If you lead with breasts or bras, you are going to get hits.
By “hits” I don’t mean “hit on,” as in the 1990s catchphrase meaning what happened to women in the smoke-filled bars of those days.
I mean “hits” as in Internet interest — “reads,” you might say, or clicks.
And any seasoned editor or headline writer can tell you — whether online or on the pages of an old-fashioned folded-up newspaper — stories involving the breast in any size, shape or form equal interest. They always have, and I suspect they always will.
There is nothing wrong with that, especially if the story behind the headline, the message behind the word, is worth hearing and especially when it knocks on the noggins of people who otherwise may have managed to turn a blind eye to a story theretofore easily ignored.
And though I have a lot of faith and admiration for the readers of the BDN, and though Sally Quinn’s Op-Ed piece on the Egyptian military’s violent response to a demonstrator in that country back in December was compelling, my guess as to why it was the second-most “hit on” story on the BDN website on Wednesday actually had more to do with the mention of a “blue bra” in the headline.
Quinn, of The Washington Post, wrote her column about a young Egyptian woman who was beaten by members of the military on Saturday, Dec. 17, while she was protesting.
While beating her, members of the military tore at her clothes, revealing that the young woman was wearing a beautiful, bright blue bra beneath her abaya. The pictures were broadcast around the world and sparked the “blue bra movement” calling attention to the continuing oppression and violence against the demonstrators, especially the female ones.
I offer my wholehearted apologies to all of those who actually read the column because of their genuine interest in the revolution. I know there are many of you. I know that most of us have continued to pay at least some attention to the nearly year-old uprising.
There was some shared energy involved between the Egypt protests and the Occupy Wall Street Movement in the U.S.
But by some accounts more than 840 people have died during the violence in Egypt that resulted in last February’s resignation of President Hosni Mubarak, and I just don’t recall that story being among the top four or five viewed on the BDN website.
Yet on Wednesday it was No. 2, just behind the story about a rollover on I-95 in Bangor, but beating out the story about two men killed over the holiday weekend, a municipal employee accused of impersonating a state official, and a loophole that allowed the state to pay $235 million to organizations run by lawmakers and their spouses.
That the column about women’s rights in Egypt and the violence against women protesters was mixed in with the interest in all of that local chaos sort of stood out.
And thus I stand behind my theory that the actual interest — the actual motivation behind the click — was the mention of that beautiful blue bra.
The image of that unarmed young Egyptian woman with her abaya splayed open by the armed and well-armored members of the country’s military being beaten and dragged unconscious through the street needed to be seen.
The story needed to be told and heeded.
It may have been the mention of the bra in the headline that caused some to “hit” on Quinn’s column, but that’s OK, because they were rewarded with an insightful commentary on the history of the suppression of women, especially in the realm of religion.
And the whole lesson was learned amongst visions of lacy lingerie and the sexy secrets that lie beneath a woman’s business suit or abaya.
And it highlighted once again that the breast and the bra are nearly always a hit.



I’m not sure which part of Quinn’s column you thought was insightful. As far as I can tell, she entirely missed any realistic, accurate generalizations about the way groups who hold power asymmetrically over others react to shifts in social values and political action, and instead asserted the completely ludicrous generalization that men (all men!?) are threatened by liberated, powerful women.
The article’s conclusion is something like, “wouldn’t it be cool if ladies everywhere wore sexy underpants, and then men had to fantasize/wonder about it???”, which seems like the worst possible thing to take away from a situation where women are fighting for social and political equality in an oppressive regime.
If a piece is only able to attract attention because of the sexual content of its image, and then ends up making sensational, sweeping remarks about men being inherently predisposed to oppressing women, I’m not sure what how it has merit at all.
The article and Renee’s article isn’t about ladies wearing something sexy. The picture and the article shows that even when women and those people are being oppressed by the regimes that want to keep people from being everything that they can, this young lady defied the status-quo and wore something that was against the regimes “rule” and law. Don’t take the fact that it’s just men, it’s anyone that criticizes and kills and use racial slurs to keep control. That can be women, children and people of color as well. Where society is so use to seeing the sensationalism in the headlines, actresses, sex and things that catch the eye of scandal, of course people are going to read. It’s when you see below the surprise, then you see the real issue. Oppression, no matter in Egypt, USA or any other country. Just like the symbol of the clothes line for sweat shops and clothes made overseas by peasants who being oppressed, the blue bra is the same kind of symbol of oppression, nothing more, nothing less.
Right- and my point is that in this comment you’ve already done a much better job of interpreting and discussing the issue than Quinn did in her article. :)
While I’m
not saying that this photo couldn’t be real, or that this stuff doesn’t happen,
this photo looks staged to me. Are there more pictures of this girl being
beaten or is this the only one? The reason I say this is that the ‘soldier’ who
is doing the stomping, is wearing sneakers, is being held back by another
soldier, and is wearing a different uniform. Could be one of the protesters
using an opportune moment. Has anyone else felt this way???
no
I saw a lady nearly topless and I clicked.