BANGOR, Maine — Middle school math classes have worked in much the same way for decades. Teachers send students home with a textbook and a set of problems. Students work out the solutions on paper and bring the answers in the next day.

Teachers then spend a good chunk of the class reviewing the answers with students and explaining the solutions wherever students went wrong.

That changed this year at about 40 Maine schools, where students, mostly seventh-graders, are testing out a new way of crunching numbers for class. They use a computer program that gives students automatic feedback on homework answers by telling them whether they’re right or wrong and updates the teachers on their progress.

Neil Heffernan, a gregarious, lanky Worcester Polytechnic Institute computer science professor with a penchant for math and educational data-mining, started development of the program, called ASSISTments, eight years ago with the support of his wife, Cristina, a math teacher in Worcester, Mass.

ASSISTments hatched as an idea to help students practice math skills but has grown into an immense database of textbook questions used by students across the nation and in countries such as the United Kingdom and Japan. Throughout the process, Heffernan and others working on the project have visited schools across the country that are using the program.

On Tuesday, Heffernan and Andrew Burnett, who trains teachers to use the program, visited the William S. Cohen School in Bangor and schools in Hermon and Ellsworth to meet with teachers and administrators to gauge their feelings on the program.

At Cohen school, the duo from ASSISTMENTS sat down with Principal Gary Gonyar, two math teachers and representatives from the University of Maine’s Center for Research and Evaluation, which is assisting in an efficacy study of ASSISTments funded by a $3.5 million U.S. Department of Education grant.

“I see teachers very excited about what we have now and the potential for expanding student achievement in the future,” Gonyar said.

Using ASSISTments, the student goes through assigned questions in sequence, working out the solutions on a sheet of paper and entering the answers into the computer. If the student gets the right answer, the program moves to the next question. If the answer is wrong, the program tells the student to try again. If the student struggles with the question or gets stuck, he or she can ask for a series of hints that will lead to the right answer.

Before students come to class the next day, teachers can look at a table, which shows whether the students got the answer correct and whether they requested hints to get to the answer. The table also breaks the statistics down into percentages. If 95 percent of the class gets a question right, there’s little need to spend time on it in class, but if only 25 percent get it right, the teacher might decide to review that topic. The program also tells teachers how long it’s taking students to complete their assignments.

“We don’t shop the same way we did 30 years ago. We don’t communicate the same way we did. So why do we teach students the same way?” Heffernan said during his Cohen School visit Tuesday.

Cohen School math teacher Terrence Tibbetts said the program requires some getting used to and leads to more preparation time before classes, but said he believes it will pay off in instruction.

“In our school, the math teachers are all working very well together and collaborating on this,” Tibbetts said. “It’s a big change compared to the way we were teaching before.”

“You always have numbers to look at, you always have percentages to look at,” Tibbetts said, adding that it’s valuable to have “concrete evidence” of how well students are understanding what they’re learning.

He said he had a couple of suggestions for improvements to the program. His students sometimes complain that if you accidentally click a button, there’s no going back.

Heffernan said his goal is to evolve ASSISTments into something like Wikipedia, a website that allows users to post their own encyclopedia-like entries about people, places and things. Instead of creating a database of biographies, historical information and articles, ASSISTments users will help build an expansive bank of textbook questions, which teachers will dip into to select assignments. Only teachers and educational institutions, such as textbook producer Pearson, will have access to add to or alter ASSISTments entries.

Maine is prime territory for ASSISTments thanks to the laptop program started by former Gov. Angus King, now senator-elect, Heffernan said.

However, Heffernan added, the laptops should allow students to do more than research and make PowerPoint presentations. The laptop is just a tool, he said, and schools need practical uses and programs to make them valuable for students.

There are similar homework and tutoring programs available, but ASSISTments is unique in that Heffernan provides it for free.

Heffernan’s program was born from near disaster. In 1998, Heffernan had a seizure. A brain scan revealed a brain tumor and doctors gave Heffernan two to three years to live.

During that time, Heffernan had been working with his brother-in-law on a Web startup that was poised to make a lot of money. After hearing his diagnosis, Heffernan decided money “didn’t matter anymore” and left the startup.

The company he left eventually sold for $15 million. Heffernan’s cancer went away with treatment, and he earned a doctorate degree, which led to the creation of ASSISTments.

“We’re all about accelerating the learning of all kids,” Heffernan said.

Bangor school Superintendent Betsy Webb said earlier this week that she has been pleased with the decision to bring ASSISTments into Bangor middle schools.

“Students are really finding it helpful, and when we think about how humans learn, immediate feedback is so much more valuable,” Webb said.

She said ASSISTments is a prime example of “formative assessment,” which allows teachers to observe student performance and adjust their teaching plan or techniques to help students better retain the material.

“Even if one student struggles, that’s one too many,” Webb said.

The ASSISTments program has been featured in news media across the country, including The Boston Globe and New York Times, which ran the Web story with the headline “The machines are taking over.”

The lengthy Times piece highlights the story of ASSISTments, but the headline was wrong, Heffernan said.

Heffernan argues that ASSISTments doesn’t restrict the role of the teacher, but rather it crunches numbers and presents statistics so teachers can do what they’re trained to do — teach.

“Computers are good at what computers are good at. Teachers are good at what teachers are good at,” Heffernan said.

Join the Conversation

34 Comments

    1. Well those are POOR kids. Nobody expects them to do their homework anyways.

      Seriously, instead of waiting for the next great thing to save schools (and cost taxpayers money) why not instead focus on getting people to have their children unplugged from the tv or computers for a couple of hours and actually doing homework. I know parenting is hard (and certainly not for everybody) but you owe it to your children to do it the best you can.

      1. I guess schools do not deserve all the blame . It is only a reflection of society . They do not seem to get people lower on Maslows Hiearchy have a more difficult time. I for one am a true believer in Maslow lol Seems like the really well to do have less moral values than the poor. Just less likely to get caught.

          1. I saw infinite campus on line some of my kids classes homework were counted as 50% of grade, test scores 30% and participation at 20% . With numbers like those a kid could get 100% on every test and fail or score in the lows 90% with a failing grade on every test. Not ever kid goes home to a perfect home life. Some kids parents help with homework while other kids go home to total dysfunction a bit lower on Maslows Hiearchy . The plan might sound good but dose not work well in the real world. They have a few great teaches but a system the is more about making the elite look more elite . The whole BS. about standardized test only hurts kids more. What I am saying is in Bangor schools they have serious issues are leader refuses to address. But What do I know I do not have an assistant making a $100k a year on paid leave. When push come to shove the elite always come out on top.

      2. I will say this much some thing have changed a bit. I was a slow learner (special ed) when I went to Bangor schools . Not much was expected of me . My last 2 years of high school brought my GPA in the top 10 of my senior class. I think Abraham Lincoln said . Something to the affect of ” Schools do not teach what you do not already know . It makes you behave in ways you do not already. Sounds fitting for Abraham Lincoln school . Slogan should be posted . Watching my sons science fair a watched a kid cry because he had no project in 3rd grade. Some other kids had projects a graduated school level and got A’s. Make you wonder just who was getting the grade. Not everyone can be a winner but to punish or reward kids because of parents is just wrong in my book.

      3. You can’t legislate good parenting. That’s why we have public schools in the first place.

        A good percentage of kids go to school hungry. I agree with your post, but how do you effect the kind of change you are asking for? I don’t think its possible.

    2. Students who do not have internet access can stay after school to work on their homework. The Cohen school offers a late bus at 4pm M-Th. Students may stay after school with their teachers, access the school library or the tutor room. Also, students who struggle with math are able to access guided study hall time throughout the week during school hours.

  1. American Education Corporation’s computer based instruction software would administer a test at the end of class, print the results and prescribe remedial homework based on questions missed–students get a ‘report’ card and homework assignments as they leave class;, and adjust Independent educational plans forward i.e. more difficult/advanced or backward so that at the next class a student would be given more or less difficult lessons.

    A teacher can monitor the entire process and apply more direct learning resources as needed, i.e. tutoring, etc.

    This isn’t experimental since AEC software has been around since the mid 90’s.

  2. From the above article: “We don’t shop the same way we did 30 years ago. We don’t communicate the same way we did. So why do we teach students the same way?” Heffernan said during his Cohen School visit Tuesday.”

    Yeah, and how is this working for us nowadays anyway? Not too good, wouldn’t ya say?

    Every time we remove a teeny particle of the human connection, we lose. We’re seeing the end results of these types of seemingly benign maneuvers and everyone acts all shocked when it blows up in our faces with horrible consequences. Bring back face-to-face interactions. It’s not hard. Well, maybe it is a little harder. Like the old adage goes, “Nothing worth doing is easy.”

    1. I like shopping online. I like email better than a phone call. I like being able to be a blowhard on message boards with other blowhards. Couldn’t have done that 30 years ago, eh? Eh? ;)

      1. Yes, shopping on line is funsies. What’s not so funsies is the steady decline in jobs created by this demand. Also, blowhards were not as prevalent 30 years ago, because to be a blowhard in person would have most likely been followed by swift retribution by a parental figure or whoever was at the receiving end of said blowhard behavior. Yay for “progress,” eh?

        1. Online shopping doesn’t represent a long term loss in jobs, it represents a shift. And no it’s not my idea of fun, but then going to crowded stores isn’t either.

          Blowhards weren’t as prevalent 30 years ago? Shooting the s*&! is a new activity is it? :D

          It’s easier certainly for introverts like myself – though it’s not really all that different, just again, a shift. People are still people.

    2. The amount of teacher/student face time is limited. This method should make it more efficient for both parties and more can be covered. More effectively.

      I’m curious what level of math this covers. I assume that since it’s 7th grade, it’s pre-algebra.

    3. using modern technology doesn’t hinder the relationship between the teacher and the student, it frees the teacher to spend more time teaching.

      flip the classroom.
      school of one.

      these are new methodologies that are giving kids a chance to excel.

  3. Assistments allows teachers more time to teach. Instead of taking 15-20 minutes going over homework, they can spend 5 minutes just going over the problems that students struggled on.
    Assistments also has an offline mode, for students who don’t have excess to internet at home. The offline mode provides everything it would if you were online. (Telling the students if they are right or wrong.)
    I have been using it in my class this year, and have seen a great improvement in my students.

  4. The more homeschooling environment we give children the better! Get them as far away from the immoral, drug infested, liberal brainwashing camps (public education) the better!

        1. i hear you. the first comment i typed, i erased….i think homeschooling is for whackadoos who want to brainwash their kids.

  5. i already do something similar to this in my 6th and 7th grade math classes. Students are assigned homework. A key is posted online. They are expected to use the key to correct their own homework and give themselves feedback. They should have every problem correct when they come to class the next day. If there are problems that they could not get their answer to match with the key, they post those numbers on the board. After we’ve gone over those questions, we have a student self check assessment that includes 3 problems directly from the homework. Their homework “grade” consists of 2 points for doing the homework and correcting it, 1 point for partial or uncorrected work and 0 points for no work. IN addition, the student selfcheck assessments are given 6 points possible and these are totaled up for the week and also entered as homework.

    I’ve had a lot of success with this program, summative assessments are getting higher average scores and students are showing less frustration.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *