WISCASSET, Maine — Over, under and around all have been scrapped, which leaves through as the only answer for one of Maine’s worst traffic bottlenecks.
Anyone who travels Route 1 in the summer knows the situation in Wiscasset: sometimes miles-long lines of traffic inching toward the town that calls itself “Maine’s Prettiest Village” and attracts crowds of tourists.
For years, transportation planners and locals have debated what to do about the congestion, with ideas ranging from routing pedestrian traffic crossing Main Street over a bridge or through a tunnel to building a bypass that sends motorists around the town altogether. With the debate as gridlocked as the road and funding for major projects at a premium, the town and Department of Transportation are exploring lesser fixes that Town Manager Laurie Smith said might help, but aren’t an end-all solution.
“All of the measures we’re talking about are really things that have been discussed in the past, like creating some one-way streets and trying to improve signage along I-295 to encourage people to take other routes,” said Smith. “[Easing congestion] is going to be difficult to accomplish without major traffic pattern changes, but the state has told us that’s not going to occur. Whatever we look to for alternatives are going to have a minimal impact.”
The situation in Wiscasset is just the latest challenge for the Maine Department of Transportation, which has spent tens of millions of dollars over the years on coastal Route 1 between Brunswick and Stockton Springs — an area of Maine not served directly by the interstate system. In addition to continuous paving and rebuilding of the road along the entire stretch, there have been high-profile projects. They include the Coastal Connector, which in 1997 ended what was once known as the “30-minute mile” through downtown Topsham and Brunswick, and the four-lane Sagadahoc Bridge between Bath and Woolwich, which in 2000 eased a ferocious bottleneck on both sides of the Kennebec River — especially during the summer and Bath Iron Works shift changes.
All of those investments, according to Martin Rooney, a transportation planner for the DOT, are testament to the fact that smooth traffic flows on Route 1 are critically important for both residents and businesses in the midcoast.
“That corridor is as important as any other in the state,” said Rooney.
But there are some who believe the state isn’t doing enough, particularly when it comes to looking at improvements on a regional basis and not just town-by-town. In 2000, the 21 Route 1 towns between Brunswick and Stockton Springs began an MDOT-led effort called Gateway 1 with the intention of working together toward large-scale solutions. In exchange for a seat at the table when it came to deciding on investments in Route 1, municipalities were required to sign an agreement to work with each other and support land-use measures that would regulate development along the corridor.
More than $2 million was invested into the effort, but the project was scrapped in March 2011 by Gov. Paul LePage and Transportation Commissioner David Bernhardt, who said the department’s economy-stressed budget would be better spent on maintenance as opposed to large capitol projects.
“What we wanted to try to avoid was getting into a discussion about a new superhighway,” said Chris Mann, a policy development specialist for the DOT. “I briefed the new commissioner on Gateway 1 … The basic upshot was that this just wasn’t consistent with our basic priorities. We’ve really got to focus more on maintaining our top critical infrastructure. It’s the fiscal reality.”
Instead of major investments, the DOT’s focus is now on controlling development and traffic patterns along the corridor that could exacerbate congestion. Wiscasset and Edgecomb selectmen, for example, are in discussions with the DOT about measures including creating one-way streets to ease traffic entering Route 1 and stationing officers in Wiscasset’s downtown to usher pedestrians across the street in groups — a measure that already has been tried and had some success, according to Smith, and may return next summer. The towns are expecting recommendations from the DOT on that front in the next few weeks.
Chris Dilts, executive director of the Wiscasset Area Chamber of Commerce who runs a bed and breakfast in Wiscasset, said any improvements are welcome with the exception of the now-defunct bypass idea.
“Those of us who have businesses in the area are kind of appreciative of the traffic,” said Dilts. “The problem is the sheer volume of traffic plus four crosswalks and a two-lane road never really meant for truck traffic. Then throw in a set of railroad tracks [that cross Route 1 in downtown Wiscasset] and it adds up to a problem. They stop everything while [trains and pedestrians] move through.”
The congestion has a ripple effect far outside of Wiscasset. North of the town, in Newcastle, Town Administrator Ron Grenier said the summertime congestion is “a major hassle” for anyone traveling south. Grenier said Newcastle’s residents and selectmen were enthusiastic supporters of the Gateway 1 project — even though it could have ended up working against some of the town’s interests such as broadening the tax base with new businesses along Route 1.
“We don’t have a lot of undeveloped commercial land,” he said. “We have only a few spots for development and some of them are near Route 1.”
Grenier said the town is rewriting its land-use code, which will allow for more commercial development. However, according to Mooney at the DOT, too much development on Route 1 could lead to new gridlock in the future. That’s why the department requires any new business on Route 1 that could attract more than 100 vehicles during peak traffic hours to go through a permitting process that includes a traffic impact study and possible installation of mitigation projects such as turning lanes and traffic lights.
Eric Gallant, executive director of the Mid-Coast Regional Planning Commission, which helps towns with transportation planning, among other things, said that while there may be widespread concern about the future, he doesn’t see Route 1’s problems as impediments to economic development.
“Highway-dependent businesses don’t necessarily mind if it’s congested,” he said. “We have a fair amount of businesses along the corridor that are tourist-based.”
Audrey Lovering, development director for the City of Rockland, agreed.
“Businesses I’ve spoken with, they’ve done their homework,” she said. “They know what Route 1 currently is and how it could impact them. They’ve already factored that into their decisions.”
Lovering said Rockland is looking for local solutions to ease traffic on its Main Street, which is also Route 1. The city already has installed a speed table and is looking at other measures such as more public transportation options and making space for pedestrians and bicyclists.
“We’re slowly looking at these issues, but doing it in a strategic way,” she said. “We’re trying to plan for the future, and not just the immediate future.”
Mooney said the DOT also has its eye on the long-term health of Route 1. He said in the past 10 years, the department has invested tens of millions of dollars in Route 1, including repaving more than 50 miles of highway between Brunswick and Rockland, improving the corridor north of Camden Village and a major reconstruction and widening project in Thomaston and Warren. There are also bridge maintenance projects in the pipeline in Bath, Wiscasset, Woolwich and Newcastle. Those projects represent only a percentage of the overall need, but Mooney said it’s a matter of funding.
“It’s inherent in everything we do to use public money as wisely as possible,” he said.
Frank Rissell of Wiscasset is co-founder of a grassroots organization called ROAD, which stands for Route One Alternative Designs. Though he said the group formed originally in opposition to the bypass idea, it favors just about any other solution that will help ease the problem.
“We really hope the powers that be will put some solutions together,” he said.



Sounds like these towns want their cake and eat it too. They didn’t want the by-pass but they don’t want the traffic either. Traffic means money coming to the area. It’s time for them to shut up and put up with the traffic if they want the business. There are other areas of the state that would love to have this problem.
Maybe a by-pass would allow commercial and public vehicles with destinations further east avoid the traffic jams thus saving time and money.
Signs on I295 stating “no thru traffic” or “long delay” might help; people from away like to see Maine at about 65mph from what I see.
“Maine’s Prettiest Village”
LOL…yeah, sucking in bus-fumes all day!
I made the BIG mistake of trying to take Route 1 a few years ago, in the summer. Never seen anything like it. Will never, ever take that road again unless I absolutely have NO other option.
Wiscasset has titled itself “Maine’s prettiest village” but instead should have named it “Maine’s slowest” and I don’t mean traffic-wise, although that would fit, too. I hate Wiscasset and its residents for blocking progress for over 50 years. We opt to go to Damariscotta, which years ago saw the benefit of getting the thru traffic onto a b pass. Damariscotta is a vibrant village whereas Wiscasset is a mess, so we never stop there. Too bad the invested business owners don’t get the benefit for having people stop there. Yes the summer folks will stop, but more would stop if it were safe and manageable because at the moment it is just a place to get through.
The town council opted to not even investigate viable solutions in Oct./Nov. passing by a lot of low cost improvements, such as traffic routing and a pedestrian underpass. The latter suggested as a way to safely pass people across Rt. 1 with a walkway under the natural hill. This is done a lot in Europe and it works great, but NOT in Wiscasset.
I would add, that we live nearby Wiscasset and are retired. Although not wealthy, we do have lunch out several times a week, shop for various items once or twice a week, BUT never spend a dime in Wiscasset on anything from gas to any other item (plus refuse to visit galleries or antique shops in that town) You would take your live in your hands to park there. We have boycotted it for years and will continue to do so until the log jam moves or the grim reaper visits, whichever comes first.
aka Wis-traffic.
Is that a trane truck in the picture, hopefully he is only selling oil furnaces and air conditioners…Only good thing a heat pump is good for is a boat anchor.
One thing I have done is boycott all the business owners that support R.O.A.D.
Members of R.O.A.D. found here: http://wiscasset-road.org/about.html
They are the ones who are paranoid about a bypass. They don’t realize that a bypass would have helped their businesses. Who wants to stop and shop in Wiscasset and then try to get back on the road again?
Thanks for the list, I’m in for the boycott. Will pass along to a lot of locals, too.
Red’s Eats is the only eating establishment in Maine where you can enjoy a lobster roll at a picnic table that is 25 feet from a stinky outhouse, a smelly dumpster, railroad tracks and Route 1. This is the prettiest village in Maine?
Local business interests keep fending off a bypass, but until one is in place nothing will change. Not rocket science, same old same old. When sufficient political backbone is summoned up progress will be made.
I agree.. but have the buisnesses take a look at bath, and freeport… Rt1, and 295 pass right by/thru them, and they seem to do alright buisness wise.. I think Rt1 could be widened to 2 lanes, and go around both sides of the courthouse.
You can attribute this continuing mess to either supremely effective lobbying and manipulation by local business interests or the fact that it takes place in an increasingly dysfunctional atmosphere that defines regional planning in Maine. Either way a tiny group of interests are sticking their thumb right in the eye of a huge portion of coastal Maine and its people. Nobody in the old South ever voluntarily freed their slaves. Wiscasset will never ever support a bypass. One would expect the population of the affected area will some day wake up and realize what has to be done; and pressure the banana backs in Augusta to do the right thing for the greatest number of people and their interests.
Its true. Those of us who live around here could give a rats you know what about anything in downtown Wiscasset. If the antique shops cannot survive like Damariscotta did non of us care. Give us a choice like Damariscotta. If you have business that’s worth stopping at they will still go.
Maybe Roxanna can build it into a park for all the hippies. Good place for her.
first off.. get rid of the parking on Rt1 (this causes a lot of congestion)…. widen the road to a 2 lane, 1 for those exiting rt1 into wiscasset, and 1 a “thru lane” I know whenever I had to go south of my town through wiscasset.. I always had to choose the time of day.. and expect to add another 15 minutes to my trip. wiscasset PD could also help out allowing through traffic totravel more freely than those crossing the streets in town (alter the light timing) or having traffic officers during high load periods.
Widen the road in Wiscasset to 4 lanes, build a pedestrian bridge over/under the road, build an over/underpass for trains, and tear down any buildings in the way under eminent domain. People would whine and cry, but they would still have their precious Rt 1 running straight through downtown. All the back and forth discussions are accomplishing is a waste of time and money, while people who don’t like sitting in traffic for hours are choosing alternate routes to avoid that area all together. Traffic doesn’t always mean business, if it is too difficult to even get in their parking lot.
pedestrian bridges and tunnels rarely, if ever get used. when you see them other places, you’re seeing an artifact.
That may be true, but I have seen instances like the situation in Wiscasset, when they were used regularly because pedestrians were left with no other option to cross the road. If Wiscasset refuses to consider any other option for Rt 1, a pedestrian bridge/tunnel would be a lot quicker than waiting for a nice person to let you pass or waiting for a police officer to stop traffic. Wiscasset lost my business years ago, I choose to take different routes to my destinations on the coast, that don’t involve spending half the day in a line of traffic outside of Maine’s worst village to drive through. Sure isn’t too pretty when all you have to look at is a line of cars for miles in both directions.
make route 1 a 4 way like the interstate.
It works for Bath, it works for Brunswick.
either that or bypass the town altogether and watch it die off.
they can either change and expand, or keep their “most beautiful village”, get bypassed, and fail.
I don’t feel it will wither because look at the huge benefit it has proven for Belfast and Damariscotta.
true, but still, a change needs to be made, because right now, the status quo is hurting potential and business.
You have in Wiscassett an illustration of what happens when increases in population and tourism combine with decreases in alternatives to the automobile. The traffic jam there is a result of philosophy, not logistics: we have put almost all our transporation eggs into one basket. Building more road will only encourage more traffic and will do nothing to solve the problem. We need instead more and better public transportation — and Eastern Maine Rail has made a small start in that direction. Let’s be creative instead of additive in our thinking. How about passenger ferries running up and down the coast, with stops at Boothbay, Rockland, Mount Desert Island, etc.? More buses and trains. Yes, buses use the road, too, but one bus replaces as many as 50 cars in that traffic tie-up.
The days when we could all jump into our cars and drive cheaply and conveniently to wherever we wanted to go are coming to an end, even in uncrowded Maine. There’s no better illustration of this than the Wiscassett bottleneck (though Ellsworth in the summer comes close). The train ride between Brunswick and Rockland, on the other hand, is a pleasant, stress-free experience.
people like choice. which is why they’re driving and not riding public transportation.
Wiscassett isn’t the destination for most people on route 1.
They may be headed to rockland or camden or farther.
Offering alternative forms of transportation would be great, don’t get me wrong, but it’s not what most people would take.
I personally do not like to be packed up with whatever i may or may not need in a bus for hours on end with a bunch of potentially annoying people. I want to be able to stop if i see something interesting along the journey to where i’m going.
it comes down to the fact that either the road needs to be expanded to accomodate the increased traffic, or a bypass needs to be built.
simple as that.
How about alternatives for the locals, who are using Route 1 numerous times a day, including lots of things like left turns, pulling into/out of parking spots, etc that the thru traffic isn’t doing.
The town won’t even consider alternatives. The town selectmen turned down 6 within the past 2 months without even fairly considering them.
I apologize in advance for the length of this quote (which I am typing by hand, NOT cutting and pasting from a convenient source). But it is directly relevant:
We are not only stuck in traffic, we are stuck in spending money that promotes more of the same. By underpricing and oversubsidizing the automobile, the highway and sprawl, we have made this lifestyle the overwhelming option and diminished the alternatives. History has shown us how the government’s bankrolling of car costs and car-based land use has made the automobile look economical and become essential. Our subsidies, not only ourselves, have ruled.
So it is that people are NOT “voting with their gas pedals,” NOT victims of a born-to-lose “love affair,” NOT opting for exurban flight out of pure passion or even a clear preference. They are responding to a rigged market. They are reacting to price supports for ring roads, beltways, and free parking, responding to taxes and infrastructure that promotes far-flung highways and suburban homes. “Driving’s not just a free lunch,” says one activist, “it’s a free lunch you’re getting paid to eat.” And whether through selfishness, ignorance, or indifference, we devour our landscape and cityscape, aggravate our lives, and destroy our environment.
We know that every year we “invest” $25 billion of federal taxes in auto-dominated transportation. Add to this the amount from state and local agencies. We have seen the direct costs and indirect ones, the incalculable sums spent in the wrong way, in the wrong place, for the wrong way of life. It is time to price them correctly — to right the imbalance toward sustainable transportation.
Jane Holtz Kay
Asphalt Nation, p. 345-346
c 1997 Crown Publishers, New York
while i agree with what you say, wiscassett cannot be expected to fix the underlying issue with the u.s. transportation system.
Yes we need different and better ways of doing things,
but if we don’t change and adapt to the issues we have today, then the future for these areas won’t matter because people will have either found other ways of getting to their desired destinations or will have stopped coming all together due to the hassle.
wiscassett and the other towns along route 1 have a great opportunity.
they have what any good business owner knows is one of the keys to success: location.
there is a massive amount of traffic that goes up route 1 every year, and we need to adjust for that by either building a bypass or making the road easier for people to use (4 lanes)
more traffic = more money and more business.
capitalize on this before it’s too late and people stop coming.
Personally, i love route 1, but i avoid it in the summer.
that means that businesses along route 1 lose my business during the tourist season.
I’m sure it’s the same with many other people.
This will continue to be the trend until things change one way or the other.
Your opinion sums up exactly what I think … including the pertinent quote from “Asphalt Nation” (a fantastic book). I believe Kay also quotes in her book, “You’re not stuck in the traffic jam … you ARE the traffic jam.”
Grow up! The train ride might be great, but what do you do if you are headed to Bob Foster’s Auction gallery from Westport Island? While Wiscasset has done nothing productive for 50 years (YES it has been 50 Years) Ellsworth has dealt fairly deftly during the same time by allowing a 4 lane through the south end and re-routing Rt. 3 at the bottleneck. Further, although it is busy, it never plugs unlike Rt. 1 at Wiscasset. As for ferrys I can just see the weather dependent ferries now, rushing up the bay to Bath, rushing down the Sassanoa to and up the back river to Wiscasset (tide depending or around Robinhood to get there), then down the bay again to Boothbay, (oh, waiting for the bridge onto Southport), screaming past E. Boothbay enroute to Damariscotta and all the variations to Waldoboro, Thomaston and Owls Head. Trains don’t run to Boothbay, so we are to drive to Newcastle, wait to meet the train, travel to Wiscasset and yadadadada…..I wonder if you are getting the point……The travel time will obviate the trip
It’s troubling to me that this is being presented as
Wiscasset’s problem when it is, in fact, a regional problem. Gateway 1 IS the solution that got the
region’s communities talking AND planning for a long-term solution avoiding the
creation of a super highway. For the
governor and DOT to pull the plug on its investment was a HUGE mistake!
As a tourism-related business owner in Rockland, the
majority of our income is earned during the summer. Currently, we redirect visitors
wanting a direct route to Rockland via Augusta and Route 17 completely avoiding
the congested area. However, many visitors
want to meander along Route 1 in order to sightsee along the way. They do not want a prolonged delay sitting in
bumper to bumper traffic reminding them of other tourism destinations like Cape
Cod, or worse, their daily commute. What
are we going to do if we wait to do something until after they stop coming?
The answer is self-evident as demonstrated by solutions of two
other of the region’s communities along Route 1. Years ago, Waldoboro created a bypass and put
no development restrictions in place resulting in a failing downtown and overdevelopment
creating congestion along Route 1 resulting in last year’s angst about the end
of the world for some businesses due to a necessary traffic island installation.
In contrast, New Castle/Damariscotta created a bypass in an
area that forced limited development along Route 1. And guess what, downtown is thriving. You can walk the streets without fear of
being run over by an inattentive driver.
And a variety of stores and restaurants makes for a great PEDESTRIAN
FRIENDLY setting. Additionally,
development has been encouraged along Business Route 1 further enhancing the
local economy and local tax base.
Our regional and local economies are already fragile, and
statewide, the number of tourists visiting continues to decline. Further delaying a bypass only worsens the economic
outlook for all of us. We need to act
now! Someone said, “Wiscasset wants its
cake and eat it too.” I think this is
true of everyone. Unfortunately, Wiscasset
is misguided in not supporting a bypass as the correct solution as demonstrated
in the paragraph above. Allowing an
alternative for through traffic in addition to direct access to the downtown
would further enhance the economy for “Maine’s Prettiest Village”.
Instead of one or two pedestrians crossing the road and stopping traffic every 10 seconds, why don’t they install a signalized crosswalk?
Pedestrians could queue up and all cross once every 30 seconds or so.
They did that about ten years ago, and it made things worse. I know that seems impossible, but its true!
Yeah when the cop was there it was worse too.
Part of the problem in Wiscasset is the zoning. There is very little day-to-day business left in the village anymore, so that means every single trip generated by the grocery, lumberyard, etc. all has to get out and onto Route 1 for a several mile trip, then turn around and come back. This could be numerous trips each day for every household – it adds up quickly.
If more day-to-day services were located in the village, at least you could remove the local traffic from the equation.
UNLESS one is going to Boothbay Harbor the best route to see the MAINE coast is
ME Turnpike to Augusta, Rte 3 to Belfast.. Then you don’t sit in traffic forever and can double back to Camden, Rockland. OR continue EAST on Rte 1 to Ellsworth, Bar Harbor, or even further EAST beyond Ellsworth to beautiful eastern ME towns.
Or you take Rte 295, struggle through Brunswick, see the Kennebec River passing though Bath and sit in Wiscasset forever. Then struggle down Rte 1 w/ no glimpse of the “coast” until you get to Belfast.
Its caused by those railroad tracks next to reds, cars slow down for the bump.
No its not. It is the fact that Red’s is on the corner and the flood of people crossing the street.
What about Route 3? Traffic at the head of the island is ridiculous
It figures…this has been a problem for as long as I can remember. If only Wiscasset would smarten up…I HATE Wiscasset. I would never live there and I certainly do not spend any money there. If it were not for the fact that I must travel through Wiscasset to see my family, I really would not care either.
How about the State just biting the bullet and building the dam bypass. They have done it in other communities where the local villagers were against it, why should Wiscasset be any different. Half of the problem to begin with is the fact that the town has allowed mechants to build their business’s so that they impede traffic. They don’t care how long it takes someone to get through their town as long as they think they might squeeze a nickle out of them on the way through.