BANGOR, Maine — A Hudson man charged with slaying a Bradford contractor was released on bail in time to spend the holidays with his family, but Peter Robinson, 48, of Bradford still faces murder charges.
Superior Court Justice William Anderson on Dec. 23 found there was probable cause to charge Robinson with intentional or knowing murder and depraved indifference murder in the death of David P. Trask, 71, Robinson’s attorney, Thomas Hallett of Portland, said in telephone interview Friday.
Anderson then set bail at $30,000 cash or $150,000 surety. Robinson put up his Hudson property, located on the Bear Road, as bail, according to court documents.
Judges rarely grant bail to a person charged with murder.
“The judge found he was not a danger to himself or others,” the attorney said. “He used his judicial discretion to grant bail.”
Robinson is living at Wellington Manor in Wells, according to court documents.
Bail conditions call for Robinson to live outside Penobscot County. He is only allowed into the county for court hearings, his bail bond states.
Robinson also is prohibited from having contact with more than 50 individuals, most of whom live in Hudson, Bradford, Corinth or Charleston.
They most likely are related to the victim or are potential witnesses.
The probable cause hearing began on Dec. 2, when Robinson also pleaded not guilty to the charges. The judge continued it but did not set a definite date until mid-December.
Hallett argued on Dec. 2 at the Penobscot Judicial Center that Robinson should not have been charged with murder because he struck Trask in self-defense. The defense attorney admitted after that hearing that it would be unusual for a judge to not find probable cause for charges after a grand jury had indicted an individual.
Robinson was indicted by the Penobscot County grand jury on Nov. 30.
Hallett’s self-defense argument is based, in part, on information in the affidavit that described a history of disputes between Robinson and Trask over alleged trespassing and a right-of-way issue.
Robinson called 911 around 2 p.m. Nov. 12 to report Trask’s death.
Trask died of head injuries with extensive fractures, Deputy Medical Examiner Michael Ferenc testified on Dec. 2. The fatal blow “caved in his face” and injured the brain, the medical examiner testified. Ferenc said it was his opinion that Trask was on the ground, on his back, when he was struck in the face.
The medical examiner also testified that he found no defensive wounds on Trask’s body.
The affidavit described several previous encounters between Robinson and Trask and-or his relatives.
In February 2009, a Maine warden issued trespass warnings to Trask and five male relatives after Robinson complained they were hunting on his posted land, according to the affidavit. Robinson allegedly told the warden the next day, “If I ever catch them down in there again, I’ll probably kill them,” the affidavit said.
Earlier this year, Trask purchased a lot with a right-of-way on Robinson’s land. Cheryl Robinson, the defendant’s wife, allegedly told police who came to investigate Trask’s death that her husband had intended to confront Trask about an unlocked gate at the entrance to Bear Road.



WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That sums it up nicely.
This is extremely rare for a judge to do that
Is This Judge Seine? I Really Wonder…
Are we supposed to be elated that he can spend Christmas with his family? Seems that Mr. Trask, an honorable, hard-working family man did not have that choice!
HUH?????? YOUR KIDDING RIGHT? Am I On Candid Camera???
WTF!!!This guy killed a man and admitted to it and now he is out on bail…So Wrong!!!!!
I don’t agree about him being out on bail but he did not admit that he killed the man in a court of law. He pleaded not guilty and just because he told a Maine warden he would probably kill them next time does not mean he admitted guilt.
“The judge found he was not a danger to himself or others,” the attorney said. “He used his judicial discretion to grant bail.”
Right and you also are the same judge that determined in a previous paragraph
“found there was probable cause to charge Robinson with intentional or knowing murder and depraved indifference murder..”
Sounds a lot like it is OK to let someone out home for the holidays when you have reason to believe or cause that supports you are charged with intentionally committing murder. Way to go by the judicial system, surprised you just didn’t let everyone out of jail for the holidays
This must be a relative to miamijohn.
These judges are trying to keep the most dangerous defendants behind bars in a jail system that has very limted space. Based on the news lately, this man may in fact pose far less risk to the public than many others stacked up in the system. When and if he is found guilty of murder, manslaughter, or some lesser charge he’ll pay the penalty for his alleged actions. I think Judge Anderson’s decison tells us all something about how terribly overcrowded the various facilities really are. This goes right back to the allocation of precious state revenues.
Sad that David Trask was not able to celebrate the holidays with his family.
Apparently Judge Anderson felt it was so important that the stupid murderer spend Christmas with his family, as to let him out on bail. Mr . Trask’s loved ones would have loved to have him present with them, but because the murderer went up where Mr. Trask was working and ended Mr. Trask’s life, they had to spend this Christmas and all the rest to come , without him.
Maine needs the death penalty badly, and even more, an EYE FOR AN EYE.
I was under the presumption that bail was never a consideration when charged with a capitol offense…… guess I was wrong..huh.
No capital punishment in Maine, but I know what you mean. Seems ridiculous to me, too.
What was the judge thinking, or obviously he WASN’T thinking. To let a man who committed a savage murder on the loose. It is time to up the ante on these murderers. There may be crowding at the prisons, but it is time these judges acted like judges.
in my opinion, drug users that are locked up are less of a threat to others, than a murderer. Especially, one that has said he will “kill them all”. and “IT” is walking around free on bail.
“The judge found he was not a danger to himself or others,” the attorney said. “He used his judicial discretion to grant bail.”
Yeah…seems like he already killed the guy who he was a danger to…
I was thinking the same thing; ..”not a danger to himself or others”….WHAT?! He committed a MURDER, yerhonor! I think he has pretty much proven that he’s a danger to others.
Again, I do not agree with him being out on bail but he has yet to be found guilty of murder. It is innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent.
i hafta to agree with most of the responses!! if that was ME in jail for murder..be hell or high water b4 they let me out on bail!! this is VERY worng!!!!
It’s too bad Mr. Trask doesn’t get to vote!!
This is a feud that’s been going on for years. The warden that Pete made his threat to should loose his job. The warden should have charged Robinson with criminal threatening. Law enforcement needs to be held accountable for doing nothing to deescalate this problem. Robinson has years of paper trails of complaints against the Trask family. I’m not saying Trask deserved what he got by no means. The cops knew this was a problem and didn’t address it. Regardless of who is right or who is wrong, they did nothing.
You obviously don’t understand the Criminal Threatening statute…
The police can’t just arrest someone because of what “might” happen.
Let a cop find you drunk in a parked car and he can arrest you for O.U.I. even though you didn’t drive. Besides I said charge him, not arrest him. Last I knew there was a difference between the two. The courts could have solved this before it came to blows. Follow this story and you will find out how much the law knew but still did nothing. Again, I will state that I don’t think it was right to kill.
So….if I see obama on the street and threaten to kill him……they will do nothing?? I think NOT
What an injustice has been done. What was the judge thinking–he killed a man in a savage beating and he has been released on bail. Doesn’t make any sense.
Just a thought, but maybe the judge has seen something in this case that has not been released to the public. Maybe the BDN should go back and read the past articles. A lot of mistakes in this one.
Keep in mind that Robinson called 911 and told them he hit Trask a few times with the crowbar and thought he was dead. They didn’t arrest him until a few days later. If it was murder, why did they wait to arrest him?
I think he might beat it,sounds like Mr Trask thought he was God and could go where he wanted ,also its obvious he bought that piece of land just to pi.. off Robinson.If they can prove he was a threat to Robinson with something when he was clubbed, then all bets are off.
I wonder what Trask had in his truck? After all it was hunting season.
yep,
In my opinion, maybe the judge is thinking he’s going to screw up, take his property b4 the Trasks own it in a wrongful death suit.
The judge ought to be locked up.
This just another case that proves our Judicial system does not work anymore. I have been a law biding citizen all my life but when the laws hurt the innocent and protect the criminal, there is no Justice! Our system can’t be fixed because it has become so corrupt just like our Government. It is time for the people to replace both!!
In this case I think the stupid judge is a danger to others.
WHAT a great country we live in, you can kill someone and still be home for Christmas….sounds like a song I know…
Another fine move by the court system.
I hope that’s not a threat. I hope that it doesn’t encourage someone to make a bad situation much worse.