PORTLAND, Maine — During the heyday, Maine urchin fishermen harvested more than 40 million pounds of the spiny creatures a year. A move is now under way to jump-start the industry, which has fallen on hard times and is just a skeleton of its former self.
A panel made up of scientists, urchin harvesters and regulators has begun discussions on developing a fishery management plan that would look at how best to maximize the value of the fishery while also protecting the resource.
Nobody expects the industry to return to the days of the 1990s, when it employed thousands of people who harvested and processed the pincushion-looking animals, selling the golden roe to Japan, where it’s a delicacy.
But developing a plan with goals, scientific criteria and a broad regulatory regime could result in a bigger fishery with more jobs, while protecting the urchin population down the road, said Larry Harris, a marine scientist at the University of New Hampshire who is chairman of a panel spearheading the plan. He’d like to see a plan developed by the end of spring and have it go into effect by fall.
“One would love to see greater production, but at the same time it’s important how you do that so it’s sustainable,” Harris said.
Sea urchins used to be a pest in Maine’s coastal waters, where the population multiplied during the 1970s and ’80s, destroying kelp beds and clogging lobster traps.
But that all changed in the late 1980s when processors developed markets in Japan for the urchin roe, or uni. With a gold rush mentality, thousands of fishermen harvested the globular urchins from the ocean bottom by hand or by scooping them up in devices dragged behind their boats.
Hundreds more people worked at processing plants along the Portland waterfront.
During the peak years in the mid-1990s, the harvest topped 30 million pounds a year three years straight, with a peak of 42 million pounds. The value of the fishery exceeded $30 million, making it the No. 2 fishery in the state behind lobster.
But as the urchin population dwindled under heavy pressure, the catch fell sharply. In 2010, the harvest was just 2.6 million pounds, the smallest yield since 1987.
Earlier this year, a Department of Marine Resources advisory board known as the sea urchin zone council began exploring how best to develop a fishery management plan for urchins. A 90-page top-to-bottom review of the department recommended that it be restructured around a policy requiring “sustainable resource management based on management plans with clear objectives and goals.”
The urchin fishery now has two zones, east and west, a limit on the number of harvesters and size limits on the minimum and maximum size that can be harvested. Urchin divers and draggers in western waters are limited to 10 days a year, while those in eastern waters can go out 45 days a year.
Those regulations are management tools but don’t represent a management plan, said Trish De Graaf, a resource management coordinator for the Department of Marine Resources. A fishery management plan could also include things such as environmental, economic, social and scientific assessments, a look at the history of the fishery and an analysis of the impacts of regulatory changes.
A model used by the department suggests the fishery could grow without threatening the long-term health of the urchin population.
“Our model says the fishery would be sustainable if it was a third of what it was back in the 1990s,” De Graaf said. “We don’t have to rebuild to the abnormally large population we had back then, but we’d like to get it to the point where fishermen could make a good livelihoods off it.”
At the peak, a lot of people got into the fishery to make a fast buck before moving on. Those that remain are in it for the long haul, said Joe Leask, a longtime urchin diver from Bath.
The industry is at a crossroads and a fishery management plan is one step in ensuring its longterm viability, he said.
“I’d like to see it be a big industry,” Leask said. “The only limitation on how big it can be is Japan and how much roe it wants. I’d like to see it grow, and to make it grow I think these steps need to be taken now.”
The owner of the state’s largest urchin processing company said the urchin population has been showing signs of improvement, due primarily to the minimum size requirement that forces divers to leave baby urchins on the ocean bottom. The size of the harvest now, though, is as much a function of the marketplace as it is the size of the urchin resource, said Atchan Tamaki, owner of ISF trading in Portland.
“The market is quite a bit downsized in Japan because of the bad economy and the tsunami,” Tamaki said. “The amount of the harvest right now is matching the demand.”



They harvested the urchins till they couldn’t find any more then stood around with their thumbs up their butts wondering what happened. Like shooting tiny underwater buffalo. Poverty, greed, and stupidity never go out of fashion .
the tragedy of the commons…rather predictable
Well John, lest you be too smug so far above us in the clouds, don’t forget the roll greed and stupidity played in the deregulated financial institutions, markets, ect and the price we poor bozo’s are paying for free market mendacity. The fat cats don’t have the excuse of the desperation of grinding poverty to account for their actions.
The urchins were not overfished. There was a die off. It killed almost all of them.
They were over fished, especially in the southern coastal waters. There were no regulations until 1995, when over fishing became a reality. The only die off, was in the midcoast region, and the extent of the die off is not known.
They were indeed over fished. You can read yourself
http://www.maine.gov/dmr/rm/seaurchin/Urchin%20report%207-04.pdf
If they were overfished what happened to the small ones in deeper water. Divers and draggers never went there. Our traps used to come up covered. Now they are gone. I am downeast and there was adie off here. Don’t need to read anything i see it everyday.
Whatever you wish. But the Me. Dept. of Marine Resources disagrees with you. How is it that you can fish longer in your zone than the other? Because there is more of them there.
We are in what used to be a great urchin area. Bet i didn’t catch a dozen last year in my traps. Don’t believe everything that you read on the internet.
Well, it’s from DMR’s website, so they really don’t have any motivation to publish anything other than their findings. Heck, they even admitted that they did not pursue a “die off” ratio, because it wasn’t that pervasive and was generally located to the mid coast.
I take it that you are not an urchin fisherman, rather you are a lobster man, which is obviously a different profession.
Yes different profession but a do see what comes up in my traps. I take it that you have no idea what you are talking about and just read their website. Open your mind and learn from others who know what they are talking about.
can’t crunch them up with a drag and have them 2.