NEW YORK — Susan G. Komen for the Cure, the renowned breast-cancer charity, faced an escalating backlash Thursday over its decision to cut breast-screening grants to Planned Parenthood. Some of Komen’s local affiliates are openly upset, and at least one top official has quit, reportedly in protest.
Meanwhile, Komen has been deluged with negative emails and Facebook postings, accusing it of knuckling under to pressure from anti-abortion groups, since The Associated Press reported on Tuesday that it was halting grants that Planned Parenthood affiliates used for breast exams and related services. The grants totaled $680,000 last year.
Planned Parenthood has been heartened by an outpouring of support in response to the cutoff. In addition to $400,000 in smaller donations from 6,000 people, it is receiving $250,000 from a family foundation in Dallas and a $250,000 pledge announced Thursday by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg to match future donations.
In Washington, 26 U.S. senators — all Democrats except for independent Bernie Sanders of Vermont — signed a letter calling on Komen to reconsider its decision.
“It would be tragic if any woman — let alone thousands of women — lost access to these potentially lifesaving screenings because of a politically motivated attack,” the senators wrote.
Komen’s top leaders, in their first news conference since the controversy erupted, denied Planned Parenthood’s assertion that the decision was driven by pressure from anti-abortion groups.
“We don’t base our decisions on whether one side or the other will be pleased,” said Komen’s founder and CEO, Nancy Brinker.
Komen has said the decision stemmed from newly adopted criteria barring grants to organizations under investigation — affecting Planned Parenthood because of an inquiry by a Republican congressman acting with encouragement from anti-abortion activists.
Brinker said Thursday that there were additional factors, notably changes in the types of breast-health service providers it wanted to support. However, she said grants would continue this year to three of the 19 Planned Parenthood affiliates — in Denver, California’s Orange County, and Waco, Texas — because they served clientele with few other breast-screening options.
A source with direct knowledge of decision-making at Komen’s headquarters in Dallas gave a different account, saying the grant-making criteria were adopted with the deliberate intention of targeting Planned Parenthood. The criteria’s impact on Planned Parenthood, and its status as the focus of government investigations, were highlighted in a memo distributed to Komen affiliates in December.
According to the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of repercussions, a driving force behind the move was Karen Handel, who was hired by Komen last year as vice president for public policy after losing a campaign for governor in Georgia in which she stressed her anti-abortion views and frequently denounced Planned Parenthood.
Brinker, in an interview with MSNBC, said Handel didn’t have a significant role in the policy change.
The source also said that Mollie Williams, who had been Komen’s director of community health programs, had resigned in protest over the grant cutoff.
Williams, in an email, said she could not comment on her departure for reasons of professional confidentiality, but she was clear about her views.
“I have dedicated my career to fighting for the rights of the marginalized and underserved,” she wrote. “And I believe it would be a mistake for any organization to bow to political pressure and compromise its mission.”
Williams said she was saddened by the rift because she admired both Komen and Planned Parenthood.
“I am hopeful their passionate and courageous leaders, Nancy Brinker and Cecile Richards, can swiftly resolve this conflict in a manner that benefits the women they both serve.”
Among Komen’s affiliates, there were clear signs of discomfort with the decision. The Connecticut branch received scores of supportive emails after expressing frustration about the cutoffs and good will toward Planned Parenthood.
The board of the Arkansas affiliate issued a statement noting that the decision was made at Komen headquarters “without input from affiliates,” and called for the new policy to be changed.
“We hope Komen national will reverse its position on granting to organizations under investigation because we feel decisions of this nature should be made only after the investigation is complete,” the statement said.
At the Orange County affiliate in Costa Mesa, Calif., executive director Lisa Wolter said there have been lots of exchanges with headquarters.
“We’re very troubled by the reaction, and we want to make sure there are clarifications,” she said.
The American Association of University Women, in protest over Komen’s decision, said it was scrapping plans to offer a Komen Race for the Cure as one of the activities at its upcoming National Conference for College Women Student Leaders.
“AAUW is disappointed that some are playing politics with women’s health and jeopardizing care for the most vulnerable among us,” said Lisa Maatz, the association’s director of public policy.
Though comments posted on Komen’s Facebook page seemed to be mostly critical of the grant decision, Brinker said donations to the charity had increased since Tuesday.



Ok, so the money was stopped because of a policy change of not giving money to any org. currently under investigation? And this only hurts low income people? Gotta tell ya, the 99% are starting to make some sence. A right wing congressmen and senator who are against abortion can do that? What ever happened to that seperation think? You and I can be aginst it and some others can be for it. What place does the Govt. have in this? I’ll wait for the seers here to enlighten me, please.
Keek, I am guessing English is not your first language? Komen did the right thing. Taxpayer dollars should not be used to kill unborn babies!
Komen did the right thing?!? Planned Parenthood is a resource for women to get breast cancer screenings, and Komen is taking away that funding. Are you implying that proper screenings should not be available to those who need it? As a person who has known many breast cancer survivors, and many who didn’t survive, I think you should drop the name ‘concernedmainer’ and just go with evil selfcentered mainer or something like that
Dosen’t matter if english is, 1st,5th or 10th language. We’re talking about donations NOT taxpayer dollars dufus. But thanks for keeping an eye on my money.
As far as their new policy of not giving to organizations under investigation.. they seem to have no problem with Penn State, which is under investigation ….. http://motherjones.com/mojo/2012/02/komen-foundation-gave-75-million-grant-penn-state
On the upside, Planned Parenthood donations are way up… good job!
Welfare 101 if your to STUPID to keep form getting pregnant then to bad. The cause is very well known and it is very easy to prevent. Telling people go ahead make bad choices and the government will take care of you is how we got into the overabundant welfare system we now have.
Subject is Breast cancer not pregnacy. P.P. has denied any Komen money was directed that way.
It is absolutely amazing that a massively beneficial charity organization that saves women’s lives every day was able to be infiltrated, subverted, and destroyed from within by right wing Christianic theofascist extremists who hate everything our country stands for.
THIS is why Americans should register to vote so we can eliminate the theocracy-driven fascists from positions of power over our country, both in government and in the private sector.
http://www.SkepticTank.Org/
A lot of CYB going on in the Komen camp. I’m sure that the new that the new public policy VP did have a lot to do with the unfortunate decision. Understandably, there’s even dissent in their ranks. Contributions to them may be up, but I note they aren’t giving out figures. Planned Parenthood has and the new contributions almost matched the Komen back out in 24 hours. Personally, I never contributed much to Komen programs, but I sure won’t now. I’d rather contribute directly to the American Cancer Society. In addition to this folly, Komen seems to be top heavy with administration. I wonder what percentage of contributions to them go to meaningful programs.