Why are Republicans playing the Democrats’ game that the “fiscal cliff” is all about taxation?
House Speaker John Boehner already made the pre-emptive concession of agreeing to raise revenues. But the insistence on doing so by eliminating deductions without raising marginal rates is now the subject of fierce Republican infighting.
Where is the other part of President Barack Obama’s vaunted “balanced approach”? Where are the spending cuts, both discretionary and entitlement: Medicare, Medicaid and now Obamacare (the health care trio) and Social Security?
Social Security is the easiest to solve. So you get a sense of the Democrats’ inclination to reform entitlements when Dick Durbin says Social Security is off the table because it “does not add a penny to our deficit.”
This is absurd. In 2012, Social Security adds $165 billion to the deficit. Democrats pretend that Social Security is covered through 2033 by its trust fund. Except that the trust fund is a fiction, a mere “bookkeeping” device, as the OMB itself has written. The trust fund’s IOUs “do not consist of real economic assets that can be drawn down in the future to fund benefits.” Future benefits “will have to be financed by raising taxes, borrowing from the public, or reducing benefits or other expenditures.”
Or by draining the Treasury, with 10,000 baby boomers retiring every day. Yet that’s off the table. And on Wednesday, the president threw down the gauntlet by demanding tax hikes now — with spending cuts to come next year. Meaning, until after Republicans have fallen on their swords, given up the tax issue and forfeited their political leverage.
Ronald Reagan once fell for a “tax now, cut later” deal that he later deeply regretted. Dems got the tax; he never got the cuts. Obama’s audacious new gambit is not a serious proposal to solve our fiscal problems. It’s a raw partisan maneuver meant to neuter the Republicans by getting them to cave on their signature issue as the hold-the-line party on taxes.
The objective is to ignite exactly the kind of internecine warfare on taxes now going on among Republicans. And to bury Grover Norquist.
I am not now, nor have ever been, a Norquistian. I don’t believe the current level of taxation is divinely ordained. Nor do I believe in pledges of any kind. But Norquist is the only guy in town to consistently resist the tax-and-spend Democrats’ stampede for ever higher taxes to fund ever more reckless spending.
The hunt for Norquist’s scalp is a key part of the larger partisan project to make the Republicans do a George H. W. Bush and renege on their heretofore firm stand on taxes. Bush never recovered.
Why are the Republicans playing along? Because it is assumed that Obama has the upper hand. Unless Republicans acquiesce and get the best deal they can right now, tax rates will rise across the board on Jan. 1, and the GOP will be left without any bargaining chips.
But what about Obama? If we all cliff dive, he gets to preside over yet another recession. It will wreck his second term. Sure Republicans will get blamed. But Obama is never running again. He cares about his legacy. You think he wants a second term with a double-dip recession, nine percent unemployment and a totally gridlocked Congress? Republicans have to stop playing as if they have no cards.
Obama is claiming an electoral mandate to raise taxes on the top two percent. Perhaps, but remember those incessant campaign ads promising a return to the economic nirvana of the Clinton years? Well, George W. Bush cut rates across the board, not just for the top two percent. Going back to the Clinton rates means middle-class tax hikes that yield four times the revenue that you get from just the rich.
So give Obama the full Clinton. Let him live with that. And with what also lies on the other side of the cliff: 28 million Americans newly subject to the ruinous alternative minimum tax.
Republicans must stop acting like supplicants. If Obama so loves those Clinton rates, Republicans should say: Then go over the cliff and have them all.
Then add: But if you want a Grand Bargain, then deal. If we give way on taxes, we want, in return, serious discretionary cuts, clearly spelled-out entitlement cuts and real tax reform.
Otherwise, strap on your parachute, Mr. President. We’ll ride down together.
Charles Krauthammer is a columnist for The Washington Post. Readers may contact him at letters@charleskrauthammer.com.



Krauthammer is spot on. Revenues are just one part of addressing the deficit. There has to be serious entitlement reform and we have yet to see any serious proposal from Obama in this regard. So far we have seen nothing from the Democrats except promises to address entitlements in an uncertain manner in an uncertain future. Finally, economic growth is essential to growing revenues, but Obama hasn’t come up with a strategy to do that either.
Obama has posted and presented entitlement reform of some $600 billion, the R’s laughed, now the ball is in their court what do they want? Now let the negotiations begin.
Can you give us a link to that?
My mistake it is $600 billion total cuts see following A/P release
http://www.greenvilleonline.com/usatoday/article/1742059?odyssey=mod%7Cnewswell%7Ctext%7CPolitics%7Cp
Both parties are cowards here…
It’s about politics and not about the nation. Neither party wants to do the ugly business of raising taxes OR cutting entitlements. What they would rather do is let the other guy suggest the unpopular and then skewer them in front of the public…screaming faux outrage and indignation while the rest of us sit and spin.
So Obama throws the tax increase for the rich out there (politically safe…) plus some other stuff that he knows the right will hate, and wait for them to counter offer.. But instead of countering with their own offer, they laugh and ridicule without making a counter offer… while both sides whine on that it’s not us, it’s them! If we go over this so-called self created cliff (that’s another rediculous concept) “IT’S THEIR FAULT!!!!”.
Childish garbage, do the hard work you were supposed to do and not worry about being re-elected. Both sides know what needs to be done, but cowardly posturing once again rules our elected “representatives”…
As far as I’m concerned go over the damn cliff and then start anew, act like adults and use the base of the cliff as a place to start… Things weren’t so bad under Clinton and the (pre-Bush) Republican majority economics of the 90s… going over the cliff might just get these people to do SOMETHING!
…oh and one more thing; Krauthammer is a nutjob, if the BDN had to pick a right wing opinion, I’m glad they picked this one. He’s great for us lefties!
Why he’s still upset about Lee’s deal at appomattox! LOL! Keep on spewin!
“Why are Republicans playing the Democrats’ game that the “fiscal cliff” is all about taxation?” I don’t think that’s the D’s “game” necessarily, but if it’s being played it’s because they won the election. You remember that, Dr. K, right?
Hey BDN , if the number of comments are any indication it looks like Krauthammer’s popularity is waning…!