BIDDEFORD, Maine — Of the 21 men scheduled to appear in court Wednesday to face charges of paying for sex in the high-profile Kennebunk prostitution case, only two pleaded guilty.

Another man pleaded no contest — which triggers a guilty verdict in court — to the charge of engaging a prostitute, while 18 pleaded not guilty.

The otherwise routine slate of arraignments Wednesday at Biddeford District Court drew intense media attention as the first court appearances for men charged as johns in the sensational case, which has garnered headlines around the globe.

Only three men charged with engaging a prostitute in the case appeared in person Wednesday, with attorneys representing the other 18 filing letters with the court pleading not guilty on their respective clients’ behalf.

Claude S. Palmer, 47, of Oxford pleaded no contest to the charge before District Court Judge Andre Janelle and paid a $700 fine, while Kenneth A. Fairbanks of Lisbon Falls also appeared in person and pleaded guilty, paying a $1,000 fine. Paul A. Main, 43, of Biddeford initially pleaded not guilty before the judge and received a trial date of Jan. 8, but returned to the courtroom later in the afternoon, changed his plea to guilty and was assessed a $600 fine.

Neither the prosecutors nor judge were available for comment immediately after the arraignment to explain why some men were required to pay higher fines than others.

None of the three men who appeared in person Wednesday commented on the case to reporters. But Main’s brother-in-law, Robert Dion, said outside the court that the ordeal — and all of the associated publicity — has been devastating for his sister, Main’s wife. He said the couple, who are still married, have three children under the age of 18.

“I think the authorities should focus their attention on bigger crimes,” Dion said. “They should never have put their physical addresses out there.”

Sarah Moon of Sanford agreed with that sentiment. She stood outside the courthouse with a bright pink sign reading “Decriminalize Sex” throughout the arraignments. Moon, who said she has never worked in the sex trades, said prostitution should be legalized and that she would be among the first in Maine to “open a brothel” if that happened.

“Let me do what I want with my vagina and I will pay you [taxes],” she said.

The 18 others scheduled for arraignments Wednesday avoided the television cameras present in the courtroom by entering written not guilty pleas included local attorney Jens Bergens and former South Portland Mayor James Soule.

Police claim all 21 men were clients of fitness instructor Alexis Wright, who faces 106 counts — including prostitution and tax evasion — tied to a prostitution business investigators allege she ran out of her Kennebunk Zumba studio alongside Thomaston businessman Mark Strong. Strong faces 59 counts associated with the case, including promotion of prostitution.

Thus far, 62 men have been charged as johns in the alleged operation, most of whom were named over the course of four biweekly blotter releases issued by Kennebunk police going back to Oct. 15. Another group of men charged as clients in the case is expected to be released Friday, continuing in an incremental process that is likely to last into next year.

Police have said Wright kept thorough records of her alleged business, including a ledger of nearly 150 client names. That list, however, has not been made public.

The names of men accused of being johns are only coming to light as they receive official summonses for engaging a prostitute. Kennebunk Police Lt. Anthony Bean Burpee has said investigators are combing through massive amounts of evidence, and are charging each man with engaging a prostitute as they compile enough incriminating evidence to do so.

At least 15 more individuals charged as johns in the case are due to appear in court on Dec. 14.

Both Wright and Strong have pleaded not guilty to the charges. Cumberland County Superior Court Judge Nancy Mills has agreed to separate trials for the two, as requested by their respective attorneys, but prosecutors from the York County District Attorney’s Office have filed a motion asking Mills to reconsider her decision and rejoin the two cases.

On Tuesday, Justice Mills ordered prosecutors to provide evidence supporting that motion to the court and defense by Thursday.

That evidence, however, will be sealed from public view at the judge’s direction. The attorneys for the two defendants will have until Monday to inform her whether they will file any written opposition to the state’s evidence.

Strong’s attorney, Daniel Lilley of Portland, had successfully urged Justice Mills to separate the trials, arguing that his client wants a trial sooner than Wright does. He also contended that the charges against Wright are more serious and would make it difficult for Strong to get a fair trial.

If kept separate, Strong’s trial is scheduled to begin in January, while Wright’s is slated to begin in May.

Seth Koenig

Seth has nearly a decade of professional journalism experience and writes about the greater Portland region.

30 replies on “2 men plead guilty, 1 pleads no contest in Kennebunk prostitution case”

  1. They should put age and addresses because of others with the same name..It is only fair. These men caused their own trouble.

    1. Ages and hometowns are listed there, dear. All that other stuff seems like public shaming and morbid fascination…

      1. Someone (men) decided that sex sells…and it does. It sells perfume and jewels and even shampoo! Hence the so called morbid fasination. If no one was interested, it would have been a back page news item.

        1. Billswifey, I’d seriously question whether ‘men’ originally decided that sex sells — seeing they’re the buyers far more often then the sellers in situations like this at least. But lets not confuse a prostitution case for the ad industry.. LOL

          And, seriously, who ELSE should pose for women’s cosmetics and perfumes — auto mechanics, loggers and coal miners? Fella with a big beard, plaid shirt, suspenders and work boots going-on about Chanel #5? Guy with greasy coveralls and a socket wrench in one hand holding a bottle of Suave Shampoo in the other, saying how it ‘adds body and shine’ to the motor oil and axle grease in his hair?
          C’mon, will ya? =)

          1. Who else should do an ad for men’s shaving cream and razor blades and fast cars!! hahahaahahahaha…women!… because sex sells! But I get your point. It may not have been men that decided sex sells. Women are so darned competitive!!!

  2. WHY the three different fines …..???………………….. Oh ya, the State wants to recoup the wasted time used on these desperadoes……………. plus the DA’s Christmas party is coming up.

    1. I wonder if it may have to do with how many “counts” against them. Maybe the lesser fined people didn’t frequent her as often. Just a thought….

      1. If that the case, then that fella with the Viagra will have to mortgage his house to pay the his fines. AAARRRGGGHHH!!!

      2. Sarah Moon said it best : ” Let me do what I want with my vagina…”
        So in other words, MAINE , keep your noses out of her private affairs.

    2. So if a person out right admits their guilty they are fined more than the person who pleads no contest which is interpretted as guilty but not willfully admitted, and the person that plead not guilty pays $400.00 less than the other two after he decided after the fact to just admit guilt. What message does this send about our court system?

  3. Geez, you’d think the fines would be reduced based on the money prepaid for the “Zumba classes”…

  4. “Another man plead no contest-which triggers a guilty verdict in court”….
    Incorrect. A plea of Nolle Contendre equates to just that. The defendant, by pleading no contest states before the court that he is not contesting the charge. Therefore, the defendant is not pleading guilty or not guilty.
    And if by pleading no contest “triggers a guilty verdict” then Maine is probably the only state in which that occurrs….and that would not surprise me in the least.

  5. I feel for the kids. They’ll undoubtedly take some crap at school. Bullying any way you look at it. I dealt with it with my fists daily. Kids today should not have to endure bullying.

  6. I’m surprised Judge mills did not put the guy who lied and then came back in and pleaded guilty in jail. The worse thing that will come out of this for the Johns is their relationships with their wives if they are married.

    1. Who lied?

      Pleading not guilty isn’t lying, if that’s what you mean. It is your right to require the prosecution to prove their case.

  7. I feel sorry for the families. They are the victims in all this. An affair might take time to repair, but a hooker, please, his butt would be out the door!!!!

    1. Really you could forgive an affair but not a hooker? Personally I look at that as an affair is something that’s typically ongoing and emotions get involved, now a hooker on the other hand, is just straight up sex, nothing more, nothing less. Not saying that a married man doing either is right by any means.

  8. 3 guilty. 1 $700 fine, 1 $1000 fine and 1 $600 fine. All charged with the same crime, engaging a prostitute. What caused the fines to be different, the number of “infractions”, the sex acts performed or the ability to pay? Seems like a lot of time and effort went into this. I guess the drug problem up there is under control then?

Comments are closed.