WASHINGTON — Latino voters’ decisive tilt toward Democrats in the presidential election has given new life to proposals that would clear a path to legal status for the estimated 11 million people in the U.S. unlawfully.
For the first time in five years, some Republicans are calling on their party to change its tone and embrace ways to ease the law to keep families together while intensifying efforts to tighten the borders.
“For too long, both parties have used immigration as a political wedge issue,” Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Fla., said in an interview. “But the time has come to find a bipartisan solution.”
President Barack Obama said he is “already seeing signs” that some Republicans are changing their positions, and his staff is in discussions with members of Congress on how to get a bill introduced “very soon” after his January inauguration. White House officials are unlikely to settle for proposals that take narrow slices of the issue because they feel they won’t get more than one chance to push through an immigration bill in the next Congress.
“We need to seize the moment,” Obama said at a news conference last week.
Some people inside and outside the GOP say it needs to seize the moment too.
Republicans “are in a free fall, and the only parachute they have is the immigration reform parachute, and they should pull that rip cord,” said Angela Kelley, an immigration policy expert at the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank based in Washington, D.C.
“A lot are tugging at it,” she said.
Sens. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., spoke by phone the Saturday after the election about how to write a bill that would have a chance to pass next year.
“Taking people at their word, like Lindsey and Chuck, if they really want to end illegality, then things are possible,” said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. “We will fairly and compassionately wrestle with what to do with people who are here illegally.”
In private conversations with other lawmakers, Graham and Schumer are pushing to revive a proposal they floated in March 2010 that would create a limited guest worker program and enable illegal immigrants already in the U.S. with no criminal record to pay fines and eventually apply for legal status.
Their plan would create a new, tamper-proof biometric Social Security card, enact stiff fines and prison sentences for employers who repeatedly hire illegal immigrants, and grant automatic green cards to foreigners who graduate from U.S. universities with advanced degrees in high-tech fields.
“We’ve got to reform our message as it relates to immigration,” said Republican Rep. Richard Nugent, a former county sheriff from Florida’s northwestern Gulf Coast. “I would hope after this national election we’ve learned.”
But some Republicans, including Sens. Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine, have set their sights on a narrower approach: passing a version of the Dream Act that would create a path to citizenship for people brought to the U.S. unlawfully as children.
“I think it’s very obvious that our party needs to take major steps to improve its outreach to women, to younger voters, to Latino voters, and I believe that we should start with the Dream Act bill,” Collins said. Although she voted against the Dream Act in 2010, she said her objections could be overcome.
But top Senate Democrats and White House officials think the Dream Act would not go far enough toward solving the central problem: what to do with the millions of people in the country unlawfully. Young people who would qualify for the Dream Act already can apply for work permits under the administration’s deferred-action program, which began in August.
“We aren’t going to get a second chance to do this bill and we want to do this the right way,” said Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., who talked to Graham last week about working on a comprehensive bill that includes a broad path to legal status.
The White House plans to rally groups that have clout with conservatives — such as business leaders, evangelical Christians, Catholic leaders, police associations and state governors — in hopes of creating political momentum for immigration reform, and political cover for Republican lawmakers.
In addition, a handful of key conservative voices outside Congress, including Rupert Murdoch, Sean Hannity and Charles Krauthammer, have said since the election that they favor a path to legal status for illegal immigrants as a way to wrest the issue from the Democratic Party.
During a post-election interview, House Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, expressed optimism that a deal could be struck, telling ABC’s Diane Sawyer that a “comprehensive approach” to immigration reform was “long overdue.” He has declined to endorse a pathway to citizenship, however.
But many House Republicans feel pressure from vocal constituents to hold the line. In response to Boehner’s comments, the lobbying group Numbers USA mobilized activists to make thousands of phone calls to congressional offices.
“We have quite a bit of assurance that comprehensive immigration reform won’t pass the next Congress,” Numbers USA president Roy Beck said in a telephone interview.
“All of this is just national talk,” he said. “The House is not about national talk. It is about one district at a time.”
Beck’s comments underscore the challenge: Any effort to change immigration laws would likely face strong opposition from a vocal and powerful cadre of Republicans.
Some shaken GOP strategists are urging Boehner to stand up to that wing of the party.
“If we believe in the free market, why are we preventing American businesses from bringing in the workers they need?” said Alfonso Aguilar, a Republican strategist at the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, a Washington-based nonprofit.
“The restrictionists are a minority in the party,” Aguilar said. “They are not the mainstream.”
In a possible sign of shifting party priorities, immigration reform came up at a large, informal gathering of House Republicans on their first day back in the Capitol after the election. And several GOP leaders and rank-and-file lawmakers have indicated they would be open to considering the issue.
“We’re going to start having a lot of conversations,” said Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., a conservative leader. “There’s a lot more we can do to convey the conservative values that we all share.”
(c)2012 Tribune Co.
Visit Tribune Co. at www.latimes.com
Distributed by MCT Information Services



It is a positive thing that those like Senator Collins, who voted against the Dream Act before , now want to work towards it. It seems their motivation must be their recent losses in the election and that they are afraid for their party. In other words, it seems like a calculated, political move. It is a bit difficult to believe they are sincere. Either way, if it leads to fairness of opportunity for immigrants and immigration reform then it is movement in the right direction (of doing the right thing for those people who will be helped towards a better life.)
Dream act… Great idea. reward families for breaking the law. How about helping OUR children to a “better life?” or why not just dispense with the rule of law for these non-citizens and let those people do what ever they want?
It burns me some that my tax dollars are spent on foreign outlaws, but withheld from old Maine people in need of heating assistance.
So go ahead call me a racist. I wasn’t, but the idea is not as repugnant to me as it was ten years ago.
.
What a sad post. Yes, so very terrible to just think (oh, the horror!) of young people who will go to college in the U.S. , in the military or other responsibilities and arrived here as minors , be given citizenship. Gee whiz….isn’t that just terrible.
You sound like an old white man. Get with the world.
I don’t mind if they go to college here. As long as they pay the same tuition that any other foreign student pays.
By the way. If they were born here they already are citizens and none of this applies. A loophole that should be corrected….
The Dream Act applies to those who arrived in this country as minors and have lived here for at least 5 years. There are contingencies and certain criteria that are applied. They are not just being handed this.
who are you kidding, most of them will be here with open arms.
my grandparents came here and had the file the right paperwork, and file each year. Is it too much for them to do it legally.Open the floodgates, have you learned Spanish yet
Quite a stretch, not all against this are “old white men” Some of us are young legal immigrants.
why do i supect you have no intterest in bettering “OUR” families either?? Yeah I bet it “just burns you’ when it is spent on OUR families too.. I wont call you a racist I’ll call you a typical right wing conservatiive who doesn’t want to pay a dime to contribute to the betterment of anyone .
He is going to be so hurt by these young people becoming citizens, don’t you know! It just bothers people like him no end . They have to find someone or something to blame their discontent on.
Sometimes being pragmatic doesn’t feel right. It’s not “fair” certainly. Though if we can make illegals, who are going to be here one way or the other, taxpayers vs under the table workers, it’s a win for the collective.
Sen. Collins never takes a courageous stand on anything, not least here. Now that it’s safe to urge reform she expects–and will receive–tons of praise for her own “Profile in Courage.” Am not impressed, but nice that she finally saw the light.
Collins needs to push hard to change the Republican Party, in daring and innovative ways–otherwise, Maine should replace her with someone else.
All she’s doing now is jockeying to keep her job.
So this is the new and improved GOP? After all the recriminations about why they lost so much in the elections they are going to change their ways? Who better to lead the charge but Sen Collens who has lived under their crushing accusations of being a RINO. Maybe now she will be of use to them.
I too would like to see progress on these important issues, but a tiger doesn’t change it’s stripes and the GOP has already demonstrated it’s willingness to flop flop for political advantage. This reminds me of Bush’s claims to be a uniter. It was cow pie then and it is cow pie now.
If the GOP is going to change it’s stripes, let it start with a apology for the destruction it has caused.
I think I’ll stick to my commitment to never vote for a republican…ever.
Better change for the wrong reasons than no change at all.
It was demonize the President time if he mentioned anything about immigration, but now after the election it’s, why won’t you work with us President?
Just remember the American Indian didn’t have a very good immigration plan, did they ? George Romney brought down American Motors and his son, Mitt has brought down the Republican Party. Just as the New York Yankee’s, regardless of the wealth, they couldn’t buy a championship, this year. Here is a idea, lets do away with the parties and bring to power people of merit, not wealth. How about drafting the brightest and the best that America has to offer in a chosen field. We need desperately to update our system to mirror 2012 not 1812.
I think it is time we embrace a system similar to what Europe has. We would need to have tight screening for anyone coming into Mexico, Canada, and the US but once you are into any of the North American countries you can travel freely between them. While I would like to see a fifty foot wall along the entire Mexican border it just isn’t possible. I hate the idea of allowing illegal aliens to be allowed in our country but I just don’t see any feasible solution. At least if we allowed free travel among North America we would save a ton of money and resources which could be properly allocated elsewhere. We should allow those who are currently considered “illegals” to work in this country but not become citizens. Those who follow proper procedure would obviously still be granted citizenship.
“Immigration reform” is code for the process of legalizing 20 million people who are in the USA illegally.
Now I know I will get trash from the left where that population thinks we are far too white, and I’ll get trash from the right because they believe US citizens don’t work hard enough or cheap enough for them, BUT the truth is that we did “immigration reform” like this once before, in 1986. We said “impossible to chuck them all out, so lets give them all “status.” Coincidentally the most nasty cocain problem occured about this time. Coincedentally the crime rate also spiked in around 1986, 7, 8. Also around this time, several smaller cities (including Lawrence Massachusetts) went bankrupt trying to pay the welfare bills associated with their new “citizens.” Lawrence later became the drug hub for northern New England. That chapter of immigration reform didn’t work out very well for more permenent citizens.
So, I’m gonna sit back and watch them do it again. It is a shame that no one ever learns anything from history.
That’s the problem…..people don’t learn from history.
Oh yeah, Collins at the forefront of one bandwagon or another.
Go, Suzy , Go !
Immunity for criminals??
Already happening here in Maine.
just look at all the reduced sentences handed out for crimes.
The Law Enforcement community doesnt really care about this issue.
Too much paperwork or they would do job site sweeps and actually visit Pleasant
Point Reservation and get to work.
True immigration reform would be adopting the same immigration laws that Mexico has and then enforcing them.
Here illegally, go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. Or any other government money of benefits either.
Really easy to solve the problem. For 2 months announce everywhere, especially on all the Spanish TV and radio stations that at the end of 3 months if you are here illegally you will go to prison for 1 year and everything you own will be confiscated right down to your underwear. If you leave in that period nothing will happen. If you have been deported before then you will spend 5 years in prison. Prison will be a nice big tent city in the Arizona desert.
This entire post is gross. But please, GOP….keep talking this way! Your short sighted tough guy talk is appreciated come election time!
I simply want the existing laws enforced.
Tough guy talk would be advocating for a shoot on sight policy.
But just keep on with the open border policy. When the lawlessness and corruption of Latin America finally touches you directly maybe you will get a clue.
I’ve lived in Miami, dude! I have more Latin American friends than you have friends period. They are actually just people…..you know….people. You live in the whitest state in the country, you are going to be fine. Shoot on site….ahahahahahaha…..hilarious.
Yes. Just people. People who have chosen to break and ignore US laws. I’m guessing you think they should just get a pass because they do not know any better.
Net immigration from Mexico has dropped to a net zero, due to economic situation + increased enforcement. So I am guessing you want to spend the money to use physical force to remove 20 million or so people from this country who mostly work for barely subsistence wages (thus making your food MUCH cheaper) because you don’t know any better.
So selling out our country and in effect condoning what is indentured servitude or even the equivalent of slavery is OK as long as you get cheaper food.
Great moral high ground you have there.
You dont read before you reply, huh? I am objecting to someone saying “everything you own will be confiscated right down to your underwear…..big tent city in Arizona……shoot on sight” and then having the stones to use the term “moral high ground”
Illegally gained goods have always been subject to confiscation by the state.
Maybe you should read before replying. I didn’t advocate “shooting on sight”. You do know that is how the Mexican government deals with illegals trying to cross their southern border.
It is simply amazing at how many conservatives are living in abject fear of life.
You almost have to feel sorry for them….almost….
Yeah…throw them all in jail and make them completely dependent on the state…that will save taxpayers lots of money. Not only would the prison costs be outrageous, but the cost for enforcement, processing and trying these millions.
Targeting illegals is the wrong approach. Target the magnets – the employers – that make it possible to make an illegal living. Remove the magnets and the incentive to come here illegally disappears.
There are actually 3 magnets.
I agree with the employers. Pass a law fining any employer 3 times the entire salary including all benefits, etc, ever paid to the illegal. Remove all incentive to consider any fine or penalty as an acceptable “cost of doing business”. However, progressives have fought against any such requirements for employers to identify illegals.
Second magnet Welfare. It must be made illegal for any government welfare of any type beyond emergency medical care to be given to any non citizen. And any illegal receiving medical care should be immediately turned over to ICE for immediate deportation. Reinstate the old policy of requiring immigrants to show proof they can support themselves and that they cannot collect welfare for 5 years minimum.
Third magnet. Anchor babies. Eliminate the privilege of relatives of anchor babies or of naturalized citizens to get preferential immigration status. Time for a constitutional amendment on this one.
And don’t worry about the cost of my crack down program. After the first few hundred are in the tent city most of the rest will get the message and leave on their own. Also, cost of a tent city would be minimal. Cold public showers, trench latrines, bright orange jumpsuits, cots, lots of wool blankets, electric fence with antipersonnel mines outside….
I’m not opposed to what you’re saying in regard to the second magnet. Stricter controls on welfare makes sense. No strings attached medical care is obviously costing us big time as well.
Though the “anchor babies” issue is a little trickier. Illegal or not, separating parents from children is not a very palatable option. Tackle 1 and to a lesser degree, 2, and 3 will become a much more manageable issue.
As for your “tent city” – sounds remarkably similar to a concentration camp (though I think there’s a bit of tongue in cheek here…I hope.)
I’m not saying we should separate children from parents. The child goes home with the parents and at age 18 can choose to come back here if they wish. Unfortunately they are a citizen by our present laws.
Laws that were never intended to be used as they are now. That is why the law needs to be changed.
You could call it a concentration camp. They would not be required to work. They would get adequate but minimal health care. Adequate shelter, heat, and nutritious food. Bland however, the idea is while safe and humane this is not intended to be pleasant. No cable TV, cell phones, weight rooms, etc.
Gulag system of labor camps is what you are describing. The so called glorious days of the soviet union is what you are channeling.
No forced labor, no executions. Adequate food shelter and medical care and they get out after serving their time.
Maybe you should read about the Soviet Gulags and what they were like.
those who voted for him, that have sentiments as you have expressed here.
It’s why you lost and why you will continue to lose.
You got part of it right. You do know nothing.
But I don’t dismiss you. In fact I will be keeping a close eye on those like you. You are the ones who will be rioting in the streets for your promised entitlements when the government can no longer afford to give them to you.
Those who are ignorant live in fear of the unknown as you are doing. I won’t be rioting, I’ll be amused at how wrong folks like you are. I’m smiling all the way to 2016 now.
You may not have mentioned the executions but in reality you’d love to see the population be culled. Remove your undesirables just as they did in the Gulags.
History shows us that most of the “culling” of human populations that has been done has been by those on the far left side of politics.
Nice try to blame a certain political party for the actions of some. Pffttt…. uh huh
He’s advocating the soviet Gulag system……….
I like your thinking….I would vote for you!
You advocate the inhumane treatment of human beings. No wonder you guys lost!
Singing Kumbaya and asking them to pretty please with sugar on it to leave or at least to stop breaking our laws while they are here just doesn’t seem to be working all that well.
How many have you met and are familiar with their personal stories?
I would vote for you!
We do not need reform we need enforcement. Either enforce the laws on the books and clean up the mess you have created by not enforcing or just open the gates. All these ridiculous ideas that they come up with to cover the law and it’s meaning are stupid. Not that Canada has a big problem or at least they don’t advertise it. What do they do?
Enforce the laws, there’s a novel concept. I was in Canada earlier this year, they have the same problem, just fewer digits in the numbers.
This isn’t about immigration. This is PR for the Republican party. They’re trying to soften their image.
well they are trying to get votes , after gettiing stomped into the ground
They keep us out of Canada…..
Thanks Democratic voters, here starts the opening of the floodgates to illegal immigrants
Boy the R’s can sure do a sudden 180 when they get their hat handed to them by voters . As for collins she has been mighty silent for the last 2 years , when her voice MIGHT have mattered. and brought some sanity to the last 2 years of nastiness. When push came to shove she chose party “loyalty” over the best needs of Maine people. she has got a lot of ‘catching up to do ” with Maine voters. I’ll be watching her votes VERY carefully .
I wish she had spoken out on WOMEN”S issues , when the GOP was tromping all over women;s right for the last 2 years!!!.
Collins is a RINO but she is still better than someone like King Angus so I guess I’ll have to continue supporting her. Sometimes it’s the lesser of two evils.
boy the teas finally learned the lesson …. little late though …
Call me crazy, but i’m still waiting for the BDN to report somethiing that is newsworthy. Perhaps a story on the war taking place in Israel.
After King was elected:
The first BDN story was how he is not going to say,if he was going to side with Republicans or Democrats.
The second BDN story was how “R” Sen. Collins had a ‘welcome’ chat with King
The third BDN story was how King decided he will go with ….the Democrats.
What in the world Sam Hill advice did she give to King
Thank you for your service Senator Collins.
……..
—–
Here unlawful? Then don’t reward them- send them home and make them come in legally, like earlier immigrants had to do.
Only immigration act we need is: If you aren`t here legally then get out until you are legal.
RINO Collins is listening to Liberal Lieberman again. Do we neen more going here?
Homeland Security promotes welfare to new immigrants in government ‘welcome’ materials
Click here: Homeland Security promotes welfare to new immigrants in government ‘welcome’ materials | The Daily Caller or copy and paste to browser
http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/18/homeland-security-promotes-welfare-to-new-immigrants-in-government-welcome-materials/