultimate feel the affects.  Unfortunately you can not force ethics and morals onto people nor can you regulate and enforce it to death but like it or not many laws are rooted in ethical or moral beliefs for a reason.  If you were to put a different person in charge of the police department each day they would have a different focus each day based on that persons personal beef or beliefs.  This is not a big nothing, the lives are ruined by the actions not the reactions. 

      1. Things sure have changed over my lifetime.  When I was a boy “downeasters” prided themselves on staying OUT of other people’s business.  The “business” which trickled over on to their property, or into their lives was handled by them.  They didn’t need to go running to the authorities for every non-consequentil thing.

        Cops sniffing around adult picadillo’s costs us all money. Finding these folks (both men and woman) and posting their names helps no one except the newspeople who make their money selling sex drugs and murder. Cheating  isn’t a crime. Embarassing your family isn’t a crime having sex with 1,000 women isn’t a crime.  The only crime is taking cash for the act. You can give a woman a car, diamonds, or a house on the shore in exchange and there is no crime. That makes this a stupid law and a waste of tax dollars to enforce it.

        A true “downeaster” should recognize stupidity.

        1. If what you say was correct and it were really true that “taking cash for the act” was the only crime, then the Johns wouldn’t all be charged with misdemeanors.  Obviously, despite what you apparently wish to be true, the reality is that BOTH parties engaged in a criminal act.

          1. Sorry, of course you are correct.  Taking AND giving cash is a crime.  That of course was not my point. Taking and giving cars, a house, even a castle on the Rhine in exchange for sex is NOT a crime.

            It’s a stupid law.

        2.  STDs cost people their lives.  It’s not “no one’s business but their own” when it most certainly can and DOES affect other people.

          1. As I said sex even with 1000 women is not a crime.  Just paying for it.  If you think your husband is more likely to get a “sexually transmitted disease” from a Zumba instructor, than from some woman for whom he just bought dinner and a movie, I think you may be a bit naive.

        3.  Born and raised here so a “true downeaster” does not have concern over things like ethics and morals, no I doubt that.  I think percentage wise there are just as many of us downeasters that do or do not as in most town. While I will agree that this is not my “business” I am only doing as you and others are doing and stating my thoughts and opinion not doing anything to get involved or stick my nose in, the difference is my thoughts and concerns center on the families hurt here not the poor guys caught or the police wasting money etc.  Cops “sniffing” around any crime costs us all money.  You are right cheating is not a crime, nor is ruining your family, stigmatizing your kids, etc but many of the reasons things are crimes to start with have partially to do with those types of reasons.  

          Oh and I do not run to the authorities for anything, I have never once made a police complaint related to me, maybe a drunk driver or something or a domestic but nothing for me, I take care of my own stuff and my property.   

    2. Try making a 150,000 in tax free money in any other line of  “work”, and see what happens. People really need to think before they post their lofty “thoughts”. This is a MAJOR crime, from just a tax evasion standpoint (not to mention the videotaping), yet no one mention’s this other than occassionally stating tax it going forward. Case closed!

      “Police said she kept meticulous records suggesting the sex acts generated $150,000 over 18 months.”

      http://news.yahoo.com/release-names-prostitution-case-stirs-debate-202420189.html

    3. Try making a $150,000 tax free money in any other line of work and see what happens. This is a major crime in regards to tax evasion, as well as violation of privacy rights with videotaping just for starters. Glad to see most posters have missed this point and many think this isn’t a big deal. Legalization and taxing it going forward is another issue, a crime none of us could get away with is apparently no big deal. People should really think before they post their “lofty” thoughts. Case closed!

      Police said she kept meticulous records suggesting the sex acts generated $150,000 over 18 months.
      http://news.yahoo.com/release-names-prostitution-case-stirs-debate-202420189.html

  11. If so, the name would be “George McHale” with the police, as that is his real name, and the one that he used when he was on the State’s Gambling Control Board for many years (until recently).  George “Hale” is a radio personality stage name that he assumed many years ago and still uses today on WVOM-FM. 

    1. George is good at spinning things, so if his name does show up, I’d tune in for a day or 2 just to see how a true beaurcrat  would spin this.

  12. Ricko ask any of the Johns wives if its the same as a speeding ticket.. Am I to believe you are personally involved in this case?

  13. What’s up with goin all crazy about someone selling what all men like for a few bucks.  I f I lived in your state and it looked good…..tax me for it!  AFTER I have my legitamate FUN!

    1. If they were having sex elsewhere they were in trouble with the wife before the charge.  If they are married or in a  relationship and are out for a good time they are in trouble with the one they committed a relationship with before the charge.   Good time lasts for a moment.  A good relationship lasts for a lifetime. 

  14. I grew up in Maine, went away, came back…and went away again.  

    No regrets on the “went away again” part.  Come on, people.  Stop destroying people’s lives just because you’ve never had the gumption to venture out into the world, live and work in other places…other than another unconnected places in New England.

    These guys are, #1, guys.  #2, you have NO idea what’s going on in their lives, or in the lives of their families.  All you people who put shame on them because of the damage they MAY have done to their families are not in these guys’ shoes.  This is a time I can honestly say to all of you, “You Don’t Know What You’re Talking About”.

    …And that’s what makes living in small town Maine difficult.  You all have too much time on your hands.  For some reason, you take more interest in other peoples’ lives than your own.  Stop letting your kids eat dirt, and warn them before they run into oncoming traffic.  

    Meh.  Blah!  The whole state of Maine is becoming a bad, national, and painful joke.  No pride at any level.  From the township, to city, to Capital level, there’s no focus on subjects that will turn your state around.  

    Embarrassing…as a true Mainiac

    1. Duh. This has gotten world wide attention and interest due to Internet access. So save the small town maine angle the world has shrunk.

    2. Well Mr Worldly, since you don’t live here any more, why don’t you take your own advice and  get a life wherever you live now, instead of sticking your nose into our business and trying to tell us who love living in Maine how we should live our lives. 

      You’re far from a true Mainiac if you don’t even live here! 

    3. Since you are here commenting…I would say YOU have too much time on your hands. Stop worrying about us and move on.

    4. Your the one that appears to have difficulty  getting settled in. Just what skeletons are you hiding from?

    5. I think of Maine as the area that is always hidden by the weather forecaster’s head, as he describes what is going on in America.

    6. You said these guys are number 1 guys, LOL! Your guide to rating peoples value, is it a one to 10 rating system?  Who put you in charge of rating people? You must think your special to in charge of the Human rating system.. Seek help, your no better then anyone else.

    7. Guys will be guys.  A nice justification for your uncontrollable primal needs to dump your seed wherever you get the chance.  I wouldn’t ever want to be that weak.

    8.  Right.  Because the rest of the country has no interest in other peoples lives.  That’s why no one has ever heard of the Kardashian sisters and why reality TV is unheard of.

      This isn’t about Maine.  This is about a crime that involves sex with higher profile names.  That’s why it’s getting attention.

  15. If she would have called it political fund raising, I’m sure it would be perfectly legal. The end result is the same.

  16. THE ACT, is usually a part of, or end result of an addiction, alcohol or drugs or sex addict, it manifests itself in this behavior.

    Most civil minded people don’t go out and have sex with strangers, it is usually a spur of the moment action, where the participants think nothing of the consequences and only think of the high at the time.

    It is in part a very selfish act.

    1. one fella drove down from glenburn. that took some forethought,it was not a spur of the moment thing

  17. She should get charged for the tapes she reportedly made with a dog. Pathetic. “Meanwhile, the domain name Kikicu.com is of interest as well. Hidden behind this very handle, Kikicu, Alexis Wright uploaded at least 250 videos of herself, some of which include clients having sex with her. Allegedly, there is at least one video out there that includes sexual acts of Alexis Wright with a dog!”Copyright DomainGang.com: http://domaingang.com/domain-news/zumba-sex-scandal-alexis-wright-videos-domains-and-trademarks/

  18. “former Portland Planning Board chairman Joe Lewis”

    Pretty poor planning on his part, I’d say……………..

    1. He could have been extorted with threats to expose him if he didn’t pass permits.. That is what scares me. How many decisions have been made or laws passed because someone has this type evidence on people.. Maybe none here but I’m sure it’s happening somewhere..

  19. Kennebunk all freaked out but I don’t see where anyone on the list is actually from Kennebunk.??!!!

      1. Justine if you had been following the story the residents of Kennebunk have been freaking out at names being released and the damage it would cause LOCAL families and their reputations. So far the majority if not all have been from elsewhere. Even the Madame herself is from wells. THAT was my point. If your going to participate pay attention. DUH

  20. As a guy, myself or no other guy that I know has ever managed to “use sex to get what we want.” Is that something you’ve managed to do or are you just fantasizing again?  No need to answer. 

    If you can’t tell the difference between a wife doing something “extra special” in bed for her husband because she wants something from him or wants to show her appreciation for something nice he’s done for her, and a prostitute engaging in paid sex with hundreds of strangers, then maybe that explains why YOU seem to be on such a high horse!

  21. The Portland planning board chairman was most likely planning the layout of the room and make sure it was up to code. Well maybe making sure they where up to code.

  22. Prostitution is a crime.  The names of people charged with crimes are public information.  Too bad the “johns” didn’t think about this ahead of time.  Deal with it.

  23. My children and I appreciate you posting this link.  I’m sure they won’t be harrassed at all by the other kids at school!  How about attempting to use your brain before you post a link like this.  Because you know this wasn’t already humiliating enough for us!

    1.   Humbling ones self every now and then grounds us, once it happens we tend to look at others differently.. I myself find it interesting to see the whole thing unfold. I am hoping the selfserving elite class is pulled into this, just to shame them.. You know the ones I mean, the ones that jury their childs friends parents to see if they are good enough to hang around with..  Good luck

      1. Kinda enjoy that possibility myself, like to see old Rev. Holier Than Thou or The Uppities take one on the beak this time.

  24. I had breakfast with my wife this morning and everything went well, I guess my name isn’t on the list.

  25. the government should just legalize it and have health cards and charge tax on it, instead of WASTING tax dollars, start collecting tax dollars, especially when it seems there are always government officials involved anyways.

        1. people who defend the  w h o r e  in these comments are ignorant.

          most of the time they are Alexis defending herself, under a new name everyday (like she did in the original 2010 blog by a person who caught-on to what she was doing). She’s dirty. NASTY. its a fact and that was their point.

  26. I will have to say this event has no effect upon their job performance unless they are counselors  So,levy the fines and seek cost reimbursement and lets move on. They will have to deal with their spouses.

  27. Don’t quite get the angle of  “former” this and “former” that, seems like a bit too much hoo-haw.  Hell, I’m a ‘former high school’ student, but nobody mentioned that in 40 years…  LOL    Former selectman, mayor, fireman, mail man, brick layer — seriously what difference does all that make?

  28. yuck. this whole thing is quite disturbing. can’t wait for it to be over and Alexis gets put in the slammer.
    MehSquared: I am just stating my thought like anyone else and they are based on simple observations and my knowledge of what is happening. True & Blunt. ok and I do not hate Alexis or anyone else, I don’t use that word. I went to school with her and I don’t like what she has become and what she has done to the community and state. And to her child. There is nothing disturbing about that. Peace.

  29. the thought of how many people could be infected with STDs from Alexis Wright…. this scares the living daylights out of me. can you imagine! wow.  (puke)

  30. So you go to a bar, buy a lady a couple of drinks, take her to a motel, do the deed, and no crime is committed.  Give the same lady $100, take her to the same motel, do the same deed, and a crime is committed.  Welcome to Maine, it’s been a business doing pleasure with you.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *