What a difference 50 years makes. Back in the late 1950s and early 1960s, Bangor took the plunge on urban renewal, an invasive form of economic development that was widely accepted then as the right treatment for the blight that ailed hundreds of communities around the country.

The cure was worse than the disease, though. The strip of land along the Kenduskeag Stream and beyond was cleared, but it took decades for new buildings to finally be constructed. And beautiful old structures that today would have developers drooling over their commercial and residential potential were crushed into the dust of history.

That’s the CliffsNotes version of the urban renewal in Bangor. The full story is more complex, and was explored in a three-part series by former BDN Assignment Editor Tom McCord in 2009 and 2010.

Now, with the wisdom of hindsight and the fiscal reality of these post-recession times, the Bangor City Council is again embarking on revitalizing a portion of the downtown. It won’t take on big-ticket expenditures like purchasing property, but there are steps it can take that, if executed properly, can start a chain reaction that will transform a neighborhood. A little luck would help, too.

The nature of the Main Street Corridor, as city staff has dubbed it, harks back to an earlier commercial order. It was a time when small stores were interspersed through residential neighborhoods. People walked to these businesses to buy groceries, a hammer and nails, newspapers or to have a cup of coffee or a beer. Those days are long gone.

Today, commercial districts must be clearly delineated and have a buffer between them and residential areas. The real estate market is responsible for some of that outcome; large stores need large parking areas and perform better when they are near other retail outlets. But there is precedent in this particular neighborhood for city intervention.

The Shaw’s grocery store on Main Street was built in the mid-1990s. But it was actions taken by the city in 1977 that paved the way for that development. An earlier attempt to improve the neighborhood led to the city buying 3.8 acres and demolishing buildings at the former Gas Works, as the site was known, paid for with a Community Development Block Grant. It was part of the city’s Third Street-Main Street Neighborhood Conservation Project of that time.

So even though the problems of blight and unsafe neighborhoods are somewhat amorphous and subjective, and perhaps respond more dramatically to market forces, government intervention can work.

Code enforcement can be brought to bear on multi-unit apartment buildings. The targeted neighborhoods can get new sidewalks, “pocket” parks and other amenities to then justify higher tax assessments for those run-down properties. When absentee landlords have to pay more in property taxes, they are likely to fix their buildings or sell them.

And zoning is the city’s best weapon. By designating some parts of the corridor commercial and others residential — even if they do not currently reflect that — the city can nudge property owners to take action to improve or sell their buildings.

Changing the character of the corridor will require some money, and the city is wise to pursue grants — federal, state and private — to get the work done. The first essential step is to reach consensus on a vision for the area. Residents from beyond the corridor should take an interest in the discussion, because this slice of Bangor will affect adjacent areas and beyond.

Join the Conversation

30 Comments

  1. Amazing….downtown itself needs numerous improvements and yet somehow this city cannot see that.

    1. Westmarket Square is looking old – the landscaping has deteriorated over the years with scraggly evergreen bushes, unkempt mulch beds that spill along the pavement, minimal to nonexistent flowers and flowering bushes, disgusting rotting park benches (these rotting benches can be found many places around town), and buildings around it that desperately need a paint job. A central spot like this should look great in a city – it does not now.
    2. Lack of TREES – Franklin St., Central St, State St, Exchange St, let’s go on forever. Instead they plant these puny scraggly bush trees that provide no shade in the summer and don’t even look good.  Plant some nice sturdy green leaf big trees on these streets!  No decent flower landscaping downtown – at the 4-way intersection Main/Hammond there should be perennial and annual flower beds planted within the tree beds, for starters. Sorry folks, these same old same old flowers stuck in an ugly plastic tote and then placed in a square wood box scattered around some blocks are boring anymore. This city needs a major landscaping revision – check out what downtown Orono or Belfast does.
    3.  Pickering Square is a disgrace for this city.  Somehow somewhere it needs to both be revitalized and discouraged from any more being a ghetto hangout. Someone I know once came out of the parking garage one time last summer only to sadly view the collection of druggies, drop outs, smoking kids and adults essentially commandeering that circle.  It is no longer available for any respectable working person to sit and have lunch. Is that fair?  Post it –  no smoking, Patrol it, clean it up for us majority who do not drug, smoke, drink, loiter with nothing to do.
    4.  Traffic systems – Allow right turns on RED most everywhere downtown! This is so backwards it is not even funny.
    5.  Do something about the spooky too “darkness” of downtown now that the city has installed new energy efficient lighting. Either get different types of bulbs that are brighter (just like different versions of CFL’s, surely there are better city lights) or add more lamps. Along that line, why are there not lights along the island of Broadway where it meets State St. parallel to Family Dollar? It is too dark there.  Also, there needs to be street lighting from the top of State St. hill all the way down to the bottom – again, too dark.
    Just one person’s rant on the topic.

    1. Open your checkbook then go grab a shovel..my property taxes are high enough.  Thanks.

      typical attitude of the day..sit back and let the government do everything. 

    1. Thanks for the link…Found it amusing that one individual in the article was blaming socialism. Things never change.

      1. Might not have been socialism perse but when you remove the rights of the owners and give power to the government this sort of thing happens.

        I remember walking by the old Train station by the river as a child. It had long since been vacated and was then just a roost for swarms of pigeons. (hundreds) Busted windows on the upper level had allowed them access and had given them a perfect breeding ground and shelter from predators.

        I don’t know if anyone ever considered renovating the existing structure or if it was even possible but I do know that if it was anything would be better than the present day government inspired strip mall that is on the property now.

        1. Multitudes of people have never forgiven the government “power” for trampling their  ancestors  constitutionally guaranteed “rights” to hold African  people in bondage, with no human rights, only those g ranted to the beasts of the fields; with the passage of 13th Amendment abolishing slavery; and that only after the horrendous bloodshed of the civil war.  Just to point out “rights” means a multitude of things to  people, with all sorts of different agenda’s.  An invocation of “rights” isn’t necessarily desirable as some sort of universal trump card to negate the “power” of “government”.

  2. “The nature of the Main Street Corridor, as city staff has dubbed it,
    harks back to an earlier commercial order. It was a time when small
    stores were interspersed through residential neighborhoods. People
    walked to these businesses to buy groceries, a hammer and nails,
    newspapers or to have a cup of coffee or a beer. Those days are long
    gone.”

    Why?

    “Today, commercial districts must be clearly delineated and have a buffer between them and residential areas.”

    Why?

    1. Exactly. 

      I don’t believe the days of interspersing residential areas with commercials areas are gone. Sure, some people more familiar with suburban living, and hopping in the car to drive to the store or the pub, might expect that, but I’ve read just as many articles indicating people want to be able to get to restaurants and things without needing to get in the car. 

      Does Bangor have some zoning that prevents a series of stores at an intersection in a neighborhood? I’d like to know. 

    2. You keep hearing about how “Walkable neighborhoods” are the new thing.  Young people want urban living where there are a variety of amenities nearby, but what we have most of in Maine is rural and suburban sprawl.

    3. Because people will not buy groceries at small stores. Those small stores can no longer compete on price, variety and freshness. For better or worse, that ship has sailed.

  3. It’s funny that the city only want national/ large businesses in Bangor. They make it so the only retail rentals are stripmalls which the average person wanting to open a  small business would be out of luck renting… I understand the city wants the big tax revenue from the box stores but you would think they would enjoy little business growing in their City… I’m Guessing no more mom and pop shops for Bangor..  Inquire on the prices for space in these strip malls.. I’m Guessing Mayor Carry Weston and company(councelors) don’t like small start up businesses…  Think of it as being green, save gas by walking to the corner store rather than having to drive to the mall area, yuck!!!!

  4. Marvelous Bijou Theatre  gave way to a bank parking lot. First do no harm is not only applicable to medical practice.

    1. I have beams from the Bijou demolition in my living room where a wall was removed. Saw the movie Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid and Cactus Flower at that theater. Those were the days. It even had a balcony!

  5. The problem with Bangor is that function always trumps form.  This city will allow a cinder block box to be built onto the front of a historic Victorian (there are several on Union Street).  As long as that happens, any discussion of tasteful urban planning is hopeless.

  6. I have no idea where that brick building is but all I am thinking is wow, what an awesome building. It would make one heck of a workshop or house

    1. I thought the same thing when I saw it in our photo archives. Those arches are great. It’s too bad it couldn’t have been saved.

  7. Your Romney-esque vision of governmental sponsored “renewal” discounts a whole class of people.  Those “absentee landlords” rent to a lower income population, increasingly squeezed out of “renewed” cities across the country.  Attempts to “rectify” this problem with government intervention have been abject failures.  One only need to see pictures of old White Plains (New York) and the new city which has pretty much eliminated the poor.  Now don’t get me wrong, the poor still exist, they were just forced to move to Yonkers, Mount Vernon, Elmsford or Washington County Maine.

    Another better way to “improve” neighborhoods is to form neighborhood associations, encourage (through policy like public low interest loans) tenant ownership of those (absentee owned) apartments, and a system of mass transit which is friendly to people who choose not to own, or can not afford cars.  Repairing sidewalks, encouraging walk to businesses, and creating pocket parks are all nice little extras, but people who actually live in these “run down” places need consideration.  I saw NONE in your editorial.

    1. Fair point, and one I considered. I saw this kind of transformation in Belfast when MBNA arrived here in the mid-1990s. Old houses that had been divided into four or five dumpy apartments were fixed up and sold as single-family residences. This is why, as embattled MaineHousing head Dale McCormick says, we need more quality, affordable rental housing built.

      1. Yeah, but funny thing. where are these people going to live untill….if….that becomes qa reality.  ALSO hasn’t this operation been a way to segregate lower and middle class workers?

        The end result can be seen in New York City where firemen, policemen and nurses must live outside the city they serve.

        My  personal opinion is cities should conform to the needs of their current residents. 

        1. Got gobbled up by Bank of America. They still have an office in Belfast, but BOA doesn’t employ nearly as many as MBNA did.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *