SEARSPORT, Maine — Maine’s day in the sun has come, according to businessman Chuck Piper.

The owner of the Sundog Solar Store, a 3-year-old business that has grown and moved to a new building east of town, argues that despite Maine’s northerly climate and heating challenges, the region gets enough sun to warrant installing residential and commercial solar power hardware.

And many Mainers are doing just that, Piper said.

In addition to moving from the storefront in downtown Searsport to the larger commercial building on U.S. Route 1 (last occupied by Tom Gocze’s American Solartechnics), Sundog has hired three more installers to work with son Danny Piper and an office assistant.

“In three years, we’ve become the second largest solar installer in Maine, according to Efficiency Maine,” Piper said, the non-profit energy efficiency organization.

To understand the business, it’s important to define terms.

The term “solar power” is used to describe two technologies. One is the array of photovoltaic, or PV panels that are mounted on roofs or on poles on the ground. When activated by sunlight, they produce an electrical current that can be stored in batteries or fed back into the grid, earning the owner credits that equate to free electricity from the utility company.

“It will run the meter backward,” Piper said.

The other kind of solar power is panels that are filled with glycol or other liquid antifreeze and are mounted in similar fashion as the PVs. The sun heats the liquid, which passes through a heat exchange device inside the building, transferring the heat to, typically, domestic hot water — the water used for showers and washing dishes.

Such systems require backup, Piper said. Sundog sells wood pellet boilers designed to be used in conjunction with solar systems.

Sundog sells and installs both kinds of solar panels. Surprisingly to many, he said, Maine does get enough hours of sunlight, averaged out over the year, to provide enough energy so that hot water and electricity solar systems will pay for themselves in savings in 6-10 years.

Maine’s latitude is more southerly than Germany’s, which derives nearly 20 percent of its power from solar sources, he said.

Maine receives an average of four hours of sunlight per day, according to Pi. While days like Thursday, when snow ruled the atmosphere, do little to produce energy from solar systems, a sunny day in July can produce plenty of electricity and heat, Piper said, the former of which can pay the utility bill in the winter.

Piper asks to review a customer’s electricity bill before designing a system. If the monthly bill is about $100, he recommends 28, 250-watt panels. The panels each measure 65 inches by 40 inches. With a 30-percent federal tax credit and a $2,000 state rebate, the total cost for installing such a system is about $10,000, Piper said.

Prices on photovoltaic hardware have dropped quite a bit from a year ago, he said. Still, the investment is significant. Piper said customers tend to be in their 50s “who have some extra resources.”

The Town Office in Searsmont, the Waldo County town where Piper and his family are moving soon, features an array of PV panels. Entities such as municipalities and schools are well-positioned to reap energy savings after the initial investment, he said.

Many customers choose to live well away from utility poles and embrace the solar systems because of the independence they provide. A recent installation was done in the Waldo County town of Jackson, he said.

Piper would like to see younger people be able to afford to install solar systems on new and newly purchased homes, but the cost can persuade would-be homeowners to spend their money on getting more square-footage of living space instead of an energy system, even one that pays for itself.

Efficiency Maine offers loans, he said, and tax credits or rebates also help new homeowners. Piper hopes Maine state government retains the current utility surcharge program that funds rebates for solar systems.

Sundog’s new building provides ample room for displaying and explaining the options, he said, as well as for storing the components. It’s a lot easier to stage the hardware for the installers to pick up and transport to the job site in the new building than in the small downtown storefront, Piper said.

Sundog also sells heat pumps and high-efficiency appliances such as freezers and refrigerators.

For information about Sundog Solar Store, call 548-1100 or visit sundogsolarstore.com.

Join the Conversation

37 Comments

    1. EXACTLY!!!! AND…..No mention of the space required and replacement
      costs of the battery bank. This is just more pie in the sky left wing
      bullsheet.

        1. As opposed to going all left wing / right wing why don’t you address the parts left out that the poster pointed out.

        2. Science and technology is not meant to be exploited for political purposes, but of course it is. The person to whom you are replying is listing a reason, or two as to why it may not be beneficial to purchase solar panels as a means of providing electricity to ones home. However, the real message here, is as it always is, is that there are two groups of people, one group of who believes their ideas are so good that they should be mandatory, and another group who spends their entire time trying to protect themselves from the tyranny of the first group.

          So instead, why cant we all just leave everyone be? Not only do people not have the right to tell others how they must power their home, but they also do not have the right to steal $2,000 from me in order to subsidize their desired outcomes.

          I have never understood why all throughout history people have always desired to control and enslave people, and their behaviors as they believe their ideas and opinions are righteous. And you guys call yourselves liberals, liberals you are not.

          1. Is promoting policies that protect the human race from extinction enslaving us to survive? Climate change is a real issue that will impact you and your kids and grandchildren. Fighting for clean energy is taking up the battle for the survival of the human race.

            A side benefit in making the transition to clean energy is the economic benefits. Every time society develops new technologies that replace existing technologies prosperity is created. We are building new industries that replace old ones
            and

            I view renewables as a way to freedom. Free from the corporations that are corrupting our country. If you make it here and use it here they no longer have a grip on your wallet.

          2. No, but that really isn’t what is going on. Like everything else, “green energy” has become a hot button political issue. Which only means that there will be some divide among the population in which you have two parties who by nature disagree, whose only desire is to seek information that further confirms their hypotheses in order to convince the American public that their solutions are the best in order to progress a political agenda.

            And then of course you have to consider the amount of corruption involved in government, in our case the ability that a corporation has to influence new bills, that are friendly to their bottom line.

            But this could just go back and forth because it is a political issue, and you and I appear to have different opinions, but I will say that home solar panels not only appear to not be the solution, but not even part of the solution. According to what appear to be facts, the environmental impact of manufacturing, and transporting solar panels makes them a total wash. Which leaves me wondering, either I am being lied to, or our politicians are being bought and sold. And if the latter is true, my previous question stands, what gives them the rights to steal my money to subsidize their desired behaviors?

            Here is an article from the Huffington Post regarding what I said about the environmental impact of solar panels: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jennifer-grayson/eco-etiquette-how-green-a_b_554717.html

          3. With respect you are wrong. Solar is part of the solution. Until a miracle source of energy comes along renewables are the answer. If you went a bit further you might get to viewing electricity produced from renewable sources by you as protecting your money as well as providing a livable climate.

    2. You criticize a subsidy for a technology that is going to be the primary source of energy in the near future. You must really love the subsidies to the fossil fuel industry.

  1. 20 years to get your money back out of the system and that’s not even counting what it costs to replace pieces as they fail over that 20 year period. Nice deal for someone who likes to throw away their money right?

    1. Reread the payback is 6 to 10 years. Pay back may not be the correct way to judge the true value. Return on investment may be on day 1. You also may want to add value for carbon free electricity. Climate change is expensive.

      1. As is the loss of lives (of our own as well as those in other countries) or the ill will we generate from imposing our will upon oil producing countries. This is always a difficult discussion to have when you’re playing chess with others who haven’t moved beyond checkers. For many the future only extends to the change in their pockets, nothing else matters.

          1. Did we war before we had oil? Man has been killing man since man has existed. Spending a bunch of extra money to make solar salesman rich as opposed to making oil salesman rich won’t change that.

          2. Would you rather continue to buy oil and gas. The money leaves the state and does not benefit the local economy.

            The two men in the picture are Mainers. The work they are doing pays well. That’s job creation in the new Green economy.

            Because electricity is being made on the roof there is no payment to an out of state corporate owner of an electrical generation plant. The money saved by making your own stays in the local economy.

            The utility companies and the fossi9l fuel companies hate renewables, They don’t like competition. I would rather pay for equipment, make it myself, and be independent.

          3. The money for solar goes to the same places the money for oil went since the owners are the same people.
            http://www.ehow.com/list_7358409_solar-manufacturers-owned-oil-companies.html
            “One of the largest global solar manufacturers today is British Petroleum (BP). Other companies, like Chevron, Exxon, Shell and Mobil, have sizable subsidiaries producing solar equipment.”

            I also know a lot of people who work for oil companies in this State and they make pretty good money so we could put pictures of them up as well if you wanted. I know that is irrelevant but I thought I should at least address your points.
            I’m sure those sort of points play really well in Dover or someplace else that doesn’t understand how this all works but the reality is the money still ends up in the same hands.

          4. I gave you these sources earlier. This time read and watch the video. The video last for 48 minutes. Herman Sheer is the farther of German feed in tariff policy. Hard to argue that the policy isnt working. The Germans are not dumb people.

            http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/27/1165128/-How-the-Fossil-Fuel-Industry-Will-Die

            http://www.juancole.com/2012/11/bigger-than-the-it-revolution-solar-is-going-to-electronics-firms-energy-giants-left-behind-video.html

            Bigger than the IT Revolution: Solar is Going to Electronics Firms, Energy Giants Left Behind (Video)

            This documentary about the European embrace of solar energy is
            eye-opening. Germany and Spain especially are well on their way to
            totally replacing fossil fuels. The technology is accelerating. The
            tipping point is nearer than we have been led to believe.

          5. I’m not “claiming” anything. There are lots of reasons not to keep burning oil or polluting the earth by squeezing chemicals into it for more oil or gas. If we are to survive as a species we need to put an end to that as soon as possible and investigate and invest in a NUMBER of other alternatives, of which your narrow focus on solar is only one. Sorry I didn’t fall into your little trap here…but really, did I say something that would suggest to you that I would be that easily drawn in or manipulated? Ok I’ll throw you a bone, when was the last time you heard that Germany (a leader in alternative energy production was involved in a war anywhere on the planet?). You know, they just might be on to something there. Ya think?

          6. I’m only focusing on solar because that is what the article focuses on. That being said wind is an even bigger boondoggle that we are throwing money at instead of allowing it to sink or swim on it’s own merit. Is war your only focus? If so I hate to disillusion you but it will never stop. Men hate and men kill, they always have and they always will. I’m a bit of a poet, yes?

          7. Wind energy is anything but a boondoggle. It is part of the mix of renewables that will replace dirty energy.

            We in the USA have been lied to by the big propaganda machine run by the fossil fuel industry. The money to be made by extracting and distributing fossil fuels is enormous. They will do anything it takes to make the money. That includes destroying the planet.

          8. So what shall we do? It looks like you’re a supporter of whatever technology that has a history of producing power to be the only logical alternative (I would hope there‘s a few of those even you would reject). All I can say is what I’ve already implied, all of those except Hydro (which has harsh environmental impacts of its own) are destroying your earth and the air you and your children breath. A very foolish path to keep walking down when better alternative are in sight.

            By saying new technologies should sink or swim on their own, I’m assuming your referring to the government not subsidizing new power technologies. I strongly disagree with that. Government should serve many roles, most of which involving infrastructure to allow for commerce and safety of the people who support it through their taxes. Government today should support alternatives just as it did for the oil and gas industries 100+ years ago. Back then it was the whale blubber folks who complained about government subsidies. The world passed them by just as it will eventually pass by you.

            I support good roads, good health care, good education. I’d have to go back to WW2 to support U.S. involvement in war worth fighting or that provided any real protection to this country. We’ve probably spent many trillions since 91 and countless thousands of lives (on both sides) killing people in the Middle East just to protect our oil interest. Was that money and those lives well spent to keep giving you your preferred energy format?

            Had we invested that money and spared those lives in clean alternative energy production by now we would be a world leader in sales, service, and production of such energy and technologies. Not to mention that other countries would be coming to us and spending their money for energy technologies rather than hating us for manipulating them to get our hands on filthy oil reserves out of their ground.

            I’d rather be a respected producer and seller of clean renewable energy than a hated taker of someone else’s filthy fuel. But that’s just me. I’m crazy!

      2. I don’t need to reread it I’ve researched the topic for a major project we were planning at my business. Don’t always believe what you read in the papers, the fine print includes about 10 pages of legalize for them to manage this level of lie. Panels don’t even make it 10 years here without damage of some sort. As for climate change, this equipment is far from carbon free if that is your goal.

        1. Ok

          I don’t need to read about solar electricity I have it installed on the houses I build- Zero Energy Homes. No doubt it is cost effective. If you want to see how the more advanced nations are making the transition to clean energy economies click on the links provided.

          http://www.wind-works.org

          http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/27/1165128/-How-the-Fossil-Fuel-Industry-Will-Die

          http://www.juancole.com/2012/11/bigger-than-the-it-revolution-solar-is-going-to-electronics-firms-energy-giants-left-behind-video.html

          If you are a business person numbers should matter. Energy inflation over the past 10 years has averaged 8% annually. Solar electrical systems have dropped in cost by 10% annually for the past 6 years and are expected to drop 10% this year. Interest rates are 4%. Do the math.

          1. Numbers do matter, and in the real world, especially in Maine, solar isn’t it yet. Not even close. What we need is a nuclear option. Per KWH nothing beats it.

          2. Why don’t you contact Sun Dog and get an estimate for the solar application you mentioned for your business.

            My hands on experience is that solar electricity is financially right for Maine. I build zero energy homes. Solar electricity, along with efficient building techniques, is not only affordable but less expensive than building conventional homes. It cost less to own a ZEH because you buy your energy up front. Huge savings over 30 years.

            If nuclear was financially viable we would be building plants. The only way they get them built is with massive public funding and massive public acceptance of risk.

            Comparing US renewable energy policy to German policy is education. If they are doing it on the massive scale they are how can they and why aren’t we?

            The Forbes graph shows our higher cost because of our regulatory policy. In spite of our higher costs renewables are becoming cost competitive, Why not solve the problem and implement policy that streamlines the process.

            FEED-IN TARIFF

            http://www.wind-works.org

            The cost of burning fossil fuels is not usually factored into the conversation. Climate change has a price.

            Thanks for the conversation. I hope that the links I have provided to you are of interest.

          3. Perhaps something like a Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor? No meltdowns, no nuclear waste, it can actually use spent fuel, it is quite cheap, a lot of other countries use them, not sure why we don’t. Probably because it is “nuclear” which apparently means death and destruction, but only to those who don’t know what the hell they are talking about, but when does that ever stop anyone?

            Some more info, if interested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_fluoride_thorium_reactor

  2. Why would anyone invest any money in homes/business around Searsport? After all, we have been led to believe property values will plummet when the LP tank gets built, homeowners wont even be able to give away shorefront property, yet here is a business doing well and expanding, located in Searsport. The logic is not adding up. Mr Piper, arent you afraid of being blown to the moon when the tank explodes?

    1. I live in Belfast and can’t sleep anymore because I worry that the Searsport propane tank will explode someday. Your sarcasm is not appreciated.

      1. This is a very reasonable concern. People must be widely involved in the permitting process. “Not in my neighborhood” is vastly un-successful.

        Sarcasm may be a -functional- motivator.

        Move away: don’t be a corporate target/victim (don’t ask me what planet – or what universe).

  3. The technology has come a long way but it still has a ways to go. Have to consider maintenance over the long term and not base the choice to do this off of the optimum numbers that companies all ways provide you.

  4. It will always amaze me how these flatlanders can hornswaggle so many into some of the stupid, more useless places to toss ones money.

  5. In his book “American Theocracy”, Kevin Phillips proposed that
    societies that attain great power via a particular energy source
    eventually rebuild their culture around that source, such that they
    can’t move forward on more advanced alternatives until their competitors
    have already ruined them:

    Netherlands – wind & sail power

    Britain – coal

    USA – petroleum

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *