Next time you go to an emergency room, you should be prepared for this: If your problem isn’t urgent, you may have to pay upfront.
Last year, about 80,000 emergency-room patients at hospitals owned by HCA, the nation’s largest for-profit hospital chain, left without treatment after being told they would have to first pay $150 because they did not have a true emergency.
Led by the Nashville-based HCA, a growing number of hospitals have implemented the pay-first policy to divert patients with routine illnesses from the ER after they undergo a federally required screening. At least half of all hospitals nationwide now charge upfront ER fees, said Rick Gundling, vice president of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, which represents health-care finance executives.
“It has been a successful part of helping to reduce crowding in emergency rooms and to encourage appropriate use of scarce resources,” HCA spokesman Ed Fishbough said.
But emergency-room doctors and patient advocates blast the policy as potentially harmful to patients, and they say those with mild illnesses such as sore throats and ear infections do little to clog ERs and do not require CT scans or other pricey technologies.
Kim Bailey, research director for the consumer group Families USA, said the tactic lets hospitals turn away uninsured patients who often fail to pay their bills and are a drag on profits. While the uninsured pay upfront fees as high as $350, depending on the hospital, those with insurance pay their normal co-payment and deductible upfront.
Physicians worry that sick people will forgo treatment. There is no data on how many who leave the ER without treatment follow up with visits to doctors’ offices or clinics.
“This is a real problem,” said David Seaberg, president of the American College of Emergency Physicians, who estimated that 2 to 7 percent of patients screened in ERs and found not to have serious problems are admitted to hospitals within 24 hours.
“After you’ve done the medical screening, it makes little sense to not go ahead and write a patient a prescription,” said Michael Zappa, a Boca Raton, Fla., hospital consultant and former president of the Florida College of Emergency Physicians.
Patient advocates say the strategy could discourage patients from going to the ER for true emergencies.
“It seems the point of the policy is to put a financial barrier between the patient and care,” said Anthony Wright, executive director of Health Access California, a consumer advocacy group,
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that about 8 percent of ER visits are for non-urgent problems that could be treated less expensively in a doctor’s office or clinic; others put the number of non-emergency visits much higher. A 2010 Health Affairs study found that 27 percent of those visiting ERs could be treated more cost-effectively at doctors’ offices or clinics.
Hospital officials say the upfront payments are a response to mounting bad debt caused by the surge in uninsured and underinsured patients, and to lower reimbursements by some private and government insurers for patients who use the ER for routine care. In the past year, for instance, Iowa, Tennessee and Washington state reduced or eliminated Medicaid reimbursements for those visiting ERs for specified non-urgent conditions, such as sore throats or warts.
In an annual report filed last year with the Securities and Exchange Commission, HCA officials wrote that “we are taking proactive measures to reduce our provision for doubtful accounts by, among other things, screening all patients, including the uninsured, through our emergency screening protocol, to determine the appropriate care setting in light of their condition, while reducing the potential for bad debt.”
HCA says it complies with federal requirements to screen and stabilize anyone with an emergency. Of more than 6 million ER visits to HCA hospitals last year, 314,000, or about 5 percent, were determined not to be emergencies, Fishbough said. About 230,000 of those patients paid and remained in the emergency room for treatment. The other 80,000 or so left. The HCA payment policy excludes children 5 and younger, pregnant women and those 65 and older.
HCA officials declined to say which of its hospitals use the practice, but the company owns more than 160 hospitals in 20 states, including Virginia, California, Alaska, Georgia, Missouri, Kentucky and South Carolina.
Other large chains that have followed HCA’s example include Florida-based Health Management Associates and Franklin, Tenn.-based Community Health Systems.
The upfront payments for non-urgent ER visits are also used by nonprofit hospitals.
In May, Halifax Health in Daytona Beach, Fla., began asking adult patients to pay their co-payment or $350 before treatment for a non-emergency in its ER, spokesman Byron Cogdell said. Like other hospitals, Halifax applies that fee to the patient’s bill.
In December, Skaggs Regional Medical Center in Branson, Mo., began asking ER patients to pay $40 or their insurance co-payment before receiving a prescription.
“If they don’t pay . . . they won’t be given their prescription,” hospital spokeswoman Michelle Leroux said.
The change was implemented after the ER reported $1.3 million in bad debt for August.
Midland Memorial Hospital in Midland, Texas, implemented a $150 upfront ER fee in 2009 as part of a cost control effort. In 2008 the nonprofit hospital lost $14 million, partly because of millions of dollars in unpaid bills from ER patients.
Since the change, the 320-bed hospital has seen a 10 percent drop in people visiting the ER with non-emergencies and a big drop in bad debt, said Stephen Bowerman, Midland’s chief financial officer.
In conjunction with the new ER policy, Midland set up a 24-hour telephone nurse triage system so people in the community can call a nurse to help decide whether to go to the ER or a nearby clinic.
Bowerman said the policy is helping to change behavior. He estimated that about 75 percent of patients with non-emergencies left the facility instead of paying the upfront fee.
“More people now know our ER is not a walk-in clinic or a primary care office,” he said.



Good!
How many more obvious reasons to support Universal coverage are the American people going to ignore?
If we had universal coverage, you would still see people running to the ER for things they shouldn’t, wasting all of our money. Education is the key, not socialism.
There are many reasons people to the ER with non-emergent problems. Some of them don’t have health insurance and cannot get care anywhere else. Many can’t get prompt appointments to be seen by their own primary care providers. (I had a foot injury a couple of years ago that left me unable to walk. My PCP referred me to an orthopedic practice who told me it would be nine to 12 weeks before I could be seen.) Many cannot afford dental care and come in as a last resort when they have infections. Are there people who abuse the ER? You bet, and no amount of education will stop them. Those people — women who come in claiming to have specific symptoms that miraculously evaporate once they know the results of their pregnancy tests, for example — need to be warned and then sanctioned if they persist. These tend to be “serial patients” who can be tracked and identified. They are often people with behavioral issues.
I agree with you, Jen.
The last time I was at the ER was for a “non-emergency” this past summer. I had a bad cold for a week, I was suffering through it. But after a week, my fever had climbed higher, though not astronomically so, and my throat was so swollen and tender that I could no longer take fluids. I was uninsured at the time. I could have called doctors all day to find someone who would take me in a few days or go to the ER and wait a few hours to get the antibiotics I truly needed. I did what I had to do. The doctor said he had never seen a throat so bad, I am not exaggerating here. If you don’t have insurance, you know what it’s like! You wait as long as you possibly can. You can only live so long without the ability to drink water!!
My first year in college I got sick, though I was insured back then. I stayed in bed to get lots of rest, but totally neglected fluids. I ended up severely dehydrated with a fever reaching 104. By the time I had walked across campus to the infirmary on a bitter cold winter morning in shorts and a t-shirt, my fever was back to almost normal temp. The nurses didn’t believe I was really sick, but someone eventually looked at my throat and decided I was sick after all. They wanted to do a throat culture and have me wait for the results for days before I could get medicine. I convinced them to call a cab to take me to the ER where they determined how dried out I was. A baggie of IV fluids later and I was pretty much back to my normal self with a not-as-bad sore throat.
Another time at college, my throat was destroyed. Since I was a kid, I’ve gotten strep every single year. I think as I’ve gotten older, the strep has generally hit me harder but perhaps it’s just that my mother isn’t bringing me to the doctor. I try to tough it out, but sometimes bacteria is stronger than our bodies. So, anyways, I went to infirmary again for my awful throat. The woman there must have been blind because she claimed to have not seen anything worse than “a little irritation” I got a cab over to the ER once again. The triage and the doctor were taken aback at the sight of my throat. A sore throat *CAN* be an emergency. Strep throat, if left untreated, can kill.
Another time I was sick and didn’t end up going to the ER, but had serious problems trying to reach my PCP. I called the hospital where she worked and asked to make an appointment, they told me she couldn’t be a PCP that she was just a nurse and I had to sort this out with the insurance company. Doing that while I was feeling so badly brought me to tears and it was never sorted out.
I could be one of the people the people that can’t get treatment. Should I have to break into my savings for necessary medical attention? It’s not like I’m asking for a physical or much time. Just a script for the antibiotics plz.
Really sorry for your troubles…I know what it’s like to have a hurting throat. Good thing that there are a number of prompt care/urgent care clinics now that accept walk-ins so that most people don’t have to unnecessarily use the emergency room!
You say that there are a number of urgent care clinics. The *only* one I know of in Bangor is Concentra.
http://maps.concentra.com/corporate/?searchVal=04401&locationsgo.x=47&locationsgo.y=9#
ETA: I’ve never been to Concentra. But I think next time I need antibiotics because I’m pretty darn sure it’s strep, I’ll try them! Hopefully the wait is shorter in places like these? I waited 4 miserable hours in St. Joe’s ER last time. Understandably so though, mostly older folks and I think a pregnant woman were seen before me.
Concentra is wonderful where I live. We need much more urgent care clinics and we need them to be open evenings and weekends.
Alykins, you did everything you could to receive care without seeking out the ER first. But the system failed you and you had little choice but to go to an ER. You are right, strep can result in complications, such as rheumatic fever, if left untreated. I know how discouraging it can be. You just want to say “I have a flaming red throat, a fever, white spots, and a rash!!!! What other evidence do you need???” (Well, sometimes a rash accompanies strep but not always.) Anyway…
Many years ago, I worked at a healthcare facility. A young woman who was receiving care, compliments of the state, came to the ER via ambulance for a stubbed toe. Why did she call an ambulance? Because she could. She was scolded by the staff for abusing the system (I don’t know why the EMTs still brought her in for something so ridiculous. She must have told them a good story.) Anyway, she was a “frequent flyer” so I don’t thank any amount of scolding would do any good.
Another day, a young man called the ER, asking if he could get an Ace bandage. He was told to go to the drug store and buy one. About an hour later, a group of teens came into the ER. One claimed to have a sprain and just needed an Ace bandage. He was treated for his alledged “sprain” and sent away…without the Ace bandage. I’m sure his parents were thrilled about receiving a bill for an ER visit.
These are just a couple of the healthcare abusers I’d seen.
An insurance company told me recently that health insurance in Maine is expensive because no one can be denied care. Therefore, many people who do have jobs, like me, opt out of getting insurance because of the high costs of paying for our own insurance as well as insurance for other people. I can’t afford both. Fortunately my husband and I are healthy enough, don’t smoke, and take care of ourselves. I’m taking a chance at not having insurance but I can’t affort the roughly $12000 a year that’s been quoted. It’s actually cheaper to pay for services when rendered than pay almost $1000 a month, when I see a doctor maybe once a year.
I almost want to say “hooray!” for people being charged on the spot, especially if they can get what they need with a purchase from a drug store, like a bandage or a pregnancy kit. But I agree with the docs, that I don’t want people going without care, like you did for so long, and getting really sick.
Hopefully the ERs will get the results they are looking for without jeopardizing care.
Maybe we should put a shop around the corners of ERs in the hospitals. They can charge way more than a pharmacy would, and wouldn’t have to deny anyone care. Need an Ace bandage? Pregnancy test? They’ll help you right down the hall!
Thank you for reassuring I was not out of line in going to the ER those times. The people you talked about definitely abused the ER. Hopefully those teens got a big lecture & had to pay the bill themselves!
I don’t know the solution, but I don’t think a pay-first system will be helpful unless it were very clear upon entering the ER. Like a pre-triage that would tell you upon entering that you weren’t a “true emergency” and would have to pay x dollars.
Well, I guess we’ll see since it’s already being done elsewhere!
I agree that education is key, and on this issue, you might consider getting some.
people use the ER for non-emergencies because they don’t have insurance and don’t have a primary care physician. With universal healthcare, they could be seen by at a (cheaper) clinic or a primary care physician vs going to the emergency room for a non-emergency. Also, people without insurance tend to ignore medical problems until they become an emergency or chronic disease. Healthcare is a large expense to society, whether is is paid for on the private or public side of the economy. Making it a public expense is perfectly reasonable if there are savings from efficiencies and economies of scale, in the end it would likely be a smaller portion of GDP than having the current for-profit private insurance system we have now. Even though taxes would need to be raised to pay for it (less we want to make our deficit problems worse), individuals would still come out ahead as the “healthcare tax” paid by them and their employer would be less than the premiums paid by employee and employer to a for-profit insurance company. We currently have the MOST EXPENSIVE healthcare system in the world. A large reason is that it is not used efficiently (people using the ER for their primary source for medical care is a prime example).
Taxes might not need to be raised exactly. I would gladly pay the 500 a month I pay in premiums, not counting copays, to a universal system. I don’t see that as an added “tax” just diverted from another area.
This is the ultimate catch 22 of medical care. If you have no money or insurance, go to the ER, where they will decide if your sick enough to receive the treatment you can’t afford; or be charged if your not in enough discomfort or pain in some functionary’s opinion. Notwithstanding you are at the ER because you have no means and nowhere else to go! If I read you correctly you want to cure and heal disease, illness of all kinds, and trauma, with positive thinking and correct outlook.. You should try it sometime, let us know how you make out.
This is EXACTLY why most do not support it. ER care comes at a much higher cost then a family doctor does. People ONLY go to the ER as they know they have to be treated by law IF they need urgent care. So they do not seek a doctor till it becomes a larger problem then it had to be. How would you like it if the business you owned became regulated by the government so you had to provide your products and services to people you know can not or will not pay.
If the universal care system is so good why do so many from countries that have it come here and PAY out of pocket to get the care offered. IF we adopt this system we to will loose the great minds that go into medicine. Who is going to get a two hundred thousand dollar education or higher to be forced to take government pay at a rate where it would take them the majority of there working career to make it back? Ask the UK and Canada about there DRASTIC doctor shortages.
OK ! No problem , but from now on when a doctor misdiagnoses a problem i have i want my money refunded just like i have to do to my customers if i do my job incorrectly !
Me tooooo. How come we have to pay N.P and P.A.s as much as a doctor?????? And it is still imposable to Email any doctors office. I wonder why that is …LOL
I can email my doctor. It often saves a followup visit as he can check and see if an antibiotic worked, etc.
Good reason why all emergency rooms should have a walk-in clinic staffed by nurses – funnel routine things over there and treat emergencies correctly.
Universal coverage won’t solve this problem because people will continue to use emergency rooms for things that aren’t emergencies, running up the bill for EVERYONE.
Nurses have neither the education nor the legal authority to diagnose and treat. Federal law requires that patients presenting to ERs be evaluated by a physician, physician assistant or NP. Universal coverage would go a long way toward solving the problem of people with non-emergent problems crowding ERs. That’s because so many of them cannot pay for care elsewhere. Federal law prohibits hospitals from turning people away on the basis of their ability to pay. I agree with your premise that people need to be educated about the proper use of the ER, but it is not the underlying problem. If you want to think about what’s really “running up the bill for everyone,” look at private insurance companies, their profit margins, and the insufficient reimbursements hospitals receive for their services.
YES! YES! YES!!!!!
good idea. with competition and growth, and with more medical schools and doctors, that fee will go down.
try being an employee for a hospital and having to dish out $200 to be seen in the ER for a co-pay…thats just rediculous…