OLD TOWN, Maine — The Maine Department of Environmental Protection expects to decide by the end of the month whether tripling the capacity of state-owned Juniper Ridge Landfill would benefit the public, allowing the expansion application to move forward.

Landfill officials say the state must act quickly because Maine is running out of room for waste. This is a familiar argument. When the state signed a 30-year deal in 2004 handing control of the landfill over to Casella Waste Systems Inc., it did so knowing Casella eventually would need more room. In fact, the company applied for an expansion in 2009, but withdrew the application in the face of questions from the DEP.

Controversy persists over the waste that’s forcing the proposed expansion and where that trash is coming from.

Don Meagher, manager of planning and development for Casella, said in a November interview that the landfill in Old Town is projected to be filled to capacity in less than five years. The entirety of Maine’s landfill space is expected to be used up within the decade, according to Meagher.

When Casella, which operates the landfill for the state, started operations at Juniper Ridge eight years ago, it expected the landfill would be full around 2018. It’s filling up more quickly than planned.

Casella calculated capacity estimates in 2004 using a landfill cell construction method that saved space. However, that technique proved to be too expensive, so Casella stopped using it, according to Meagher.

Further, Meagher said the closure of Hampden’s Pine Tree Landfill in 2009 has sped up the fill rate because waste that would have gone to Hampden now has to come to Old Town. Also, changes in state regulations mean more treatment plant sludge has to be landfilled.

Casella and the State Planning Office, which oversees waste management for the state, argue that the state needs somewhere to put its trash, sludge waste from paper mills and construction demolition debris — and soon.

Casella is seeking to increase the Juniper Ridge footprint by 143 acres.

As the DEP considers the expansion proposal, letters and comments are flowing in from members of the public, municipalities, politicians and businesses. More than 60 had been submitted by early January. Most letters decry Casella’s waste management practices and call for a denial of the proposed expansion. Some have accused Casella of filling Juniper Ridge with waste from other states and charged that some Casella-owned companies haven’t been as efficient or effective in recycling as they should be.

Casella and representatives of businesses that benefit from a centrally located landfill, on the other hand, argue that if Juniper Ridge shuts down in five or so years once it’s full, a variety of jobs, including those in the trucking, landfill and waste-to-energy sectors, will be lost — something the state can’t afford to have happen.

Other states’ trash

Much of the opposition to the expansion revolves around out-of-state waste, with many arguing that if Maine took in less trash from other states, there wouldn’t be a need for new landfill space.

“Out-of-state waste is such a minor component of all this,” Meagher said. “They’re looking for a bogeyman that isn’t there.”

There is no out-of-state waste in Juniper Ridge Landfill, according to state statute.

“Waste that is generated within the State includes residue and bypass generated by incineration, processing and recycling facilities within the State or waste whether generated within the State or outside of the State if it is used for daily cover, frost protection or stability or is generated within 30 miles of the solid waste disposal facility,” according to the statute enacted by the 123rd Maine Legislature in 2007.

In more than a year’s worth of waste activity reports, which Casella is required to submit to the State Planning Office and DEP, not a single truck among the thousands that bring waste to the facility each month came directly to Juniper Ridge from another state.

But of the more than 100 trucks and trailers that roll through the Juniper Ridge weigh station on an average day, some bear license plates or company names from other states.

According to Meagher, out-of-state plates don’t prove that trucks are coming directly from another state to Juniper Ridge without first stopping at a processing facility. A non-Maine license plate means only that the truck wasn’t registered in Maine by the company that owns it.

The drivers of several of these trucks confirmed that they mostly operated in Maine or had dropped off a load at one of Maine’s waste processing facilities — where the trash, by definition, becomes in-state waste — before picking up another load to take to the landfill.

Maine’s major waste processors include KTI Bio Fuels Inc. in Lewiston, which sorts construction and demolition debris and chips up the wood for use as fuel in boilers; Aggregate Recycling Corp. in Eliot, which recycles soil and construction and demolition debris; J.A. Sampson Inc. in Sanford, which makes mulch and recycles wood; and A.L. Murphy Inc. in Naples.

Other companies are licensed to process waste but aren’t active in the industry.

Trash is processed at these facilities when it has been “mechanically or chemically altered in some way,” according to state Rep. Bob Duchesne, D-Hudson, a member of the Legislature’s Environment and Natural Resources Committee.

The practice of converting out-of-state waste to in-state waste didn’t start with the recent statute — it has been an accepted waste management practice for decades.

“We’re approaching 25 years of historical practice, which people erroneously think is somehow a recent development,” Meagher said.

Decades of waste worries

Where did this definition distinguishing in-state waste from out-of-state waste come from?

Maine’s waste management policy began to take shape in the 1980s. Soaring heating oil and gasoline prices that resulted from the 1973 oil embargo still were fresh in the minds of Mainers — spurring a desire to develop trash-to-energy facilities to ease the sting. Trash was dumped in hundreds of unlined landfills, usually owned by municipalities, some of which would burn the trash to make way for more.

In 1989, the Legislature banned new or expanded commercial landfills and formed the Waste Management Agency to reduce the environmental hazards and get Maine’s waste practices under control.

Sherry Huber was the agency’s executive director.

Huber said during an interview in December that the Waste Management Agency was “very successful” in many regards. It established a waste management hierarchy — reduce, reuse, recycle, compost, waste-to-energy and, lastly, landfill — to guide the state in prioritizing its methods of waste management.

It eliminated private landfills, halting several proposals around that time to place more landfills in Maine that could have drawn more trash across state borders.

In 1995, the agency identified land at Carpenter Ridge, west of Lincoln, where the state hoped to place the first state-owned landfill. That project, however, was sidelined in 2004 when the state and Old Town’s failing Georgia-Pacific paper mill completed a $26 million deal that gave the state control of Juniper Ridge Landfill — which, under Casella, transformed from a paper mill dump to a more general-use landfill. Georgia-Pacific folded two years later.

After acquiring Carpenter Ridge and doing what it could to prevent future privately owned landfills, the state abolished the Waste Management Agency in 1995, and the State Planning Office took over its duties.

But the Waste Management Agency had one major goal it couldn’t reach, Huber said. It couldn’t slow the flow of waste coming to Maine from other states.

Free trade of trash

Out-of-state waste is no new phenomenon, Huber said, and the Waste Management Agency and state recognized early on that the fact that other states were sending construction and demolition debris and other waste to the Pine Tree State could lead to an overcrowding problem in Maine’s landfills.

When lawyers looked into ways to regulate the amounts and types of trash coming into the state, they hit a barrier the agency couldn’t overcome — the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which gives the federal government — not states — the authority to regulate commerce between states.

The agency believed that an attempt to cut down the amount of waste flowing into Maine might lead to a federal case, so it left the matter alone, Huber said.

Because the state couldn’t stop out-of-state waste from coming into Maine, it at least had to clarify what in-state waste meant so it could better monitor what was being disposed of in Maine landfills.

In 2007, the Legislature passed the revision to state statute in an effort to create a “clear picture” of what in-state waste was, as well as what would be allowed to go into state-owned landfills such as Juniper Ridge, according to Paula Clark of the DEP.

She said state officials didn’t want Maine to become the Northeast’s “dumping ground.”

Before the statute’s approval, Clark said, it was widely accepted by the waste management industry that ash from boilers at energy recovery plants and other products processed at waste facilities became Maine’s responsibility once businesses drew some benefit from the garbage.

The statute’s aim was to make that practice official, according to Clark.

“[Critics of the state’s waste management policy] may not agree with the statutory direction that was taken,” Clark said. “But at least it was more clear.”

Landfills on the horizon?

For the bulk of this decade, Juniper Ridge will be the only state-owned landfill in Maine capable of taking in a substantial amount of waste.

Pine Tree Landfill in Hampden stopped taking in waste in late 2009. Today, it acts as a collection site for hazardous waste, such as mercury switches and fluorescent lights, which it ships to out-of-state hazardous waste sites. The facility also collects and burns methane from the landfill underneath to create electricity.

Carpenter Ridge is still several years from development. It needs legislative approval, an access road needs to be built and the facility itself hasn’t been designed.

The state-owned Dolby Landfill in East Millinocket is limited to serving as a disposal site for the local paper mill. Even if that were changed, a process that would take at least five to seven years, the potential capacity of the landfill would be too small to serve the state for an extended period of time.

Waste Management-owned Crossroads Landfill in Norridgewock, which survived the state’s elimination of private landfills because it already existed, is expected to reach capacity within about 12 years. That landfill also is eyeing an expansion bid.

For now, the state is relying on Juniper Ridge to meet its waste disposal needs, but it can do so only with an expansion — an expansion that awaits DEP approval.

Public benefit

When Casella agreed to operate Juniper Ridge as part of the deal that revived the Old Town mill, it signed a three-decade contract with the state.

“The state picked a 30-year deal,” Meagher said. “The 30-year deal can only work with an expansion.”

The contract specified the need for an expansion in the future, according to Meagher.

“Now we’re fighting over whether that expansion is going to happen or not,” he said.

Meagher said regulation changes and obstacles have made the inevitable expansion of Juniper Ridge more trying and contentious than it should have been.

A year ago, the State Planning Office and Juniper Ridge pulled their application for an expansion after the DEP issued a draft denial because it saw questions that were unanswered in the paperwork.

The only items the DEP considers in making a public benefit determination are:

• Whether the expansion meets immediate, short-term or long-term state landfill capacity needs.

• Whether it’s consistent with the state waste management recycling plan.

• Whether it’s inconsistent with local, regional or state waste collection, storage, transportation or disposal activities.

Opposition to the renewed expansion proposal has been boisterous, with many going beyond the three items.

“I suspect that if a vote were taken, that the overwhelming majority of Maine citizens would not want any out-of-state waste brought into the state,” Orono resident Al Larson wrote in a letter to Cyndi Darling of the DEP. “The people who represent us in Augusta are supposed to do the will of the Maine people, not some corporation whose only purpose is to make a profit for their stockholders.”

Many letters blame Casella for filling its own landfill too quickly with waste shipped in from other states.

In her letter, Deborah Gibbs of Milford argued that the DEP’s public benefit determination shouldn’t fall in favor of Casella before a full audit of all waste going into Juniper Ridge is conducted “to accurately determine which public benefits (be it Massachusetts’s public, Connecticut’s public, New Hampshire’s public … half the country’s public?)”

She also argues that the expansion would be inconsistent with the state’s waste management hierarchy because “[Juniper Ridge’s] waste capacity is prematurely being utilized by imports from out-of-state and going to sorting and processing facilities within the state that do not reduce, reuse or recycle to the greatest extent possible.”

Several trucking and waste-to-energy businesses, as well as the city of Lewiston — home to KTI Bio Fuels — voiced support for the expansion. They argued that the expansion of Juniper Ridge would allow business at Maine’s waste processing facilities to continue maintaining jobs, creating energy, bringing money to the state and handling the waste disposal needs of Maine residents.

The DEP should issue its ruling “fairly close” to the Jan. 31 deadline, according to DEP spokeswoman Samantha DePoy-Warren.

Even after the DEP reaches a decision, Casella, its facilities and the state will continue to face those critical of how waste is handled in Maine.

“As long as we keep making garbage, we’ll have controversy,” Huber said. “No one wants it.”

To view an in-depth, cross-section map of the Juniper Ridge landfill site, click here.

Join the Conversation

40 Comments

    1. The city make tons and are willing to distroy the rest of peoples home values… I think you need to demand your property taxes be cut in half… The unions went to all the landfill meetings when it first started begging for the landfill, then they begged again for the state to step in, and the state did… dumps happen…

      1. Mr. Goliath: how can I demand to have my taxes cut. I do not pay taxes their. Try to recognize satire when you read it. There are endangered plants and animals that are being exposed to chemicals from that dump. A guide entitled: Threatened and Endangered Species in the Forests of Maine: A Guide to Assist with Forest Activities by Brian D. Carlson  (Maine Department of Conservation) and edited by Dr. James M. Sweeney (Champion International Corporation) shows many species in potential danger, because of that West Old Town landfill. This guide was a cooperative publication of Champion, US Forest Service (Department of Agriculture), Department of Conservation (Maine), Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (Maine), National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Univ. of Maine Cooperative Extension, New England Wild Flower Society, and the Nature Conservancy.

  1. There’s got to be a real way to burn the waste-much like a biomass electrical generator-to produce power.  The problem is the EPA won’t let them burn it.  So it has to go somewhere.  Interesting problem. Maybe Roxy can help.

  2. The EPA is going to decide if it benifits the Public…. No they are not.. They already decided and it’s a go.. There is actually 750 acres there and before it all said and done they will fill it all and mostly with out of state waste. The hearing are sort of like the Windmill hearings, they never deny them.. The hearings are just pandering to the public so they can say We Listened… Old Town’s Jack Cashman and John Baldacci opened the door for this dump… Live with it, you deserve what you get.

  3. You want to stop the landfill, Go collect signatures and have a citizen referendum that Maine landfills can’t take out of state waste.

    1. Oh forgot!!! thats already a law… If they take out 1 item per truck the size of a marble it becomes sorted and Maines waste… fix the loophole…..

    2. I’ll sign  it but I’ll bet they fight it tooth and nail and probably find a way in court to find it illegal. As you can see the damage that these landfills are doing we should go back to open dump burning and let each town take care of its own. The worst thing to burn is tires and the junk companies are paying around $200 per ton them.

  4. Talk about two Maine’s. It will soon be New England Trash Site, and, or New England Park.  At this stage of the Game, what else is it good for?

  5. “The [Waste Management] Agency believed that an attempt to cut down the amount of waste flowing into Maine might lead to a federal case, so it left the matter alone…”

    So all the out-of-state toxic debris is the fault of the feds? You can’t make this stuff up. It was Baldacci who engineered the deal with Casella which led to the expansion at Juniper Ridge and the mess we’re in today, as well as the 2007 “revision” to the state statut “defining” exactly what in-state trash was.

    Baldacci turned his own constituency into a toxic waste dump, and no amount of hiding behind federal “Commerce Clauses” will change that.

    1. You would be right, unless you actually read the article of course….

      “There is no out-of-state waste in Juniper Ridge Landfill, according to state statute.”

      so keep trying and you’ll get it right one of these times…. hopefully.

      1. The key word here is “legal” — the law, and its interpretation,  treat waste that ORIGINATES from out of state as in-state. As the saying goes, if you wave a two-by-four over a truck full of out-of-state trash, that makes it in-state trash.  Casella and the Baldacci administration have had excellent lawyers working on their behalf throughout this process. As well they might.

        For more information on Casella’s trash laundering opertation, see my comment on the KTI article here:

        http://bangor-launch.newspackstaging.com/2012/01/13/business/the-kti-example/

        (This article and the KTI article should be read together to get a complete view of Casella’s system of trash laundering; I can’t imagine why BDN separated them, because they are two aspects of the same story.)

        1. And BTW, take a close look at the accompanying photo in the KTI article.

          That doesn’t look much like “fines” from the recycling process that is being LOADED into the truck bound for Juniper Ridge.

      2. I read the article word-for-word, all by myself. Clever, huh?

        Do you actually believe what state officials write in a statute, Mainebrew? They are LYING, get it? The trash comes in from out-of-state and goes to a PROCESSING facility, where — presto! — it becomes Maine trash.

        Put down that brew, buddy. Keep trying and you’ll get it right one of these times… hopefully 

  6. Remember when this landfill was pushed through as the only way to save the Old Town mill? Lies then, more lies now. Who is getting rich? How long before they go bankrupt and leave the whole mess for the state to clean up with YOUR money?

  7. they must think that we the people of Maine are just dumb rednecks -give me a break you are telling me that trash from another state comes here, gets processed, and then it becomes Maine trash -that is nice.  Then we get to store it-0h pretty sweet deal for us dumb rednecks!  It is all about the money for our state representatives and everyone in Augusta

    1. “they must think that we the people of Maine are just dumb rednecks. ” … 
       
      Well, LePage does represent Maine, now. 

        1. If the Govenah shuts down Dortheria Dix, what can you say or do with people,  
          who are not dealing with reality, like living in the past, and conformable there  ?  

          1. If Baldacci had taken care of the states business not borrow our future away we would not be in this mess we are in today….All he did was kick the can down the road and unfortunately we have come to end of the road….But that has nothing to do with this land fill which I am sure this administration will let expand because like 95% of Old Town residents they don’t live near it. It is as they say where I live most of Old Town lives inside the bridges.

  8. BAN ALL IMPORTED WASTE. 
    Massachusetts, where most of this C&D waste originates, has had a total ban on disposing this material since 2006. Casella gets paid by the ton to haul it from there to Lewiston, where it becomes Maine garbage because it has been “processed”, which basically means that they unloaded it, and reloaded it on Maine soil. 
    The same thing happens with municipal waste at the incinerator plants in Orrington and Biddeford, where “front end process residue” (FPR) is sorted and sent to the landfills as Maine waste. This FPR is nothing more than the wet, sloppy fraction of the municipal waste stream that is too difficult to burn, and makes up about 40% by weight of the total. Casella loads it on trucks that then haul it to Juniper Ridge, where it is used to build another “Mount Baldacci”.
     Former governor Baldacci’s cozy relationship with Casella has allowed this travesty to happen.

    CHA-CHING!

  9. If their contract rewards them with a lower per ton cost once they hit a certain volume, why wouldnt they try to get as much volume as they can? It may not, but my understanding is that in Hampden, Casella’s contract basically rewarded them for putting as much volume in as they could.
    Look at their contract & see if they are paying less in fees on each ton put in after a targeted volume. If so, find the rocket scientist that approved that contract and ask them why they think the site is filling up faster than planned.
    We should be looking for our next landfill site now, while we have some time to do it right. It should be located somewhere for the environmental & social impacts, not just because some other entity started dumping there years ago. We should be smarter than that.
    The contract should reward proper management, not high volume.

  10. You can thank the self serving union, Gov Balducci and former Rep Matthew Dunlap and the city council for this mess.

  11. The notion of the Interstate Commerce Clause is a Red Herring and completly inapplicable to Juniper Ridge.
    Yes, Hampden and Norriedgewock, when privately-owned, came under the Interstate Commerce Clause.
    Juniper Ridge is owned by the State of Maine, and as RI proved in court that as the owner of the RI landfill, they could decide what waste to accept or not.
    Casella is grossing up to $80 Million a year in fraudulent disposal of C&D waste which originated MA, they picked over some of the good stuff, and landfill the rest here in Maine.
    The Rape of Juniper Ridge was a failed  scheme by Prince John Baldacci, and allowd to continue under Paul LePage.
    SHAME!
    I say, have our new Attorney General investigate this issue, hold public hearings so those of us who know a thing or two about the issue can testify, and make a LEGAL decision… not one debated in the media by folks with a vested interest!

  12. Hey Nick,
    Why don’t you talk with a few folks who both know a thing or two about all this,  who’ve been in the middle of the Public Policy debates over the years, and who aren’t beholden to an out-of-state, publicly-traded conglomerate?
    I’m available and I suspect Rep Bob Duchesne is as well…
    You need to take a hard look at the eminal issue of this, in my opinion, illegal importation of MA C&D… the Interstate Commerce Clause Red Herring!

    1. I spoke with Rep, Duchesne and Sherry Huber, former director of the Waste Management Agency, representatives of the DEP and SPO, state legislators and others several times while researching this article. If you’d like to speak as well, my email address is nmccrea@bangordailynews.com.

  13. So eventually they will buy all the homes in the neighborhood, pay all their taxes and let them live  there for a dollar ,then the  complaints  will stop,Bottom line is we have to put it somewhere and now that i dont live within 500 feet of it anymore, like i use to, its ok with  me:) 

  14. If there are no out-of-state plates at JRL, that’s because trash from out-of-state was moved onto trucks with Maine plates at KTI, Casella’s trash laundry in Lewiston. (This is certainly what happens with “fines for daily cover,” according to KTI’s own figures; a big part of what ends up at JRL.)

    And the beauty part here — a tip of the hat to whichever lawyer devised this scheme — is that if trash that ORIGINATES out of state is moved from one truck to another, that means that it’s been “processed,” and that means — drumroll, please — it’s been converted to in-state waste (under the law). It’s like a magic wand! Casella’s PR operation gotten a lot of mileage out of confusing the legal definition of “out of state” with the definition any normal person would use, but if the comments on this thread are any guide, very few people are being fooled any more.
     
    On the Interstate Commerce Clause:

    First, I’m not a lawyer, but I think have a state-owned landfill exactly because it’s for the people of Maine, and because only a state-owned landfill is exempt from that clause. Nobody’s suggesting, for example, that the Constitution requires that Maine State Thruway has to be opened up to competition from out-of-state private firms. Or that local municipal facilities must be. They are INTRA-state commerce, by definition.

    Second, even if the Interstate Commerce Clause does apply, that’s no reason why the State of Maine should seek to attract out of state waste as a matter of public policy. There’s no reason, for example, why our fees should be any lower than any other state’s. Indeed, given Maine’s unique natural characteristics, which translate directly into revenues from both tourism and agriculture, there’s every reason to think our fees should be higher, especially if all the externalities of landfills (surface and ground water, disease vectors, damage to the roads, and lethal accidents) are in the price, as they should be.

    Finally, attitude counts. Under the Baldacci administration, the Interstate Commerce clause was always used as an argument for why the state was helpless (and had therefore to give Casella whatever it wanted). At a recent legislative workshop in Augusta, the LePage administration seemed to signal a more pro-active stance on the behalf of the people of Maine. If they follow through on this — and never in a million years did I think I would end up saying this — kudos to the LePage administration.

  15. If there are no out-of-state plates at JRL, that’s because trash from out-of-state was moved onto trucks with Maine plates at KTI, Casella’s trash laundry in Lewiston. (This is certainly what happens with “fines for daily cover,” according to KTI’s own figures; a big part of what ends up at JRL.)

    And the beauty part here — a tip of the hat to whichever lawyer devised this scheme — is that if trash that ORIGINATES out of state is moved from one truck to another, that means that it’s been “processed,” and that means — drumroll, please — it’s been converted to in-state waste (under the law). It’s like a magic wand! Casella’s PR operation gotten a lot of mileage out of confusing the legal definition of “out of state” with the definition any normal person would use, but if the comments on this thread are any guide, very few people are being fooled any more.
     
    On the Interstate Commerce Clause:

    First, I’m not a lawyer, but I think have a state-owned landfill exactly because it’s for the people of Maine, and because only a state-owned landfill is exempt from that clause. Nobody’s suggesting, for example, that the Constitution requires that Maine State Thruway has to be opened up to competition from out-of-state private firms. Or that local municipal facilities must be. They are INTRA-state commerce, by definition.

    Second, even if the Interstate Commerce Clause does apply, that’s no reason why the State of Maine should seek to attract out of state waste as a matter of public policy. There’s no reason, for example, why our fees should be any lower than any other state’s. Indeed, given Maine’s unique natural characteristics, which translate directly into revenues from both tourism and agriculture, there’s every reason to think our fees should be higher, especially if all the externalities of landfills (surface and ground water, disease vectors, damage to the roads, and lethal accidents) are in the price, as they should be.

    Finally, attitude counts. Under the Baldacci administration, the Interstate Commerce clause was always used as an argument for why the state was helpless (and had therefore to give Casella whatever it wanted). At a recent legislative workshop in Augusta, the LePage administration seemed to signal a more pro-active stance on the behalf of the people of Maine. If they follow through on this — and never in a million years did I think I would end up saying this — kudos to the LePage administration.

  16. If there are no out-of-state plates at JRL, that’s because trash from out-of-state was moved onto trucks with Maine plates at KTI, Casella’s trash laundry in Lewiston. (This is certainly what happens with “fines for daily cover,” according to KTI’s own figures; a big part of what ends up at JRL.)

    And the beauty part here — a tip of the hat to whichever lawyer devised this scheme — is that if trash that ORIGINATES out of state is moved from one truck to another, that means that it’s been “processed,” and that means — drumroll, please — it’s been converted to in-state waste (under the law). It’s like a magic wand! Casella’s PR operation gotten a lot of mileage out of confusing the legal definition of “out of state” with the definition any normal person would use, but if the comments on this thread are any guide, very few people are being fooled any more.
     
    On the Interstate Commerce Clause:

    First, I’m not a lawyer, but I think have a state-owned landfill exactly because it’s for the people of Maine, and because only a state-owned landfill is exempt from that clause. Nobody’s suggesting, for example, that the Constitution requires that Maine State Thruway has to be opened up to competition from out-of-state private firms. Or that local municipal facilities must be. They are INTRA-state commerce, by definition.

    Second, even if the Interstate Commerce Clause does apply, that’s no reason why the State of Maine should seek to attract out of state waste as a matter of public policy. There’s no reason, for example, why our fees should be any lower than any other state’s. Indeed, given Maine’s unique natural characteristics, which translate directly into revenues from both tourism and agriculture, there’s every reason to think our fees should be higher, especially if all the externalities of landfills (surface and ground water, disease vectors, damage to the roads, and lethal accidents) are in the price, as they should be.

    Finally, attitude counts. Under the Baldacci administration, the Interstate Commerce clause was always used as an argument for why the state was helpless (and had therefore to give Casella whatever it wanted). At a recent legislative workshop in Augusta, the LePage administration seemed to signal a more pro-active stance on the behalf of the people of Maine. If they follow through on this — and never in a million years did I think I would end up saying this — kudos to the LePage administration.

  17. If there are no out-of-state plates at JRL, that’s because trash from out-of-state was moved onto trucks with Maine plates at KTI, Casella’s trash laundry in Lewiston. (This is certainly what happens with “fines for daily cover,” according to KTI’s own figures; a big part of what ends up at JRL.)

    And the beauty part here — a tip of the hat to whichever lawyer devised this scheme — is that if trash that ORIGINATES out of state is moved from one truck to another, that means that it’s been “processed,” and that means — drumroll, please — it’s been converted to in-state waste (under the law). It’s like a magic wand! Casella’s PR operation gotten a lot of mileage out of confusing the legal definition of “out of state” with the definition any normal person would use, but if the comments on this thread are any guide, very few people are being fooled any more.
     
    On the Interstate Commerce Clause:

    First, I’m not a lawyer, but I think have a state-owned landfill exactly because it’s for the people of Maine, and because only a state-owned landfill is exempt from that clause. Nobody’s suggesting, for example, that the Constitution requires that Maine State Thruway has to be opened up to competition from out-of-state private firms. Or that local municipal facilities must be. They are INTRA-state commerce, by definition.

    Second, even if the Interstate Commerce Clause does apply, that’s no reason why the State of Maine should seek to attract out of state waste as a matter of public policy. There’s no reason, for example, why our fees should be any lower than any other state’s. Indeed, given Maine’s unique natural characteristics, which translate directly into revenues from both tourism and agriculture, there’s every reason to think our fees should be higher, especially if all the externalities of landfills (surface and ground water, disease vectors, damage to the roads, and lethal accidents) are in the price, as they should be.

    Finally, attitude counts. Under the Baldacci administration, the Interstate Commerce clause was always used as an argument for why the state was helpless (and had therefore to give Casella whatever it wanted). At a recent legislative workshop in Augusta, the LePage administration seemed to signal a more pro-active stance on the behalf of the people of Maine. If they follow through on this — and never in a million years did I think I would end up saying this — kudos to the LePage administration.

  18. If there are no out-of-state plates at JRL, that’s because trash from out-of-state was moved onto trucks with Maine plates at KTI, Casella’s trash laundry in Lewiston. (This is certainly what happens with “fines for daily cover,” according to KTI’s own figures; a big part of what ends up at JRL.)

    And the beauty part here — a tip of the hat to whichever lawyer devised this scheme — is that if trash that ORIGINATES out of state is moved from one truck to another, that means that it’s been “processed,” and that means — drumroll, please — it’s been converted to in-state waste (under the law). It’s like a magic wand! Casella’s PR operation gotten a lot of mileage out of confusing the legal definition of “out of state” with the definition any normal person would use, but if the comments on this thread are any guide, very few people are being fooled any more.
     
    On the Interstate Commerce Clause:

    First, I’m not a lawyer, but I think have a state-owned landfill exactly because it’s for the people of Maine, and because only a state-owned landfill is exempt from that clause. Nobody’s suggesting, for example, that the Constitution requires that Maine State Thruway has to be opened up to competition from out-of-state private firms. Or that local municipal facilities must be. They are INTRA-state commerce, by definition.

    Second, even if the Interstate Commerce Clause does apply, that’s no reason why the State of Maine should seek to attract out of state waste as a matter of public policy. There’s no reason, for example, why our fees should be any lower than any other state’s. Indeed, given Maine’s unique natural characteristics, which translate directly into revenues from both tourism and agriculture, there’s every reason to think our fees should be higher, especially if all the externalities of landfills (surface and ground water, disease vectors, damage to the roads, and lethal accidents) are in the price, as they should be.

    Finally, attitude counts. Under the Baldacci administration, the Interstate Commerce clause was always used as an argument for why the state was helpless (and had therefore to give Casella whatever it wanted). At a recent legislative workshop in Augusta, the LePage administration seemed to signal a more pro-active stance on the behalf of the people of Maine. If they follow through on this — and never in a million years did I think I would end up saying this — kudos to the LePage administration.

  19. Tell Casella to stop hauling in all the garbage and solid waste coming from out of state. Then leave Old Town just for the state of  maine. Have all the towns that are dumping up there help support it and stop leaving the burden on Old Town. Say thing that should have happen at PERC. But old Hadley saw it different and lied to the town of orrington people. 

  20. All I can say is I can look out my window I can see Baldacci’s  Mountain which was not there five years ago. We see it grow day by day and the heavy truck traffic on route 16 is deplorable. We have chip trucks, local gravel trucks as well as waste trucks with no sign of any safety officials enforcing the weight limit laws. What does Old Town do build a road to no where with money they got from taxes from Cassella. There is no plans to improve the truck traffic verses local car traffic ask any one who drives route 16 we have all had near accidents with these trash trucks speeding to get rid of their loads.

  21. Juniper Ridge sounds more like a Resort Hotel…. Lets rename the garbage pile…  My suggestion is we should memorialize this mountain an call it the John Baldacci or the Jack Cashman Landfill… any ideas out there??  Write your rep today…Name Change. 

  22. Top sentence, Maine is running out of Landfill space!!!! How I read between those line is, Mainers are a bunch of dummies and will drink any flavor KoolAid you give them.. It should read Casella is running out of space to dump out of state trash, to make their billions…. Nobody  cares anyway, Mainers are weak and like being used as door mats… Weak people believe and except anything they are told.. Lets not make waves it will get better….

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *