Although not facing the same deadlines as their potential major-party rivals, former Gov. Angus King and former gubernatorial candidate Eliot Cutler expect to decide by next week whether they will run for Sen. Olympia Snowe’s seat as independent candidates.

Political observers, meanwhile, said an independent candidate — and particularly King — could have a major impact on what will be Maine’s most hotly contested U.S. Senate race since 1996.

King said Thursday that he is talking with people in both Maine and Washington, D.C., as he attempts to figure out whether he could make a difference on Capitol Hill or whether “it is hopeless down there.”

King, who served as governor from 1995 to 2003, said the partisanship and divisiveness that prompted Snowe to drop her re-election bid would be his major reason for running. But the question he is asking right now is whether there was some way that he, as an independent, could help bridge that two-party gap and help change a broken system.

“To be honest, I am trying to figure out whether I can make a difference down there,” King said Thursday. “If I can, then it is worth it … But I don’t need to be a senator. Is it possible to make a difference or is it hopeless down there?”

Cutler, who finished second in the 2010 gubernatorial contest, agreed with King that this is the one electoral instance in Maine where independents have an advantage over major-party candidates. That is because independents have until June 1 to collect 4,000 petition signatures to qualify for the ballot while party candidates must collect 2,000 signatures by March 15.

But Cutler said being coy is not his strong suit, so he expects to decide by sometime next week.

“I am committed — deeply committed — to rebuilding the political center and reforming the political process, and I am committed to serving the people of Maine,” Cutler said in an interview Thursday. “The question is what is the best way to do that? Is the best way to run for Senate? Is the best way to run for governor of Maine again? Or is the best way to continue what I am doing?”

For her part, Snowe has said she does not foresee the partisanship changing in the short term but that she believes she could help build support for that change outside of the Senate.

King won his first election as governor in 1994 by capturing roughly 35 percent of the vote in a five-person race, becoming Maine’s second independent governor. King easily won re-election four years later.

James B. Longley, the state’s first independent governor, served one term after being elected in 1974.

While independents ran for U.S. Senate in Maine in 1994, 1996 and 2006, none of those candidates received more than 6 percent of the vote. Cutler and especially King likely would have a much bigger impact, observers said.

Douglas Hodgkin, a retired professor of politics at Bates College, said he believed King would be “an immediate contender.”

“He was a very popular governor and was re-elected by quite a margin,” Hodgkin said. “I believe he would have enough money. And there are also substantial numbers of voters who are unenrolled, so that independent designation would be appealing to some Maine voters.”

MaryEllen FitzGerald, president of the Portland-based polling firm Critical Insights, said she does not see King as “having a lot of negatives” if he decided to run, at least initially. He largely walked away from politics after leaving the Blaine House and would be able to disassociate himself with the current partisanship, she said.

“I think he was seen as a good leader and as a very articulate spokesperson,” FitzGerald said. “I think he engendered trust on both sides of the aisle.”

Of course, during a political campaign, opposing parties would be sure to mine King’s eight-year record as governor for potential political liabilities. And with the Maine race suddenly critical to the power balance in the Senate, national GOP and Democratic campaigns are expected to spend large sums in the Pine Tree State — with some of that money likely targeting King if he were viewed as a threat.

Cutler could have an impact in his own right, judging by his second-place finish in the 2010 gubernatorial race, just 2 percentage points behind Republican Gov. Paul LePage. Although lesser known than King, Cutler has stayed in the public eye, to some extent, since November 2010 by his participation in the No Labels and Americans Elect campaigns to support candidates that shun party labels and ideology and will work across party lines.

“People in Maine very much want a choice and very much want one of us to run,” Cutler said of himself and King.

Cutler’s success in 2010 was due in part to the fact that some loyal Democrats perceived him as having a better chance to defeat the conservative LePage than the Democratic nominee, Senate President Libby Mitchell. Hodgkin said that as a result he believes King would be the stronger of the two because of his reputation as governor.

Either King or Cutler — or both — inevitably would face criticisms from some Democrats concerned that their candidacies would aid the Republican nominee by dividing Maine’s moderate and liberal voting blocks. King apparently has already heard some of those arguments but said Thursday that they are not a factor in deciding whether to enter the race.

“I tell people, ‘The last time I ran I wasn’t a spoiler, I was the winner,’” King said.

Join the Conversation

46 Comments

  1. King help put the screw’s to the  State of  Maine people.Watch out Washington DC here come King and Cutler trying to help finsh the rest of the country off. Does Cutler own businesses in China???

  2. I don’t like leftovers or re-runs. Aren’t there any decent average non-attorneys willing to run and serve?

      1. That’s how it used to be. And the system proved pretty darn effective over the last 200 years.

        1. Actually, for much of that two centuries, it was wealthy men, the landed gentry of their day, who were elected, and made the crucial decisions that set the foundation for the awsome country we all enjoy today.

          No one else had either the time to serve, nor access to resources to cover their expenses.

          America was so “small” at the time, that Linconln actually held “office hours” for common folks to stop in and chat.

      2. you’re right, rich lawyers are much better than just some regular guy off the street whose actually walked a mile in our shoes

        1.  Well, not too sure.  The TP crowd didn’t seem to work out all that well.  I am all for anyone who has a sense of reality (not the TP crowd) and who isn’t a religious nutbar and whomever can get more to the center and understand the concept of compromise.

  3. An independent run would be great; it would split the liberal vote and pave the way for a nice republican to win. Go get ’em Angus & Eliot!

      1. No I agree. If either run we’ll end up with Charlie Summers or Bruce Poliquin or some other Republican putz as our US Senator.

    1. Angus is a crypto Demorat.  So do not get excited thinking that he is going to protect you civil liberties or do anything useful.   I do like his name though:  AnnnGGhhhusss.  Reminds me of a cow.

  4. Cutler, wait for governor. Afraid King would split the vote and give us a weak Republican, unless he brokers some kind of deal with Dems…don’t see that happening, as they both want in. But is Pingree likely to diminish partisanship? Methinks not. 

  5. Collins is justly “devastated’ and may well want to go home after the wedding. Michaud could then join King in the Senate. But Chellie??? stay where you are and hold the liberal ground while others work on diminishing partisanship.  

  6. What does it matter? Once they arrive in DC they get hooked on the POWER and MONEY and  they forget all the campaign promises. The PACs take over control of their position. All they worry about is getting re-elected. To get re-elected they have to take special interest money, and by doing so they all become corrupt. Their position as our representative becomes secondary to their need for power and money. So, I ask again: What does it matter? Democrat, Republican, Independent. They are all the same.

      1. Thanks for the link to the anti-federalist papers. Many of the “problems” posed, HAVE come true. I am 70 years old and  Washington politics have caused me to become cynical. Sadly, the “citizen” representative has become extinct. They are all “pros” now. We are not better off for it.

  7. HOPE for our country is resounding loudly. It only takes a spark to get a fire going and Washington needs one LEADER willing to stand up and say, “No more; we need to work together.” “As Maine goes so goes the nation.”, may get back in vogue. :) There is no doubt in my mind that the solutions are there, yet it does no good if people won’t respectfully listen to one another.

  8. In all fairness I was not here when King was in Blaine House. But he has a number of advantages that Cutler does not. 1st, he knows the State. Having served as Governor for 2 terms, King has an intimate knowledge of the State, the citizen’s and history of Maine that Cutler doesn’t. That knowledge, and it’s basis, would be a huge advantage when it comes to King representing Maine in the Senate, especially in the areas of healthcare, education, natural resources, energy policy and hi-tech development. The only ‘hiccup’ that he’s going to face is the fact that he’s not been in the public eye for a while. Given Maine’s changing demographic’s, that the Census clearly shows, King is going to have to really make his presence and his history known to a lot of folks who came here, like I did, after he left office.

    Cutler, for better or worse, is a transplant that just doesn’t have the needed historical exposure to appreciate the various communities that make up Maine’s citizen’s. His recent business promotion of Kathadin’s loghomes going to China is a real good start. Maybe in the next Gubernatorial election he could run,  having gained a better appreciation of Mainer’s. But being a transplant shouldn’t be a used as an excuse to deny someone the opportunity to serve their community. Such thinking, from what I’ve seen and read about Maine’s history, is obscene. It also deprives Maine of something that is mentioned as being needed more and more,  from time to time, that being the leaving of our kid’s out of Maine to other State’s and their not coming back. We keep losing our future then we had all better face the reality that we need to work with who’s here and what we’ve got, not whine about who and what we’ve lost. Cutler, as I said, may not be a ‘home boy’ but he does bring to Maine a huge amount of DC experience and business knowledge that Maine is going to need, no matter how many people dislike it’s source. Just because you don’t like the source of the information doesn’t mean it doesn’t have value or can be applied for your benefit. Maine needs to learn that lesson now.

    1. Cutler grew up in Bangor.  He worked for Senator Muskie.  I wouldn’t exactly call him a transplant and someone that doesn’t know Maine. He is a Mainer that went away to find work and then came back home.  Many people do this.

      1. King is a wind developer LIAR and federal subsidy money scammer!
        He would not know how to make an honest dollar if he were as prince!

  9. King gets my vote by a long ways.  Cutler should continue his journey to the governorship. Pingree and Michaud should stay in the House!

  10. Please, will some kind soul tell Cutler that it’s over. Tripe isn’t a staple anymore .. and fish oil is only used in pet food.
     

  11. King or Cutler would have very little impact on the U.S. Senate race.  Independent or not, a senator is going to caucus with one party or the other.  It’s going to be neccessary to elect leadership positions, and for committee assignments.  What’s going to happen is that if either runs they’ll say that they will caucus with the Democrats, and the Democrats will put up a weak candidate with the intention of losing to King or Cutler.

  12. Angus… run!

    Either a Senator Chellie or Baldi would be the worst that could happen to Maine.

    Elliot… Patience. The 2014 race is yours to win.

    Baldi… Run! Maine Dems really need to run another loser like Libby Mitchell to hand the Senate election to Angus.

    Chellie… While the duo of Congrresswomen Pingree (jr) and US Senator Pingree (Sr) sounds appealing, I don’t think you could beat Angus. Keep the safe seat until Susan’s seat opens up.

    Mike… Sorry you didn’t seek Olumpia’s seat as you’re the one Democrat who’d have a chance against Angus.

  13. after King’s association with 1st Wind and the lies he has perpetrated, I wouldn’t vote for him as garbage collector.  He doesn’t care about the state of Maine at all.  All he is interested in is the next big dollar.  He is courrption  in the making.  Look out folks!!!!

  14. SIGN OF THE TIMES= Olympia Rain? Her meltdown definitely opened some political floodgates eh?

  15. Ghengas King and son Angus Windtoy of First Wind should attempt to work for a living, instead of using their old money influence to further scam the working people of this state.
    The only  real good they could do for Maine would be to fill up the RV (with wind power perhaps), and leave the state.
    They are in the right business now, that being the  development of  more HOT AIR.
    Daddy King will only use the Senate seat to self serve and scam, securing his snake oil hobby of wind development.

  16. Yet another reason why we need run-off voting. 
    And Im not talking about that confusing, lackluster instant-runoff voting (no offense Portland’s Mayor Race system).
    Maine needs a run-off voting system.  Where on election day, if the winning candidate wins less than 50% of the vote, there is a run-off vote between the top two candidates.  The run-off vote could take place 2-4 weeks after election day. 
    I think it’s really needed.  It would encourage more independents and third-party candidates to run for office, without fear of being accused of being a spoiler.  The public would be able to vote for who they really want, without fear of splitting the vote. 
    And run-off elections would bring extra excitement to elections.  It’s like extra innings!  Championship Overtime! 
    The two leading candidates could have a show-down debates.  More rallies.  The top two candidates may even have to moderate their views to get more crossover votes. 
    It would lead people to maybe even for the first time, vote for other political parties or independents in the final round.  One person’s particular candidate may not have made it to the final round, but they would vote stratigically against another candidate in the final vote.
    A run-off voting system would bring a fairer process, extra excitement, broader particapation, and a more level playing field. 
    And as far as any extra costs that may be attributable to a run-off vote, I think it would be well worth the cost for a more well functioning democracy.  And we’re Mainers, since when are we afraid of alittle extra work?  We even make our own paper for peats sake, how hard could it be to print off some exta ballots.

    And really, are we satisfied with the current winner take all system we have now?  Just look at the last Governor’s race. 
    Wouldn’t it have been nice to have a run-off vote between Republican Paul LePage and Independent Eliot Cutler. 
    I wonder who would have won……

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *