DOVER, N.H. — The woman behind the wheel of the vehicle that struck three children on Portland Avenue as they crossed the road to their bus stop Jan. 10 will have violation level charges brought against her in Dover Circuit Court next month.
Tina Conlon, 35, of 15 Spruce Street, Somersworth, is being charged with negligent driving and failing to yield to a pedestrian in a crosswalk after driving her 2003 Honda Element in the path of three Dover schoolchildren ages 10, 14, and 16 just before 7 a.m. that morning, striking them with the vehicle and sending all three to Wentworth-Douglass Hospital with serious non-life threatening injuries.
The three youths were in the crosswalk on Portland Avenue at the Rogers Street intersection when Conlon, who was allegedly distracted by messaging on her cell phone and using the vehicle’s radio at the time, collided with them in the roadway.
The charge of negligent driving alleges Conlon operated her vehicle in a manner that was likely to endanger others by diverting her attention from the roadway.
“When you’re driving a car, put the attention on the road, not your cell phone,” Capt. Bill Breault said.
He said distracted driving by something like texting is something that is likely under reported and is also not an easy thing to prove.
“We respond to a lot of collisions where we suspect it,” he said.
In certain investigations, like this one, additional steps are taken and a forensic analysis is done on the phone. Breault said police essentially ruled out everything else and have reason to believe this is what happened.
The Dover Police Crime Unit and Accident Reconstruction team were at the scene for hours after the crash piecing together exactly what led to the collision. The weeks-long investigation determined that speed, lighting conditions, road conditions and mechanical defect were not factors in the crash, elements that are taken into consideration in the event of any accident, according to Breault.
In this case, Breault said, had Conlon been paying attention to the road, the accident could have been completely avoided.
“Even the radio can distract you,” Breault said. “It only takes a split second to become distracted.”
Since the charges are of violation level, he said there is no jail time associated with them. There is a $59 fine for failing to yield to pedestrians in a crosswalk. For a first negligent driving offense, which requires a defendant to appear before a judge in court, a fine of $250-$500 will be set by the court. That amount increases to $500-$5,000 for a second offense.
Conlon will be arraigned on Feb. 27 at Dover Circuit Court.
© 2012 the Foster’s Daily Democrat
Distributed by MCT Information Services



The penalty for texting and driving should be the same as O.U.I.. I would rather share the road with a drunk. At least they have one eye on the road.
Agreed. Harder to prove drunkenness than texting though. Drunks smell like booze, but texters smell like Starbucks.
LoL! Or Dunkin’ Donuts for those who are too cheap to be snooty.
Just get a copy of the phone records… It has date, time, and who…
and stale cigarettes…
i love ur comment!
The possible punishment here is criminal in itself. Tougher laws and sanctions need to be in place for texting/cell phone use while driving.
Years ago DUI was not really treated as a serious crime.Attitudes change but not fast enough for those killed or injured.
How very true. My father was a bad alcoholic and had O.U.I’s in a dozen different states and several foreign countries. 25 in all, that I know of. This was back in the 60’s and 70’s before computers allowed reciprocity between states. He had a head on collision with the chief of police in Freeport, Bahamas. They both walked away, the chief was just as drunk as he was. “Texters” rarely hit each other. I have to head for the ditch at least once a week because some dim wit is trying to give their friend the “What’s Up” while piloting 4,000 pounds of steel. The university of Southern California did a study a couple of years ago about the effects of cell phone use and driving. Out of 2,000 participants, a whopping 2% saw no reduction in their driving skills while talking on the cell phone. They asked them about the effects of texting and driving. They said it was too ridiculous to even study.
TWENTY FIVE DUI’s?OMFG!
That is just the ones that I know of. He had 7 in Maine spread out over 30 years. He died of lung cancer in 2000 and had a valid drivers license when he died.
They may have 2 eyes on the road, but they still can’t drive straight. I’d rather share the road with sober people who understand that the minute you take your eyes off the road, you become a menace to everyone else.
Agreed.
If she and the kids weren’t extremely lucky, wouldn’t the charge be some type of negligent homicide?
Or negligent vehicular manslaughter.
Absolutely!! Not enough punishment for “almost” seriously injuring or killing 3 children. She should do jail time & just maybe others would get the message. As with everything else, we have to lose lives before the general public are protected.
Looking on the bright side, three children’s collage funds are going to be paid in full.
Wishful thinking :(
Not wishful thinking. It’s called law suit. With the police saying there was no other factors in the accident, other than her own stupidity, they will be trowing money at these kids hand over fist.
This just proves that women are not going to stop texting while driving for any reason.
Regardless of which set of genitals you have, you are capable of endangering everyone around you when you are not paying attention to the road.
It ain’t just women. Texting while driving is a disease that knows no gender boundaries.
thank you Bill.
It’s not just women. I am a woman, and my phone stays in my bag while I drive. No texting, no calling.
Another woman here who does not text or call while driving. I am a woman against using phones while driving and against sexist comments.
Add another woman to the list of the ones that do not text or make calls while driving. And while I’m at it, your sexist attitude shows your ignorance.
I do not text while driving. Never have. My boyfriend, on the other hand, does it all the time.
Do you ride in the same vehicle as he does while he is texting? You must love him very much to risk losing your life so he can keep in constant contact with other people. I hope you survive.
Actually, no I don’t. He doesn’t make calls while I’m in the car either. But thanks for your concern.
That is a relief. Hopefully he never has a reason to regret using that device while driving.
________________________________
From: Disqus
To: patom064@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 2:34 PM
Subject: [bdn] Re: NH woman charged after allegedly hitting 3 schoolchildren in crosswalk while using cell phone
Disqus generic email template
jaks_fan wrote, in response to patom1:
Actually, no I don’t. He doesn’t make calls while I’m in the car either. But thanks for your concern. Link to comment
….
Oh Puh-Leaze! I can’t tell you how many times, from the passenger side, I have taken my husband’s phone from his hands and said, “tell me what you want me to text, I’LL do it.”
Add yet another to the list of women who don’t text or use the cell phone while driving
‘Scuse me, sir, but I am a woman and I don’t even have texting included in my cell phone plan. I don’t send texts, and don’t receive them. I’m too cheap to pay for texting. I hardly ever use the phone anyway and if it rings while I’m driving in an area with lots of traffic or pedestrians, I let voice mail pick it up.
Sexist much? It’s not just women who text.
A group of drivers were tested by one of the auto magazines. They used an airstrip to conduct their test.
They first tested the drivers reaction time to a red light on the dashboard sober at 35 mph.
They then got the drivers to .08 blood alcohol level. Their reaction time slowed by a split second and the car traveled an average of 4′ further before they hit the brakes.
They then tested the drivers sober but using a cell phone. The average reaction time was 36′ further before the hit the brakes.
They then tested the drivers texting. The average reaction time was 76′.
Does anyone have any reason to believe that they are fully capable of driving and paying full attention to their surroundings while using a cell phone and texting (safely)?
Their minds tell them they can, that they are ‘capable’ people with great reflexes. Nothing to worry about.
Your mind is not your friend. Your mind wants to tell you different from the facts of the physiology of the brain and body systems.
Don’t listen to your mind. Listen to your brain’s facts.
Most people think they are far better drivers that they really are.Like Garrison Keillor”everyone is above average”WRONG!And the old folks are just as scary but they get a free pass.
I would like to re-post this on social media. It is very powerful and eye opening. Can you refer me to the study?
It was Car & Driver or Motor Trend if I recall correctly. I think if you google it you may find it. I also believe that the BDN had an article quoting this over a year ago.
MythBusters did the exact same test & showed that using a cell phone or texting was twice as deadly as drunk driving. Kill or inuure someone while drunk driving & you’ll go to jail. Kill or injure someone while talking or texting on the phone & you’ll receive a59.00 fine. i ionce saw a tractor trailer driver who was driving while eating a hamburger with one hand & using his cell phone with the other. When will the lawmakers wake up & adjust the penalties accordingly?
I just want to know how I can volunteer for one of those tests!
I don’t know what N.H. law is on this infraction, other than the fines stated in the article. IMO the driver should lose their driving privileges for a minimum 90 days.
A $59 fine for hitting pedestrians in a crosswalk? Our justice system needs a major overhaul to make fines match the crimes.
Should be a feloney. period
Only talking on cell phone. Come’on she could have been drinking coffee and putting on makeup too. Remember, driving doesn’t require any concentration nowadays.
nice
I have seen people run red lights on busy city streets using their phones before and have thought “what if someone had been crossing the street!” For injuring three youths and endangering all of those around, I hope this person gets more penalty then listed.
oui charge…operating under the influence of a cell phone…
So,you all still think we dont need any more laws????HMMM???
This was no accident. The perpetrator of this crime chose to use the phone while driving. Assault with a deadly weapon. That should be the charge.
….
Running over three people with your car? Isn’t that called assault with a deadly weapon?
I would think it would be considered as such.
they should revoke her license forever , there is no cure for stupid
Crucify her ( Tina Conlon) and use the cell phone as nails…
They should make her walk across the road and strike her with a Honda Element!!! She is lucky she isn’t facing a triple murder charge!! :/
sad! can you hear me know?
Does anyone remember back in the days when we had no cell phones??–We made it to the stores, doctors, anywhere else we wanted or needed to go!–How did everyone get to be so damn important that they can’t leave home without a phone??–Good God, there are women in the grocery store calling to find out what brands to buy and what aisle it’s in!!—Unbelievable! Common sense has left us, and 3 children are paying the price!–And,the sex of the “user” seems to make no difference.
Very well said! It’s so aggravating to go into a nice restaurant for a “quiet” night out, in which my husband and I like to escape the telephones, and ALL you hear while eating your dinner are damn cell phones ringing.
Indeed…..and not just the ringing. Now we have to be subjected to everyone’s favorite song/rap/jingle (for way longer than necessary) as well as some rather tasteless “ring tones”. I actually have heard , “You have another “F”ing text message.” as a ring tone. Unbelievable.
I was in line during Christmas season (store was packed and probably 10+ lines,all with 10+ people)and the woman in the next lane was bellowing into her phone the “graphic” details of a surgery.GROSS!
What would you say to someone who has a cell phone instead of a house phone? Just leave it at home? Cell phones come in handy in emergency situations too! Would you let someone who was in an accident die in the middle of the road while trying to find a house where you could borrow someone’s house phone to dial 911?
How insane! This woman should NEVER have the privilege to drive again, should spend some time in jail thinking about her stupidity, and should be given one heck of a hefty fine!
How about driving to endanger, assult with a deadly weapon and attempted manslaughter? The charges she faces are not serious enough for her transgressions.
Hope the kids are recovering nicely. What a shame that they should have to recover from someone’s stupidity.
What if the providers were held liable as well?(won’t happen)Then we would see some laws change in a hurry.She needs a far greater penalty than she will get.
People should drive as though the only people who count at that moment are themselves, the people in their vehicle and everyone else they encounter on the road. Anyone on the other end of a technological hook-up must be put on the “B” list and wait until it’s safe to pay them attention….and that can’t be while the driver is operating a vehicle.
and then there’s the lawsuits that follow…
I hope so!
Just shows you. Women drivers and cell phones don’t mix.
I think you stated that wrong. I think you meant that women drivers and those that make stupid comments about the abilities of a woman to drive dont mix.
You might NOT want to read this….http://autos.aol.com/article/women-worse-drivers/
He said distracted driving by something like texting is something that is likely under reported and is also not an easy thing to prove. How about checking the time the texts came in or were sent?
Just hang up and drive!
Your story validates why SafeApp created the first Bluetooth activated distracted driving prevention App. DO NOT DISTURB(Bluetooth) is the only App that silences your phone automatically when connected to the Bluetooth in your car. Our App activates based on a private connection within your car unlike GPS based App. Best part is you can download the LITE version for FREE. Please consider sharing our story as you share your experience and desire to keep your friends and family safe.
For this type of violation ‘Assault with a deadly weapon” springs to mind. After all, more people die from the involvement of automobiles than firearms. Legislators take note!!!
This I agree with
this is just the begining of many many more.. if stiffer laws are not put in place things will never change just bget worse
I”m yelling at my computer!!!! serious, non life threatening injuries… so she could have broken a bone. This could mean they will be unable to play sports, etc.
I really think they should charge her with an OUI, also, remove her texting plan.
First this is not an OUI in any sense. This is a case of distraction and they cannot take her texting plan that is just plain stupid. She was in the wrong I do not know if NH has a law but Maine does and you can get charges for doing so. Not an OUI charge though.
under the influence of a cell phone…….people are addicted to these things, perhaps OUI is not that difficult to visualize here.
“Since the charges are of violation level, he said there is no jail time associated with them. There is a $59 fine for failing to yield to pedestrians in a crosswalk. For a first negligent driving offense, which requires a defendant to appear before a judge in court, a fine of $250-$500 will be set by the court. That amount increases to $500-$5,000 for a second offense.”____________________________________________________________
Gee, good to know you can plow into 3 kids on a crosswalk, and have pretty much nothing happen to you. I am waiting for the “accidents happen” crowd to post.